We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6
The Development of Accounting
Principles in the USA
The Development of Accounting Principles in the USA Formulation of accounting principles in the USA goes through these four phases:
Management Contribution Phase (1900 – 1933)
Institution Contribution Phase (1933 – 1959)
Professional Contribution Phase (1959 – 1973)
Politicization Phase (1973 – present)
Copyright@2005 by Rohana Othman. All 02/27/2023 2 rights reserved. Management Contribution Phase • Management have complete control over format & content of accounting disclosures • Management intervention charactrized by Adhoc solutions to urgent problems & controversies • Implication of management initiatives – Most accounting techniques lacked theoretical support – Focus on determination of taxable income & minimize income tax – Techniques adopted motivated by the desire to smooth earnings – Complex problems avoided & expedient solutions adopted – Different accounting techniques adopted by different firms for same problems Copyright@2005 by Rohana Othman. All 02/27/2023 3 rights reserved. Institution Contribution Phase
• Increasing roles of institutions in the
development of accounting principles • SEC created; AIA broad principles approved; new role for Committee of Accounting Principles (CAP)
Copyright@2005 by Rohana Othman. All
02/27/2023 4 rights reserved. Professional Contribution Phase • The intervention of professional associations and agencies in the formulation of accounting theory was spurred on by the efforts to eliminate undesirable techniques
• AICPA established the Accounting Principles Board (APB) &
Accounting Research Division
• The American Accounting Association (AAA) developed an
integrated ‘Statement of Basic Accounting Theory’.
Copyright@2005 by Rohana Othman. All
02/27/2023 5 rights reserved. Professional Contribution Phase • Dissatisfactions over the preparation of ‘Statement of Basic Accounting Theory ‘ •The criticisms on the statement were – It was not based on any established theoretical framework, – the authority of the statements was not clear-cut; and – the existence of alternative treatments allowed flexibility in the choice of accounting techniques.