Scribd
Upload
7 views18 pages

Sire 2.0

Uploaded by

seromania02
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
7 views18 pages

Sire 2.0

Uploaded by

seromania02
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

SIRE 2.

0
•
WHY SIRE 2.0
-Outdated , time of a change
-Previous protocol was more -equipment focus/too many Questions
-Question were not targeted - not focused towards higher risk areas
-Inspector bias – areas inspected / Prime discipline
•
-Time spent on specific areas / Fulfilment of VIQ
-Critical operation not repeatedly covered
-Time management not consistence
-Most shipping incident due human error
-Does not allow for after inspection assessment
-Data mining
Bow Tie Diagram

•
SIRE 2
Questions • Addresses the critical activities that maintain the
health of Priority Barriers which protect against a
Summary Critical Threat .
• These questions are always allocated to an
inspection where the questions are applicable to the
vessel and its operations.

CORE • A minimum questions required to meet the


fundamental risk assessment criteria as defined by
OCIMF.
QUESTIONS • A negative observation raised against a Core Question
will the carried forward to the next inspection ( to
ensure that the weakness in Critical Activities are
properly resolved)
SIRE 2 • These are questions associated with lower risk
activities
Questions • There will be two level of rotational questions
Summary allocations
• 1. Rotational 1, Questions with an allocation

ROTATIO frequency of approximately every third or fourth


inspection.

NAL • 2. Rotational 2, Questions of non – critical


activities linked to priority barriers with no direct
link to process or process or personal loss will
QUESTIONS hold an allocation frequency of approximately
half of Rotational 1 questions
• An example would be CVIQ 4.2.3, pertaining to
Master Standing Instruction
• These questions have been developed to
SIRE 2 assess a vessel operator’s level of attainment
Questions against TMSA.
• These are known as conditional questions
Summary since they are allocated based on information
provided by the vessel operator through the
Pre-Inspection Questionnaire ( PIQ)
CONDITIONAL • Examples of Conditional Question would be
CVIQ, related CAP, VOC, static Navigational
QUESTIONS Assessment ( 3.2.1) , Dynamic Navigational
Assessment by Specialist Contractor ( 3.2.3),
etc
This would be a new or “existing rotational”
SIRE 2 question assigned to every inspection or a
Questions fixed period in response to an incident or
Summary industry trend.

If data analysis identifies that weakness are


developing with the tanker industry, Campaign
CAMPAIGN Questions can be assigned for a defined period
QUESTIONS to assess and measure the prevalence of the
Weakness within the inspected fleet.
SIRE2
•

An important change in Sire 2.0 is to recognised that an Observations can be Positive,


Neutral or Negative.
Each question assigned with one or more Response Tools to record the outcome of the

Observatio inspection activities related to a top-level question.

ns An example of Top Level Question


4.1.1 Were the Master and navigation officer's familiar with the company procedures for
the set up and operation of the ECDIS units fitted to the vessel and were records available
to demonstrate that the ECDIS had been operated in accordance with company procedures
at all stages of a voyage?
This Question Response included, Hardware Response, Human Response and Process
Response.

•
•
SIRE2
Observation
s
Human Response
Process Response
Hardware Response
Photograph Response
SIRE 2 Recording Rotational Question
Negative
Observations in 6.6.1 Were the Master and engineer officers familiar with the company
procedures for the use of the oil filtering equipment, and was the oil filtering
Multiple equipment in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the
company procedure, manufacturer’s instructions and MARPOL Annex I?
Observation
Modules
Potential multiple observation could exist over numerous questions for
SIRE 2 Recording the same observation
Negative
Observations in
Multiple Observation
Modules
SIRE 2 Addressing
What if the inspector find a member of the ships staff
Negative Observation
unfamiliar with the process, procedure or human response,
to None Allocated but not associated with a question that was being asked
Questions
SIRE 2 Minor Defect
that Present a Hazard What if inspector finds a Safety Related condition that
cannot be identified to a Specific question ?
As vessel owners, “All users of the programme are
operators, managers and strongly encouraged to take the
crew, inspectors or time to review the SIRE Question
recipients of the SIRE 2.0 Library documentation in full and
inspection reports will not follow the necessary Management
be able to predict the of Change (MOC) actions,”
inspection questions in advises Sam Megwa, programmes
advance, they should be director at OCIMF. “SIRE 2.0 is a
prepared to respond to all significant departure from the
questions within the SIRE existing inspection regime and all
2.0 Question Library parties are advised to do their
applicable to a particular utmost to prepare for the change.
vessel.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy