Chapter 6 Intersection and Interchanges
Chapter 6 Intersection and Interchanges
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING I
CENG 3206
Chapter Six
Intersection and
Interchanges
6.1 Introduction to
Intersection
6.2 Design Principles of At- 2015 E.C
Grade Intersections
6.3 Traffic Controls
6.1. Intersection
Intersections are areas shared by two or more roads serving
conflicting traffic when competing for the same space at the same
time when going ahead or changing directions.
Intersections vary in complexity from a simple to three or more
roads cross within the same area.
The process of decision making for road users at intersections is
complex and this is part of the reason why intersections tend to
have a high potential for accidents and delays.
The overall traffic flow on any highway depends to a great extent
on the performance of the intersections, since intersections usually
operate at a lower capacity than through sections of the road.
At Grade Intersections:
• Most highways intersect at grade, and
• the intersection area should be designed to provide
adequately for turning and crossing movements, with due
consideration to sight distance, signs, and alignments.
The basic types of at-grade intersections are
• T, Y or three-leg intersections, which consist of three
approaches;
• four-leg or cross intersections, which consist of four
approaches; and
• multileg intersections.,
December 5, 2024 5
At grade Intersection
ASTU/SoCEA 6
ASTU/SoCEA 7
At grade Intersection
CONFLICT POINTS AT INTERSECTIONS
Conflicts occur when traffic streams moving in different
directions interfere with each other. The three types of conflicts
are;
Merging,
Diverging, and
Crossing.
The number of possible conflict points at any intersection
depends on the number of approaches, the turning movements,
and the type of traffic control at the intersection.
ASTU/SoCEA 8
At grade Intersection
There are 32 conflict
points in this case.
o Merging conflict points –
8
x Diverging conflict points
–8
Crossing conflict points -
16 ASTU/SoCEA 9
2. Grade Separations Intersection
Grade Separations and Interchanges:
• Intersections at grade can be eliminated by the use of
grade-separation structures that permit the cross flow of
traffic at different levels without interruption.
The advantage of such separation is the freedom from
cross interference with resultant saving of time and
increase in safety for traffic movements.
• Grade separations and interchanges may be warranted:
As part of an express highway system designed to carry
high volumes of traffic,
To eliminate bottlenecks,
To prevent accidents,
Where the topography is such that other types of design are
not feasible,
December 5, 2024 10
Interchanges
An interchange is a grade separation in which vehicles moving in one
direction of flow may transfer by the use of connecting roadways. These
ASTU/SoCEA
Interchanges
Interchan
ge
System Service
Interchan Interchan
ge ge
ASTU/SoCEA 12
Interchanges
System interchange is used to identify interchanges that
connect two or more freeways. System interchange
connections should be high speed and free-flow to provide
all directional movements.
Service interchange applies to interchanges that connect
a freeway with local surface streets or arterials. Service
interchange ramps may be a low speed free flow, or may
require a stop condition at the connection to the local or
arterial street.
ASTU/SoCEA 13
Interchange Types
Diamond Interchange ;
uses less space than most types of
freeway interchange, and avoids the
interweaving traffic flows that occur in
interchanges such as the cloverleaf.
Also it is easy to navigate, eliminates
last-minute lane changes, and provides
better sight distance at turns, resulting in
fewer crashes.
The design reduces congestion and better
moves high volumes of traffic without
the need to increase the number of lanes
in an interchange.
It is applicable in both rural and
urban areas, and
they are particularly adaptable
to major crossings where left
turns at grade on the minor
roads are fitting and can be
handled with minimal
interference to traffic
14
approaching the intersection ASTU/SoCEA
from either direction.
Interchange Types
Cloverleaf Interchange;
The objective of a cloverleaf
is to allow two highways to cross
without the need for any traffic
to be stopped by traffic lights.
The limiting factor in the
capacity of a cloverleaf
interchange is traffic weaving.
The principal disadvantages of
the cloverleaf are the additional
travel distance for the left-
turning traffic, the weaving
maneuver generated, the very
short weaving length available,
and the relatively large right of
way area needed.
15
ASTU/SoCEA
Interchange Types
Trumpet interchange:
The trumpet
interchange have
been used when one
highway terminates
at another highway.
It takes the place of a
T-intersection which
is often used when a
roadway ends at the
intersection of
another roadway.
ASTU/SoCEA 16
6.2 Design Principles of At-Grade
minimize delay and the number and severity of potential conflicts among
not be less than either the turning radius of the design vehicle or the radius
required for design velocity of the turning roadway under consideration. The
design also should ensure adequate pavement widths of turning roadways and
This suggests that at-grade intersections should not be located at or just
beyond sharp crest vertical curves or at sharp horizontal curves.
The basic requirements of intersection design are maximize safety and
minimize traffic delay.
December 5, 2024
Cont…
It should always be remembered that the combination of horizontal and vertical
alignments at an intersection should produce traffic lanes that are clearly seen
by motorists at all times, without the sudden appearance of potential hazards.
The angle of turn, the turning speed, the design vehicle, and traffic volume are
the main factors governing the design of curves at at-grade intersections.
December 5, 2024
Cont…
Islands are generally grouped into three
major classes:
› directional or channelised: designed
primarily to guide the motorist through the
intersection by indicating the intended
route.
› Divisional : A divisional island is a raised
median or island that is placed in the
middle of a multi-lane highway to separate
opposing lanes of traffic and reduce the risk
of head-on collisions. Divisional islands are
typically used on multi-lane highways with
high traffic volumes, where the risk of
collisions is greater.
› Refuge: located at or near crosswalks to aid
and protect pedestrians crossing the
roadway. Refuge islands are most generally
used on wide streets in urban areas for
loading and unloading of transit riders .
22
December 5, 2024
CHANNELISATION OF AT-GRADE
INTERSECTIONS:
Channelization is the separation or regulation of
conflicting traffic movements into definite paths
of travel by traffic islands or pavement markings
to facilitate the orderly movement of both
vehicles and pedestrians. Proper channelization
increases capacity, provides maximum
convenience, and instils driver confidence.
ASTU/SoCEA 23
CHANNELISATION OF AT-GRADE INTERSECTIONS:
Channelization of intersections is considered for one or
more of the following factors:
To confine paths of vehicles
To control the angle and locations of merge, diverge or
cross conflicts
To give priority for the predominant movement
To give area of refugee for pedestrians
To provide space for installing traffic control devices
where they can be clearly seen
To control prohibited turns
To restrict the speed of vehicles to some extent
ASTU/SoCEA 24
ASTU/SoCEA 25
Sight Distance at Intersections:
The high accident potential at an intersection can
be reduced by providing sight distances that
allow drivers to have an unobstructed view of the
entire intersection at a distance great enough to
permit control of the vehicle.
At-grade intersections either have no control or
are controlled by one of the following methods:
yield control, stop control, or signal control.
At signalised intersections, the unobstructed
view may be limited to the area where the signals
are located, but for un-signalised intersections, it
is necessary to provide an adequate view of the
crossroads or intersecting highways to reduce the
potential of collision with crossing vehicles.
As shown in the schematic sight triangle, the safe
stopping sight distance for the give design speed
should be used for da and db. It can be seen from
that triangle ABC and ADE are similar, which
gives:
db a
da da b
26
From this equation, if any of the variables da, db,
a, and b are known the fourth can be determined.
Sight Distance Requirements
Sight Distance Requirements for No-Control Intersections: -
In this situation the intersection is not controlled by a yield sign, a stop
sign, or a traffic signal, but sufficient sight distance is provided for the
operator of a vehicle approaching the intersection to see a crossing
vehicle and if necessary to adjust the vehicle's speed so as to avoid a
collision..
Sight Distance Requirements for Yield-Control Intersections: -
intersection at which one or more drivers is legally required to yield the
right-of-way to another driver on which yield signs have been posted.
December 5, 2024 27
Cont…
Sight Distance Requirement for Stop-Control Intersections: - When vehicles are required to stop at an
intersection, for a safe departure from the stopped position for the three basic manoeuvres that occur at an
average intersection. These manoeuvres are:
› Crossing the intersection, thereby clearing traffic approaching from both sides of the
intersection,
› Turning left onto the crossroad, which requires clearing the traffic approaching from the left
and then joining the traffic stream on the crossroad with vehicles approaching from the right,
and
› Turning right onto the crossroad by joining the traffic on the crossroad with vehicles
approaching from the left.
Sight Distance at Intersections with Signal Control: - Although the unobstructed view at signalised
intersections may be limited to the area of control, it is recommended that the minimum sight distances
based on sight distance requirement for stop-control intersections be made available at these
intersections.
28
INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE
Sight distance requirements at-grade intersections
are based upon the following three different cases
of intersection control:
Level I – Basic Rules of the Road or No-Control
Intersections
ASTU/SoCEA 32
No-Control Intersections cont…
Where:
ds= safe stopping distance, ft
Si = initial speed of vehicle, mi/hr
G=grade,%
t =reaction time, s
0.348 = standard friction factor for stopping maneuvers.
ASTU/SoCEA 34
No-Control Intersections cont…
Rule-2
Vehicle A must travel 18 feet past the collision point in the
same time that vehicle B travels to a point 12 feet before the
collision point.
ASTU/SoCEA 35
Example:
.
ASTU/SoCEA 36
No-Control Intersections cont…
it is assumed that Vehicle A is one safe stopping distance from the collision
point.
STEP – 1
= 196.5 ft.
STEP -2
= = 25.4ft.
Step -3
= 300.3 ft.
12 = 298.0 ft.
dB, act <<dB, min - - - - - - - - - Both rules are
violated!
ASTU/SoCEA 37
Level II – YIELD and STOP Control
Stop or yield signs should be used at an intersection if one or
more of the following conditions exist:
A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road
where application of the normal right-of-way rule would
not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with
the law:
B. A street entering a designated through highway: and/or
C. An un-signalized intersection within a signalized area.
ASTU/SoCEA 38
Level II – YIELD and STOP Control
YIELD Control
STOP Control
ASTU/SoCEA 39
Level II – YIELD and STOP Control
Site distance criteria for STOP-controlled intersections (AASHTO)
The methodology is based upon observed gap acceptance behavior of
drivers at STOP controlled intersections.
The distance to the collision point dA has three components:
Distance from the driver’s eye to the front of the vehicle (assumed to
be 8 ft)
Distance from the front of the vehicle to the curb line (assumed to be
10 ft)
Distance from the curb line to the center of the right-most travel lane
approaching from the left or from the curb line to the left-most travel
lane approaching from the right (dcl)
ASTU/SoCEA 40
Level II – YIELD and STOP Control
dA-STOP = 18 + dcl
Where:
dcl = distance from the curb line to the center of the closest
travel lane from the direction under consideration, ft.
ASTU/SoCEA 41
Level II – YIELD and STOP Control
dB-min = 1.47 * Smaj * tg
Where:
tg = average gap accepted by minor street driver to enter the major road,
sec. (ranges 6.5 sec to 12.5 sec, AASHTO recommends 7.5 sec for
left turn movements.)
ASTU/SoCEA 42
Level II – YIELD and STOP Control
Example: Speed of V =40mph
B
ASTU/SoCEA 43
Level II – YIELD and STOP Control
Solution:
dA-STOP (from left) = 18 .0+ 8.0 = 26.0 ft.
dA-STOP (from right)= 18.0 + 18.0 = 36.0 ft.
The minimum sight distance requirement for vehicle B is
determined:
dB, min = 1.47*40*7.5 = 441 ft.
Now, the actual distance of vehicle B from the collision point
when visibility is established is determined as:
dB, act(from left)=
dB, act(from right)=
ASTU/SoCEA 44
Level III – Traffic Signalization
One of the most effective ways of controlling traffic
at an intersection.
Can be used to eliminate many conflicts because
different traffic streams can be assigned the use of the
intersection at different times.
Most important factor that determines the need for
traffic signals:
Intersection‘s approach traffic volume and
accident experience. 45
ASTU/SoCEA
Level III – Traffic Signalization…Con’t
The primary objective in the design of a traffic control
system at an intersection is to reduce the number of
significant conflict points.
sig le-
n al
g
h w sin
tro roac tion
ith
con e app ersec
t
lan g in
e
l
4 -l
rol
ASTU/SoCEA 49
Advantages of Signal
ASTU/SoCEA 50
Disadvantages- Traffic signal
peak hour
Failure of signal due to electric power failure
51
ASTU/SoCEA
Warrants for Traffic signal
• A warrant for any traffic control device (sign, signal or pavement marking) is
the minimum criteria that must be met before such a device can be installed.
• Traffic signal should not be installed unless one or more of the following
signal warrants are met
Cycle length: Cycle length is the time in seconds that it takes a signal to
between the starting of of green for one approach till the next time the
ASTU/SoCEA 55
Terminologies in Traffic Signal
Green Time (G) or Green Interval -The amount of time for which a movement receives
a green indication.
Yellow Time (Y) -The amount of time for which a movement receives a Yellow
Red Time (R) -The amount of time for which a movement receives a Red indication.
All Red Interval (AR) : All red interval the display time of a red indication for all
approaches. (for wide intersection and for pedestrian crossing)
ASTU/SoCEA 56
Terminologies in Traffic Signal
Lost time: It indicates the time during which the intersection is not
effectively utilized for any movement.
Change interval is also called the yellow time indicates the interval
between the green and red signal indications for an approach
57
ASTU/SoCEA
Terminologies in Traffic Signal
Phase:
A phase is the green interval plus the change and clearance
intervals that follow it. Thus, during green interval, non
conflicting movements are assigned into each phase.
It allows a set of movements to flow and safely halt the
flow before the phase of another set of movements start.
ASTU/SoCEA 58
Phase design
The signal design procedure involves six major steps.
They include:
(1) phase design,
(2) determination of amber time and clearance time,
(3) determination of cycle length,
(4) apportioning of green time,
(5) pedestrian crossing requirements, and
(6) performance evaluation of the design obtained in the
previous steps.
ASTU/SoCEA 59
Phase design
The objective of phase design is to separate the conflicting
movements in an intersection into various phases, so that
movements in a phase should have no conflicts.
If all the movements are to be separated with no conflicts,
then a large number of phases are required. In such a
situation, the objective is to design phases with minimum
conflicts or with less severe conflicts.
ASTU/SoCEA 60
Phase design
There is no precise methodology for the design of phases.
This is often guided by
the geometry of the intersection,
the flow pattern especially the turning movements, and
the relative magnitudes of flow.
ASTU/SoCEA 61
Phase design
To illustrate various phase plan options,
consider a four legged intersection with
through traffic and right turns where Left turn
is ignored.
Fig-1
The first issue is to decide how many phases are required. It is 62
ASTU/SoCEA 63
Phase design
ASTU/SoCEA 64
Phase design
Option-2
B
Four phase signals
65
Phase design
Option A: This type of phase plan is ideally suited in urban
areas where the turning movements are comparable with
through movements and when through traffic and turning
traffic need to share same lane. This phase plan could be
very inefficient when turning movements are relatively low.
Option B: This type of phasing is very efficient when the
intersection geometry permits to have at least one lane for
each movement, and the through traffic volume is
significantly high.
Option C: This is rarely used in practice.
66
Traffic Signals
One of the most effective ways of controlling traffic at an intersection
is the use of traffic signals.
Traffic signals can be used to eliminate many conflicts because
different traffic streams can be assigned the use of the intersection at
different times.
Since this results in a delay to vehicles in all streams, it is important
that traffic signals be used only when necessary.
The most important factor that determines the need for traffic signals
at a particular intersection is the
Intersection's approach traffic volume,
pedestrian volume and
Accident experience may also play a significant role.
ASTU/SoCEA 67
Traffic Signals
The efficient operation of the signal requires proper timing
of the different color indication, which is obtained by
implementing the necessary signal timing design.
The main objectives of signal timing at an intersection are
to reduce the average delay of all vehicles and the
probability of accidents. These objectives are achieved by
minimizing the possible conflict points when assigning the
right of way to different traffic streams at different times.
ASTU/SoCEA 68
Traffic Signals
Several methods have been developed for determining the
optimal cycle length at an intersection and, in most cases,
the yellow interval is considered as a component of the
green time.
The figure below shows a typical two-phase signal system
to illustrate the terminologies commonly used in the
design of signal times.
ASTU/SoCEA 69
Traffic Signals
70
Traffic Signals
Yellow interval: - The main purpose of the yellow indication
after the green is to alert motorists to the fact that the green
light is about to change to red and to allow vehicles already in
the intersection to cross it.
A bad choice of yellow interval may lead to the creation of a
dilemma zone, an area close to an intersection in which a vehicle
can neither stop safely before the intersection nor clear the
intersection without speeding before the red signal comes on.
The required yellow interval is the time period that guarantees
that approaching vehicles can either stop safely or proceed
through the intersection without speeding.
ASTU/SoCEA 71
Traffic Signals
The yellow interval, which eliminates the dilemma zone, is estimated from
the following equations:
72
Traffic Signals
Cycle Lengths: - The signals at isolated intersections can
be pre-timed (fixed), semi-actuated, or fully actuated. Pre-
timed signals assign the right of way to different traffic
streams in accordance with a preset timing program.
Each signal has a preset cycle length that remains fixed for a
specific period of the day or for the entire day. Several
design methods have been developed to determine the
optimum cycle length, two of which the Webster method is
presented here.
ASTU/SoCEA 73
Traffic Signals
Webster Method
where,
C , = optimum cycle length (sec)
0
saturation flows for all traffic streams using phase i (i.e., Vij/ Sj)
Vij = flow on lane j having the right of way during phase
Sj = saturation flow on lane i
ASTU/SoCEA 74
Traffic Signals
77
Traffic Signals
78
Traffic Signals
79
Example 1
A fixed time 2-phase signal is to be provided at an intersection having four
arms. The design hour traffic and saturation flow are
North South East West
Time lost per phase due to starting delay is 2 sec and All red riod is 4
pe sec. Design two phase traffic signal using Webster‟s aw the
method. Dr phase diagram also
76
ASTU/SoCEA 80
Solution
ASTU/SoCEA 81
Solution
The maximum value of critical flow ratio (y) in N-S direction = 0.33
The maximum value of critical flow ratio (y) in E-W direction = 0.25
ASTU/SoCEA 82
Solution
Optimum cycle time,
C =
𝟏.𝟓𝑳+
𝟓
= (𝟏.𝟓 𝒙 𝟖)+𝟓
𝟏−𝟎.𝟓𝟖
= 40 seconds
Effective green time per cycle = C0 –L
= 40– 8 = 32seconds
Effective Green time is given by
ASTU/SoCEA 83
Solution
ASTU/SoCEA 84
Example 2
The figure below shows peak-hour volumes for a major
intersection on an arterial highway. Using the Webster
method, determine suitable signal timing for the
intersection using a four-phase system and the additional
data given in the figure. Use a yellow interval of 3 sec.
ASTU/SoCEA 85
Example 2
86
Solution
ASTU/SoCEA 87
Solution
ASTU/SoCEA 88
Solution
ASTU/SoCEA 89
Solution
Then; Determine the optimum cycle length:
ASTU/SoCEA 90
Solution
Effective time for phase i is obtained from:
ASTU/SoCEA 91
Solution
92
ASTU/SoCEA 93