This document outlines the importance of research philosophy, methodologies, and the research process, emphasizing the connection between research, theory, and knowledge. It discusses various philosophical frameworks, including ontology and epistemology, and the significance of choosing a research paradigm, whether positivist or interpretive. The document concludes by highlighting the role of theory in generating knowledge and the necessity of a theoretical framework in research projects.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views34 pages
Unit 4 Understanding Research Philosophy
This document outlines the importance of research philosophy, methodologies, and the research process, emphasizing the connection between research, theory, and knowledge. It discusses various philosophical frameworks, including ontology and epistemology, and the significance of choosing a research paradigm, whether positivist or interpretive. The document concludes by highlighting the role of theory in generating knowledge and the necessity of a theoretical framework in research projects.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 34
Research
Methodol ogy Understanding Research Philosophy Study Unit 4 Week 4 Learning Outcomes
Purpose: Understand the concept of research philosophy.
By the end of this unit, you should be able to: Understand philosophical concepts of research and methodologies Compare and contrast various views presented on different philosophical methods Analyze the connection between research, theory and knowledge Comprehend the importance of theory in the research The Research Process As aforementioned, research is a process, with a series of scientifically proven and universally applicable steps to be followed. The process starts with problem identification and ends with report writing and presentation of findings that will then be used for decision making. The graph below summarises the research process that a business researcher has to follow in that chronological order in order to come up with the tangible findings of the business research. The Research Process The word risk is usually used in a context of potential hazard of possibility of an unfortunate outcome resulting from a given action. In financial management, risk also indicates the expectation that the actual outcome of the project may differ from the expected outcome. The term risk and uncertainty are used interchangeably The Philosophical Framework It is important that every step in the research project should be appropriate to the nature of the study, its aims, population and the context of the study. The focus is on understanding philosophical frameworks in research. Every research project is underpinned by a philosophical framework; every research project is situated within a particular philosophical framework. The philosophical framework within which the research project is situated evidences the worldview within which the research is situated. Every step in the research process as designed by the researcher should be appropriate to, ‘fit’ with, the purpose and focus of the research. Every aspect of the research project, as it is developed by the researcher, should ‘fit’ with the philosophical framework within which the research project is situated. Ontology and Epistemology Our choice and use of particular methodologies and methods relate to the assumptions about reality that we bring to our work. Questions about the nature of reality are questions of ontology. Questions about the methodology and methods used in the research project relate to our understanding of knowledge and how it is created, and the value we ascribe to knowledge, relate to epistemology. Ontology Ontology is the study of the nature of being or becoming existence and their differences and similarities. The word ontology is derived from the Greek words ‘ontos’ which means being and ‘logos’ which means study. The aim of ontology is to identify and isolate things around us that actually exist. Ontology attempts to answer questions that begin with ‘what’. The scope of ontology can be generalised from philosophy to other fields like medicine, information science or even advanced physics. Ontology helps us to understand questions like what is God, what is a disease, what happens after death, what is artificial intelligence and so forth. The field is dedicated towards understanding whether things exist or don’t exist. Ontology also studies how various existing entities can be grouped together on the basis of similar characteristics and it tries to find out those similarities. The field also tries to find a relation between the objects that exist. People who deal in ontology try to understand why a particular thing occurs how it is related to other things. Epistemology
It is a branch of philosophy that aims at discovering the true meaning
of knowledge. In essence, it tries to find out what is there in the universe and what exists within it. Epistemology is one of the core branches of philosophy which deals with the aspect of procuring knowledge. It is more concerned with the natural sources and scope and limits of knowledge. Epistemology is also derived from the Greek word ‘episteme’ meaning knowledge and ‘logos’ which means study (Anonymous, 2016). Research Paradigm • Here, a decision needs to made about the paradigm within which the study is conducted. • Decide if you are going to conduct your research according to Positivist thinking or according to the Interpretive/Social Constructivist paradigm, and motivate why you decided on that particular paradigm. • The verb in your primary objective will indicate which direction you ought to go here. • DO NOT mix paradigms, a study is either Positivistic or Interpretive/Social Constructivist, NEVER BOTH. • The reason for this is that paradigms usually represent philosophical stances that stand in opposition to one another. • A paradigm is more often than not borne out of critique against another paradigm, therefore they are somewhat like oil and water. Interpretivism/ Social Constructionism Research Paradigm Falls under Research Paradigm. Since qualitative research method will be used, the researcher must adopt an interpretive or social constructivist paradigm. The term interpretivism has its aetiolgy in Greek where it means pattern. The central endeavor of the interpretivist paradigm is to understand the subjective world of human experience. Interpretivism will help the researcher get into the head of the research main issue. Research will interpret the findings from structured interviews carried out from supply chain professionals. This will help to socially construct reality in what is termed social constructivist paradigm and interpretivism. Data will be gathered through interviews and text messages to present a balanced report of the findings to bring an indepth examination. Data collected will be recorded by the researcher and analysed by a trained professional. This will resonate to deeper insights and understanding. Interpretivists have developed trustworthy and quality research practices over the years. Positivism Research Paradigm (Quantitative) • Positivism is a philosophical theory that holds that all genuine knowledge is either positive—a posteriori. (Quantitative research). • Is exclusively derived from experience of natural phenomena and their properties and relations—or true by definition, that is, analytic and tautological. • Positivism is a research paradigm associated with scientific theories. • Positivists apply scientific methodology as the way of understanding and researching social and psychological phenomena. • Scientific research in a positivist paradigm focuses on explanation and prediction. • The hypothetico-deductive model of science is used to facilitate the research process, taking a theory-verification approach. • Theories of nature depend on empirical data, with larger samples used to make generalizations. The Three Epistemological Positions Some Philosophical Frameworks The table below provides some of the important theoretical terms that students will meet in this subject. The goal is to reflect on the terms as many times as possible and not to get intimidated by these philosophical terms. See table below with philosophical frameworks; The Philosophical Underpinnings of Research The epistemological positions of relevance to this module are positivism, constructionism and interpretivism. Some commonly used philosophical frameworks (see Table above) in social science research are: functionalism, symbolic interactionism, feminism, critical inquiry and postmodernism. Each of these represents a particular framework for viewing the social world, and each represents particular ontological & epistemological standpoints. The Philosophical Frameworks Knowledge creation and the nature of knowledge are epistemological questions. The means by which knowledge is created is an epistemological issue. Knowledge is created in the research project through the use of research methodologies and methods. The methodology and the methods used must fit with the research project, the philosophical framework used in the research project. In order to answer epistemological questions, the researcher must explain and justify the methodology and methods used in the research project. The Five Basic Elements In Figure 4.2 above, the five basic elements of the research process are evident. The epistemological and ontological assumptions embedded in the research project are embedded in the theoretical perspective deployed in the research, and this is embedded in the research methodology used in the study. The Methodological Pyramid The methodological pyramid (see above) illustrates how the underlying philosophical frameworks support the research methodologies which in turn support the data collection methods. This is the way in which the concept of ‘fit’ works within social science research. There are two types of data that can be collected for any research project, quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data is data in the form of numbers, numerical data. Qualitative data is data is non-numerical data. The Use of Theory in the Generation of Knowledge All research is about the generation of knowledge. Every research project emerges from a particular body of knowledge and in turn it makes a contribution to that body of knowledge. As every research project concludes and makes its contribution to the body of knowledge, the body of knowledge grows. The Importance of Theory in Research Theory is of the most fundamental importance in research. Research that is theorised makes a contribution to the body of knowledge – it connects with the body of knowledge. Such research becomes part of the ‘what is known’ about the phenomenon under investigation. Concepts - the Building Blocks of Theory Concepts are the building blocks of theory. Concepts, as we have seen from our exploration and use of the conceptual framework, are key ideas, key words, often the big words in a sentence, a paragraph, in an idea. Every discipline and every theory is made up of concepts. Each concept contains a great deal of meaning. Concepts, created and developed, and aligned with other concepts, are the means through which theory is created. Concepts are the building blocks of theory. The Uses of Theory in Research The conceptual framework contains the key concepts in the research project. The theoretical framework contains the literature review. The theoretical framework is designed by the researcher, and it emerges from the conceptual framework. How to create a Theoretical Framework: the 2nd of the 4 Frameworks The key concepts in the conceptual framework direct you in your search for literature and in your reading. The theoretical framework, or literature review, contains a discussion, or a review, of the literature in the area of the research project. The key concepts provide a structure for the literature review. The researcher first sources the literature. Then s/he downloads and saves the literature. Then s/he reads the literature. Finally, s/he begins to construct from the literature s/he has read the theoretical framework for their research project. Theoretical framework is required in order to;
Provide the theoretical framework for the research
project; Establish their expertise in this area; Detail the current state of knowledge in the area; Highlight what is known and to highlights any gaps in what is known; Detail the theory from which the research has emerged; To outline the theory to which the research will ultimately contribute How to Generate Theory from Your Own Research Your review of the literature gives you material from which you develop questions to ask in data gathering. When you analyse the data gathered, you begin the process of theorising your data. You do this by establishing where and how your data supports, and/or contradicts, the theory in the literature review. This is the process of establishing how your data fits with the theory in the field. Research, Theory and Knowledge The conceptual and theoretical frameworks guide the research in terms of data gathering. The analysed data is theorised. The findings of the research are knitted into the body of knowledge. What results is new theory or an extension of existing theory. This is the new knowledge created by the research project. Summary The following areas have been covered in this unit The philosophical underpinnings of research and research methodologies. The difference world views represented in the different philosophical approaches. The links between research, theory and knowledge. End of Chapter 4