3 Single-Stage Amplifiers: 3.1 The Common-Emitter Amplifier
3 Single-Stage Amplifiers: 3.1 The Common-Emitter Amplifier
VCC
VCC RL
RL
vOU T
iC +
iC
vin Q1
iB vOU T Q1
iB
+ vIN
VIN vIN
−
−
3 Single-Stage Amplifiers
Three different two-port topologies are possible for a 3-terminal transistor. How do we know which one to use for
a certain application? As we will see, each topology has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Here, we
look at the characteristics of the 3 different topologies of single-stage BJT amplifiers: (1) the common-emitter, (2) the
common-base, and (3) the common-collector amplifiers, as well as their MOSFET equivalents: (1) the common-source,
(2) the common-gate, and (3) the common-drain amplifiers. Single-stage amplifiers, such as these ones, are important
building blocks in the design of linear electronic amplifiers.
3.1.1 DC Analysis
The goal of DC analysis is to find the quiescent DC (or bias) currents and voltages of our transistors, since this will,
in turn, allow us to calculate the transistor small signal parameters. These small signal parameters will then be used
to calculate the two-port parameters of the common-emitter amplifier.
For DC analysis, we set all small signals to zero, leaving us with only the quiescent DC voltages and currents.
Writing the KVL equations around the output side of the amplifier, and recognizing that VBE,Q = VIN and VCE,Q =
VOU T , we get
1
EEE 51 Handout 3-1
c L. Alarcón, updated January 27, 2015
Resistor I−V Characteristic DC Voltage Source I−V Characteristic DC Current Source I−V Characteristic
5 5 2
4 4
1.5
[mA]
iDC [mA]
3 3
iR [mA]
DC
2 2
i
0.5
1 1
0 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 1 2 3 4 5
v [V] v [V] v [V]
R DC DC
If VIN is around 0.6 V, and VA is large compared to the supply voltage, then we can approximate the quiescent
DC collector current as
VIN
IC,Q = IS · e VT
(3.4)
Then we can solve for VOU T as
2
EEE 51 Handout 3-1
c L. Alarcón, updated January 27, 2015
B ib ic C
+ +
− −
E E
Figure 3.3: The small signal equivalent circuit of the common-emitter amplifier in Fig. 3.1a.
+ +
− −
no small signal change in the voltage. Hence, the small signal equivalent of the DC voltage source is a short circuit
since the small signal voltage is always zero.
For the independent DC current source, whose I-V characteristic is given in Fig. 3.2c, we can once again determine
the equivalent small signal resistance as
−1
∂iDC
Rsmall signal = →∞ (3.12)
∂vDC
Therefore, the small signal equivalent resistance of an independent DC current source is an open circuit. This is due to
the fact that no matter what small signal voltage we force across the current source, the current will remain constant,
resulting in zero small signal current change.
Using the small signal equivalents of all the components in Fig. 3.1a, the small signal equivalent circuit of the
common-emitter amplifier can be obtained, as seen in Fig. 3.3. Again, it is very important to note that the small signal
equivalent circuit describes the relationships only between the small voltage or current changes about the quiescent
DC operating point. There is no DC (voltage or current) information in the small signal domain.
Given the small signal equivalent circuit of the common-emitter amplifier, we can now derive its equivalent two-port
equivalent circuit. Using our two-port parameter definitions, the input resistance of the CE amplifier is
β β · VT
Ri = rπ = = (3.13)
gm IC,Q
The circuit transconductance is then
IC,Q
Gm = gm = (3.14)
VT
The output resistance can then be expressed as the parallel combination of ro and the load resistance, RL ,
VA
Ro = ro k RL = k RL (3.15)
IC,Q
The CE amplifier two-port equivalent circuit is shown in Fig. 3.4.
In most cases, we are interested in the small signal voltage gain. Thus,
vout ro RL RL
Av = = −Gm Ro = −gm (ro k RL ) = −gm · = −gm ro · (3.16)
vin ro + RL ro + RL
The small signal voltage gain is negative since for the CE amplifier in Fig. 3.1a, a small voltage increase at the input
would result in an increase in vBE , resulting in an increase in collector current. This increase in iC results in an
increase in the voltage across RL , causing the output voltage to drop. Note that an amplifier with a negative small
signal gain is called an inverting amplifier.
For the CE amplifier in Fig. 3.1a, if we assume that ro is finite, the maximum small signal voltage gain can be
obtained when we let RL → ∞, resulting in
IC,Q VA VA q · VA
|Av,max | = ao = gm ro = − · = = (3.17)
VT IC,Q VT kT
3
EEE 51 Handout 3-1
c L. Alarcón, updated January 27, 2015
∂VOUT/∂VIN [V/V]
4 −50
VOUT [V]
3 −100
B →
← B
2 −150
C →
← C
1
−200
0
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
VIN [V] VIN [V]
(a) Large signal transfer curve (b) Small signal voltage gain
Figure 3.5: Common-emitter characteristics for a transistor with IS = 2 × 10−16 A and VA → ∞, using VCC = 5 V,
and RL = 500 Ω at T = 300K.
Eq. 3.17 represents the maximum voltage gain we can get out of a single BJT, also known as the intrinsic voltage
gain, ao . Note that any other value of RL would result in a voltage gain lower than ao , and that ao is only dependent
on the transistor Early Voltage, and temperature. The intrinsic voltage gain is also a convenient metric that be used
to determine if a transistor is suited for a certain circuit or task.
IC,max = = IS · e VT (3.19)
RL
If the supply voltage is very much greater than VCE,sat , then we can approximate Eq. 3.19 as
VCC
IC,max ≈ (3.20)
RL
Aside from setting the output DC voltage level, and converting the small signal current to a small signal voltage,
the load resistance RL in Fig. 3.1a also limits the maximum collector current that the transistor can draw.
Using Eq. 3.18, and the fact that VOU T = VCE,sat when the transistor is in saturation, we can plot VIN versus
VOU T , or the large signal transfer characteristic, of the CE amplifier in Fig. 3.1a, as shown in Fig. 3.5a.
As we expect, the small signal voltage gain is just the slope of the transfer characteristic at a particular bias point.
Taking the derivative of Eq. 3.18, we get
∂VOU T IS VIN IC,Q
= −RL · · e VT = −RL · = −gm RL (3.21)
∂VIN VT VT
Since Eq. 3.18 assumes that VA → ∞, the resulting small signal transistor output impedance, ro , will also approach
infinity, reducing Eq. 3.16 to Eq. 3.21.
As we can see from Figs. 3.5a and 3.5b, choosing different values for the DC input voltage, VIN , would result in
different quiescent collector currents, leading to different quiescent output voltages and small signal gains.
4
EEE 51 Handout 3-1
c L. Alarcón, updated January 27, 2015
vOUT [V]
vIN [V]
2
0.72
1
0.71
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Time [s] Time [s]
(a) Input voltage (b) Output voltage
Figure 3.6: BJT common-emitter amplifier transient response when (a) it is biased at point C, and (b) a small signal
input sinusoid is applied.
For example, choosing VIN = 709.5 mV, and using Eqs. 3.4 and 3.18, results in IC,Q = 5 mA, and VOU T = 2.5 V,
corresponding to point B in Fig. 3.5a. Then, by using Eq. 3.21, we get Av = −108.7 VV , corresponding to point B in
Fig. 3.5b. Note that choosing either point A or point C in Fig. 3.5a would result in different small signal gains, as
seen in Fig. 3.5b and Table 3.1.
Choosing a Bias Point: A common question in the design of linear amplifiers is “What bias point should we use?”.
Clearly, if we want the largest possible gain, we would bias the CE amplifier near point C in Fig. 3.5b. However, let
us look at the implications of using point C as our bias point.
If we apply a sinusoidal small signal voltage, vin , to the input of our CE amplifier, we would get the transient
waveforms in Fig. 3.6. For vin = 10 mVp−p , we will get an output sinusoid, vout ≈ 1.6 Vp−p , as expected. However,
if we increase vin to 20 mVp−p , we see that the output is distorteda , as seen in Fig. 3.6b. The clipping of the lower
part of the output sinusoid is due to the transistor’s entry into its saturation region. This is due to the fact that the
increase in collector current, increases the voltage across RL , reducing the transistor’s VCE until it reaches VCE,sat .
Note that in the saturation region, vOU T = VCE,sat ≈ 0.2 V, independent of the input, vin .
The maximum symmetricb peak-to-peak output voltage of an amplifier is known as its output swing. For the
CE amplifier at bias point C, the output swing is limited by the largest negative output voltage that would keep
the BJT in its forward-active region. Thus, to keep the transistor VCE > VCE,sat , we should satisfy the relation
VOU T − |vout | > VCE,sat on the negative swing of vout . Therefore, the output swing can be expressed as
certain amount of distortion when a perfect sinusoid is applied at its input. However, here we mean the distortion due to the clipping or
flattening of the peaks of the sinusoid.
b The positive swing should be equal to the negative swing about the quiescent DC point.
5
EEE 51 Handout 3-1
c L. Alarcón, updated January 27, 2015
0.69 4.8
vOUT [V]
vIN [V]
0.68 4.6
0.67 4.4
4.2
0.66
4
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Time [s] Time [s]
(a) Input voltage (b) Output voltage
Figure 3.7: BJT common-emitter amplifier transient response when (a) it is biased at point A, and (b) a small signal
input sinusoid is applied.
3
0.715
2.5
0.71
2
0.705
0.7 1.5
0.695 1
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Time [s] Time [s]
(a) Input voltage (b) Output voltage
Figure 3.8: BJT common-emitter amplifier transient response when (a) it is biased at point B, and (b) a small signal
input sinusoid is applied.
to be very small, requiring a larger negative small signal input voltage. Note that for the output to reach VCC , the
transistor needs to be placed in its cut-off region, where the collector current is zero.
A good tradeoff between gain and output swing would be to bias the common-emitter amplifier at point B. Thus,
by placing the output DC voltage at around half the supply voltage, we would get a relatively large output swing
without significant loss in voltage gain. The transient response of the common-emitter amplifier biased at point B is
shown in Fig. 3.8.
For a small signal input voltage of 10 mVp−p , the resulting small signal output voltage has a peak-to-peak value
V
of around 1.1 V, consistent with our computed small signal gain of −108.7 V in Table 3.1. Increasing the input to
20 mVp−p results in the output waveform in Fig. 3.8b. Note that the output exhibits less flattening during the positive
cycle of the sinusoid, while clipping is avoided during the negative cycle.
It is also important to note that the DC power the amplifier needs depends on the bias point. For the common-
emitter amplifier in Fig. 3.1a, we can calculate the quiescent DC power as
6
EEE 51 Handout 3-1
c L. Alarcón, updated January 27, 2015
VCC VCC
RB RL
vOU T
iC
Q1
iB
vin
+
C∞ vBE
−
B ib ic C
+ +
− −
E E
Figure 3.10: The small signal model of the fixed-bias CE amplifier in Fig. 3.9.
7
EEE 51 Handout 3-1
c L. Alarcón, updated January 27, 2015
VCC VCC
RB RL
vOU T
iC
Q1
iB
vin
+
C∞ vBE
−
RE
iE
Note that this small signal equivalent circuit is almost the same as the one in Fig. 3.3, except that the input
resistance now becomes
Ri = rπ k RB (3.28)
variation, we would probably find some of the transistors to have β values as low as 50, or some as high as 200.
8
EEE 51 Handout 3-1
c L. Alarcón, updated January 27, 2015
B ib ic C
+ +
− −
E E
RE
Figure 3.12: The small signal equivalent circuit of the emitter-degenerated CE amplifier in Fig. 3.11.
β Sensitivity: One way to quantify the effect of β on the quiescent DC collector current is to compute the sensitivity
of IC,Q to β. Sensitivity is expressed as
I ∂IC,Q
SβC,Q = (3.33)
∂β
Thus, for a circuit with a lower the sensitivity, varying β would have a smaller effect on IC,Q .
Calculating the sensitivity of the quiescent DC collector current to the β value of the fixed-bias CE amplifier in
Fig. 3.9, we would get
Comparing Eqs. 3.34 and 3.35, we can see that as β → ∞, the sensitivity of the emitter-degenerated CE amplifier
goes to zero, while the sensitivity of the fixed-bias CE amplifier remains constant.
Notice that the quiescent DC output voltage is now
Note that Eq. 3.37 is obtained by rearranging Eq. 3.36. For example, if VCC = 5 V, VCE,sat = 0.2 V, β = 100, and
IC,Q = 1 mA, the value of RE should be less than 2.28 kΩ, which is relatively small compared to ro and rπ .
Once we have obtained the quiescent DC collector current, we can now determine the small signal parameters of
the transistor, as well as draw the small signal equivalent circuit of the emitter-degenerated CE amplifier, as shown
in Fig. 3.12.
In order to reduce the complexity of our calculations, we can first solve for the two-port Norton equivalent circuit
of the transistor small signal model together with RE , ignoring RB and RL for now, as shown in Fig. 3.13.
In order to get the effective transconductance of the transistor with RE , we short the output to ground, and solve
i0
for G0m = vout 0
0 , where iout is the output short-circuit current. Writing the KCL equation at the emitter node, and
in
0
recognizing that vbe = vin − ve0 , we get
ve0 − vin
0
v0 v0 0
+ e + e − gm (vin − ve0 ) = 0 (3.38)
rπ RE ro
Solving for ve0 , we get
1
gm + rπ
ve0 = vin
0
· 1 1 1 (3.39)
gm + rπ + ro + R E
9
EEE 51 Handout 3-1
c L. Alarcón, updated January 27, 2015
0
B0 B ib ic C C 0 iout
+
+ + + +
rπ vbe gm vbe ro
0 0 −
vtest i0test vin 0
vout vtest itest
+
E E
ve0 RE
− − − −
−
E0 E0
Figure 3.13: The small signal model of the emitter-degenerated NPN BJT.
Thus,
1 1
i0out R E − ro g m rπ
G0m = 0 = gm · (3.41)
vin gm + r1π + r1o + 1
RE
Eq. 3.41 is relatively complex and does not give us much intuition regarding the effect of RE . However, if we
simplify Eq. 3.41 by assuming gm ro 1, gm rπ = β 1, RE ro , and RE rπ , we get
1
RE gm
G0m ≈ gm · 1 = < gm (3.42)
gm + RE
1 + gm RE
Since (1 + gm RE ) > 1, Eq. 3.42 shows that the effective transconductance of the transistor and RE circuit is lower
than the transconductance of the transistor without RE . Thus, we say that the transconductance is degenerated by
the degenerating resistor, RE .
The effective output resistance can be calculated by applying a test voltage at the output and measuring the
current, when the input small signal voltage is set to zero. However, in this case, let us apply a test current source,
itest , at the output, and measure the resulting output voltage, vtest . Since the circuit is linear, we should get the same
result.
Applying itest at the output, and recognizing that rπ is now parallel to RE when the input small signal voltage is
set to zero, gives us
10
EEE 51 Handout 3-1
c L. Alarcón, updated January 27, 2015
B0 C0
+ +
0 gm 0
vin RB rπ (1 + gm RE ) vin 1+gm RE · vin ro (1 + gm RE ) RL vout
− −
0 0
E E
Figure 3.14: The emitter-degenerated common-emitter amplifier small signal model in Fig. 3.12 using the derived
effective two-port model of the emitter-degenerated transistor.
Applying i0test , and recognizing that vbe = i0test rπ and that RE and ro are connected in parallel, we can get the
voltage across the parallel combination of RE and ro as
Ro = RL k ro (1 + gm RE ) ≈ RL (3.53)
Ri = RB k rπ (1 + gm RE ) ≈ RB (3.54)
The small signal voltage gain is then
gm RL
Av = −Gm Ro ≈ − (3.55)
1 + gm RE
Again, note that the small signal voltage gain is degraded or degenerated by RE . It is interesting to node that if
RL
gm RE 1, then the voltage gain approaches − R E
, which is independent of the transistor parameters!e
Thus, the consequences of reducing the effect of β variations on the quiescent DC collector current include (1)
reduced small signal voltage gain, (2) increased small signal input resistance, and (3) increased small signal output
resistance.
11