0% found this document useful (0 votes)
404 views9 pages

USAMO 2011 Notes

Soal dan Pembahasan USAMO 2011

Uploaded by

Aprilia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
404 views9 pages

USAMO 2011 Notes

Soal dan Pembahasan USAMO 2011

Uploaded by

Aprilia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

USAMO 2011 Solution Notes

Compiled by Evan Chen


November 23, 2019

This is an compilation of solutions for the 2011 USAMO. Some of the


solutions are my own work, but many are from the official solutions provided
by the organizers (for which they hold any copyrights), and others were found
on the Art of Problem Solving forums.
Corrections and comments are welcome!

Contents

0 Problems 2

1 USAMO 2011/1 3

2 USAMO 2011/2, proposed by Sam Vandervelde 4

3 USAMO 2011/3 5

4 USAMO 2011/4, proposed by Zuming Feng 7

5 USAMO 2011/5 8

6 USAMO 2011/6 9

1
USAMO 2011 Solution Notes web.evanchen.cc, updated November 23, 2019

§0 Problems
1. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers such that a2 + b2 + c2 + (a + b + c)2 ≤ 4. Prove
that
ab + 1 bc + 1 ca + 1
2
+ 2
+ ≥ 3.
(a + b) (b + c) (c + a)2

2. An integer is assigned to each vertex of a regular pentagon so that the sum of the
five integers is 2011. A turn of a solitaire game consists of subtracting an integer m
from each of the integers at two neighboring vertices and adding 2m to the opposite
vertex, which is not adjacent to either of the first two vertices. (The amount m
and the vertices chosen can vary from turn to turn.) The game is won at a certain
vertex if, after some number of turns, that vertex has the number 2011 and the
other four vertices have the number 0. Prove that for any choice of the initial
integers, there is exactly one vertex at which the game can be won.

3. In hexagon ABCDEF , which is nonconvex but not self-intersecting, no pair of


opposite sides are parallel. The internal angles satisfy ∠A = 3∠D, ∠C = 3∠F ,
and ∠E = 3∠B. Furthermore AB = DE, BC = EF , and CD = F A. Prove that
diagonals AD, BE, and CF are concurrent.

4. Consider the assertion that for each positive integer n ≥ 2, the remainder upon
n
dividing 22 by 2n − 1 is a power of 4. Either prove the assertion or find (with
proof) a counterexample.

5. Let P be a point inside convex quadrilateral ABCD. Points Q1 and Q2 are located
within ABCD such that

∠Q1 BC = ∠ABP, ∠Q1 CB = ∠DCP,


∠Q2 AD = ∠BAP, ∠Q2 DA = ∠CDP.

Prove that Q1 Q2 k AB if and only if Q1 Q2 k CD.

6. Let A be a set with |A| = 225, meaning that A has 225 elements. Suppose further
that there are eleven subsets A1 , . . . , A11 of A such that |Ai | = 45 for 1 ≤ i ≤ 11
and |Ai ∩ Aj | = 9 for 1 ≤ i < j ≤ 11. Prove that |A1 ∪ A2 ∪ . . . ∪ A11 | ≥ 165, and
give an example for which equality holds.

2
USAMO 2011 Solution Notes web.evanchen.cc, updated November 23, 2019

§1 USAMO 2011/1
Let a, b, c be positive real numbers such that a2 + b2 + c2 + (a + b + c)2 ≤ 4. Prove that

ab + 1 bc + 1 ca + 1
2
+ 2
+ ≥ 3.
(a + b) (b + c) (c + a)2

The condition becomes 2 ≥ a2 + b2 + c2 + ab + bc + ca. Therefore,


X 2ab + 2 X 2ab + (a2 + b2 + c2 + ab + bc + ca)

cyc
(a + b)2 cyc
(a + b)2
X (a + b)2 + (c + a)(c + b)
=
cyc
(a + b)2
X (c + a)(c + b)
=3+
cyc
(a + b)2
v
(c + a)(c + b)
uY
u
≥ 3 + 3t
3
2
=3+3=6
cyc
(a + b)

with the last line by AM-GM. This completes the proof.

3
USAMO 2011 Solution Notes web.evanchen.cc, updated November 23, 2019

§2 USAMO 2011/2, proposed by Sam Vandervelde


An integer is assigned to each vertex of a regular pentagon so that the sum of the five integers is
2011. A turn of a solitaire game consists of subtracting an integer m from each of the integers at
two neighboring vertices and adding 2m to the opposite vertex, which is not adjacent to either of
the first two vertices. (The amount m and the vertices chosen can vary from turn to turn.) The
game is won at a certain vertex if, after some number of turns, that vertex has the number 2011
and the other four vertices have the number 0. Prove that for any choice of the initial integers,
there is exactly one vertex at which the game can be won.

Call the vertices 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 in order. First, notice that the quantity N1 +2N2 +3N3 +4N4
(mod 5) is invariant, where Ni is the amount at vertex i. This immediately implies that
at most one vertex can win, since in a winning situation all Ni are 0 except for one,
which is 2011.
Now we prove weP can win on this unique vertex. Let ai , xi denote the number initially
at i and xi denote m over all m where vertex i gains 2m. WLOG the possible vertex
is 0, meaning a1 + 2a2 + 3a3 + 4a4 ≡ 0 (mod 5). Moreover we want

2011 = a0 + 2x0 − x2 − x3
0 = a1 + 2x1 − x3 − x4
0 = a2 + 2x2 − x4 − x0
0 = a3 + 2x3 − x0 − x1
0 = a4 + 2x4 − x1 − x2 .

We can ignore the first equation since its the sum of the other four. Moreover, we can
WLOG shift x0 → 0 by shifting each xi by a fixed amount. Then

x4 = 2x2 + a2 and x1 = 2x3 + a3 .

We let p and q denote x2 and x3 (noting that p, q ∈ Z =⇒ x1 , x4 ∈ Z). Anyways the


system now expands as

2p − 3q = 2a3 + a1 − a2 and 2q − 3p = 2a2 + a4 − a3

whence we have a two-var system, easy! We compute


1
p−q = [a1 − 3a2 + 3a3 − a4 ] .
5
This is an integer by the condition, whence so are p and q, QED.

4
USAMO 2011 Solution Notes web.evanchen.cc, updated November 23, 2019

§3 USAMO 2011/3
In hexagon ABCDEF , which is nonconvex but not self-intersecting, no pair of opposite sides
are parallel. The internal angles satisfy ∠A = 3∠D, ∠C = 3∠F , and ∠E = 3∠B. Furthermore
AB = DE, BC = EF , and CD = F A. Prove that diagonals AD, BE, and CF are concurrent.

We present the official solution. We say a hexagon is satisfying if it obeys the six
conditions; note that intuitively we expect three degrees of freedom for satisfying hexagons.
Main idea:

Claim — In a satisfying hexagon, B, D, F are reflections of A, C, E across the


sides of 4ACE.

(This claim looks plausible because every excellent hexagon is satisfying, and both
configuration spaces are three-dimensional.) Call a hexagon of this shape “excellent”; in
a excellent hexagon the diagonals clearly concur (at the orthocenter).
Set β = ∠B, δ = ∠D, ϕ = ∠F .
Now given a satisfying hexagon ABCDEF , construct a “phantom hexagon” A0 B 0 C 0 D0 E 0 F 0
with the same angles which is excellent (see figure). This is possible since β + δ + ϕ = 180◦ .

F F′
A ϕ A′ ϕ
B B′
β β
δ

ϕ β
C E C′ E′

δ δ

D D′

Then it would suffice to prove that:

Lemma
A satisfying hexagon is uniquely determined by its angles up to similarity. That is,
at most one hexagon (up to similarity) has angles β, δ, γ as above.

Proof. Consider any two satisfying hexagons ABCDEF and A0 B 0 C 0 D0 E 0 F 0 (not neces-
sarily as constructed above!) with the same angles. We show they are similar.
−−→ −−→
To do this, consider the unit complex numbers in the directions BA and DE respectively
and let ~x denote their sum. Define ~y , ~z similarly. Note that the condition AB 6k DE
implies ~x 6= 0, and similarly. Then we have the identities

AB · ~x + CD · ~y + EF · ~z = A0 B 0 · ~x + C 0 D0 · ~y + E 0 F 0 · ~z = 0.

So we would obtain AB : CD : EF = A0 B 0 : C 0 D0 : E 0 F 0 if only we could show that


~x, ~y , ~z are not multiples of each other (linear dependency reasons). This is a tiresome
computation with arguments, but here it is.

5
USAMO 2011 Solution Notes web.evanchen.cc, updated November 23, 2019

First note that none of β, δ, ϕ can be 90◦ , since otherwise we get a pair of parallel
sides. Now work in the complex plane, fix a reference such that A~−B ~ has argument 0,
and assume ABCDEF are labelled counterclockwise. Then
~ −C
• B ~ has argument π − β

~ −D
• C ~ has argument −(β + 3ϕ)

~ −E
• D ~ has argument π − (β + 3ϕ + δ)

~ − F~ has argument −(4β + 3ϕ + δ)


• E

So the argument of ~x has argument π−(β+3ϕ+δ)


2 (mod π). The argument of ~y has argument
π−(5β+3ϕ+δ)
2 (mod π). Their difference is 2β (mod π), and since β 6= 90◦ , it follows that
~x and ~y are not multiples of each other; the other cases are similar.

Then the lemma implies ABCDEF ∼ A0 B 0 C 0 D0 E 0 F and we’re done.

Remark. This problem turned out to be known already. It appears in this reference:
Nikolai Beluhov, Matematika, 2008, issue 6, problem 3.
It was reprinted as Kvant, 2009, issue 2, problem M2130; the reprint is available at
http://kvant.ras.ru/pdf/2009/2009-02.pdf.

Remark. The vector perspective also shows the condition about parallel sides cannot be
dropped. Here is a counterexample from Ryan Kim in the event that it is.

F
A

B0 C0
E

B C D0

By adjusting the figure above so that the triangles are right isosceles (instead of just right),
one also finds an example of a hexagon which is satisfying and whose diagonals are concurrent,
but which is not excellent.

6
USAMO 2011 Solution Notes web.evanchen.cc, updated November 23, 2019

§4 USAMO 2011/4, proposed by Zuming Feng


n
Consider the assertion that for each positive integer n ≥ 2, the remainder upon dividing 22 by
2n − 1 is a power of 4. Either prove the assertion or find (with proof) a counterexample.

We claim n = 25 is a counterexample. Indeed, note that


25 25
22 ≡ 22 (mod 25)
≡ 27 (mod 225 )

which isn’t a power of 4, and is actually the remainder since 27 < 225 .

7
USAMO 2011 Solution Notes web.evanchen.cc, updated November 23, 2019

§5 USAMO 2011/5
Let P be a point inside convex quadrilateral ABCD. Points Q1 and Q2 are located within ABCD
such that

∠Q1 BC = ∠ABP, ∠Q1 CB = ∠DCP,


∠Q2 AD = ∠BAP, ∠Q2 DA = ∠CDP.

Prove that Q1 Q2 k AB if and only if Q1 Q2 k CD.

If AB k CD there is nothing to prove. Otherwise let X = AB ∩ CD. Then the Qi are


isogonal conjugates of P with respect to triangles XAD, XBC. Thus X, Q1 , Q2 are
collinear, on the isogonal of XY with respect to ∠DXA = ∠CXB.

8
USAMO 2011 Solution Notes web.evanchen.cc, updated November 23, 2019

§6 USAMO 2011/6
Let A be a set with |A| = 225, meaning that A has 225 elements. Suppose further that there
are eleven subsets A1 , . . . , A11 of A such that |Ai | = 45 for 1 ≤ i ≤ 11 and |Ai ∩ Aj | = 9 for
1 ≤ i < j ≤ 11. Prove that |A1 ∪ A2 ∪ . . . ∪ A11 | ≥ 165, and give an example for which equality
holds.

Ignore the 225 — it is irrelevant.


Denote the elements of A1 ∪ · · · ∪ A11 by a1 , . . . , an , and suppose that ai appears xi
times among Ai for each 1 ≤ i ≤ n (so 1 ≤ xi ≤ 11). Then we have
11
X 11
X
xi = |Ai | = 45 · 11
i=1 i=1

and
11    
X xi X 11
= |Ai ∩ Aj | = · 9.
2 2
i=1 1≤i<j≤11

xi = 495 and i x2i = 1485. Now, by Cauchy Schwarz


P P
Therefore, we deduce that
!
X X 2
2
n xi ≥ xi
i

495 2
which implies n ≥ 1485 = 165.
Equality occurs if we let A consist of the 165 three-element subsets of {1, . . . , 11} (plus
60 of your favorite reptiles). Then we let Ai denote those subsets containing i, of which
10 9
 
there are 2 = 45, and so that |Ai ∩ Aj | = 1 = 9.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy