0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views3 pages

Scoring Rubrics

The document provides a scoring rubric to evaluate resumes and interview skills. For resumes, criteria include format/appearance, organization, content, and spelling. Higher scores are given for easy to read resumes that highlight relevant experience and accomplishments. For interviews, criteria include general attitude, responses to questions, candidate integrity, and overall demonstration of skills. Strong interviews feature interest, detailed responses, consistent stories, and proficient skills. Lower scores are assigned for issues like disorganization, irrelevant information, inconsistencies or lack of examples.

Uploaded by

Aljon Basilan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views3 pages

Scoring Rubrics

The document provides a scoring rubric to evaluate resumes and interview skills. For resumes, criteria include format/appearance, organization, content, and spelling. Higher scores are given for easy to read resumes that highlight relevant experience and accomplishments. For interviews, criteria include general attitude, responses to questions, candidate integrity, and overall demonstration of skills. Strong interviews feature interest, detailed responses, consistent stories, and proficient skills. Lower scores are assigned for issues like disorganization, irrelevant information, inconsistencies or lack of examples.

Uploaded by

Aljon Basilan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Scoring Rubric for Resume

Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Non-Competitive Needs Improvement Comments/


(5) (4) (3) (2) Suggestions
 Appropriate length  Appropriate length  Slightly too short or long  Too short or long
 Fills the page but not  Adequately fills page,  Filling of page or use of  Page seems empty
overcrowded decent use of white space could be improved or crowded
 Margin between ½ and 1 space  Issues with font/spacing  Inappropriate
Format/ inch.  Apprpriate margins  Margins outside of font/spacing
Appearance  Consistent font/spacing  Minor issues with printer range  Extreme margins
 Design elements font/spcing  Some design element  Design elements
appropriate and  Design elements issues distracting
consistent appropriate  Not easy to read /bullet  Difficult to
 Easy to read and scan  Could be easier to read point used inconsistently read/paragraph form

 Name and contact  Name and contact info  Some issues with name  Name and contact
informations clearly listed at top and contact informations info missing/unclear
listed  Titles, organizations,  Titles, organizations,  Titles, organization,
 Titles, organizations, dates, locations dates locations are dates, locations are
dates, locations are consistent inconsistent missing
Organization consistent and clear  Section titles clear  Section titles could be  Inadequate section
 Most important infos in  Some use of reverse improved titles
top chronological order  Little use of reverse  No clear pattern in
 Experiences listed in chronological oder how experience is
reverse chronological listed
order
 Education section  Education section  Some issues with  Education section
complete and effective complete education incomplete/inclear
 Variety of strong action  Some effective action  Action words repetitive  “I statements” used
verbs used words and weak  No use of outcomes,
 Well-developed  Some  Accomplishment accomplishments
accomplishment accomplishments are statements not well  Many wordy,
Content statements, trainings and included developed ineffective
seminars  Wording descriptive  Some wordy or descriptions
 Wording is concise and and is somewhat ineffective descriptions  Information is
descriptive concise  Little targeting for irrelevant and
 Keywords/skills targeted  Keywords, skills specific position unimportant for
for specific specification somewhat targeted position

Spelling  Error Free  One Error  Two Errors  Three or more Total:
Errors
Rubric for Interview Skills
Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Non-Competitive Needs Improvement Comments/
(5) (4) (3) (2) Suggestions

 Appropriately  Shows basic interest in  Somewhat interested  Lack of interest and


interested and the assessment process in the assessment enthusiasm about the
General enthusiastic about the  Shows some enthusiasm process assessment, passive and
Attitude assessment process as  Shows little indifferent as reflected on
reflected on the output enthusiasm the output

 Gives well-  Gives well-constructed  Gives well-  Answers with a “yes” or


constructed, detailed responses, somewhat constructed “no” ad fails to elaborate
Responses to and accurate confident accurate responses but or explain
Questions responses that are  Does not sound rehearsed sounds rehearsed or  Talks negatively about
genuine and the student’s answer unsure the concepts
is somewhat hesistant or
unsure

 Responses are all  Responses are generally  Responses are  Responses are
consistent consistent somewhat inconsistent or
 Concrete and specific  Concrete and specific inconsistent or contradictory
examples are used examples often used contradictory  No concrete or specific
Candidate  Candidate provides  Candidate provides  Concrete and examples are used
Integrity verifiable information verifiable information for Specific examples  Candidate provided no
for all claims most claims occasionally used verifiable information for
 Candidate provides claims and/or claims may
some verifiable be exaggerated or even
information for appear manufactured
claims
 Highly proficient  Demonstrated average  Demonstrated  Demonstration of poor
 Appropriately utilized proficiency limited proficiency, skills with little Total:
Overall skills in an  Average demonstration of limited confidence displayed;
Demonstration enthusiastic, competent skills demonstration of illogical
Of motivating and competent skills
Skills engaging manner;
logical

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy