Error Control PDF
Error Control PDF
o Jetern~'1-e h
I V1 lldVttnce io e)1 sure the
I
overcJl
ervo r J V1 rpr o /(, i' J, vJ 1·5
tl. Vt,,_ 0 LesJ t~n
So ""'-e sreci fie J error .
y! +/:~ .(~;_;
I I
h; 4
I
l +.-,vi.~~) J
I I I I - -
I I I I ~
I I
-y11ii / - 0~+J I
I I I
-1 Y1
/\-
6) ~-~, {h I=
+-
c o wd ;n i'1 / {f) ttj)
A-
c,'11
~{\ltCe i0e- Lef 1- 0tt~J- s/Jc
rs
-q h I
tkeh
Y1
-
t-t I l qh) -
('-
/'v k (q h) :;;-
- -
Y1
9- h
tJ
?--
,c
J"
i-1
h k.
,c,--
/'1 (k h ) '1 I'\.... 9.,, (L
- -
A,
__,,
ct)
__,
-7
f)
- f_
Y)
95
f I I 11]:ll-J I
£. ti _
I
9 JC 11
I
{ -
- - ' --=--
- - t -w;+11
+~
I
2:5'" hJ
*
--L-
3 -
+ Zl5 7-
~10'-t k1i - f kJ~
wke ~e_ : --
k3= k t ( I--; + 3! h / w;
\
-+ ] !-<,
J i-- I
-f 5' k '- )
' ] •2..
\t{rt•
11_ I
/2~
--f \,J
I ; r.
Cl\./' I
-t l j J 24, I 7 'le>
+-- ·- ----.-
'6
/ -
I I
I v<.1
4-IS 7
I ' I
'
It , Zt3J
t
l
~-t t H· l I I I I I Hj I I I t I '] I I !.! I I I I I I I I
I
tk q -+,_+--y -
-
11, - I "J - C ,;, L(_ k_-i:-J e J h&<, f e J I - l?i_H) O '1
If _ < z
lke. s +ef - -is Dt.-C c_eff e J .
/ lt e >te 'X +__-t -; V'1.C s -f- e f 1 -:s - - ; }t c re 4- .s1 e J
t O q h - -
- - -
In et' the( C°'-.5e / {) /s l: tk f -l-e J
Very ,~ Pl ½
I I
I
1
ts -4- _I 9h lAi-i~sJ
.....--, I
I !----..+--:-
+ I I I I 7 1 . I I I
Co I-if i v~)
+ -
- - - _.....,__~ -
lI l I
--r
I
e y--r_o V-_ I
0
bI,{, T - S--0 _ ,:s the.. C< i,-,,,o U·I-\ f f c. ""'.f ,,.'t.,;/:.-o,i~ t>
~CC , _ct JC\.L_ j\) r-- V_ e {\CA._~ f Le_ ; - i's - 't be_+ter
I
O I _J _, - .
{ h. e re \-:.S - - - - - - -'--JI. - - ,
- __- _v-. te, Lc.JC-, g kt p be -t vJe e11 +I.e. 1tt4.~ 1, (
0 111
0 f
\M.et~gJ
ev"-L\Ac);o"5 -v-.e_oui'i-e.
-
J . . J .- i t.e. 'orde r "'-f i-he
e V 4. [tA
,JLVf-' -
th set n ;;.- v • -
Step 9 If 8 0.1 en . > 4 then set h 4h =
else 1f 8 - else set h -- 8h . (Calcu late new h.)
th - hmax.
Step 10 If h > hmax then se .-
8 .
= o.25 ( o. 125 , 0. 5 - -0.375
27 + 2(0.3974609) - 3544 O4095383
2565 .
1859 11 )
+ 4104 0.4584971 - 40 0.4658452
= 0.4204789.
The two approximations to y(0.25) are then found to be
_ _ 16 6656 28561 9 2
wi - wo + 1
135k + 12825k + 56430k - 50k5 + 55k6
3 4
16 6656 28561 9
= 0. 5 + 135 0.375 + 12825 0.4095383 + 56430 0.4584971 - 50 0.4658452
2
+ 55 0.4204789
= 0.9204870,
and
25 1408 2197 I
w1 = wo + 216k1 + 2565k3 + 4104k4 - 5ks
25 1408 2197 I
= 0.5 + 2160.375 + 25650.4095383 + 4104 0.4584971 - 50.4658452
= 0.9204886.
This also implies that
_ I 11 128
R - 0.25 360k1 - 4275k3 -
2197 k I k 2
75240 4 + 50 5 + 55k6
I
1 128 2197 I 2 I
= 4 1360 0.375 - 4275 0.4095383 - 75240 0.4584971 + 50 0.4658452 + 55 0.4204789
= 0.00000621388,
and
£ 1/4 ( 0.00001 ) 1/4 .
q = 0.84 (R) = 0.84 , O.Q0000621388 = 0.9461033291.
Since q < I we can accept the approximation 0.9204886 for y(0.25) but we should adjust
the step size for the next iteration to h = 0.9461033291(0.25) 0.2365258. However,
only the leading 5 digits of this result would be expected to be accurate because R has only
about 5 digits of accuracy. Because we are effectively subtracting the nearly equal numbers
w; and w;when we compute R, there is a good likelihood of round-off error. This is an
additional reason for being conservative when computing q.
The results from the algorithm are shown in Table 5.11 . Increased accuracy has been
used to ensure that the calculations are accurate to all listed places. The last two columns
in Table 5.11 show the results of the fifth-order method. For small values oft, the error is
less than the error in the fourth-order method, but the error exceeds that of the fourth-order
method when t increases.