Annexure-1 Customer Specific Requirement Matrix
Annexure-1 Customer Specific Requirement Matrix
6 Action to address risks QSP 38 No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this
6.1.1 & 6.1.2 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section YES YES YES No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
and opportunities for this section this section this section section for this section section
No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this
7 6.1.2.1 Risk Analysis QSP 38 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section YES YES YES No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
for this section this section this section section for this section section
No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this
8 6.1.2.2 Preventive Actions QSP 30 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section YES YES YES Only for electronic suppliers and not appalicable for us.
for this section this section this section section for this section section
The supplier becomes aware of an impending production
interruption, the
supplier shall make every attempt to notify the Nexteer receiving
Rane must establish and provide an plants (Production Control), the Buyer
and the AQE/SQE within 24 hours.The nature of the problem shall
executable contingency plan to ensure supply
be communicated with the
of product to Benteler.
immediate actions taken to assure supply of product. Production
This plan should generally address natural
No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this interruptions may include (but are not
disasters, power outages, labor work YES YES YES
No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this for this section section limited to) natural disasters, political unrest, war, cyber-attacks on
9 6.1.2.3 Contingency Plans SGIPL-SB-QSM-FNo RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section stoppages, etc. The plan
this section this section section information technology systems,
should also specifically address the facility and
equipment used to produce the Benteler capacity issues, quality issues, labor strikes, planned down-time or
other events that prevent the
products and details
supplier from meeting the specified capacity volumes or from
regarding alternative means to continue the
supply of product to Benteler Refer section 24 performing/submitting any APQP event or
task that would impact program launch or timing (e.g. R@R or
PPAP). The supplier is required to
No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents
No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement
for this section
No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this
10 7.1.2 People QSP 33 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section See ISO 9001:2015 requirements See ISO 9001:2015 requirements YES YES YES No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
this section this section for this section section
No AL customer specific requirement for this
Tools and/or equipment shall be permanently
7.1.3 & Plant, Facility, and No Beneteler customer specific requirement No TRWcustomer specific requirement for section No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents
11 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section marked so that ownership of each item is 0 YES YES YES No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
7.1.3.1 equipment planning for this section this section for this section
visually apparent refer section 20.10
Gage R&R’s:
• Shall be completed on all measurement systems identified on the
control plan. This includes
hand tools such as micrometers or calipers, as well as those features
checked by a CMM, Optical
Comparator, Smart Scope, attribute gages, online test or inspection
equipment, visual inspection,
Measurement System QMS MANUAL No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this etc.
12 7.1.5.1.1 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section YES YES YES
Analysis for this section this section this section for this section section • Shall be included in PPAP submission for special characteristics
and those features that will have
capability studies submitted at the time of PPAP.
No AL customer specific requirement for this • Gage R&R’s are to be updated annually along with annual layouts.
section • Minitab version 15 or newer is the required software and format
for all MSA submissions, unless
an alternate software has been evaluated by Nexteer and proven to
match the results from minitab
Rane must present their planned level of
Supplier shall be responsible to maintain gauges,
traceability (single part or batch size, including
inspection Fixtures and instruments used in a valid
Measurement definition of the traceability reference) to All part dimensional; performance and
7.1.5.2 & state of calibration. Calibration work at specified No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents
13 traceability & QSP 21 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section Benteler and gain written acceptance from material requirements as conducted at PPAP 0 YES YES YES No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
7.1.5.2.1 interval shall be carried out from calibration this section for this section
calibration the Benteler SQE (@ the Benteler APQP are to be verified yearly refer page no 14
laboratories, who have traceability to National
Milestone - Production Readiness Review).
Standards.
Refer section 17
14 Organizational QSP 34 No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this
7.1.6 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section YES YES YES No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
knowledge for this section this section this section section for this section section
No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this
15 7.2.1 & 7.2.2 Competence QSP 06 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section YES YES YES No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
for this section this section this section section for this section section
16 Internal Auditor QSP 25 No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this
7.2.3 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section YES YES YES No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
Competency. for this section this section this section section for this section section
A member who was selected by a supplier
17 Second - party auditor QSP 25 from its own employees and leads assessment No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
7.2.4 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section YES No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
Competency. during a Quality Assurance Visit (supplier this section this section section for this section section section section
quality audit).
The organization ensure the persons awareness for the followling;
a) the quality policy;
b) relevant quality objectives;
c) their contribution to the effectiveness of the quality management system, No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No customer specific requirement for this
18 7.3 & 7.3.1 Awareness QSP 06 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section YES YES No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
including the benefits of for this section this section this section section for this section section section
improved performance;
d) the implications of not conforming with the quality management system
requirements.
The Nexteer Supplier Website provides easy access with links to
Internal and External communications relevant to QMS, incliding
supplier systems and important
a) on what it will communicate;
documents required to do business with Nexteer.
19 QMS MANUAL No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section b) when to communicate; No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No PIAGGIO customer specific requirement
7.4 Communication No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section YES YES (http://www.nexteer.com/doing-business-with-nexteer/)
c) with whom to communicate; this section this section section for this section section for this section
All communication with Nexteer and in Nexteer systems should be
d) how to communicate;
in English to facilitate multi regional
e) who communicates.
sharing of information.
The supplier Shall establish a Quality
managemnet system. It should be set up in
line with the currently applicable version of
ISO/TS 16949. Evidence must be provided
through certification by a certification society
20 7.5.1.1, Quality Management QSP 01 & QSP 03 No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No customer specific requirement for this
No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section Zero audit findings without an agreed upon action plan recognized by the IATF. Any deviation from YES YES YES No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
7.5.2 System documentation for this section this section this section section section
this procedure requires specific approval by
Daimler.
the supplier will set up its QM system and its
sub suppliers are also required to comply
with the requirements of this MBST.
7.5.3.1 & Control of documented No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRWcustomer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this
21 QSP 01 & QSP 03No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No volvo customer specific requirement for this section YES YES YES No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
7.5.3.2 information for this section this section this section section for this section section
Production part approvals, Tooling Records, Product & Preservation For Inspection Record for 11 Years 1. Quality Records - 3 years retention from date of production Supplier project records must be stored by suppliers in a manner
process design records, Purchase Orders or contracts 2. Quality System Documents - 3 years retention from date of creation that will facilitate effective search
and amendments shall be 3. Product Safety Related Records - 15 years from date of product and retrieval as required for business, legal or tax purposes for their
retained for the length of time that the product is manufactured entire retention period.
active for production and service 4. Conformance of Production Parts - 10 years from date of Product Computing and communication resources must be maintained to
requirements ,plus one year. manufactured. The minimum retention period for records The minimum retention period for records access and retrieve records
The storage periods shall be based on VDA The storage periods shall be based on VDA
5. PPAP Documents - Duration of production and service activity throughout the total retention period. These resources may include
pertinent to Customers is 3 years except pertinent to Customers is 3 years except Record for internal quality systems and volume 1. Following the discontinuation of
Plus 1 year Unless otherwise specified by VOLVO Refer 7.9 Record for internal quality systems and volume 1. Following the discontinuation of required operating systems,
No Beneteler customer specific requirement those specified in the table or as specified as those specified in the table or as specified as management review shall be retained for series production, the PPA process YES YES
22 7.5.3.2.1 Record Retention QSP 03 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section management review shall be retained for series production, the PPA process applications, retrieval tools and retention media. Periodically,
for this section Customer specific requirement. The Customer specific requirement. The three years. Refer page no 50 documents shall be archived for 15 years by
three years. Refer page no 50 documents shall be archived for 15 years by Suppliers may be requested to
maximum retention period is product active maximum retention period is product active the supplier and submitted on request.
the supplier and submitted on request. provide retained data.
years + 15 years years + 15 years
Pass through requirements Refer 6.7 --- A VOLVO SMA on-site audit will be
Supplier shall declare SPOC for TML to the concerned
8.4.2 , Type and extent of conducted at the supplier of Safety Critical “pass through parts”. The No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
39 QSP 11 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section SQE. In case of any changes, Supplier will communicate No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
8.4.2.1 control VOLVO safety auditor will conduct the audit focusing on Chapter 1 – this section this section section for this section section section section section
immediately in writing.
“Company Management” and Chapter 4 – “Supplier Chain Management
54 QSP 37 No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents
8.5.5 Post delivery activities No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
for this section this section this section section for this section
55 Service agreement with QSP 37 No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
8.5.5.2 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
customer for this section this section this section section for this section section section section section
The supplier shall inform and get feedback from Renault
Control of changes includes changes to part design, material, and
about any Change in its Product or its Process or its Control 1. The scope of sampling of new and modified sub-tier supplier, manufacturing
means prior to start change implementation. The Supplier
parts supplier is obligated to set the material location (internal or external) or process.
shall inform the relevant SAM in RNPO and the relevant CSDL
Supplier shall inform TML if there is any change in data sheets in IMDS. The ID number for the
in DQSC-F about change proposal with its risks analysis and
Methods / Processes / Tooling or change of premises IMDS data records has to be definied on the Nexteer requires that all suppliers and their sub-tier suppliers
necessary countermeasures to be taken. Then, in case of of its manufacturing facilities (4M Changes). Supplier initial sample cover sheet and in the No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this understand the importance of the timeframe required to get
56 8.5.6, common approval, Change management will be performed No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this
Control of changes QSP 32 shall obtain prior permission from TML for any No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section corresponding Annex " Material data sheet/ section section section section change request approvals through each customer level up to and in
8.5.6.1 accordingly to ANPQP chap. 9 during project phases or for this section this section this section section
changes in product/ process / sub-contractor and shall IMDS". some cases, including the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM).
adapted procedure during serial life. As mentioned in ANPQP, keep TML posted. The changes will be validated and 2. The regulation of MBST 36, especially with
change of or at Tier-2 is included in this requirement.
approved by TML through PPAP route. regard to "confirmation of adherence to Nexteer requested changes require timely response to the Buyer.
substance bans", have to be observed by Supplier responses are required
supplier. within 10 business days.
No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement
Temporary change of No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
57 8.5.6.1.1 QSP 42 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
process controls for this section this section this section section section section section section
Tata motors may deploy 3rd party for inspection &
segregation of parts to protect non confirming parts Model,Part Name, Part no: Date of inspection, Ford reserves the right to require the use of an independent third party
Release of products No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
58 8.6 & 8.6.1 QSP 26 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section issued to assembly line. In Case of 3rd Party inspection item,judgement critieria,Judgement,batch inspector to ensure that the organization only ships compliant product to No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
and services for this section this section this section section for this section section section section section
Deployment at TML, the cost of such deployment will code of lot. Ford facilities.
be debited to supplier.
Supplier shall carry out layout inspection of products 1. The organization shall perform annually a layout inspection (to all
and inform the result to TML dimensional requirements) on at least 5 parts.
Layout inspection and functional testing done and submitted to
once in a year. In case of nonconformity, supplier shall
nexteer yearly once with control plan.
work on the 4M to meet the 2. Where tooling has multiple cavities, tools or centers, the organization
Layout inspection and No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
59 8.6.2 QSP 26 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section specifications. No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section conducts the annual layout on at least one part from each cavity, tool or
functional testing for this section this section this section section for this section section section section section If discrepancies are found in the layout inspection or
center, with a minimum overall sample of 5 parts.
functional tests, the supplier shall include an Interim Recovery
Supplier shall carry out type test for the products of
Worksheet.
their own design and inform the verification result to 3. The measurements are to be documented on the APQP/PPAP Evidence
TML every 6 months. Workbook.
Appearance approval requirements are
60 QSP 26 Appearance approval requirements are specified in PPAP, Volvo customer No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
8.6.3 Appearance Items No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section specified in PPAP, Beneteler customer specific No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
specific requirements. this section this section section for this section section section section section
requirements.
Doc No: AQM / Annexure 01
CUSTOMER SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS Issue no: 1, Date 01.04.2018
Revision no: 3, Date 02.12.2019
RML
S no IATF 16949 IATF CLAUSE RENAULT NISSAN AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED - CSR TATA MOTOR'S - CSR MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD - QUALITY ASSURANCE VOLVO BENETELER COSMA TRW AL DAIMLER M&M VW DAIHATSU PIAGGIO Nexteer
DOCUMENT
Clause ref: DESCRIPTION 1st Edition - Version 2016 REVISION DATE - 01/01/2018 VERTICAL As On 01/05/2016 - Fourth Edition: As On 14/04/2018 - Rev.No. : 12 'K': OCT 2016 , EDITION:2018 THIRD EDITION Release date : September -2017 Supplier Quality Manual: May2012 CSR : Jan'2018 March'2007 June'2012 Release date : 07.10.2019
REFERENCE
Statutory and No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
62 8.6.5 QSP 26 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section See clause 8.4.2.2 No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
regulatory conformity for this section this section this section section section section section section
63 QSP 26 For guidance on product monitoring and reaction plan techniques for No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
8.6.6 Acceptance criteria No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
product conformance to specification for this section this section this section section for this section section section section section
1.Managing Non conforming parts- Inspection reports - In the event non-
conforming parts or materials have been identified at a VOLVO location,
Rane will be notified using an INSPECTION REPORT [IR]. The Inspection
Report is sent to an internet location along with an email to the supplier’s
quality contact.Under normal circumstances, Rane respond immediately to
The supplier shall review FMEA by using Reverse FMEA (R- any nonconformance and ensure that all receiving plants are protected
FMEA) tool. In order to switch from Corrective to preventive within 24 hours. Refer Section 8.1
64 Control of Non- QSP 27 actions, the supplier shall check at shop floor level their 2.Managing Non conforming parts- Corrective action response reporting -- No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents
8.7.1 No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
confirming outputs Existing FMEA and provide necessary activities to avoid An 8D response is required for all non- conformances. It is recommended for this section this section this section section for this section
occurrence or at minimum to improve detection of Non that Rane should respond using the VOLVO 8D format. Rane may respond
conformity. using their corrective action format as long as it includes containment, cause
analysis, problem correction, and problem prevention. To avoid delay and
extra work, Rane should submit their corrective action response format for
approval to their SQE. Refer Section 8.1
3.Managing Non conforming parts- Corrective action response timing --
When notified of a non-conformance Rane should requested to react in
No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section Supplier shall ensure maintaining all parameters of No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section 1.In deviation from VDA Volume 2, the No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
parts as per latest drawing, being supplied to Tata following requirements apply to the DS/DZ
Motors. In case of customer specification deviations, characteristics specified in the Specification
approval must be obtained in advance in the format documents ( e.g, Drawing, CAD data records):
with all agencies approval. Any subsequent deviations * Short term process capability Cmk >= 2.00
in the component will be taken by TML as non- * Long term process capability Cpk >= 1.67.
Customer conformity. This is true for all deviations Request deviations to specifications --- VOLVO will not approve deviations 2. The supplier is responsible for determining
65 QSP 27 No Beneteler customer specific requirement No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this and properly defining the special
8.7.1.1 Authorization for to safety critical characteristics,regulatory requirements characteristics No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement
For any requirement that cannot be met or is not for this section this section section characteristics (e.g. safety, certification,
concession electronic components. Refer 7.2
feasible waiver to be obtained from TML SQA functionally and process relevant) in
department accordance with the specification. the
supplier shall do everything within its power
to exclude the possibility of defective
deliveries.
3. In such cases daimler can demand that
suppliers apply different suitable methods of
TML will communicate non-conformity, if any, on
product and Supplier shall confirm the corrective Control of shipping process includes two level are ;
action taken and date of implementation to close the
non-conformity reported. Supplier shall route such Controlled shipping level 1 - Additional inspection process separate
parts through quality gate till issue is resolved. Supplier from the PPAP
Control of non The ergonomics and the robustness of the method used have shall share the corrective actions reports to TML approved process controls, implemented at the supplier’s
66 conforming product - QSP 27 to be through PRR (Online) in SRM portal with time limit. No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this manufacturing facility.
8.7.1.2 No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section --
Customer specified considered when evaluating conformance to clause 8.3 Initial response within 48 hours and for this section this section this section section for this section section section section section
process (Design and development of products and services) final response within 15 days. Controlled shipping level 2 - Additional inspection process above
The corrective shall be analyzed for occurrence, and beyond CS1, with the
detection failure & system related root causes. additional inspection process being completed by a third party.
67 Control of suspect QSP 27 No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
8.7.1.3 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
product for this section this section this section section for this section section section section section
Control of reworked Supplier shall obtain TML approval before No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
68 8.7.1.4 QSP 40 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
product commencing rework & repair of parts. for this section this section this section section for this section section section section section
Control of repaired Supplier shall obtain TML approval before No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
69 8.7.1.5 QSP 41 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
product commencing rework & repair of parts. for this section this section this section section for this section section section section section
the supplier proves the faultless product
The Controlled Shipping notification clearly identifies the
realization. The supplier documents its quality
dimensions or features that must be
assurance measures with proof of quality
No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this inspected, the supplier’s responsibilities, the minimum duration of
70 8.7.1.6 Customer notification QSP 27 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section assurance.
for this section this section this section section section section section section the inspection, and the specific exit
The supplier shall inform daimler immediately
criteria that must be met before the supplier may request exit from
as soon as violations of the zero defect
controlled shipping.
obligation are foreseeable.
Non conforming parts prevented from being used in subsequent
operations by means of disassembly, distruction or part tracking
Non conforming No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this with BAR code.
71 8.7.1.7 QSP 27 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section
product disposition for this section this section this section section for this section section section section section
Small parts or parts without bar code part is placed automatically
into a lock box with tamper proof chute.
1. Table A of this document details the on-going process capability
requirements.
2. All process controls shall have a goal of reduction of variability, using 6-
125 pice capability studies are required at the time of PPAP for all
sigma or other appropriate methods.
special characteristics unless otherwise agreed upon in the MAPP
3. The Statistical Process Control Manual in 2.11 of this document provides
supplier capability and selection review
additional guidance where tool wear impacts variability.
Suppliers shall maintain the capability index of the 4. All process metrics are to be traceable to Ford requirements.
9.1.1.1, Monitoring and Cpk to Be Calculated with 100 nos of parts during new The 125-piece data points should come from the 300-piece
critical characteristics provided in drawing or agreed Process Capability No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
72 9.1.1.2 & measurement of QSP 26 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section development. minimum PPAP production run, in time-ordered rational subgroups
during SOR / PPAP as per Pro-X manual. Suppliers are 1.The capability index for reporting launch process capability and ongoing for this section this section this section section for this section section section section section
9.1.1.3 manufacturing process Action plan to be submitted when cpk<1.33 of a minimum of 3 pieces.
responsible to plan and execute the requirements to production process capability is Ppk
meet the above index throughout the product life time 2. The organization shall maintain ongoing process capability at
The supplier should use the latest edition of AIAG SPC for
& keep the records. Ppk > 1.33.
manufacturing process controls and AIAG MSA for measurement
3. The requirement for maintenance of ongoing process capability is to be
system equipment management.
included in the production Control Plan and the capability results recorded in
the APQP/PPAP Evidence Workbook.
4. The organization ensures that the 100% inspection methodology prevents
1. The organization shall monitor performance and customer satisfaction
The scorecard calculation is based on Cost (Calendar year % booked
metrics (as defined by Q1) and updates to Ford requirements on Ford
savings), Quality (6 month rolling data), Delivery (6-month average
Supplier Portal (FSP)
score), and Responsiveness (6-
month average score) The Nexteer Supplier Scorecard performance
2. It is recommended that the organization review their performance status
on Supplier Improvement Metrics (SIM) at least weekly. No TRW customer specific requirement for No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this levels are used as a measurement
section section section section tool to compare suppliers:
73 9.1.2 & No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for this section No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents
Customer Satisfaction QSP 22 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section
9.1.2.1 3. At least twice per year, the organization shall communicate customer for this section this section section for this section
Preferred –100 to 85
satisfaction metrics to all employees who affect the quality of Ford Motor
Source-able – 84 to 70
Company parts.
At Risk – 69 and below
a. The organization shall notify its Certification Body of record in writing No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
within five (5) working days if Ford Motor Company places the site on Q1 No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
Revocation No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement
Manufacturing Product Audit: Supplier to conduct product audit at appropriate No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section A.Internal Campaigns 1.Rane supplying production parts or Problem solving - Supplier initial respond due is 24 hrs. Final
As systematic preventive action against Non Conformity stages of production & delivery. components to AL should conduct Layered , response with root cause 14 days .
2.Process Control Audits on all manufacturing No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement
occurrence that could lead to major issue, the supplier shall • First Time Through (FTT) --- Zero production impact
reserve workstations and final control with Safety or/and and assembly lines that produce production Supplier shall complete 5 why and submitted final response.
Benteler reserves the right, at their sole
Regulatory marks to workers with dully controlled experience • Line Stop --- QPM < 50 parts or components for AL. These shall If the part has CL1 or CL2 features, Nexteer Supplier Quality may
discretion, to conduct a process audit at any
and practice. Regular observation reports can be requested include all error-proofing operations. complete an additional review of quality
time during the
during different audits at shop floor level. • Product Audit --- Zero PPM as per vision* 3.Rane should provide evidence of No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement documents to determine if controls are adequate. Additional error
life of the program to ensure Supplier’s
• QPM compliance to the following requirements: proofing may be required as a result of this
process and product continue to meet
74 QSP 23, QSP • PPM No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for 4.The organization shall conduct an internal No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents review.
9.2 Internal Audit Benteler’s requirements.Supplier
24 & QSP 25 this section this section quality audit at least once per year. for this section
understands that negative process audit Supplier shall have a warranty analysis process consistent with AIAG
B.Management System -- Zero audit findings without an agreed upon 5.The run at rate verifies that the supplier‟s
scores (Aggregate or Risk scores < 90%) and CQI-14,
action plan actual manufacturing process is capable of
negative individual question scores (<8) must
producing components that simultaneously
be addressed in a timely and thorough Warrenty problem - completed with root cause 14 calender days
C. Index Audit --- Score over 60% meets: No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement
manner by Supplier’s management
Score greater than 80% 1.AL‟s ongoing quality requirement as stated
Warrenty part retention period - Supplier retained returned parts
in PPAP
2. Daily contracted capacity after analysis or if required minimum 90 days of particular nexteer
D. Process Audit --- Process Audits may be performed under any of the
customer
following circumstances: As a part of the internal quality audit, the
Supplier shall define, implement and review necessary
continuous and scheduled action plan in order to insure ZERO 1. Rane will receive a Rejected material note(
NON CONFORMING PART delivered in Renault Group plants. TML will communicate non-conformity, if any, on RMN) at this time and is required to return a
1.Suppliers shall notify
This road map heading to zero default shall be monthly product and Supplier shall confirm the corrective signed copy (acknowledging receipt) of the
Cosma Chennai - Quality
recorded and be available during audits or Performance action taken and date of implementation to close the notice within twenty-four (24) hours
team when nonconforming
Reviews. non-conformity reported. Supplier shall route such 2. Quality non-conformance will be reflected
or suspect material has been
Finding description: Findings shall be formally acknowledged parts through quality gate till issue is resolved. Supplier monthly on the supplier ratings Refer page
75 Non-confirmity and QSP 29 No Beneteler customer specific requirement shipped. No TRW customer specific requirement for No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents
10.2 by plant manager AND quality manager. (signature). shall share the corrective actions reports to TML No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section no 46 No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Nexteer specific requirements for this section
corrective action for this section 2.Permanent corrective this section for this section
Supplier should reserve 0,5 to 1 day right after the audit to through PRR (Online) in SRM portal with time limit. 3. Corrective action implementation and
action within ten (10)
start asap the corrective process. Initial response within 48 hours and elimination of the root causes of the defects is
working days of the issue
Definition of effectiveness: (What will be the evidence of final response within 15 days. required within 15 days. The supplier MUST
date of the "Incident
effectiveness of corrective actions : Define target and how to The corrective shall be analyzed for occurrence, contact the Ashok Leyland Quality
Report". Refer section 15.4
measure it (what, when)) detection failure & system related root causes. Department when resolution will take longer
It shall be formally defined, preferably with quantified figures than 15 days. Refer page no 46
or as a binary result, such as proof or eradication of the
systemic root causes. This effectiveness definition shall be 1. The organization shall have processes and systems in place to prevent
shipment of non-conforming product to any Ford Motor Company facility. When necessary, Nexteer will provide suppliers with tools and
formalized and communicated to CB jointly with the root
2. The organization should analyze any non-conforming product or process expertise for improvement activities.
cause analysis and prior to the action plan.
Root cause analysis: It shall be documented with a deep output using the 8D methodology to ensure root cause correction and
problem prevention. FTQ issues should be prioritized with action plans showing continual
analysis for occurrence, non detection and systemic cause of
improvement over time.
non-conformity. Each type of cause shall be studied down to 3.Customer Concerns:Organizations shall respond to Quality Rejects
76 10.2.1 & No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement
the root cause thanks to quality tools such as combined No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section (QRs)by:
10.2.2 for this section this section this section section for this section An FTQ improvement process should be implemented during APQP
Ishikawa and 5 why. Note: The clock starts once Ford has sent the notification to the
organization and PPM calculations verified at PPAP and Run-at-Rate.
Causes should be at organization / management level and not
related to individuals. • Responding in 24 hours
Suppliers are responsible to develop and implement a Layered
The first 3 steps should be conducted within 21 days. • Implementing containment in the Ford plant.The organization and/or third
Audit Process.
They shall be formally approved by plant manager AND party must follow local procedures and site rules while carrying out
quality manager containment. No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement
Problem Solving ----- Zero time-lag versus
Problem solving must be thorough enough to solve the
expectations* Formalized problem solving process with
problems.
• QJ/QSP Lead-time Zero Re-occurrence ref No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for forecasting and evidence of process efficiency No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents
77 10.2.3 Problem Solving QSP 44 Acceptance of a problem solving file by a customer is no No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement
Section 8.7 for this section this section this section by a supplier ensures that he has problem for this section
waiver for a poor analysis, as the ultimate goal of the analysis
• Inspection Report Lead-time solving system in place Refer Page no 18
should be for the organization itself to solve its problem
• 8D Robustness
No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
78 10.2.4 Error - proofing QSP 43 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Volvo customer specific requirement for this section No Customer specific requirement
for this section this section this section section for this section section section section section
Supplier shall sign off mutually agreed warranty TRW Warranty costs resulting from supplier
procedure made for supplier designed products and in non-conformances or failure to follow
case of TML designed parts, supplier shall be liable for established and approved processes will be
Warranty/Fault Frequency ---- Zero Safety Issues The length of warranty that the supplier has
any manufacturing defects if observed during the recovered through the Cost Recovery process
79 Warranty Management QSP 37 • External Campaign/Recall Zero Field Issues No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for with the customer is also a major part in No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents No customer specific requirement for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this No Customer specific Requiremnents for this
10.2.5 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section course of usage / product life. Also the supplier will be No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section outlined in 2D.5. For these issues, Warranty No Customer specific requirement
Systems • Quality Journal (QJ) r for this section this section determining his after market support and for this section section section section section
liable for the consequential defects due to part Concerns will be raised in VIN and Warranty
• Customer Claims (for powertrain) ----- presence Refer page 21
manufacturing defects. Cost of Quality will be inclusive of all TRW
Supplier to attend the warranty analysis meeting as incurred expenses including charges from
per schedule. TRW customers. Refer section 2D.6
Doc No: AQM / Annexure 01
CUSTOMER SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS Issue no: 1, Date 01.04.2018
Revision no: 3, Date 02.12.2019
RML
S no IATF 16949 IATF CLAUSE RENAULT NISSAN AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED - CSR TATA MOTOR'S - CSR MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD - QUALITY ASSURANCE VOLVO BENETELER COSMA TRW AL DAIMLER M&M VW DAIHATSU PIAGGIO Nexteer
DOCUMENT
Clause ref: DESCRIPTION 1st Edition - Version 2016 REVISION DATE - 01/01/2018 VERTICAL As On 01/05/2016 - Fourth Edition: As On 14/04/2018 - Rev.No. : 12 'K': OCT 2016 , EDITION:2018 THIRD EDITION Release date : September -2017 Supplier Quality Manual: May2012 CSR : Jan'2018 March'2007 June'2012 Release date : 07.10.2019
REFERENCE
When VOLVO detects an issue in the field and assess that a purchased part is
either directly or indirectly involved, VOLVO will request supplier support in
Supplier shall inform TML in case of any serious
order to investigate the case and fine tune the problem description (1D
Customer complaints process lapse at their end resulting in non -conforming
phase). VOLVO expects the following outcome from the Pre-investigation: No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for No TRW customer specific requirement for No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents
80 10.2.6 and field failure test QSP 31 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section parts being supplied to TML. In this case the supplier No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement
• Parts Analysis for this section this section this section section for this section
analysis will also bear the cost of rework/ rectification at TML
• Initial Cause Analysis
or in the field
• Estimated failure occurrence
• Proposed Containment Action Refer Section 8.7
Rane should have on-going, active improvement projects that target two or TRW recommends suppliers use the
10.2.3 & three of the largest problem areas and be able to demonstrate a positive No Beneteler customer specific requirement No COSMA customer specific requirement for fundamentals outlined in ISO/TS 16949:2009 No AL customer specific requirement for this No Daimler Customer specific Requiremnents
81 Continual improvement QSP 28 No RNAIPL customer specific requirement for this section No TML customer specific requirement for this section No MSIL customer specific requirement for this section No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement No Customer specific requirement
10.3.1 trend in reducing incidents and repeat occurrences Refer Section for this section this section as a platform for organizing continuous section for this section
8.5 improvement plans. Refer section 2D.1