PGS Overview
PGS Overview
THE
PERFORMANCE GOVERNANCE
SYSTEM IN THE PNP
SEQUENCE OF PRESENTATION
• The INTEGRATED TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM (ITP)
• PNP Scorecard
• NEGATIVE
PERCEPTION
• ORGANIZATIONAL
CHANGE
DYSFUNCTIONS AGENDA
• PERSONALITY-
BASED PROGRAMS
GOP-UNDP
STUDY
PNP
TRANSFORMATION
PLAN
PNP REFORM
COMMISSION
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Dream O.N.E. PNP C.A.R.E.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
THE
INTEGRATED TRANSFORMATION
PROGRAM
TRANSFORMATION PROGRAMS
34
PROJECTS
12 KRAs
9 QUICK WINS
EVALUATION
32%
TAGAYTAY CITY
2010
REPRIEVE
THE
PERFORMANCE GOVERNANCE
SYSTEM
LEGAL BASIS
Memorandum from
the Executive
Secretary dated
PNP Mandate RA 8551 June 23, 2009 on the
Executive Briefing of
PGS for the Six (6)
National Government
Agencies
Memorandum from
the Executive Letter of Instruction
Secretary dated July 9, 53/09
2009 mandating the “Institutionalization of
Institutionalization of Performance
PGS in the Six (6) Governance System”
National Government dated August 11, 2009
Agencies
The Executive Secretary
directed the Chief, PNP to
institutionalize the PGS into the
PNP.
Six agencies were
chosen to apply the
globally-recognized
governance model
system through the
assistance of the
DAP and ISA.
The PNP was chosen because:
As maintained by law
With the core values that serve as its
bedrock
o Designed to raise the standards of
governance
Address corruption
Maintain political stability
Upholding the rule of law
Tool for tracking
performance on a regular
basis
Used positively to assist
those who maybe falling
behind targets
Reward those exceeding “...is to translate strategy
into measures that
targets concisely communicate
your vision to the
organization.”
Stretch
but achievable
In setting targets,
begin with the end in mind.
∙outcome ∙base camp year
desired performance level
target
How to
close the
Strategic Initiatives performance
gap?
current reality
baseline
clearly defined
deliverables/outputs
supported by a budget
committed resource
allocation
clear accountability
FONTANA LEISURE PARK, CLARK, PAMPANGA
AUGUST 2009
VISION
Imploring the aid of the Almighty, by 2030, we shall be a highly capable, effective and
credible police service working in partnership with a responsive community towards the
attainment of a safer place to live, work, and do business.
Process
What operational processes must we excel at and best practices
Excellence must we adopt?
Learning How can the PNP develop a highly capable, effective and
and Growth credible organization?
Stakeholders’ How can the PNP gain the active support of the stakeholders?
Support
VISION
Imploring the aid of the Almighty, by 2030, We shall be a highly capable, effective and credible police service working
in partnership with a responsive community towards the attainment of a safer place to live, work, and do business.
Breakthrough Results
INSTITUTIONALIZED Duration: 6 months to 1 year
PATHWAY HALLMARK
Source: ISA
Institutionalization
Proficiency
Compliance
Initiation
City of San Fernando, Pampanga
Davao City
Series of Technical
Working Group
Meeting
VISION
Imploring the aid of the Almighty, by 2030, We shall be a highly capable, effective and credible
police service working in partnership with a responsive community towards the attainment of a
safer place to live, work, and do business.
Highly Capable, Effective and Credible Police Service by 2030
MANDATE
Republic Act 6975 as amended
by RA 8551 and further
amended by A safer place to live, work
RA 9708 and do business
MISSION
Enforce the law, prevent and
control crimes, maintain peace
Improve crime Improve community safety awareness
and order, and ensure public
prevention and through community-oriented and
safety and internal security
control human rights-based policing
with the active support of the
community.
CONTRIBUTORY
TARGET
PERSPECTIVE
IDENTICAL
NEW
N/A
PNP OBJECTIVE MEASURE OWNER
2010
2011 2013 2016
(Baseline)
CONTRIBUTORY
TARGET
PERSPECTIVE
IDENTICAL
NEW
N/A
PNP OBJECTIVE MEASURE OWNER
2010
2011 2013 2016
(Baseline)
CONTRIBUTORY
TARGET
PERSPECTIVE
IDENTICAL
NEW
N/A
PNP OBJECTIVE MEASURE OWNER
2010
2011 2013 2016
(Baseline)
Improve 2 National Safety Index DPCR/ DO, 60.90% 62.90% 64.90% 66.90%
community safety 3 Respect Index DI & DIDM
PROCESS EXCELLENCE
awareness through
B community-oriented
and human rights- 72.60% 74.60% 76.60% 78.60%
based policing
CONTRIBUTORY
TARGET
PERSPECTIVE
IDENTICAL
NEW
N/A
PNP OBJECTIVE MEASURE OWNER
2010
2011 2013 2016
(Baseline)
COMMUNITY
Organizational Development
Proficiency
Compliance
Initiation
PDG BARTOLOME
PDG VERSOZA
CPNP
D-STAFF
PRO
PPO/CPO
CPS/MPS
TARGETS
PNP OBJECTIVES MEASURES
2016
TARGET
National Safety PRO OBJECTIVE MEASURE INITIATIVES
Improve 2016
community safety Index
66.9% Improve crime Regional Ensure implementation
awareness Index Crime of PIPS PRIMARY
solution efficiency INDICATORS
through Rate DRIVERS
ANNUAL
community- Respect Index TARGET
Regional Case monitoring & CRIME Crime Volume
oriented and Crime tracking (UCPER) PREVENTION Crime Ratio
human rights- 78.6% Clearance
based policing Efficiency % increase in the
Enhance number of joint
Regional MOSC Methodology( police community
National Index community
initiated activities
14.7 Crime Case Management) & engagement
Crime Rate
Solution Tracking Safety index
Crime Clearance Efficiency
Improve crime Intensify police % of personnel
Efficiency 45% Number of TF MANHUNT/OPLAN operations employed/ deployed
prevention and
control most wanted TRACKER
CRIME Crime Solution
persons SOLUTION Efficiency
Crime Solution (MWP)
Efficiency 28.49% arrested % of investigative
Maintain and personnel trained
Percentage of deploy and certified
wanted competent % of trained and
persons investigative certified
arrested personnel investigative
personnel deployed
Implement
standard
% increase of cases
investigative
filed in court
systems and
procedures
Note:
KEY PERFORMANCE BL Targets
SECONDARY DRIVERS CRITICAL ACTION with OPR
INDICATORS with OPR 2011 2012 2013