MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 5% Classroom Observation Tool (COT) Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of rating sheet or inter-observer
Services and content within and agreement form from 1. an
Pedagogy across curriculum observation of synchronous
teaching areas.
teaching (limited face-toface
teaching, online teaching, or two-
way radio instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible, an
observation of a recorded video
lesson or audio lesson that is SLM-
Efficiency
based or MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC
Timeliness
Basic 2. Used 5% One (1) lesson plan Quality
Education Research-based with annotations
Services knowledge identifying the
and principles research-based
of teaching knowledge and/or
and learning to principles of teaching
enhance and learning used as
professional basis for planning /
practice designing the lesson

Efficiency
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Displayed 5% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education proficient use (COT) rating sheet or inter-
Services of Mother observer agreement form from
Tongue, 1. an observation of
Filipino and synchronous teaching (limited
English to face-to-face teaching, online Efficiency
facilitate teaching, or two-way radio
teaching and instruction)
learning 2. if option 1 is not possible, an
observation of a recorded video
lesson or audio lesson that is
SLM-based or MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC Timeliness
Basic 4. Used 5% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education effective verbal (COT) rating sheet or inter-
Services and non-verbal observer agreement form from
classroom 1. an observation of
communication synchronous teaching (limited
strategies to face-to-face teaching, online
support learner teaching, or two-way radio
understanding, instruction) Efficiency
participation, 2. if option 1 is not possible, an
engagement observation of a recorded video
and lesson or audio lesson that is
achievement SLM-based or MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC Timeliness
Basic 5. Established Classroom observation tool Quality
Education safe and secure (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services learning observer agreement form about
environments to teacher management of learner
enhance behavior using the following
learning through strategies:
the consistent 1. Providing motivation
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
implementation 2. Praising the learners/Giving Efficiency
of policies, positive feedback
guidelines and 3. Setting house
procedures rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities
to learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
8. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
Basic 6. Used 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education differentiated, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services developmentally inter-observer agreement
appropriate form about using
learning differentiated,
experiences to developmentally appropriate
address learners’ learning experiences
gender, needs, 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
strengths, developed highlighting
interests and differentiation in content,
experiences. product, process, learning Efficiency
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
4. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education and Planning managed and (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services implemented inter-observer agreement
developmentally form about using
sequenced developmentally sequenced
teaching and teaching and learning
learning process
processes to 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
meet curriculum highlighting
requirements and developmentally sequenced
varied teaching instruction that meet
contexts. curriculum goals and varied Efficiency
teaching contexts
3. Instructional materials used
to implement
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning
process to meet curriculum
requirements and varied
teaching contexts
4. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Personal notes of teachers Quality
collegial on LACs/FGDs/meetings
discussions that with proof of attendance
use teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
learner feedback sessions on use of teacher
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
to enrich teaching and learner feedback to Efficiency
practice. enrich teaching practice with
proof of attendance
3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education developed, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services organized and inter-observer agreement
used appropriate form about using appropriate
teaching and teaching and learning
learning resources, including ICT
resources, Examples:
including ICT, to  Activity sheets/task
address learning sheets/work sheets Efficiency
goals.  PowerPoint presentations
 Video clips
 Module
 SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials
 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
with appropriate instructional
materials appended
3. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Assessment selected, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and organized and inter-observer agreement
Reporting used diagnostic, form about using diagnostic,
formative and formative and summative
summative assessment strategies
assessment 2. Prepared lesson
strategies plans/modified DLLs
consistent with highlighting appropriate use
curriculum of formative assessment
requirements. strategies
3. Developed diagnostic tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed summative tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
Efficiency
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample accomplished
rubrics
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of a learner’s Quality
Education evaluated learner written work with summary
Services progress and of results and with signature
achievement of parents
using learner 2. Formative/summative
attainment data. assessment tools with TOS
and frequency of errors with Efficiency
identified least mastered
skills
3. Class records/grading
sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
showing index of mastery Timeliness
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Basic 12. 1. At least 3 samples of Quality
Education Communicated corrected test papers of the
Services promptly and same 3 learners in the same
clearly the learning area with parents’ or
learners’ needs, guardians’ signature and
progress and date of receipt
achievement to
2. Minutes of PTA meetings or
key stakeholders,
Parent-Teacher conferences
including Efficiency
parents/guardians in all quarters with proof of
. parent’s/guardian’s
attendance
3. Report cards with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
4. Communication with
parents/guardians using
various modalities Timeliness
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing
learner needs, progress and
achievement submitted to
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
other stakeholders

Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition or Quality

Education various related Participation
Services works/activities 2. Certificate of Training
that contribute to 3. Certificate of Speakership
the teaching- 4. Committee involvement
learning process. 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular
activities
6. Book or Journal Efficiency
Authorship/Co-authorship/C
ontributorship
7. Coordinatorship/
Chairpersonship
8. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers
10. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Timeliness

Rater Ratee Approving Authority