MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: BIENVENIDO H. CAPONPON JR. Name of Rater: MARJORIE G. MAGTIBAY

Position: TEACHER III Position: TEACHER-IN-CHARGE
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BATANGAS PROVINCE Date of Review: FEBRUARY 6, 2023
Rating Period: SY 2022-223

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Teacher-in-Charge) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7% 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality 4 4
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
observer agreement forms done
Services and content within and through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
Pedagogy across curriculum person classroom observation.
teaching areas. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
classes are not implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous Efficiency 4 4
teaching in other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC
session.

Timeliness
2. Used a range 7% 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality 4 4
of teaching (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
strategies that observer agreement forms done
enhance learner through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
person classroom observation.
achievement in
literacy and If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
numeracy skills. classes are not implemented,
Efficiency 4 4
• through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or

• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC
session. Timeliness
 Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Teacher-in-Charge) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
3. Applied a range 7% 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality 4 3
of teaching (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
strategies to observer agreement forms done
develop critical through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
person classroom observation.
and creative
thinking, as well If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
as other higher- classes are not implemented, Efficiency 3 3
order thinking
skills. • through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or

• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC Timeliness
session.
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 7% 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality 3 3
Education Environment classroom (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
Services and Diversity structure to observer agreement forms done
of Learners engage learners, through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
person classroom observation.
individually or in If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
groups, in classes are not implemented,
meaningful • through observation of
exploration, synchronous/asynchronous
discovery and teaching in other modalities; or Efficiency 4 4
hands-on • through observation of a
activities within a demonstration teaching* via LAC
range of physical session.
learning
environments.
Timeliness
5. Managed 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality 3 3
learner behavior Tool (COT) rating sheets or
constructively by Inter-observer agreement
applying positive forms done through on-site/
and non-violent face-to-face/ in-person
Efficiency 3 3
discipline to classroom observation.
ensure learning-
focused If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
environments. classes are not implemented,
 Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Teacher-in-Charge) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
• through observation of Timeliness 2 2
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC
session.

6. Used 7% Quality 3 3
differentiated, 1. Classroom Observation Tool
developmentally (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
appropriate observer agreement forms done
learning through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
experiences to person classroom observation.
address learners’ If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
gender, needs, classes are not implemented,
• through observation of
strengths, Efficiency
synchronous/asynchronous
interests and teaching in other modalities; or
experiences. • through observation of a Timeliness 2 2
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session.

Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality 3 4

Education and Planning managed and (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
Services implemented observer agreement forms done
developmentally through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
sequenced person classroom observation.
teaching and
learning If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
processes to classes are not implemented,
Efficiency 3 3
meet curriculum
• through observation of
requirements and synchronous/asynchronous
varied teaching teaching in other modalities; or
contexts.
• though observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC Timeliness
 Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Teacher-in-Charge) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
8. Participated in 7% 1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC Quality 3 3
collegial sessions/ FGDs/ meetings/
discussions that other collegial discussions
use teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC sessions/
learner feedback FGDs/ meetings/ other collegial
to enrich teaching discussions on use of teacher
practice. and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice
3. Reflection notes of teachers
on their demonstration of
teaching practices following
participation from LAC sessions/ Efficiency
FGDs/ meetings/ other collegial
discussions that use teacher 3 3
and learner feedback to enrich Timeliness
teaching practice, with proofs of
attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that highlights
the objective
9. Selected, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality 4 4
developed, Tool (COT) rating sheets or
organized and Inter-observer agreement
used appropriate forms done through on-site/
teaching and face-to-face/ in-person
learning classroom observation.
resources, If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
including ICT, to classes are not implemented,
address learning • through observation of Efficiency 4 4
goals. synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or
• though observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC

Timeliness
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Teacher-in-Charge)
per KRA Performance Review
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality 4 3
Education and Reporting selected, organized Tool (COT) rating sheets or
Services and used diagnostic, Inter-observer agreement
formative and forms done through on-site/
face-to-face/ in-person
summative classroom observation.
assessment
strategies consistent If onsite/face-to-face/in-
with curriculum person classes are not
requirements. implemented, Efficiency 3 3
• through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities;
or
• though observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC
Timeliness
11. Monitored and 7% Any one (1) of the Quality 3 3
evaluated learner following:
progress and • Individual Learning
achievement using Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
learner attainment • Peer assessment data
data. • Sample of learners’ outputs
with reflection/ self-
assessment

• Progress charts/ anecdotal

records
• Class/ e-class record/ Efficiency
grading sheets
• Lesson plans showing index 4 4
of mastery
Timeliness
• Frequency of errors with
identified least/most
mastered skills
• Any equivalent ALS form/
document that highlights the
objective (e.g. Individual
Learning Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment Form 2)
• Others (please specify and
provide annotation)
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Teacher-in-Charge)
per KRA Performance Review
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

12. Communicated 7% Any one (1) of the Quality 4 4

promptly and clearly following:
the learners’ needs, • A sample of corrected test
progress and paper of a learner in a
learning area with parent’s or
achievement to key guardian’s signature and date
stakeholders, of receipt
including • Minutes of meetings with
parents/guardians. key stakeholders (e.g. PTA,
SGC, SPT, CPC) with proof
of attendance
• Report card with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
• Communication with key
stakeholders (e.g.
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using various Efficiency
modalities
• Anecdotal records showing Timeliness 3 3
entries per quarter
• Any equivalent ALS form/
document that highlights the
objective (e.g. Individual
Learning Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment Form 2)
• Other documents showing
learners’ needs, progress
and achievement submitted
to other stakeholders

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Rater (Teacher-in-Charge)
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a 7% A reflection/ journal entry Quality 3 3
Education Growth and personal that highlights the
Services Professional philosophy of application of a learner- Efficiency
Development teaching that is centered teaching
 learner- philosophy in the lesson Timeliness 3 3
centered. plan or community work.
14. Set 7% 1. Certification from the ICT Quality 4 4
professional Coordinator/ School Head/
development Focal Person in charge of
goals based on e-SAT
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP Efficiency 4 4
Professional 3. Midyear Review Form
Standards for (MRF)
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP
Phase II Timeliness 4 4
Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality 4 4
Education various related • Committee involvement
Services works/ activities • Involvement as module/
that contribute learning material writer/
to the teaching- validator
learning • Involvement as a resource
process. person/ speaker/ learning
facilitator in the RO/ SDO/
school-initiated TV/Radio-
based instruction
• Book or journal authorship/
co-authorship/
contributorship
• Advisorship/
coordinatorship/ Efficiency 3 3
chairpersonship
• Participation in
demonstration teaching
• Participation as research
presenter in a forum/
conference
• Mentoring of pre-service/ in-
service teachers
• Conducted research within Timeliness 3 3
the rating period
with annotation on how it
contributed to the
teaching-learning process.
BIENVENIDO H. CAPONPON JR. MARJORIE G. MAGTIBAY MARJORIE G. MAGTIBAY
Rater Ratee Approving Authority