MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and content within and inter-observer agreement
Pedagogy across curriculum form about knowledge of
teaching areas. content within and across
curriculum teaching areas
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developed highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
Efficiency
3. Instructional materials
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration in
other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a range 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services strategies that inter-observer agreement
enhance learner form about teaching
achievement in strategies that enhance
literacy and learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy skills
numeracy skills.
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
used in teaching highlighting
learner-centered strategies
that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
3. Instructional materials
highlighting learner-centered Efficiency
strategies that promote
literacy and/or numeracy
skills
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services strategies to inter-observer agreement
develop critical form about teaching
and creative strategies to develop critical
thinking, as well and creative thinking, as
well as other higher-order
as other higher-
thinking skills
order thinking
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
skills. used in teaching highlighting
different teaching strategies
that develop critical and
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
3. Instructional materials Efficiency
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and creative
thinking and/or other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Environment classroom (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and Diversity structure to inter-observer agreement
of Learners engage learners, form about managing
individually or in classroom structure that
groups, in engages learners in various
activities
meaningful Efficiency
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
exploration,
highlighting various
discovery and classroom management
hands-on strategies that engage
activities within a learners in activities/tasks in
range of physical different physical learning
learning environments
environments. 3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation tool Quality
Education learner behavior (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services constructively by observer agreement form about
applying positive teacher management of learner
and non-violent behavior using the following
discipline to strategies:
1. Providing motivation
ensure learning-
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
focused 2. Praising the learners/Giving Efficiency
environments. positive feedback
3. Setting house
rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities
to learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
8. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
Basic 6. Used 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education differentiated, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services developmentally inter-observer agreement
appropriate form about using
learning differentiated,
experiences to developmentally appropriate
learning experiences
address learners’
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
gender, needs,
developed highlighting
strengths, differentiation in content,
interests and product, process, learning Efficiency
experiences. environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
4. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education and Planning managed and (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services implemented inter-observer agreement
developmentally form about using
sequenced developmentally sequenced
teaching and teaching and learning
process
learning
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
processes to
highlighting
meet curriculum developmentally sequenced
requirements and instruction that meet
varied teaching curriculum goals and varied Efficiency
contexts. teaching contexts
3. Instructional materials used
to implement
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning
process to meet curriculum
requirements and varied
teaching contexts
4. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Personal notes of teachers Quality
collegial on LACs/FGDs/meetings
discussions that with proof of attendance
use teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
learner feedback sessions on use of teacher
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
to enrich teaching and learner feedback to Efficiency
practice. enrich teaching practice with
proof of attendance
3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education developed, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services organized and inter-observer agreement
used appropriate form about using appropriate
teaching and teaching and learning
learning resources, including ICT
resources, Examples:
including ICT, to
● Activity sheets/task
address learning Efficiency
goals. sheets/worksheets
● PowerPoint presentations

● Video clips

● Module

● SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials
● Others Timeliness
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
with appropriate instructional
materials appended
3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Assessment selected, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and organized and inter-observer agreement
Reporting used diagnostic, form about using diagnostic,
formative and formative and summative
summative assessment strategies
2. Prepared lesson
assessment
plans/modified DLLs
strategies
highlighting appropriate use
consistent with of formative assessment
curriculum strategies
requirements. 3. Developed diagnostic tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed summative tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
Efficiency
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample accomplished
rubrics
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of a learner’s Quality
Education evaluated learner written work with summary
Services progress and of results and with signature
achievement of parents
using learner 2. Formative/summative
attainment data. assessment tools with TOS
and frequency of errors with Efficiency
identified least mastered
skills
3. Class records/grading
sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
showing index of mastery Timeliness
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Basic 12. 1. At least 3 samples of Quality
Education Communicated corrected test papers of the
Services promptly and same 3 learners in the same
clearly the learning area with parents’ or
learners’ needs, guardians’ signature and
progress and date of receipt
achievement to 2. Minutes of PTA meetings or
key stakeholders, Parent-Teacher conferences
including in all quarters with proof of Efficiency
parents/guardians parent’s/guardian’s
. attendance
3. Report cards with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
4. Communication with
parents/guardians using
various modalities Timeliness
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing
learner needs, progress and
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
achievement submitted to
other stakeholders

Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition or Quality

Education various related Participation
Services works/activities 2. Certificate of Training
that contribute to 3. Certificate of Speakership
the teaching- 4. Committee involvement
learning process. 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular
activities
6. Book or Journal Efficiency
Authorship/Co-authorship/C
ontributorship
7. Coordinatorship/
Chairpersonship
8. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers
10. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Timeliness

Rater Ratee Approving Authority