SVCP 3313 Module 3 Week 6
SVCP 3313 Module 3 Week 6
For intersections with relatively low traffic volumes typically found in rural and
suburban areas, traffic may be assumed to arrive at the intersection in random
fashion. Likewise, the same randomness of arrivals may be observed where spacing
between intersections is of considerable distance. In these situations, signals may not
be necessary and the intersection has to be controlled by traffic signs as discussed in
the previous chapter.
The control of traffic intersections by traffic signals is done by separation in
time, i.e., conflicts between opposing or merging streams are prevented by giving the
right of way to a given direction. This separation in time is termed as signal phasing.
And it can be seen that the more the number of conflicts, the more the number of
phasing needed. However, in some cases as in a major street-minor street intersection,
or in approaches where left-turning volume is relatively low, a separate phasing for the
minor flow may not be necessary. The number of phases employed at any intersection
must be kept to a minimum, compatible with safety because with every phase added,
there is a corresponding additional loss of green time, which eventually leads to
increased intersection delay.
Types of Signals
Nowadays, many types of traffic signals are being used to control traffic flow.
Depending on the distance and influence of one or more signals over the other, the
intersections may be classified as isolated, coordinated or area controlled.
Isolated
Pre-time signal
Pre-time or fixed time signals work best when there is not much fluctuation in
traffic flow. The pre-time signal controller may be of a single or multiprogram type of
controller. The single-program controller makes use of one set of signal parameters to
control traffic flow throughout the day or during the period when the signal is in
operation. On the other hand, the multiprogram type makes use of a number of sets
parameters. This offers greater flexibility and may be able to cope with the fluctuating
demand within the day (figure 5.13). Nowadays, a controller with dive or more
programs is not uncommon.
WJRN 09/27/22
Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation
Lucena City, Philippines
Granted Autonomous Status
CHED CEB Res. 076-2009
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD) cites
the advantages of pre-time control:
TRAFFIC-ACTUATED
A large number of intersections all over the country are still without traffic signals. It
is therefore necessary to have a means of analysis of the performance of this type of
intersection so as to find appropriate measures to minimized congestion and reduce
the occurrence of traffic accidents. The method presented in this section was the basis
of the method discussed in the US Highway Capacity Manual with some modifications.
In our case, it may be better to introduce the original method. As new researches on
the topic are conducted, modifications may be done to suit local conditions. The
method calculates the maximum flow in any given minor road traffic stream. It is them
compared with the existing traffic flow to estimate the reserve capacity. The probable
delay and level of service are determined based on this reserve capacity.
WJRN 09/27/22
Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation
Lucena City, Philippines
Granted Autonomous Status
CHED CEB Res. 076-2009
Consider the four-leg intersection below. Minor movements are movements coming
from the side road or minor road. In addition, the left turn movements from the major
road are also m=considered minor. But in terms of hierarchy, these left turn
movements have higher priority than the movements coming from the minor road.
The method requires that the traffic movements be dealt with in the following order:
a. Right turns into the major road
b. Left turns off the major road
c. Traffic crossing the major road
d. Left turns into the major road
WJRN 09/27/22