Scribd
Upload
218 views1 page

Training Evaluation Form

This document is a training evaluation form from the Bureau of Fire Protection in the Philippines. It asks participants to rate various aspects of a training they attended on a scale of 1 to 5, including general satisfaction with the program, content delivery, the facilitator, and how applicable the training was to their job. It also requests an overall impression of the training and suggestions for improvement. The form collects feedback to evaluate the effectiveness of the training and identify areas for enhancement.

Uploaded by

Richard R M Thodé
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
218 views1 page

Training Evaluation Form

This document is a training evaluation form from the Bureau of Fire Protection in the Philippines. It asks participants to rate various aspects of a training they attended on a scale of 1 to 5, including general satisfaction with the program, content delivery, the facilitator, and how applicable the training was to their job. It also requests an overall impression of the training and suggestions for improvement. The form collects feedback to evaluate the effectiveness of the training and identify areas for enhancement.

Uploaded by

Richard R M Thodé
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Republic of the Philippines

BUREAU OF FIRE PROTECTION


BFP National Headquarters Bldg, Agham Road,
Brgy Bagong Pagasa, Diliman,Q.C.
TRAINING EVALUATION FORM

Training Attended: Date:

Please indicate the level of your impression on the items listed below.

I. General Satisfaction
1. How would you describe the program? 1 2 3 4 5
2. How much did you know about the subject 1 2 3 4 5
before taking this program?
3. How much do you know after 1 2 3 4 5
taking the program?
4. The training met my expectations. 1 2 3 4 5
5. The training objectives were identified and followed. 1 2 3 4 5

II. Content Delivery


1. There was sufficient opportunity for an interactive interaction. 1 2 3 4 5
2. The training was too technical and difficult to understand. 1 2 3 4 5
3. I got most of my questions answered during the training. 1 2 3 4 5
4. The content of the presentation were sufficient to address 1 2 3 4 5
the topic properly.
5. The materials and references used were useful to the training.1 2 3 4 5

III. Facilitator
1. The facilitator's knowledge about the topic 1 2 3 4 5
2. The facilitator encouraged active participation. 1 2 3 4 5
3. The facilitator answered questions in a complete and clear manner.
1 2 3 4 5
4. The Training/Learning and Development Materials used 1 2 3 4 5
facilitator.
5. The facilitator's preparation on the activity. 1 2 3 4 5

IV. Training Specific


1. How do you rate the training over-all? 1 2 3 4 5
2. The training will help do my job. 1 2 3 4 5
Over-all, describe your impression on the training conducted.

How could the training be improved?

Any other comments or suggestions?

5 Outstanding
4 Very Satisfactory
3 Satisfactory
Signature of the participant: _____________________________ 2 Unsatisfactory
1 Poor

BFP-QSF-CDD-004 Rev. ØØ (05.17.18)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy