Design, Fabrication and Test Performance of A Multi-Crop Grating Machine
Design, Fabrication and Test Performance of A Multi-Crop Grating Machine
ABSTRACT
Key words: grating machine, cassava grater, papaya grater, ginger grater,
multi-crop grater
1
Presented during the Southern Luzon Cluster Invention Contests and Exhibits, Legaspi City,
Albay on September 6-9, 2010 sponsored by DOST IV A&B and DOST V. Best R&D Poster, 24th
Regional Symposium on Research and Development Highlights
2
Assistant Professor II; Mechanical Engineer; Faculty, College of Engineering and Technology,
RSU
96
Names of Authors OverFadriquel
this Line
INTRODUCTION
97
Travesía • 2011
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
98
Names of Authors OverFadriquel
this Line
Alternative
ideas from
related
literature and Design
studies Completed
Supplies and Fabrication Multi-Purpose
Materials Grating
Test Performance Machine
Tools and
Equipment
Labor
Cost
FEEDBACK
Materials
99
Travesía • 2011
Fabrication Procedure
1. The Frame
a. Measure and cut the pieces to the required dimension.
b. Assemble the frame. Use an electric arc welding in joining
the angle bars.
c. Grind the protruding welded parts of the frame with a
portable grinder.
d. Use file to grind the protruding parts that are not removed
by the grinder.
100
Names of Authors OverFadriquel
this Line
4. The Shaft
a. Using lathe machine, make a screw at one side of the shaft.
The screw will hold the nut mounted at the grating blade.
b. On the other side of the shaft, make a hole that will then
hold the bigger pulley.
c. Insert the pillow block in the shaft using hydraulic press.
d. Insert the bigger pulley.
e. Assemble and weld the shaft to the frame.
f. Grind the welded parts for smooth finish.
7. Cover
a. Top cover
i. Measure and cut the sheet with a tin cutter.
ii. Grind using sandpaper to ensure smooth finish to
avoid scratches when holding the cover.
101
Travesía • 2011
8. Finishing
a. Grind using sand paper all the rough surfaces of metal.
b. Use number 120 sand paper.
c. Spray the welded parts with a silver paint to avoid
accumulation of rusts. Spray the whole body.
Testing Procedure
1. Cassava
a. Peel the cassava tubers.
b. Wash the cassava tubers.
c. Weight the cassava tubers.
d. Put the tubers in the feeding chute.
e. Switch on the power and push the timer simultaneously.
f. Record the time consumed in grating the cassava.
2. Papaya
a. Peel the papaya.
b. Cut the papaya lengthwise into three.
c. Remove the seeds.
d. Wash the papaya.
e. Weight the papaya.
f. Slice the papaya in order to fit to the chute.
g. Put the papaya in the feeding chute.
h. Switch on the power and push the timer simultaneously.
i. Record the time consumed in grating the papaya.
102
Names of Authors OverFadriquel
this Line
3. Ginger rhizome
a. Wash the ginger rhizome roots thoroughly using brass to
remove soil.
b. Weight the ginger rhizome roots.
c. Put the roots in the feeding chute.
d. Switch on the power and push the timer simultaneously.
e. Record the time consumed in grating the ginger rhizome roots.
Note: The procedure was repeated for all the commodities in five replications
and blades were cleaned every after testing.
Data Analysis
The result of the test was tabulated and analyzed using the average
method. In each type of blade used, actual time recorded per batch of
feeding was summarized and divided by the number of replications made.
Economic Analysis
Other assumptions
103
Travesía • 2011
During the conduct of this research, the only available pulley in the
market was for B-type belt. The researcher decided to use the same type of
pulley. As indicated in the motor plate, the rpm of 1 hp motor is 1730 rpm.
The proponent also decided to use a 2-inch pulley for the motor. From the
interviews conducted to food grinder machine operators in Odiongan
market, most of them said that the average rpm of the food grinder machine
ranged from 800 to 900 rpm, so the researcher decided to use 850 rpm for
the grater. To determine the size of pulley to be used in the grater shafting,
the following formula shown below was used:
The shaft is the major component of the machine since it carries the
load for grating therefore proper sizing is necessary.
3 53.5 (1)
𝐷𝐷𝑠𝑠 = � (850 )
𝐷𝐷𝑠𝑠 = 0.39 ≈ 0.5 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖
The center to center distance of the belt will determine the distance
between the shaft of motor and shaft of the grater. To determine the center
to center distance, the formula as illustrated below was used:
(𝐷𝐷2 −𝐷𝐷1 )
𝐿𝐿 = 1.57 (𝐷𝐷2 + 𝐷𝐷1 ) + 2𝐶𝐶 +
4𝐶𝐶
105
Travesía • 2011
Feeding
250 mm
Cylindrical casing
Pillow block
Pulley
Belt
660 mm
Motor
Frame/ Support
40 mm
25 mm Ø solid shaft
Pillow Block
100 mm Ø Pulley
106
Names of Authors OverFadriquel
this Line
107
Travesía • 2011
76 mm Ø chute
19 mm Ø bolt
270 mm Ø 280 mm Ø
19 mm Ø bolt
240 mm 250 mm Ø
The Grating Unit. The grating unit is a circular case housing the
rotor plate and the grating blade. It extends downward towards an inclined
catch basin which allows the grated cassava to slide and drop into a
collection box. The grating blade is mounted to the shaft connected to a
motor being driven by pulley and v-belt is also supported by bolts and nuts
for easy assembly and dismantling, and for easy access for cleaning. The
rotor plate 280 mm Ø is made of 8 mm thick stainless sheet while the grating
blades are from a nail-punched hole at the bottom thereby creating the
grating blade in the upper portion of the rotor.
The Power Unit. The power unit consists of an electric motor, v-belt
and pulleys. The electric motor with shaft pulley of 2-inch Ø and another one
of 4-inch Ø has 1 horsepower capacity. Such motor is the prime mover of the
machine and also serves as the means through which the belt transmits
power to the shaft. The computed size of the shaft is 0.5 inch in diameter,
but since the shaft was threaded to hold the grating unit, ¾ inch was used.
The researcher used the open (Type B) v-belt.
Machine Cost
The total project cost of the completed grating machine was based
on the expenditures for supplies and materials, labor and other expenditures
summarized below.
109
Travesía • 2011
Machine Performance
As can be noted, the result of the test conducted differs since the
coarse blade has greater capacity than the fine blade.
110
Names of Authors OverFadriquel
this Line
111
Travesía • 2011
As noted, the result of the test conducted differs since the coarse
blade has a greater capacity than the fine blade.
𝑃𝑃8.50
0.746 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 𝑥𝑥 ℎ𝑟𝑟 𝑥𝑥 = 𝑃𝑃 6.34
𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 − ℎ𝑟𝑟
Economic Analysis
112
Names of Authors OverFadriquel
this Line
capacity of 95.83 kg/hr. As noted, the results of the tests conducted differed
because the coarse blade has greater capacity than the fine blade. In the
economic analysis, the five methods used in determining the viability of a
project indicated that an investment for the multi-purpose grating machine
is profitable.
REFERENCES
113