2017 Book MicroelectronicCircuitDesignFo
2017 Book MicroelectronicCircuitDesignFo
Di Paolo Emilio
Microelectronic
Circuit Design
for Energy
Harvesting
Systems
Microelectronic Circuit Design for Energy
Harvesting Systems
Maurizio Di Paolo Emilio
Microelectronic Circuit
Design for Energy
Harvesting Systems
123
Maurizio Di Paolo Emilio
Data Acquisition System
Pescara, Italy
Energy is everywhere, sun, wind, temperature and other sources rarely known like
earth vibrations: all of these are sources of “free” energy. There are not fuel costs.
The only investment required is facility and maintenance. Modern technology has
a lot of “waste energy” that needs to be captured. Producing “green energy” and
harvesting waste energy are the solution to create a better and sustainable world!
Thanks to Tesla, it is possible to gain energy at zero cost, but we don’t know
how to obtain it. There is only one solution to resolve this problem: research and
development. Energy is everywhere, as Tesla said, from the most simple resources
to capture (sun, water, wind) to more complex forms to harvest (vibrations, heat,
sound, movements). Energy harvesting is the solution for small and large energy
requirements: from smartphones to automotive. Thinking about the automotive
market, electric cars were invented more than 20 years ago, but only now there
are companies like Tesla Motors that combine technology and design. They gain
billion dollars in a few days. Energy efficiency is a critical point for electric cars
and a big contribution was given by the development of battery technology and
their evolution. In addition, features like “start and stop” or “regenerative brake”
or even energy studies about “regenerative shock absorbers” were introduced only
in the last few years. The lesson that we learned is to optimise the energy recovery
from a mix of sources and not from a single source. This is the way to obtain the best
performance. How often does a smartphone vibrate and how many times are they
illuminated by sunlight or artificial light or even are they exposed to body heat: : :all
sources of energy! Microelectronic Circuit Design for Energy-Harvesting Systems
is the ideal guide to explore and examine in detail this technology. It is only a matter
of time when smartphones without battery will be produced. Understanding energy
harvesting and its power management means discovering the future of power supply.
ix
x Foreword
The author is the right person to discuss these topics. He is an electronic engineer
and also a physicist, so who is better than him to accompany us in this study?
xi
xii Foreword
power, so it can run forever a little like perpetuum mobile. Who says this is not
doable? I can hardly wait to see what happens next.
Today’s technology world is certainly evolving and is also bringing most innovative
devices that have ever come to the market. One of those is called energy harvesting.
Energy harvesting is the process of taking energy from external sources and
converting it to electrical energy to supply any mobile device. Michael Faraday’s
law of induction found that moving a magnet though a loop of wire would create
an electrical energy in terms of current. This principle can be one point of starting
for energy harvesting. In the early twentieth century, a great scientist tried to pose
the question to which we seek an answer yet. We all live in a solar system with
an enormous amount of energy sent to the earth; adequate protection system (see
the atmosphere) allows us to live and prevent the destruction of the planet under
the powerful yield of energy from the sun. In addition to this, the earth is a living
organism, or an accumulator and generator for various types of known and unknown
energies. The question is legitimate: is it possible to be able to “catch” this enormous
energy and make it available to users? Scientifically speaking, yes, it is possible;
the thing is possible. A classic example is the photovoltaic cells that convert solar
energy into an electrical signal (photovoltaic effect). This question was asked by
Nikolas Tesla. Currently, most of these electronic devices are powered by batteries.
However, batteries have several disadvantages: they need to be replaced or recharge
periodically and mostly they are not handy with their size and weight compared to
a highly electronic technology. One possibility to overcome these power limitations
is to extract energy from the environment to recharge a battery or even to directly
power the electronic device. The environmental energy is naturally occurring in
large and micro-scale; the technologies have been widely disseminated efficiently:
solar energy is an example that although the overall efficiency remains remarkably
low (around 30 %), its usefulness is much appreciated, or almost. Fossil fuels are
limited, expensive and, above all, not environmentally friendly as they induce a
strong impact on land-based pollution. The photovoltaic system is a classical green
system that converts solar energy to electric current to supply electronic devices. It
needs improvements in terms of efficiency and new materials with the goal to be a
system totally dependent in periods of minimum intensity of the sun. In this context,
however, it is fundamental that the battery management system have a great capacity
xiii
xiv Preface
and excellent long-term efficiency. How much energy is available around us? What
kind of energy sources do we have? What is utility? They are some issues to which
we will answer in this book through an engineering discussion with the basic and
advanced concept about physics and electronic circuit. In addition to large-scale
energy such as solar, there are variants of energy, which could be defined on a
small scale to implement in low-power systems such as wearable and smartphone
devices. Walking can also be used to produce energy by using an electromagnetic
mechanism. The electronics and microelectronics are spreading steadily, and many
companies provide day after day IC systems of energy harvesting for different types
of energies such as electromagnetic. The purpose is always to harvest the energy
dispersed in the environment for reusing it in other forms (electric current) to power
other electronic devices or the same device in a way that we could define recycling
energy loop. Collecting all these energies (heat, light, sound, vibration, movement)
could have a significant impact concerning the economic and environmental factors,
reducing costs and developing new sensor technologies. The main part of every
electronic system is the battery, as in a computer or a smartphone, and thinking
to recharge it by external source of energy in a harvesting automatic mode could
be very impressive with zero-impact work process: a smartphone supplied by
environmental energy without battery. Eliminating the battery is a long-term goal
that in some systems such as photovoltaics is definitely an essential element in
the design. The physical aspects that come into play in an energy-harvesting
system can be described in terms of ability to store the energy, materials science,
microelectronics for power management and systems engineering. All electronic
systems such as computer and smartphones waste energy: why not charge your
phone by using its electromagnetic waves that we know to be of greater intensity
during calls and receiving data? Still, why not detect the energy that the universe
sends to us, such as cosmic rays for the realisation of a low-power system to supply
wearable systems. But it is interesting to note that there are other sources that have
emerged from the action of man, as a consequence of industrial and technological
development. These modern energy sources (or artificial) are directly related to
energy harvesting; vibration or temperature gradients are produced by machines
and engines. Even in the electromagnetic spectrum, we can collect the energy not
only from the natural solar radiation but also by all the artificial radio sources
which is acquiring a great importance with the development of web-based devices
concerning IoT and IIoT. The technology behind energy harvesting is possible,
thanks to a careful analysis and design of power management factors that have
reduced the consumption of electronic systems. Although manufacturers struggle
to reduce battery consumption, running out of power after just a few hours of use
and having to be connected to a power supply to recharge are common problems
that need a solution. The goal of the book is to focus on energy harvesting which
is released into the environment in various types: electromagnetic, vibrational and
heat. The most used sources are vibration, movement, all the mechanical energies
and sound that can be captured and converted into electricity using piezoelectric
materials. The heat can be captured and converted into electricity using thermal
and pyroelectric materials. This book describes basic and advanced concepts of
Preface xv
energy harvesting in terms of physics and engineering and then proposes the design
techniques to obtain power supplies for low-power systems. The first six chapters
describe a special technology of energy harvesting including the different principles
of transducer and related materials, power management, storage and design of
system. In addition, design techniques with conditioning circuital solutions to
efficiently manage a low-power system will be analysed. The final chapter describes
various types of energy-harvesting applications and related market with a focus on
future architectures.
I would like to express my gratitude to all those who gave me the possibility
to complete this book. In particular, I want to thank Svetlana Josivofska and
Emanuele Bonanni for their foreword and Charles B. Glaser, editorial director, for
the publication of present book. To my family, thank you for the patience and for
encouraging and inspiring me to follow my dreams. I am especially grateful to my
wife, Julia, and my children, Elisa and Federico.
xvii
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Sensors and Transducers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2.1 Temperature Sensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2.2 Magnetic Field Sensors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2.3 Potentiometers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2.4 Light Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.3 Communications Cabling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.3.1 Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.4 Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.4.1 Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.4.2 Settling Time. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.4.3 DC Input Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2 The Fundamentals of Energy Harvesting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.1 What’s Energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2 Why Energy Harvesting? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.3 Free Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.4 Power Management Unit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.5 Storage Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3 Input Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1 Mechanical Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.2 Thermal Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.3 Electromagnetic Energy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.4 Space Radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.5 Solar Radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.5.1 Photovoltaic Cell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
xix
xx Contents
4 Electromagnetic Transducers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.2 Electromagnetic Waves and Antenna. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.3 System Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
5 Piezoelectric Transducers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.2 Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.3 Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
5.4 System Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
6 Thermoelectric Transducers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
6.2 Seebeck and Peltier Effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
6.3 Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
6.4 Charges in a Semiconductor with a Temperature Gradient. . . . . . . . . 57
6.5 Thermoelectric Effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
6.6 Thomson Effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
6.7 Thermoelectric Generator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
6.8 Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
6.9 Figure of Merit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
7 Electrostatic Transducers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
7.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
7.2 Physical Phenomena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
7.3 Switching System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
7.4 Continuous Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
7.5 Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
8 Powering Microsystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
8.1 Power Conditioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
8.2 Rectifier Circuit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
8.2.1 Bridge Rectifier Circuit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
8.2.2 Zener Diode as Voltage Regulator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
8.2.3 Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
8.3 Piezoelectric Biasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
8.4 Voltage Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
8.5 MPPT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
8.6 Architecture. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
8.7 DC-DC Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
8.7.1 Linear Regulators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
8.7.2 Switching Regulators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
8.7.3 Buck Converter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Contents xxi
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Fundamentals
Data acquisition systems (DAQ) are the main instruments used in laboratory
research from scientists and engineers; in particular, for test and measurement,
automation, and so on. Typically, DAQ systems are general-purpose data acquisition
instruments that are well suited for measuring voltage or current signals. However,
many sensors and transducers output signals must be conditioned before that a board
can acquire and transform in digital the signal. The basic elements of DAQ are
shown in Fig. 1.1 and are:
• Sensors and Transducers
• Field Wiring
• Signal Conditioning
• Data Acquisition Hardware
• Data Acquisition Software
• PC (with operating system).
Transducers can be used to detect a wide range of different physical phenomena
such as movement, electrical signals, radiant energy, and thermal, magnetic, or
mechanical energy. They are used to convert one kind of energy into another kind.
The type of input or output of the transducer used depends on the type of signal
detected or process controlled; in other ways, we can define a transducer as a device
that converts one physical phenomena into another one. Devices with input function
are called Sensors because they detected a physical event that changes according to
some events as, for example, heat or force. Instead, device with output function are
called actuators and are used in control system to monitor and compare the value of
external devices. Sensors and transducers belong to category of transducers.
There are many different types of transducers; each transducer has input and
output characteristics and the choice depends on the goal of your system; for
example, from type of signal must be detected and the control system used to
manage it (see Table 1.1).
Sensors produce in output a proportional voltage or current signal in according
to the variation of physical phenomena that are measuring. There are two types
of sensors: active and passive. Active sensors require external power supply to
work; instead, a passive sensors generate a signal in output without external power
supply. Signal conditioning consists in manage an analog signal in order that it
meets the requirements of the next electronics system for additional processing.
Generally, in various applications of control system there is a sensing stage (for
example, a sensor), conditioning stage, and a processing stage. The conditioning
stage can be built, for example, using operational amplifier to amplify the signal
and, moreover, can include the filtering, converting, range matching, isolation, and
1.2 Sensors and Transducers 3
any other processes required to make sensor output suitable for processing stage.
The processing stage manages the signal conditioned in other stages such as analog-
to-digital converter, microcontroller, and so on [1].
Transducers and sensors are used to convert a physical phenomena into an electrical
signal (voltage or current) that will then be converted into a digital signal used [2]
for the next stage such as a computer, digital system, or memory board.
Several techniques for detection of temperature are currently used. The most
common of these are RTDs, thermocouples, thermistors, and sensor ICs. The choice
of one for your application can depend on some factors such as required temperature
range, linearity, accuracy, cost, and features. Resistance temperature detectors or
RTD are more commonly known; they are built using several different materials
for the sensing element, for example, the Platinum. Platinum is used for different
reasons: high temperature rating, very stable, and very repeatable. Other materials
used for RTD sensors are nickel and copper.
Thermocouple is composed of two different metals that have a common contact
point where it is produced a voltage (some mV) proportional to the variation of
the temperature. Thermistors are generally composed of semiconductor materials.
There are thermistors with positive and negative temperature coefficient. The ther-
mistors with negative temperature coefficient are used to monitor low temperature
of the order of 10 K [2–4]. The temperature coefficient is defined from the following
Eq. (1.1)
1 dR
˛.t/ D (1.1)
R.T/ dT
In general, a linear curve is used working only over a small temperature range.
To accurate temperature measurements, it is necessary to use the Steinhart–Hart
equation (see (1.2)):
1
D a C b ln.R/ C c ln3 .R/ (1.2)
T
where a; b, and c are parameters. The solution of Eq. (1.2) can be written as (1.3):
y 1 y 1
R D e.x 2 / 3 .xC 2 / 3 (1.3)
4 1 Introduction
where
s
3
b y2
xD C (1.4)
3c 4
and
1
a
yD T
(1.5)
c
Typical values of the resistance of 3000 at room temperature (25 C) are the
following:
• a D 1:40 103
• b D 2:37 104
• c D 9:90 108
Magnetic sensors convert magnetic energy into electrical signals for processing
by electronic system. Magnetic sensors are designed to respond to a wide range
of magnetic field; they are mainly used in different applications, in particular, in
automotive systems for the sensing of position, distance, and speed. For example,
the position of the car seats and seat belts for air-bag control or wheel speed
detection for the anti-lock braking system, (ABS). Magnetic sensors work according
to the Hall Effect (see Fig. 1.2): the production of potential difference (Hall Voltage)
across a conductor where a perpendicular magnetic field is applied [5–9].
The output voltage, called the Hall voltage, (VH ) of the basic Hall Element is
directly proportional to the magnetic field .B/ passing through the semiconductor
material:
I
VH D RH B (1.6)
t
where RH is the Hall Effect coefficient, I is the current flow through the sensor in
Ampere, and t is the thickness of the sensor in mm. Most commercial Hall Effect
devices are manufactured with built-in DC amplifiers, voltage regulators to improve
the sensors sensitivity, and the range of output voltage that it is quite small, only few
microvolts [2, 10–15].
1.2 Sensors and Transducers 5
1.2.3 Potentiometers
Light sensors detect light emitted or given off from an object: such as LED, reflected
from surfaces, transmitted from electronics device, and so on. LED or light emitting
diode, is a solid-state semiconductor that emits light when current through it in the
forward direction. A photoelectric (see Fig. 1.4) sensor is an electrical device that
responds to the change in the intensity of the light falling upon it [16–22].
6 1 Introduction
There are many sensing situations where space is too restricted or the environ-
ment too hostile even for remote sensors. Fiber optics is an alternative technology in
sensor “packaging” for such applications such as photoelectric sensing technology.
Moreover, fiber optics are flexible, transparent fiber made of glass (silica). It works
as a waveguide to transmit light [1].
1.3 Communications Cabling 7
Field wiring is the physical connection from the transducers/sensors to the hardware.
When the signal conditioning and/or data acquisition hardware is remotely located
from the PC/devices, then it is necessary to use field wiring that provides the
physical link. In this case, it is very important to estimate the effects of the external
noise, especially in industrial environments. In the next paragraph it provides an
estimation of this noise [1].
1.3.1 Noise
where kB is Boltzmann’s constant (joules per kelvin) and T is the resistor’s absolute
temperature (kelvin).
1.4 Parameters
To properly design a data acquisition system, we must know some important param-
eters. The goal of this section is to describe major system parameters for a better
design in various field of the electronics, in particular, data acquisition systems,
microelectronics, and in the power management system for energy harvesting [23].
1.4.1 Noise
The settling time of an electronic device is the time elapsed from the application
of an ideal step input to the time at which the value output has entered and
remained within a specified error range. Parameters that can describe settling time
are the following: propagation delay and time required for obtain output value
(Fig. 1.5) [23, 28, 29].
Peak Time
Slep Response
0.5
Overshoot
0.4
Steady State
desiderated error
amplitude 0.3
0.2
0.1
Settling time
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Time (Sec)
Rise
Time
It indicates the value of offset voltages, offset currents, and bias current of electronic
devices [30–35].
References
1. Park, J., & Mackqy, S. (2003). Practical data acquisition for instrumentation and system
control Elsevier, Oxford.
2. Lacanette, K. (2003). National temperature sensors handbook. Annali di Matematica Pura ed
Applicata. National Semiconductor.
3. National Instruments. (1996). Data acquisition fundamentals, Application note 007.
4. National Instruments. (1996). Signal conditioning fundamentals for PC-based data acquisi-
tion, Application Note 048
5. Roundy, S. (2003). Energy scavenging for wireless sensor nodes with a focus on vibration to
electricity conversion. Ph.D Thesis, University of California.
6. Tsutsumino, T., Suzuki, Y., Kasagi, N., Kashiwagi, K., & Morizawa, Y. (2006). Micro seismic
electret generator for energy harvesting. Technical Digest PowerMEMS (pp. 133–136).
Berkeley, USA.
7. Sterken, T., Altena, G., Fiorini, P., & Puers, R. (2007). Characterisation of an electrostatic
vibration harvester, EDA Publishing Association.
8. Sterken, T., Baert, K., Puers, R., & Borghs, S. (2002). Power extraction from ambient vibration.
In Proceedings of the SeSens (Workshop on Semiconductor Sensors, Veldhoven, Netherlands)
(pp. 680–683).
9. Szarka, G., Stark, B., & Burrow, S. (2012). Review of power management for energy harvesting
systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 27(2), 803–815. ISSN: 0885-8993.
10. Cammarano, A., Burrow, S. G., Barton, D. A. W., Carrella, A., & Clare, L. R. (2010). Tuning a
resonant energy harvester using a generalized electrical load. Journal of Smart Materials and
Structures, 19, 055003.
11. Guyomar, D., Badel, A., Lefeuvre, E., & Richard, C. (2005). Toward energy harvesting using
active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 584–595.
12. Mitcheson, P. D., Stoianov, I., & Yeatman, E. M. (2012). Power-extraction circuits for
piezoelectric energy harvesters in miniature and low-power applications. IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, 27, 4514–4529.
13. Szarka, G. D., Burrow, S. G., & Stark, B. H. (2012). Ultra-low power, fully-autonomous boost
rectifier for electro-magnetic energy harvesters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
28(7), 3353–3362. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2012.2219594.
14. Maurath, D., Becker, P. F., Spreeman, D., & Manoli, Y. (2012). Efficient energy harvesting
with electromagnetic energy transducers using active low-voltage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State
Circuits, 47(6)
15. Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006). Energy harvesting vibration sources for
microsystems applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, R175–R195.
16. Khaligh, A., Zeng, P., & Zheng, C. (2010). Kinetic energy harvesting using piezoelectric and
electromagnetic technologies—state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
57(3), 850–860.
17. Paulo, J., & Gaspar, P. D. (2010). Review and future trend of energy harvesting methods for
portable medical devices. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2)
10 1 Introduction
18. Zhu, D., Tudor, M. J., & Beeby, S. P. (2010). Strategies for increasing the operating frequency
range of vibration energy harvesters: A review. Measurement Science and Technology, 21,
022001-1–022001-29.
19. Cepnik, C., Lausecker, R., & Wallrabe, U. (2013). Review on electrodynamic energy
harvesters—a classification approach. Micromachines, 4(2), 168–196. http://www.mdpi.com/
2072-666X/4/2/168. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
20. Ulaby, F. T., Michielssen, E., & Ravaioli, U. (2010). Fundamentals of applied electromagnetics
(6th ed.). Prentice Hall.
21. Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., & Rabaey, J. M. (2003). A study of low level vibrations as a power
source for wireless sensor nodes. Computer Communications, 26(11), 1131–1144.
22. Sazonov, E., Li, H., Curry, D., & Pillay, P. (2009). Self-powered sensors for monitoring of
highway bridges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9, 1422–1429.
23. Taylor, J. (1986). Computer-based data acquisition system. Instrument Society of America,
USA.
24. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2013). Data acquisition system, from fundamentals to applied design.
New York: Springer.
25. Roundy, S., Wright, P., & Pister. K. (2002). Micro-electrostatic vibration-to- electricity
converters. In Proceedings of ASME international mechanical engineering congress and
exposition (IMECE) (Vol. 220, pp. 17–22).
26. Stordeur, M., & Stark, I. (1997). Low power thermoelectric generator: Self-sufficient energy
supply for micro systems. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on thermo-
electrics (pp. 575–577).
27. Shenck, N., & Paradiso, J. (2001). Energy scavenging with shoe-mounted piezoelectrics. Micro
IEEE, 21(3), 30–42.
28. Toh, T. T., Mitcheson, P. D., Holmes, A. S., & Yeatman, E. M. (2008). A continuously
rotating energy harvester with maximum power point tracking. Journal of Micromechanics
and Microengineering, 18, 104008-1-7.
29. Howey, D. A., Bansal, A., & Holmes, A. S. (2011). Design and performance of a centimetre-
scale shrouded wind turbine for energy harvesting. Smart Materials and Structures, 20,
085021.
30. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of analog CMOS integrated circuits. McGraw-Hill
31. Razavi, B. (2008). Fundamentals of microelectronics. New York: Wiley.
32. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2013). Microelectronic circuits. Oxford: Oxford University.
33. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of integrated circuits for optical communications. McGraw-Hill.
34. Hurst, P. J. (2001). Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits. New York: Wiley.
35. Spies, P. (2015). Handbook of energy harvesting power supplies and applications. CRC Press
Book, France.
Chapter 2
The Fundamentals of Energy Harvesting
Energy is the capacity to do work; in the physics field, work is something resulting
from the action of a force such as that of gravity. In Nature there are different types
of energy: the most classic case is solar energy and all that energies come from the
universe in the form of cosmic rays, X-rays, gravitational waves, dark matter, etc. A
system that produces energy can be represented from a kite that “floats” in the clouds
by means of wind, or a wave of light is passing through a space. According to the
energy conservation law, for example, one of the first laws of thermodynamics, the
total energy of a system is conserved, although it can be transformed into another
form. Two billiard balls can collide, for example, and energy transformations are
involve with sound and heat at the contact point: this phenomena is derived from
energy conservation law after the collision. In few words, all forms of energy can
be converted into another. This had already begun when the man (or woman) lit
the first fire by burning wood with the transformation of the chemical energy of the
molecules in the form of heat. The energy transfer is based on energy conservation.
Other examples, a battery that generates electrons from chemical reactions, a toaster,
the automobile, and many others. The sound is a form of kinetic energy: it is
caused from vibration of the air molecules described as mathematical models. This
vibration energy is transformed into electrical pulses that can be interpreted from the
human as sound wave. In some systems such as that for the production of nuclear
energy, the atoms are involved in multiple processes: the atoms of the nuclear fuel
are divided by releasing the creation of thermal energy which is capture as water
vapor to drive a kinetic energy generator. Subsequently, a motor turns it into a
current flow to provide power supply. Renewable energy (replenished naturally) is
generated from natural sources such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides, and geothermal
heat, which are renewable (that are replenished naturally). Alternative energy is a
term used for an energy source that is an alternative to the use of fossil fuels with a
low environmental impact [1–6]. In the International System of units (SI), the unit
of energy is the joule, named thanks to James Prescott Joule. It is a derived unit and
matched to the energy expenditure (or work) by applying a force of one Newton for
a distance of one meter. However, energy is also expressed in many other units that
are not part of the SI, as ergs, calories, British Thermal Units, kilowatt hours, and
kilocalories, they require a conversion factor when expressed in SI units. In classical
mechanics, from a mathematical point of view, energy is a conserved quantity. The
work, a form of energy, is a force over a given distance described by the following
equation:
Z
wD Fds (2.1)
C
Eq. (2.1) tells us that the work is equal to the line integral of the force along a
path C. In the energy field some terms are used: Hamiltonian and Lagrangian. The
total energy of a system can be expressed by Hamiltonian by using motion equation
of William Rowan Hamilton. Another energy-related concept is called Lagrange,
from Joseph-Louis Lagrange. This formalism is mathematically more convenient
than the Hamiltonian for non-conservative systems (such as friction systems). The
Lagrange is defined as the kinetic energy minus the potential energy.
An energy harvesting system captures the environmental energy and converts it into
electricity. There are many techniques about this field: for example, to capture the
energy lost or dissipated as heat, light, sound, vibration, or movement, then using
special electronic circuits to manage the collection energy and then transform it into
electrical signal.
This is important, because our existing electrical infrastructure is extremely
wasteful in its use of energy. For example, some today’s technologies used in the
production of electricity are not energy efficient. The old incandescent bulbs, now
they are no longer sold, transform into heat a good percentage of electricity.
An energy harvesting system can be described as in Fig. 2.1. The blocks are
described in the following points:
• Energy transducer used to convert ambient energy into electrical energy of
input. Environmental sources of energy available for the conversion may be
the following: heat (thermoelectric modules), light (solar cells), RF radiation
(antennas), and vibration (piezoelectric).
• Rectifier and super capacitor: a rectifier and an optional storage system for energy
management.
• Voltage regulator: a controller system for adapting the voltage level to the
requirements of the powered device.
2.3 Free Energy 13
Input Energy
Load Voltage
Regulator
Storage
The main energy sources “freely used” are solar, mechanical, and thermal. The self-
powered devices are normally of small dimensions that belong to the category of
wearable devices or otherwise forming part of the Internet of Things (IoT) system.
A possible comparison can be made in terms of power density per unit volume. In
Table 2.1 are summarized the main sources of energy [7–13].
14 2 The Fundamentals of Energy Harvesting
Microcontroller (MCU)
Transceiver
The light is a source of ambient energy available for low and high power
electronic devices. A photovoltaic system generates electricity by converting the
solar for a large number of applications in the various range of power. The sunlight
varies on the surface of the earth, depending on weather conditions and the position
expressed in terms of longitude and latitude. For each position there is an optimal
tilt angle and orientation of the solar cells in order to obtain the maximum radiation
for powering high power systems; these conditions are not suitable in the case of
small solar cells for the wearable electronics where there are not landmarks and the
design is done in according to the general case [14–20]. The sun radiates towards
the earth’s surface with a power density of at least 1350 J/m2 , with a total power on
earth about 170 * 109 MW.
As in almost all the transformations, kinetic energy is the base of the harvesting
in terms of movement of particles such as photons (sun) or generic waves. The
movement or deformation is converted into electrical energy in three main modes:
inductive, electrostatic, and piezoelectric [21–26].
2.4 Power Management Unit 15
The vibrations is the energy source for mechanical transducers and are charac-
terized by two parameters: acceleration and frequency. Table 2.2 visualizes a list of
peak accelerations and frequencies for different vibration sources in the industrial
field. From these data can be noted that the vibrations of industrial machines have
accelerations between 60 and 125 Hz. There is another possibility to use human
body as a source of vibrations. The vibrations associated with the human body have
accelerations with frequencies below about 108 Hz.
The Human Walking, for example, is one of the activities that have more
energy associated for the production of electrical signals. Two power modes can
be distinguished: active and passive. The active power of electronic devices occurs
when the user needs to do a specific work to power the device. The passive mode,
instead, is when the humans must not do any works than their daily activities: finger
movement, walking, heat of the body, etc.
The piezoelectric modules and the transducers operate with an output voltage of
the order of mV, which changes in according to the environmental conditions
and materials used. The electronic circuits, such as microcontrollers or wireless
transceivers which are very often used in power supplies energy harvesting, gener-
ally work with a supply voltage of between 1.8 and 5 V. They need constant power
to maximize their performance. The ripple oscillations declass the performance in
terms of parameters such as noise figure and accuracy. The property to suppress
that noise in a power supply line is expressed by the PSRR. PSRR is introduced to
indicate the amount of noise introduced from a power supply, it stands for “Power
Supply Rejection Ratio” expressed in dB as the ratio of the variation of the supply
voltage in an operational amplifier and the equivalent output voltage (differential).
PSRR is the main design parameter in modern SoC [27–32]. In order to limit the
oscillations, different circuits of power management such as boost converter are
used. The problem of the threshold voltage is reflected in the possibility of not
power a circuit if it doesn’t exceed 0.3 V. Various techniques (star-up circuits) are
used during the startup when the battery is not present in the system. After a level
transition, as soon as the converter provides stable voltage to the circuit, the start-
up circuits are disabled. These circuits are used primarily with thermogenerator.
16 2 The Fundamentals of Energy Harvesting
Another important aspect is the system impedance. With a certain power, the source
must provide maximum power for a given load. To adapt the impedance, Tracker
MPPT circuits such as those employed in the photovoltaic panels are used. In the
switching regulators, frequency variation is reflected in an input impedance change.
In this way, the tracker controls the input resistance to achieve maximum transducer
power. For a piezoelectric, to extract more energy implies a perfect layout of power
management. A transceiver requires a certain time and then a current to run a
data transmission in a specific time. These considerations can be expressed as the
following:
1
Ta D (2.2)
dr D 1m
n
where dr is the data flow of data rate (bytes/s), D are the bytes of data to be
transmitted, n are the bytes of a data package, and m is the length of the package.
In the procedure for sending and receiving data, all necessary blocks are activated
unlike the sleep mode. The average current required by the transceiver is the
following:
Isleep Tsleep C IT TT
ID (2.3)
Ts
where Isleep is the current absorbed by the transceiver in the sleep mode with the
corresponding sleep time, IT is the current consumed during a transmission time TT ,
and Ts is the transmission period which is the sum of the sleep and transmission
time. The important parameters in the selection of a sensor for energy harvesting
applications are the current consumption in both active and passive mode, the
average power and the sleep time. Sensors can provide an analog or digital output.
The I2C/SPI bus provides a direct interface for transmitting data to digital circuits
such as microcontroller. The sensitivity of the sensor is the amount of variation
of the output signal in according to the variation of the measured parameter. A
conditioning circuit to manage the output voltage before being sent to a control
device is required. The response bandwidth of a sensor is expressed in Hertz and
is the maximum rate at which the sensor can work correctly. The microcontrollers
have different working operation mode in according to the current consumption.
In the active mode the consumption is obviously higher than passive mode with
some circuit parts turned off. In the active mode of low-power microcontrollers,
the current consumption is higher than passive mode and all the clocks are active,
while in the low-power consumption mode the CPU and some of the internal
clocks are disabled. In Fig. 2.3 is visualized a generic block diagram of a low-
power microcontroller, while Fig. 2.4 shown a typical current profile for a wireless
transceiver. In an general energy harvesting system, the transceiver is in standby
mode in most of the time to keep the average power consumption to a minimum.
When the data are to be transmitted, the transmission mode is activated and then the
maximum peak current is consumed [33–35].
2.5 Storage Systems 17
ADC
PORTS
CONTROLLER CORE
CLOCK
CPU JTAG FLASH RAM
SYSTEM
INTERRUPTS
In an energy harvesting system, the output voltage is not constant in time. It’s
very important to have the same amount of constant energy over time, a bit as in
photovoltaic devices. That means have the same average power in the time interval
in according to load system. An energy storage element is not necessary if the power
consumption of the electronic device is always less than the power generated by
energy harvesting generator that is actuated only when there is power generated.
18 2 The Fundamentals of Energy Harvesting
For the rest of the cases, an energy storage element is required such as a battery.
The goal is to present a way to compute the initial storage element charge before the
commissioning and the maximum amount of energy needed to store. First, you must
define the energy supplied by the transducer element of energy storage and energy
consumed by the load in a mathematical way must be defined. The average power
can be defined as measuring in the time interval T:
Z
1 T
ps D Ps .t/dt (2.4)
T 0
Considering Tli the time duration during which Ps is less than ps and Thl is the
opposite case, i.e., Ps greater than ps , we can define a deficit (minimum) energy for
the first case, while in the second case an excess (maximum) energy is defined.
The energy collected by the transducer and sent to the element of energy storage
will be within a certain margin:
Z
1 T
Emin Ps .t/dt Emax (2.5)
T 0
The goal for a wearable device, such as also a node of WSN, is to eliminate
the need to replace or recharge the battery. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that
the battery is always maintained to the energy required by the electronic device. To
ensure this, the total energy must be greater than that consumed by the load, in other
words (with B the energy stored in the battery):
X
E>0 (2.6)
X
EB (2.7)
The energy available in the system is equal to the initial energy stored in the
energy collected by the transducer less battery energy consumed by the load and
any losses due to parasitic factors:
X Z T
E D B C Es El Pleak Tdt (2.8)
0
where Pleak is the leakage power of the storage element. In the case of a load with
different power consumption modes as displayed in Fig. 2.4, the calculation of the
required power is done by considering the following equation:
X
N
D Ti (2.9)
iD1
References 19
Ti is the time interval where the consumption power is Pi . Generally the following
equation can be defined:
X
pl D Pi Ti (2.10)
To acquire data from remote locations, the sensor nodes designed for the Internet
of Things (IoT) must be able to function for as long as possible on a single battery
charge. In an ideal approach, it would not need a battery because its existence can
complicate the management of the system. One major problem is that the power is
difficult to “catch,” it comes as a very low level but with phase problems to resolve.
Accordingly, specialized techniques are required for the inputs, which include a
boost converter capable of handling the low-voltage sources, high impedance, and
other characteristics of many energy harvesting modules. Furthermore, circuits such
as boost converters may introduce high frequency noise that may disturb radio
communications.
References
1. Park, J., & Mackqy, S. (2003). Practical Data Acquisition for instrumentation and system
control. Elsevier, Oxford.
2. Lacanette, K. (2003). National temperature sensors handbook. Annali di Matematica Pura ed
Applicata. National Semiconductor.
3. National Instruments. (1996). Data acquisition fundamentals, Application note 007.
4. National Instruments. (1996). Signal conditioning fundamentals for PC-based data acquisi-
tion, Application Note 048
5. Taylor, J. (1986). Computer-based data acquisition system. Instrument Society of America.
6. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2013). Data acquisition system, from fundamentals to applied design.
New York: Springer.
7. Roundy, S., Wright, P., & Pister. K. (2002). Micro-electrostatic vibration-to- electricity con-
verters. In Proceedings of asme international mechanical engineering congress and exposition
(IMECE) (Vol. 220, pp. 17–22).
8. Stordeur, M., & Stark, I. (1997). Low power thermoelectric generator: self-sufficient energy
supply for micro systems. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on thermo-
electrics (pp. 575–577).
9. Shenck, N., & Paradiso, J. (2001). Energy scavenging with shoe-mounted piezoelectrics. Micro
IEEE 21(3), 30–42.
10. Roundy, S. (2003). Energy scavenging for wireless sensor nodes with a focus on vibration to
electricity conversion. Ph.D Thesis, University of California.
11. Tsutsumino, T., Suzuki, Y., Kasagi, N., Kashiwagi, K., & Morizawa, Y. (2006). Micro seismic
electret generator for energy harvesting. Technical Digest PowerMEMS (pp. 133–136).
Berkeley, USA.
12. Sterken, T., Altena, G., Fiorini, P., & Puers, R. (2007). Characterisation of an electrostatic
vibration harvester, EDA Publishing Association.
13. Sterken, T., Baert, K., Puers, R., & Borghs, S. (2002). Power extraction from ambient vibration.
In Proceedings of the SeSens (Workshop on Semiconductor Sensors, Veldhoven, Netherlands)
(pp. 680–683).
20 2 The Fundamentals of Energy Harvesting
14. Szarka, G., Stark, B., & Burrow, S. (2012). Review of power management for energy harvesting
systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 27(2), 803–815. ISSN: 0885-8993.
15. Cammarano, A., Burrow, S. G., Barton, D. A. W., Carrella, A., & Clare, L. R. (2010). Tuning a
resonant energy harvester using a generalized electrical load. Smart Materials and Structures,
19, 055003.
16. Guyomar, D., Badel, A., Lefeuvre, E., & Richard, C. (2005). Toward energy harvesting using
active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 584–595.
17. Mitcheson, P. D., Stoianov, I., & Yeatman, E. M. (2012). Power-extraction circuits for
piezoelectric energy harvesters in miniature and low-power applications. IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, 27, 4514–4529.
18. Szarka, G. D., Burrow, S. G., & Stark, B.H. (2012). Ultra-low power, fully-autonomous boost
rectifier for electro-magnetic energy harvesters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
28(7), 3353–3362. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2012.2219594.
19. Maurath, D., Becker, P. F., Spreeman, D., Manoli, Y. (2012). Efficient energy harvesting with
electromagnetic energy transducers using active low-voltage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State
Circuits, 47(6), 1369–1380
20. Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006). Energy harvesting vibration sources for
microsystems applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, R175–R195.
21. Khaligh, A., Zeng, P., & Zheng, C. (2010). Kinetic energy harvesting using piezoelectric and
electromagnetic technologies—state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
57(3), 850–860.
22. Paulo, J., & Gaspar, P. D. (2010). Review and future trend of energy harvesting methods for
portable medical devices. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2)
23. Zhu, D., Tudor, M. J., Beeby, S. P. (2010). Strategies for increasing the operating frequency
range of vibration energy harvesters: A review. Measurement Science and Technology, 21,
022001-1–022001-29.
24. Cepnik, C., Lausecker, R., & Wallrabe, U. (2013). Review on electrodynamic energy
harvesters—a classification approach. Micromachines, 4(2), 168–196. http://www.mdpi.com/
2072-666X/4/2/168. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
25. Ulaby, F. T., Michielssen, E., & Ravaioli, U. (2010). Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnet-
ics (6th ed.). Prentice Hall, USA.
26. Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., & Rabaey, J. M. (2003). A study of low level vibrations as a power
source for wireless sensor nodes. Computer Communications, 26(11), 1131–1144.
27. Sazonov, E., Li, H., Curry, D., & Pillay, P. (2009). Self-powered sensors for monitoring of
highway bridges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9, 1422–1429.
28. Toh, T. T., Mitcheson, P. D., Holmes, A. S., & Yeatman, E. M. (2008). A continuously
rotating energy harvester with maximum power point tracking. Journal of Micromechanics
and Microengineering, 18, 104008-1-7.
29. Howey, D. A., Bansal, A., & Holmes, A. S. (2011). Design and performance of a centimetre-
scale shrouded wind turbine for energy harvesting. Smart Materials and Structures, 20,
085021.
30. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of analog CMOS integrated circuits. McGraw-Hill
31. Razavi, B. (2008). Fundamentals of microelectronics. New York: Wiley.
32. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2013). Microelectronic circuits. Oxford: Oxford University.
33. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of integrated circuits for optical communications. McGraw-Hill.
34. Hurst, P. J. (2001). Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits. New York: Wiley.
35. Spies, P. (2015). Handbook of energy harvesting power supplies and applications. CRC Press
Book, France.
Chapter 3
Input Energy
where jAj is the amplitude of the motion, ! the frequency in radians per second,
and is the phase angle. To characterize a motion, all parameters are important:
first of all not only the amplitude but also the frequency that identifies the band
Energy Harvesting
Mechanical-
Photovoltaic Seebeck RF Piezo
Electrostatic
DC output
AC output
of frequencies with one dominant and the other of a higher order. The vibrations
excited by humans are under the 2 Hz; those between 20 Hz and 20 kHz are audible
to the human ear and therefore are more likely to be caught. The lowest natural
frequency is called the fundamental frequency or dominant. It is useful to know
the natural frequencies of a structure to tune an energy harvesting system exactly
at a given frequency. The transducers measure the movement and turn it into an
electric signal in the time domain, and then with an FFT in the frequency domain.
The frequency analysis allows to determine the various frequencies and damping
of the system parameters. One or more transducers of movement measure the
output vibration. The signals measured in the time domain are then transformed
into the frequency domain, and modal analysis calculates the natural frequencies,
eigenvectors, and damping parameters of the system. The ability to extract energy
from human activities has been the subject of study for many years. It’s a fact: the
movement of the fingers (a few mW), limb movement (about 10 mW), exhalation
and inhalation, (about 100 mW), and walking (some W). The piezoelectric trans-
ducer offers a collection of higher power density than other electrostatic, especially
thanks to the advantages offered by the MEMS implementation. The maximum
power that is supplied to the energy harvesting devices depends on the frequency
and acceleration of the vibrating system, as well as by the size of the device. A
second-order model is used to analytically describe the process. From Fig. 3.2 a
3.1 Mechanical Energy 23
The damping coefficient can be divided into electrical and mechanical: e and p .
The maximum power is generated at the frequency of resonance and can be
expressed in terms of excitation X:
e
Pmax D m!n3 X 2 (3.3)
4.e C p /2
This model shows how a highly damped system extracts energy over a wide
frequency band. A less damped system would extract more power, but in a smaller
frequency range.
The characterization of the vibrations can occur by means of sensors denomi-
nated accelerometers. Their advantage is to measure the absolute value and then
used directly on the structure. Piezoelectric accelerometers are the most used due to
the high dynamics, small size, and immunity to noise factors. Other techniques are
carried out with piezoresistive or capacitive techniques that can measure static accel-
eration, and electrodynamic accelerometers used to measure very low frequencies.
The accelerometers normally measure the linear acceleration, however, there are
additional sensors which measure the acceleration in the three degrees of freedom.
The block diagram of an accelerometer is displayed in Fig. 3.2, where a mass m
experiences a dynamic force given by the second law of Newton, transformed into
24 3 Input Energy
an electric signal by the piezoelectric effect. The piezoelectric effect is the ability of
a material to respond with a change of electricity in response to a mechanical event
(stress). A piezoelectric characteristic is the reversibility of the effect: namely, the
generation of electrical energy by means of a mechanical stress, and vice versa. The
piezoelectric effect is very useful in many applications are involving the production
and detection of sound, generation of high voltages, microbalance, and in optical
systems. There are many materials, both natural and artificial, which present a
series of piezoelectric effects. Some piezoelectric materials include natural berlinite
(structurally identical to quartz), brown sugar, topaz, and tourmaline. An example of
artificial piezoelectric material comprises barium titanate and lead titanate zirconate.
In recent years, due to growing environmental concerns regarding the toxicity in
devices containing lead and RoHS directives, there has been a push to develop lead-
free piezoelectric materials. To date, this initiative has led to the development of new
lead-free piezoelectric materials [11–17]. The analytical model for an accelerometer
can be described by the following equation:
where is the damping coefficient linked to the inverse of the resonance fre-
quency !o :
p
!0 D k=m (3.5)
In particular, the piezoelectric sensors are used with high frequency sound in
ultrasonic transducers for medical imaging and non-destructive industrial controls.
In any part of the earth there is a thermal gradient and then we can use this to produce
energy. The thermal energy is available primarily in the industrial sector (machinery,
pipes, and vehicles), in buildings, and in the human body. The temperature gradient
exploits the Seebeck effect to generate electricity. To keep the thermal gradient is
need of a heat source on one side and a heat sink on the other. The thermal energy
is a byproduct of other forms of energy such as chemical and mechanical.
When the two ends of a conductor are at different temperatures (Fig. 3.3),
a potential difference is produced between the two ends. Seebeck had thought
to have created a new magnetic field mode but in reality it was an electrical
voltage. The magnitude of the electromotive force V generated between the two
junctions depends on the material and the temperature through the following linear
relationship as a function of the Seebeck coefficient S:
V D ST (3.6)
3.2 Thermal Energy 25
- +
V
where A is the section of the material, the resistivity of the material, l the length
of the thermocouple and indicated with T are the temperatures of the hot (h) and
cold (c) zone. It’s necessary to measure the temperature of each side, minimizing
the local voltage drop. The temperature is measured by a temperature sensor such
as a thermocouple or RTD. The thermistors change the electrical resistance as
function of the temperature and represent a good compromise between various
sensors present on the market in terms of cost, accuracy, and response time. A
thermal resistor or thermistor changes its electrical resistance with the temperature.
There are thermistors with a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) and other with
a negative temperature coefficient (NTC). In mathematical terms, the resistance is
expressed in the following way:
.B.T0 T/
R.T/ D R0 e TT0 (3.8)
1
D a C bln.R/ C dln3 .R/ (3.10)
T
26 3 Input Energy
a B b
R1 R2 +
R1
+
A C
+ Vout
R4 R3 −
Vin Rt
V D +
in
R2 Vout
− −
−
Fig. 3.4 (a) Wheatstone bridge and (b) voltage divider with the resistance of thermistor Rt
Vout R1
D Vin (3.11)
RT .R1 C R0 /2
Antenna
RF - to - DC Power Output
Conversion Conditioning
is growing. The mobile phones are an excellent source of RF energy and could be
a source for providing energy-on-demand for a variety of applications. Thinking of
how many wireless access points can find in a city center, all RF sources that we can
use to recharge, for example, our smartphones. The devices such as Powerharvester
receivers convert the RF energy continuously, working with standard 50 antennas
and provide the ability to maintain the RF-to-DC conversion efficiency in a wide
range of operating conditions, including variations of power in input and output
load resistance. The RF energy can be used to charge a wide range of low-power
devices. At close range, we can recharge GPS or wearable medical sensors and a
wide range of consumer electronics. Depending on the required power, the power
can be sent in a continuous mode, on a scheduled basis, or on-demand [24–30].
The radiation is a form of energy composed of high speed particles. Typically there
are two types of radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing. The first they have a lot of
energy, enough to interfere with the atom and the electron to modify the state, unlike
the other radiation.
Ionizing radiation includes gamma rays, x-rays, protons, electrons, neutrons,
alpha and beta particles; and of non-ionizing radiation includes microwaves, visible
light, infrared, and radio frequency waves. The spatial radiation is ionizing and
consists of highly energetic charged particles.
The solar wind is a stream of charged particles that originated in the upper layers
of the sun. It consists mainly of electrons and protons and blows constantly from the
surface of the sun. The energy possessed by these charged particles is between 1.5
and 10 KeV. The average speed of these particles is about 145 km/s. This speed is
lower than the solar escape velocity of 618 km/s. However, some of the particles are
able to have sufficient energy to reach the terminal velocity of 400 km/s. So, they are
allowed to create the solar wind. At the same temperature, the electrons reach escape
velocity because of their smaller mass which helps to build up an electric field that
28 3 Input Energy
accelerates the charged particles further. The solar wind can travel up to the distance
of 75 astronomical units and the density can vary from 1 to 10 particles/cm3 .
Cosmic rays are high-energy radiation to which the origin of the universe. They
are mainly composed of high-energy protons and atomic nuclei ranging from the
lightest to the heaviest. They also contain high-energy electrons, positrons, and
other subatomic such as muons. The 90 % of cosmic ray nuclei are protons and
about 9 % are alpha particles. The main sources of cosmic rays are supernovae of
massive stars, active galactic nuclei, quasars, and gamma-ray bursts. The highly
charged particles of cosmic rays travel at nearly the speed of light. Most of galactic
cosmic rays have energies ranging from 100 MeV to 10 GeV. Since, cosmic rays are
electrically charged, they are deflected by magnetic fields, and their directions are
random without giving the exact idea of their origin [31–35].
1400
1380
1360
W/m2
1340
1320
1300
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
The power of the incident solar radiation on a surface is called the solar radiation
and is measured in W=m2 . Some considerations about the solar radiation:
• It may be seem surprising that from such big numbers we’ve got to calculate a
value for the power available per square meter outside the atmosphere so close to
the typical values cited in the literature;
• Also, how is it possible to know with such precision the power produced in the
Sun?
• Actually it proceeds in exactly the opposite: it measures the power per square
meter available outside of the atmosphere and, by reversing the calculation, it is
estimated the power radiated by the sun.
The energy received on Earth from the Sun in a year is about 10,000 times the
current energy needs. If we consider a conversion efficiency of 10 % is that it would
require an area of solar panels equal to the area of England, that is one-thousandth
of the Earth’s surface exposed to the Sun (England area = 130.325 km2 , the Earth’s
surface exposed to the Sun D 127:796 106 km2 , and the ratio is 1/980.6).
Conventionally, we define the constant solar radiation outside the atmosphere
equal to 1360 W/m2 . It is interesting to analyze the spectrum of the radiation
emitted by the Sun shown in Fig. 3.7. In particular, some considerations are reported
below:
• The specter measured outside the atmosphere corresponds with high precision to
the theoretical emitted by a black body whose surface temperature is that of the
sun.
2.5
UV Visible Infrared
2 Sunlight top
1
Sea level
H2O
0.5 H2O
O2 Absorption Bands
H2O CO
2 H2O
O3 H2O
0
250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500
• The bulk of the emitted radiation is concentrated in the visible wave lengths
(approximately between 400 and 700 nm).
• The wavelength of the radiation is very important for the interaction with the
photovoltaic cell.
• The spectrum at sea level is significantly different: in general it is attenuated,
but mainly much more jagged and full of “holes”: these are due to the fact that
certain atomic species and the water present in the atmosphere completely absorb
the radiation of specific wavelengths.
As for the spectrum and the power available at sea level they vary depending
on the atmospheric conditions and of the atmosphere traversed thickness, which in
turn depends on the position of the sun in the sky. The minimum thickness is at its
zenith, that is when the Sun occupies a position vertically above the observer’s head
[30–35].
The solar cells exploit the photoelectric effect, i.e., the effect for which a suitable
material, for example, a metal, emits electrons by light radiation. The mechanism
can be explained by assuming to represent the light like a beam of particles called
photons (alternate interpretation of the light wave phenomena).
Each photon, characterized by a certain wavelength, carries a well-defined
amount of energy according to the relation:
hc
ED (3.12)
where E is the energy carried, h is Plank’s constant (equal to 6.626 * 1034 J s), c is
the speed of light, and is the wavelength of the radiation. When a photon strikes
an electron of the metal, it is absorbed and the electron receives energy if the photon
energy is greater than the metal work function: the electron is free to break away;
otherwise the energy is dissipated as heat. Semiconductors are materials in which the
vast majority of external electrons bound to the atoms (that is, those that would be
available to conduct current) occupy the valence band, and only a minimal amount
occupy the conduction band. In semiconductors the valence band and the conduction
band are separated by a well-defined energy gap, for silicon, for example, 1.12 eV.
If we illuminate a silicon surface and the photons have energy higher than that of
the gap between the bands, an electron of the valence band can absorb the photon,
and it can work to acquire the energy and move to the conduction band to conduct
an electric current. A favorable situation is in a particular structure called junction.
It is the union of two semiconductor volumes, each of which has been separately
worked by introducing the impurities in the interior (doping). For example, silicon
is a tetravalent element (each atom is bonded to four other atoms equal, by means
3.5 Solar Radiation 31
of the four valence electrons available external orbital). Adding small amounts of a
pentavalent element (such as phosphorus or arsenic), the fifth electron not engaged
in a link goes to occupy the conduction band, by resulting in an excess of free
negative carriers. There is talk of doping n. Adding small amounts of tetravalent
elements (such as boron), instead, they are generated of unstable bonds with the
surrounding atoms that tend to trap an electron to stabilize, by leaving a positive
charge is not offset gap call, and then an excess of positive charges available to
conduct current. It is important to stress that although there is an excess of positive
and negative charges available to run, a total of the two volumes of doped material
are electrically neutral (the total number of positive charges inside them exactly
compensates the number of negative charges). When the two volumes of the excess
electrons of the n tends zone are contacted to diffuse in the p region; conversely
the excess of p tends to spread in the gaps area n area. This migration produces
an imbalance of electric charge that determines the birth of an electric field that
opposes the diffusion and attracts electrons to zone n and p gaps towards the area.
The equilibrium is reached when the number of charges that moves in one direction
due to diffusion is offset by an equal number of charges that moves in the opposite
direction due to the electric field (drift, Fig. 3.8).
In the single cell, the photocurrent generation coexists with the mechanisms that
regulate the normal flow of current in a p–n junction to vary the voltage at its ends.
The photocurrent has an intensity that depends on many factors: radiation, angle
of incidence, temperature, type of semiconductor, etc. The ideal model is shown in
Fig. 3.9.
The ID has the classic expression of the current of a diode:
qVc
ID D IS .e nKT 1/ (3.13)
The typical load output voltage of a cell is of the order of 0.5–0.6 V (not in
case very close to the classical voltage of a diode in conduction). Typical values of
photocurrent for a cell in silicon are of the order of 30 mA/cm2 . One of the most
popular formats for the cells is approximately square in shape and 125 mm side,
for a total surface of about 156 cm2 ; the short-circuit current is therefore at around
4 A. For the intermediate work points between the open circuit and short circuit the
characteristic of the cell varies according to a graph shown in Fig. 3.10.
32 3 Input Energy
DV
– – + +
– – + +
– – + +
P-Zone – – + + N-Zone
– – + +
– – + +
– – + +
–W1 W2 x
Electric field
ρ Charge density +
–W1 W2 x
–
E Electric field
–W1 W2 x
V DV
Voltage –W1 W2
The output power curve shown in Fig. 3.10 has a maximum (MPP—Maximum
Power Point) which correspond to the values of current and voltage IMPP and
VMPP. The Maximum Power Point (MPP) changes to vary of the characteristics
of the cell. The manufacturers characterize the cells through the CT temperature
coefficient that indicates the variation of delivered power as function of the
temperature. Typical values are between 0.2 and 0.5 %. The efficiency of the
photovoltaic cell is the ratio of the electric power output and the power incident on
the cell. The conversion efficiency varies greatly at different technology used, but in
general is rather low by ranging from 5 to 8 % for the cells of amorphous silicon to
20 % for multi-junction cells.
References 33
IC
IL ID
VC
I,P
ISC
IMPP
VMPP VOC V
Fig. 3.10 I/V characteristic of a photovoltaic cell and output power (dashed line)
References
1. Park, J., & Mackqy, S. (2003). Practical Data Acquisition for instrumentation and system
control. Elsevier, Oxford.
2. Lacanette, K. (2003). National temperature sensors handbook. Annali di Matematica Pura ed
Applicata. National Semiconductor.
3. National Instruments. (1996). Data acquisition fundamentals, application note 007.
4. National Instruments. (1996). Signal conditioning fundamentals for PC-based data acquisi-
tion, Application Note 048
5. Taylor, J. (1986). Computer-based data acquisition system. Instrument Society of America.
34 3 Input Energy
6. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2013). Data acquisition system, from fundamentals to applied design.
New York: Springer.
7. Roundy, S., Wright, P., & Pister. K. (2002). Micro-electrostatic vibration-to- electricity
converters. In Proceedings of ASME international mechanical engineering congress and
exposition (IMECE) (Vol. 220, pp. 17–22).
8. Stordeur, M., & Stark, I. (1997). Low power thermoelectric generator: self-sufficient energy
supply for micro systems. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on thermo-
electrics (pp. 575–577).
9. Shenck, N., & Paradiso, J. (2001). Energy scavenging with shoe-mounted piezoelectrics. Micro
IEEE, 21(3), 30–42.
10. Roundy, S. (2003). Energy scavenging for wireless sensor nodes with a focus on vibration to
electricity conversion. Ph.D Thesis, University of California.
11. Tsutsumino, T., Suzuki, Y., Kasagi, N., Kashiwagi, K., & Morizawa, Y. (2006). Micro seismic
electret generator for energy harvesting. Technical Digest PowerMEMS (pp. 133–136).
Berkeley, USA.
12. Sterken, T., Altena, G., Fiorini, P., & Puers, R. (2007). Characterisation of an electrostatic
vibration harvester, EDA Publishing Association.
13. Sterken, T., Baert, K., Puers, R., & Borghs, S. (2002). Power extraction from ambient vibration.
In Proceedings of the SeSens (Workshop on Semiconductor Sensors, Veldhoven, Netherlands)
(pp. 680–683).
14. Szarka, G., Stark, B., & Burrow, S. (2012). Review of power management for energy harvesting
systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 27(2), 803–815. ISSN: 0885-8993.
15. Cammarano, A., Burrow, S. G., Barton, D. A. W., Carrella, A., & Clare, L. R. (2010). Tuning a
resonant energy harvester using a generalized electrical load. Smart Materials and Structures,
19, 055003.
16. Guyomar, D., Badel, A., Lefeuvre, E., & Richard, C. (2005). Toward energy harvesting using
active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 584–595.
17. Mitcheson, P. D., Stoianov, I., & Yeatman, E. M. (2012). Power-extraction circuits for
piezoelectric energy harvesters in miniature and low-power applications. IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, 27, 4514–4529.
18. Szarka, G. D., Burrow, S. G., & Stark, B.H. (2012). Ultra-low power, fully-autonomous boost
rectifier for electro-magnetic energy harvesters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
28(7), 3353–3362. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2012.2219594.
19. Maurath, D., Becker, P. F., Spreeman, D., Manoli, Y. (2012). Efficient energy harvesting with
electromagnetic energy transducers using active low-voltage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State
Circuits, 47(6), 1369–1380
20. Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006). Energy harvesting vibration sources for
microsystems applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, R175–R195.
21. Khaligh, A., Zeng, P., & Zheng, C. (2010). Kinetic energy harvesting using piezoelectric and
electromagnetic technologies—state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
57(3), 850–860.
22. Paulo, J., & Gaspar, P. D. (2010). Review and future trend of energy harvesting methods for
portable medical devices. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2)
23. Zhu, D., Tudor, M. J., Beeby, S. P. (2010). Strategies for increasing the operating frequency
range of vibration energy harvesters: A review. Measurement Science and Technology, 21,
022001-1–022001-29.
24. Cepnik, C., Lausecker, R., & Wallrabe, U. (2013). Review on electrodynamic energy
harvesters—a classification approach. Micromachines, 4(2), 168–196. http://www.mdpi.com/
2072-666X/4/2/168. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
25. Ulaby, F. T., Michielssen, E., & Ravaioli, U. (2010). Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnet-
ics (6th ed.). Prentice Hall, USA.
26. Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., & Rabaey, J. M. (2003). A study of low level vibrations as a power
source for wireless sensor nodes. Computer Communications, 26(11), 1131–1144.
References 35
27. Sazonov, E., Li, H., Curry, D., & Pillay, P. (2009). Self-powered sensors for monitoring of
highway bridges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9, 1422–1429.
28. Toh, T. T., Mitcheson, P. D., Holmes, A. S., & Yeatman, E. M. (2008). A continuously
rotating energy harvester with maximum power point tracking. Journal of Micromechanics
and Microengineering, 18, 104008-1-7.
29. Howey, D. A., Bansal, A., & Holmes, A. S. (2011). Design and performance of a centimetre-
scale shrouded wind turbine for energy harvesting. Smart Materials and Structures, 20,
085021.
30. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of analog CMOS integrated circuits. McGraw-Hill
31. Razavi, B. (2008). Fundamentals of microelectronics. New York: Wiley.
32. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2013). Microelectronic circuits. Oxford: Oxford University.
33. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of integrated circuits for optical communications. McGraw-Hill.
34. Hurst, P. J. (2001). Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits. New York: Wiley.
35. Spies, P. (2015). Handbook of energy harvesting power supplies and applications. CRC Press
Book, France.
Chapter 4
Electromagnetic Transducers
4.1 Introduction
The electromagnetic waves can travel in space or in a dielectric. The sound waves
are examples of mechanical waves, in contrast to the bright ones (photons) that
represent a type of electromagnetic waves. The electromagnetic waves are created
by the vibration of an electric charge: a wave with an electric and magnetic
component is created. The energy transported has a velocity in vacuum equal to that
Rs Rr
2 2
1k
S Ls Lr
Cr Load
– Cs R
1 1
Fig. 4.1 General layout of an RF energy harvesting. The R block is used to rectify the signal
Antenna Antenna
Field Rectifier Load
T R
of light indicated with the letters c, in a medium speed it is less than c. The transport
mechanism exploits the phenomenon of absorption and re-emission of the wave
energy from the atoms of the material. When an electromagnetic wave affects atoms,
the energy is absorbed with vibration of the electrons that make up the material.
After a short period of vibrational motion, the vibrating electrons create a new
electromagnetic wave with the same frequency of the first electromagnetic wave.
These vibrations occur only for a very short time and the wave motion is delayed
through the medium. Once the electromagnetic wave energy is re-emitted by an
atom, it travels through a small region of space between atoms. Once the next atom
reached, the electromagnetic wave is absorbed, transformed into electron vibration,
and then re-emitted as an electromagnetic wave. As part of the energy harvesting, the
Friis’s equation used in telecommunications engineering provides us the transmitted
power of an antenna in ideal conditions to another antenna at a certain distance.
An antenna is an electrical device that converts electrical energy into radio waves,
and vice versa. It is usually used with a radio transmitter or radio receiver. In
the transmission, a radio transmitter provides a radio frequency oscillating electric
current (that is, a high frequency alternating current (AC)) to the antenna that
radiates the energy from the current as electromagnetic waves (radio waves). In
reception, an antenna intercepts a part of the power of an electromagnetic wave
to produce a small voltage at its terminals where is applied a receiver to amplify
the signal. The electromagnetic waves are described by Maxwell’s equations which
represent one of the most elegant and concise ways to affirm the fundamentals of
electricity and magnetism. From them have been developed most of the industry
working relationships [11–20]. The four equations of Maxwell describe the electric
and magnetic fields arising from the distribution of electrical charges, and how they
change over time. The formulation of the equations is a study of many scientists
and deep insight of Michael Faraday. The first equation expresses the Gauss’ law
for electric fields: the integral of the electric field output on a surface that encloses
a volume is equal to the internal total charge:
4.2 Electromagnetic Waves and Antenna 39
Z
!
!
q
EdA D (4.1)
0
The first two equations of Maxwell are integrals of the electric and magnetic
fields on closed surfaces. The other two equations of Maxwell, discussed below,
are integral of electric and magnetic fields around closed curves which repre-
sent the work required to take a charge around a closed curve in an electric field,
and the similar in the magnetic field. The third is the Faraday’s law of induction and
the fourth is the Ampere’s law:
I Z
!
! d !
!
Ed l D BdA (4.3)
C dt
The first term is integrated around a closed line, usually a wire, and provides the
total variation of the voltage on the circuit that is generated by a variable magnetic
field.
I Z
!
! d !
!
B d l D 0 .I C
0 EdA/ (4.4)
C dt
In differential form the equations for the electromagnetic waves become the
following:
r E D 4 (4.5)
1 @B
rxE D (4.6)
c @t
r BD0 (4.7)
4 1 @E
rxB D JC (4.8)
c c @t
where E is the electric field, B the magnetic field, J the current density, and
the charge density. After the definition of the electromagnetic waves, now we can
evaluate the engineering or how to transmit them by means of antennas, and then
capture them to produce electric current. To begin with the derivation of the Friis
equation considering two antennas in free space (obstructions nearby) separated by
a distance R (Fig. 4.3).
Now, we suppose a transmission antenna omnidirectional, without loss, and the
receiving antenna is far from the transmission range. Pt is the transmission power
and p the power density (in watts per square meter) of the wave received on the
antenna at a distance R from the transmission antenna:
40 4 Electromagnetic Transducers
TX RX
PT
pD Gt (4.9)
4R2
where the parameter Gt is the antenna gain. If the receiving antenna has an effective
capture area Aer , then the power received by the antenna is the following:
PT
Pr D Gt Aer (4.10)
4R2
where the effective capture area can be expressed in the following mode:
Aer D G (4.11)
4
And then the Friis’s formula, namely the expression for the power Pr can be
expressed as follows:
PT Gt Gr 2
Pr D (4.12)
.4R/2
are related to the maximum power allowed to transmit and on the limitation of
transmission between transmitter power and antenna gain: their product is known
as EIRP, effective isotropic power [20–35].
The RF energy harvesting focuses on the receiving layout that needs some tricks to
be able to feed the load properly. The block diagram of receiving part is shown in
Fig. 4.4.
The general layout is composed of a receiving antenna, a rectifier connected
to an RF-side to the receiving antenna and on the DC side of a load. In general,
an impedance matching circuit is applied between the antenna and the rectifier.
In general there is a DC-DC conversion circuit connected to an energy storage
system (battery or capacitor) which is connected to the load. Considering the
equivalent antenna to a voltage source in series with a resistor, the equivalent circuit
is described in Fig. 4.5 where the load and the conversion part is combined in a load
single YL . The matching network is presented as an L network.
jA
R
S
+
– jB YL
IN
L
1 2
Vin Vout
C
1 2
Pin D v Re.Yin / (4.13)
2 in
where Y is the admittance, i.e., the inverse of the impedance. In output, instead, the
power is given by the same expression calculated for YL . To connect the rectifier to
the antenna has been proposed a voltage boosting circuit: a classic example is the
LC circuit (Fig. 4.6).
In this case the gain is expressed in the following way:
vout 1p
gD D 1 C Q2 (4.14)
vs 2
where Q indicates the quality factor of the matching circuit. Whereas the incident
power is given by the following formula:
vs
Pinc D (4.15)
8R2
The output voltage is equal to:
1p
vout D .1 C Q2 / 8R2 Pinc (4.16)
2
The input voltage of the rectifier/multiplier is then dictated by the available power
from the antenna and by the Q factor of the matching circuit. To maximize vout ,
which will be beneficial for the RF-to-DC power conversion efficiency, as well as to
the output voltage DC level, there is need to design a rectifier/multiplier having a real
part of input admittance that is as low as possible. The easiest rectifier is constituted
by a single diode. In general, due to the rapid switching speed, it considers using a
Schottky diode. In Fig. 4.7 an example of circuit with Schottky rectifier diode; in the
circuit is also displayed the equivalent rectifier circuit. The source has an internal
resistance Rg while the Schottky diode is represented by a resistance that expresses
References 43
the conduction losses in the substrate, while Cj is the parasitic capacitance expresses
by the following relation of proportionality as function of the frequency:
1
Cj .f / / q (4.17)
f
1
where is the potential barrier. All these parameters can be determined by using
the data sheet of the single component. The antenna must be connected to a
rectifier/multiplier. Once the frequency band or frequency has been decided, there
is need to start determining the impedance of the input rectifier/multiplier. If we
want to design an antenna without by using an impedance matching circuit, it is
necessary to design an antenna input impedance equals to the complex conjugate
of the impedance of the rectifier input. In addition, we have to design an antenna
with a low resistive part of the input impedance. To achieve this antenna, we must
make the antenna electrically small. In addition, we have to design the antenna that
has a relatively high inductance, which means that we need a small loop antenna.
The RF energy harvesting systems use a recharge battery and an array of antennas
to provide a sufficient energy source to the load.
References
1. Park, J., & Mackqy, S. (2003). Practical Data Acquisition for instrumentation and system
control. Elsevier, Oxford.
2. Lacanette, K. (2003). National temperature sensors handbook. Annali di Matematica Pura ed
Applicata. National Semiconductor.
3. National Instruments. (1996). Data acquisition fundamentals, Application note 007.
44 4 Electromagnetic Transducers
4. National Instruments. (1996). Signal conditioning fundamentals for PC-based data acquisi-
tion, Application Note 048.
5. Taylor, J. (1986). Computer-based data acquisition system. Instrument Society of America.
6. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2013). Data acquisition system, from fundamentals to applied design.
New York: Springer.
7. Roundy, S., Wright, P., & Pister. K. (2002). Micro-electrostatic vibration-to- electricity
converters. In Proceedings of ASME international mechanical engineering congress and
exposition (IMECE) (Vol. 220, pp. 17–22).
8. Stordeur, M., & Stark, I. (1997). Low power thermoelectric generator: self-sufficient energy
supply for micro systems. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on thermo-
electrics (pp. 575–577).
9. Shenck, N., & Paradiso, J. (2001). Energy scavenging with shoe-mounted piezoelectrics. Micro
IEEE, 21(3), 30–42.
10. Roundy, S. (2003). Energy scavenging for wireless sensor nodes with a focus on vibration to
electricity conversion. Ph.D Thesis, University of California.
11. Tsutsumino, T., Suzuki, Y., Kasagi, N., Kashiwagi, K., & Morizawa, Y. (2006). Micro seismic
electret generator for energy harvesting. Technical Digest PowerMEMS (pp. 133–136).
Berkeley, USA.
12. Sterken, T., Altena, G., Fiorini, P., & Puers, R. (2007). Characterisation of an electrostatic
vibration harvester, EDA Publishing Association.
13. Sterken, T., Baert, K., Puers, R., & Borghs, S. (2002). Power extraction from ambient vibration.
In Proceedings of the SeSens (Workshop on Semiconductor Sensors, Veldhoven, Netherlands)
(pp. 680–683).
14. Szarka, G., Stark, B., & Burrow, S. (2012). Review of power management for energy harvesting
systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 27(2), 803–815. ISSN: 0885-8993.
15. Cammarano, A., Burrow, S. G., Barton, D. A. W., Carrella, A., & Clare, L. R. (2010). Tuning a
resonant energy harvester using a generalized electrical load. Smart Materials and Structures,
19, 055003.
16. Guyomar, D., Badel, A., Lefeuvre, E., & Richard, C. (2005). Toward energy harvesting using
active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 584–595.
17. Mitcheson, P. D., Stoianov, I., & Yeatman, E. M. (2012). Power-extraction circuits for
piezoelectric energy harvesters in miniature and low-power applications. IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, 27, 4514–4529.
18. Szarka, G. D., Burrow, S. G., & Stark, B.H. (2012). Ultra-low power, fully-autonomous boost
rectifier for electro-magnetic energy harvesters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
28(7), 3353–3362. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2012.2219594.
19. Maurath, D., Becker, P. F., Spreeman, D., & Manoli, Y. (2012). Efficient energy harvesting
with electromagnetic energy transducers using active low-voltage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State
Circuits, 47(6), 1369–1380.
20. Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006). Energy harvesting vibration sources for
microsystems applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, R175–R195.
21. Khaligh, A., Zeng, P., & Zheng, C. (2010). Kinetic energy harvesting using piezoelectric and
electromagnetic technologies—state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
57(3), 850–860.
22. Paulo, J., & Gaspar, P. D. (2010). Review and future trend of energy harvesting methods for
portable medical devices. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2)
23. Zhu, D., Tudor, M. J., Beeby, S. P. (2010). Strategies for increasing the operating frequency
range of vibration energy harvesters: A review. Measurement Science and Technology, 21,
022001-1–022001-29.
24. Cepnik, C., Lausecker, R., & Wallrabe, U. (2013). Review on electrodynamic energy
harvesters—a classification approach. Micromachines, 4(2), 168–196. http://www.mdpi.com/
2072-666X/4/2/168. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
References 45
25. Ulaby, F. T., Michielssen, E., & Ravaioli, U. (2010). Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnet-
ics (6th ed.). Prentice Hall, USA.
26. Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., & Rabaey, J. M. (2003). A study of low level vibrations as a power
source for wireless sensor nodes. Computer Communications, 26(11), 1131–1144.
27. Sazonov, E., Li, H., Curry, D., & Pillay, P. (2009). Self-powered sensors for monitoring of
highway bridges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9, 1422–1429.
28. Toh, T. T., Mitcheson, P. D., Holmes, A. S., & Yeatman, E. M. (2008). A continuously
rotating energy harvester with maximum power point tracking. Journal of Micromechanics
and Microengineering, 18, 104008-1-7.
29. Howey, D. A., Bansal, A., & Holmes, A. S. (2011). Design and performance of a centimetre-
scale shrouded wind turbine for energy harvesting. Smart Materials and Structures, 20,
085021.
30. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of analog CMOS integrated circuits. McGraw-Hill
31. Razavi, B. (2008). Fundamentals of microelectronics. New York: Wiley.
32. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2013). Microelectronic circuits. Oxford: Oxford University.
33. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of integrated circuits for optical communications. McGraw-Hill.
34. Hurst, P. J. (2001). Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits. New York: Wiley.
35. Spies, P. (2015). Handbook of energy harvesting power supplies and applications. CRC Press
Book, France.
Chapter 5
Piezoelectric Transducers
5.1 Introduction
The piezoelectric effect had its origin in the late 1800s, where the French Curie
discovered some crystals polarization effects subjected to mechanical stress. Apply-
ing an electric field there was also a deformation with implications in the field
of telecommunications. With the passage of time there were many solutions in
lead zirconate and materials PZT (zirconate-titanate). These latter have become the
dominant materials for a variety of applications such as actuators and ultrasonic
medical devices. Subsequently, also polymers such as polyvinylidene difluoride
(PVDF) have been found to have piezoelectric properties because of the stretching
of the molecules. Today, the most important applications of piezoceramics are in
medicine as ultrasonic devices, in the measurements of time (quartz) and the fuel
technology. New applications in micro-energy harvesting need further technical and
economic progress [1–15].
5.2 Materials
The single crystals such as quartz, LiNbO3 , GaPO4 , or Langasite (La3 Ga5 SiO14 )
are less commonly used as piezoelectric devices with respect to Pb (ZRX Ti1-x)
O3 (PZT), but there are, however, some commonly used applications involving
high frequencies or that require resistance to high temperatures. The process for
producing polycrystalline piezoceramic materials generally comprises two stages.
After preparation of the ceramic powder, it provides for the cooking of a mixture
of the oxide powder (calcination) and then milling into fine powder, the ceramic is
sintered to the desired shape. In the preparation of Pb (ZRX Ti1-x) O3 the oxide
powders of PbO, ZrO2 , and TiO2 are weighed in the appropriate proportions. In
the sintering process, the calcined powders are usually mixed in the desired shape.
The final baking process at high temperatures (approx. 1200 ı C for 16 h for PZT)
enables the ceramic to reach its optimum density. The polycrystalline piezoceramic
materials must be polarized in an electric field in order to align the electric
dipoles for improving the piezoelectric properties of the material. Moreover, the
doping with small amounts of impurities can significantly improve the properties.
Currently, many research efforts are aimed for optimizing the properties by selecting
appropriate doping formulas. The most well-known difference is the distinction
between the so-called hard and soft piezoceramic actuators. A material with a
greater than 1 kV/mm field is called hard piezoelectric and a material with a pitch
between 0.1 and 1 kV/mm is called soft piezoelectric. For electrical connection
of the piezoelectric material, suitable electrode materials and related production
processes have to be chosen. The most commonly process uses silver-palladium,
which is sputtered or printed as a polymeric paste on the piezoelectric device. The
piezoelectric effect of any chosen material is limited by its Curie or phase transition
temperature. For the PZT, the Curie temperature varies between 250 ı C and 400 ı C
and is depending on its composition.
5.3 Model
D
E D gT C (5.1)
T
S D sd T C gD (5.2)
Qp D Cp Vp d33 Fp (5.3)
1
zp D d33 Vp Fp (5.4)
kp
d2
k2 D (5.5)
0
T s
The conversion of the vibration energy into electrical energy power is a crucial
point for a successful design of energy harvesting devices. In general, a piezoelectric
energy harvesting system is often modeled as a vibrating system driven and damped.
This structure is constituted by a piezoelectric transducer coupled with the mechan-
ical structure and connected to an energy storage system by an energy harvesting
circuit. A mathematical level can be modeled with a set of N ordinary differential
equations [21–30]. Whereas an energy collection system can be described as a two-
port model with one degree of freedom (Fig. 5.2) due to the fact that an energy
harvesting device is often tuned to a certain natural frequency. In this case the
differential equations can be described by the following:
F(t)
mass
c Energy
k Harvesting
Circuit
mass
c Energy
k Harvesting
Circuit
s(t)
In this case, q.t/ D u.t/ s.t/ represents the difference displacement of the
mass m and the excitation of the base. For a basic solicitation, the right side of the
equation expressed by ms00 .t/ is a d’Alembert force induced by the acceleration
of the ground. The equation of the system energy is obtained by multiplying the
above equation for u for the expression of the tension V.t/. Piezoelectric devices
are often modeled as current sources. The capacitance Cp of their inner electrodes
5.4 System Design 51
is considered in parallel with the load resistor R. Assuming that the internal current
generator is independent of the impedance of the external load, then the term V
can be eliminated from the above equation. This assumption is equivalent to the
statement that the connection is very weak or does not exist.
The voltage generated depends on the load R and the inductance L. It is assumed
that the system is driven by a force of external excitation, which is sinusoidal with a
frequency close to the natural frequency of the system with the piezoelectric element
loaded. To improve the performance of energy harvesting systems with piezoelectric
transducers can be required to apply more than one transducer on the structure.
For practical reasons, the transducers cannot be connected to different collection
circuits, but must be connected in series or in parallel (Fig. 5.4).
The piezoelectric transducers work as electrical generators and can be character-
ized by the equivalent circuit diagram of Fig. 5.4. Cp is the ability of the piezoelectric
transducer and the electric current Ip is resulting from mechanical excitation of the
piezoceramic [30–35]. For a piezo element of width b and length l, the electrical
current can be written as the following in the plane stress hypothesis:
d31 d
Ip .t/ D bl (5.10)
s11 C s12 dt
The current and voltage values on the load can be expressed in conjugate complex
form as follows:
V CP R
52 5 Piezoelectric Transducers
1
Ir D I (5.12)
1 C j!RCp
R
Vr D I (5.13)
1 C j!RCp
By varying the resistance R, it is possible to find the value for which there is the
maximum energy transfer. The power is expressed by the following equation:
I2R
PD (5.14)
1 C .R!Cp /2
I2
Pmax D (5.16)
2!Cp
References
1. Park, J., & Mackqy, S. (2003). Practical Data Acquisition for instrumentation and system
control. Elsevier, Oxford.
2. Lacanette, K. (2003). National temperature sensors handbook. Annali di Matematica Pura ed
Applicata. National Semiconductor.
3. National Instruments. (1996). Data acquisition fundamentals, application note 007.
4. National Instruments. (1996). Signal conditioning fundamentals for PC-based data acquisi-
tion, Application Note 048.
5. Taylor, J. (1986). Computer-based data acquisition system. Instrument Society of America.
6. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2013). Data acquisition system, from fundamentals to applied design.
New York: Springer.
7. Roundy, S., Wright, P., & Pister. K. (2002). Micro-electrostatic vibration-to- electricity
converters. In Proceedings of ASME international mechanical engineering congress and
exposition (IMECE) (Vol. 220, pp. 17–22).
8. Stordeur, M., & Stark, I. (1997). Low power thermoelectric generator: self-sufficient energy
supply for micro systems. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on thermo-
electrics (pp. 575–577).
9. Shenck, N., & Paradiso, J. (2001). Energy scavenging with shoe-mounted piezoelectrics. Micro
IEEE, 21(3), 30–42.
10. Roundy, S. (2003). Energy scavenging for wireless sensor nodes with a focus on vibration to
electricity conversion. Ph.D Thesis, University of California.
11. Tsutsumino, T., Suzuki, Y., Kasagi, N., Kashiwagi, K., & Morizawa, Y. (2006). Micro seismic
electret generator for energy harvesting. Technical Digest PowerMEMS (pp. 133–136).
Berkeley, USA.
References 53
12. Sterken, T., Altena, G., Fiorini, P., & Puers, R. (2007). Characterisation of an electrostatic
vibration harvester, EDA Publishing Association.
13. Sterken, T., Baert, K., Puers, R., & Borghs, S. (2002). Power extraction from ambient vibration.
In Proceedings of the SeSens (Workshop on Semiconductor Sensors, Veldhoven, Netherlands)
(pp. 680–683).
14. Szarka, G., Stark, B., & Burrow, S. (2012). Review of power management for energy harvesting
systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 27(2), 803–815. ISSN: 0885-8993.
15. Cammarano, A., Burrow, S. G., Barton, D. A. W., Carrella, A., & Clare, L. R. (2010). Tuning a
resonant energy harvester using a generalized electrical load. Smart Materials and Structures,
19, 055003.
16. Guyomar, D., Badel, A., Lefeuvre, E., & Richard, C. (2005). Toward energy harvesting using
active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 584–595.
17. Mitcheson, P. D., Stoianov, I., & Yeatman, E. M. (2012). Power-extraction circuits for
piezoelectric energy harvesters in miniature and low-power applications. IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, 27, 4514–4529.
18. Szarka, G. D., Burrow, S. G., & Stark, B.H. (2012). Ultra-low power, fully-autonomous boost
rectifier for electro-magnetic energy harvesters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
28(7), 3353–3362. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2012.2219594.
19. Maurath, D., Becker, P. F., Spreeman, D., & Manoli, Y. (2012). Efficient energy harvesting
with electromagnetic energy transducers using active low-voltage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State
Circuits, 47(6), 1369–1380.
20. Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006). Energy harvesting vibration sources for
microsystems applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, R175–R195.
21. Khaligh, A., Zeng, P., & Zheng, C. (2010). Kinetic energy harvesting using piezoelectric and
electromagnetic technologies—state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
57(3), 850–860.
22. Paulo, J., & Gaspar, P. D. (2010). Review and future trend of energy harvesting methods for
portable medical devices. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2)
23. Zhu, D., Tudor, M. J., Beeby, S. P. (2010). Strategies for increasing the operating frequency
range of vibration energy harvesters: A review. Measurement Science and Technology, 21,
022001-1–022001-29.
24. Cepnik, C., Lausecker, R., & Wallrabe, U. (2013). Review on electrodynamic energy
harvesters—a classification approach. Micromachines, 4(2), 168–196. http://www.mdpi.com/
2072-666X/4/2/168. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
25. Ulaby, F. T., Michielssen, E., & Ravaioli, U. (2010). Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnet-
ics (6th ed.). Prentice Hall, USA.
26. Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., & Rabaey, J. M. (2003). A study of low level vibrations as a power
source for wireless sensor nodes. Computer Communications, 26(11), 1131–1144.
27. Sazonov, E., Li, H., Curry, D., & Pillay, P. (2009). Self-powered sensors for monitoring of
highway bridges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9, 1422–1429.
28. Toh, T. T., Mitcheson, P. D., Holmes, A. S., & Yeatman, E. M. (2008). A continuously
rotating energy harvester with maximum power point tracking. Journal of Micromechanics
and Microengineering, 18, 104008-1-7.
29. Howey, D. A., Bansal, A., & Holmes, A. S. (2011). Design and performance of a centimetre-
scale shrouded wind turbine for energy harvesting. Smart Materials and Structures, 20,
085021.
30. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of analog CMOS integrated circuits. McGraw-Hill
31. Razavi, B. (2008). Fundamentals of microelectronics. New York: Wiley.
32. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2013). Microelectronic circuits. Oxford: Oxford University.
33. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of integrated circuits for optical communications. McGraw-Hill.
34. Hurst, P. J. (2001). Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits. New York: Wiley.
35. Spies, P. (2015). Handbook of energy harvesting power supplies and applications. CRC Press
Book, France.
Chapter 6
Thermoelectric Transducers
6.1 Introduction
V D S.Th Tc / (6.2)
˛ D TS (6.4)
with
˛ D ˛a ˛b (6.5)
and
dS
KDT (6.6)
dT
Although these main thermoelectric effects have been known for a long time, it
is difficult to find explicit expressions in the literature for their three coefficients in
terms of the most fundamental physical quantity. The electrons in the wires occupy
energy levels in pairs of opposite spin. The lower levels are fully occupied and
higher levels are empty and the population of the level is determined by the Fermi-
Dirac statistics [16–25].
To move in the conductor an electron is occupying a certain level, it must
be dispersed to a vacuum level. For this reason, the low-energy electrons do not
contribute to the electric current because their neighboring levels are occupied. The
Fermi level is the energy at which the probability of occupation electron is 0.5.
Only electrons with energies near this level contribute to the current. The average
kinetic energy of the particles is calculated by adding all the velocity squared over
all directions in space in a solid angle of 4 determined by an angle
, from 0 to ,
and azimuth of 2. Each speed is weighed by a probability distribution f0 .x; v;
/:
Z
< v2 > f0 .x; v;
/jvj2 d3 v (6.7)
m 3 mv2 =2KT
f0 .v/ D e (6.8)
2kT 2
6.4 Charges in a Semiconductor with a Temperature Gradient 57
and it is applied to the calculation of < v 2 >. The average kinetic energy is the
following:
Z
< v 2 >D 4 f0 .v/v 4 dv D 3KT=m (6.10)
1 3
m < v 2 >D kT (6.11)
2 2
6.3 Potential
kT
Vc D ln.nL =nR / (6.12)
e
where e is the electron charge and k the Boltzmann constant.
where is the electrical conductivity and E the electric field. By integrating above
equation and to equal Jq to zero:
k
VD T (6.14)
2e
The original Carnot cycle involves the transformation of heat between a hot bath
TH and a TC cold bath from a gas in a cylinder with a movable piston. The heat
flows in part from a hot bath to a cold bath, and in part is converted into mechanical
work in a closed cycle to four reversible stages. Carnot knew nothing of the chemical
potential, even on entropy. Nevertheless, he studied the cycle correctly without these
terms. At each stage of the macroscopic mechanical cycle, the work of the movable
piston is transformed to the thermal motion of the gas particles by elastic collisions
between the particles and the piston. Similarly, the electric work of a power source is
converted into a microscopic thermal heat junction by the acceleration of the charge
carriers in the electric field [26–30].
The electrons that pass through a junction will be slowed down or accelerated by
a contact potential difference Vc . Thus, they absorb or provide a quantity of heat at
the junction eVC , where Vc is calculated above with Peltier coefficients given by the
following equations:
˛a D kTln.nL / (6.15)
˛b D kTln.nR / (6.16)
The Thomson effect refers to the generation of heat by resulting from the passage
of a current along a portion of a single conductor on which is applied a differ-
ence of temperature T. Because of the temperature difference, absorbed heat per
unit of time is given by the following equation:
dQ
D ˇIT (6.17)
dt
where ˇ is the coefficient of Thomson. The origin of the effect is substantially the
same as for the Peltier effect. Here the temperature gradient along the conductor is
6.7 Thermoelectric Generator 59
responsible for differences in potential energy of the charge carriers. The Thomson
effect is not of primary importance in thermoelectric devices, but it should not be
overlooked by detailed calculations.
TH
n-type p-type
TC
L VC
60 6 Thermoelectric Transducers
I
Th Tc
N-type
Output L
power
Heat input
P-type Th Tc
N-type
Heat Output V
absorbed Heat
P-type
constructed by two branches, one of n-type, a p-type material with the length Ln
and Lp , and constant cross sections An and Ap . The two branches are connected
to metal conductors of negligible electrical resistance. The heat is transferred only
by conduction along the branches of the thermocouple. The thermocouple is used
as a current generator by means of Seebeck or Peltier effect. The efficiency of a
generator is defined as the ratio between the energy provided to the load and the
heat absorbed by the junction. The load energy is related to the current and the
resistance itself; the transported heat instead is only linked by thermal conduction
and then the conductivity parameters of the two materials, with another dependence
from Peltier effect [31–35]. The generated current is given by:
.Sp Sn /.Th Tc /
ID (6.18)
R C Rl
6.8 Materials
the Seebeck coefficient squared) has a maximum that is typically located around a
carrier concentration of about 1019 =cm3 . There are two components of the thermal
conductivity: vibration pattern and the electronic part. The latter also increases
with concentration of carriers and typically accounts for about one third of the
thermal conductivity. The maximum amount of energy falls into the region of
semiconductors. Therefore, the semiconductors are the materials of choice for
the further development of thermoelectric devices. Thermoelectric devices were
further classified with respect to the temperature ranges to which they can be
usefully employed. A positive direction of development has been the reduction of
the thermal conductivity, another search for the so-called electronic crystal glass
phonon, in which it is assumed that the crystal structures with weakly bound
atoms or molecules inside an atomic cage should conduct heat like a glass, but
conduct electricity like a crystal. Over the past decade, materials scientists were
optimistic in their belief that the low-dimensional structures such as quantum wells
(materials that are so thin as to be essentially two-dimensional 2D), quantum wires
(very small section and considered to be in one dimension 1D and referred to
as nano-wires), quantum dots that are confined in all directions, and superlattices
(a multi-layer structure of quantum wells) will provide a path for the achievement
of a significant improvement of figures of merit. There are also ongoing attempts to
improve the competitiveness of thermoelectric materials in directions different from
those of the figure of merit, such as reduction of costs, to the development of more
environmentally friendly materials.
.Sp Sn /2
ZT D p p (6.19)
. p p C n n /2
where is the thermal conductivity and the resistivity of the material. By means
of demonstrations, it can be shown that the maximum power is generated when the
external load resistance corresponds to the internal electrical resistance of the pair.
At this operating point, the power produced is given by the following expression:
References
1. Park, J., & Mackqy, S. (2003). Practical Data Acquisition for instrumentation and system
control. Elsevier, Oxford.
2. Lacanette, K. (2003). National temperature sensors handbook. Annali di Matematica Pura ed
Applicata. National Semiconductor.
3. National Instruments. (1996). Data acquisition fundamentals, Application note 007.
4. National Instruments. (1996). Signal conditioning fundamentals for PC-based data acquisi-
tion, Application Note 048
5. Taylor, J. (1986). Computer-based data acquisition system. Instrument Society of America.
6. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2013). Data acquisition system, from fundamentals to applied design.
New York: Springer.
7. Roundy, S., Wright, P., & Pister. K. (2002). Micro-electrostatic vibration-to- electricity
converters. In Proceedings of ASME international mechanical engineering congress and
exposition (IMECE) (Vol. 220, pp. 17–22).
8. Stordeur, M., & Stark, I. (1997). Low power thermoelectric generator: self-sufficient energy
supply for micro systems. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on thermo-
electrics (pp. 575–577).
9. Shenck, N., & Paradiso, J. (2001). Energy scavenging with shoe-mounted piezoelectrics. Micro
IEEE, 21(3), 30–42.
10. Roundy, S. (2003). Energy scavenging for wireless sensor nodes with a focus on vibration to
electricity conversion. Ph.D Thesis, University of California.
11. Tsutsumino, T., Suzuki, Y., Kasagi, N., Kashiwagi, K., & Morizawa, Y. (2006). Micro seismic
electret generator for energy harvesting. Technical Digest PowerMEMS (pp. 133–136).
Berkeley, USA.
12. Sterken, T., Altena, G., Fiorini, P., & Puers, R. (2007). Characterisation of an electrostatic
vibration harvester, EDA Publishing Association.
13. Sterken, T., Baert, K., Puers, R., & Borghs, S. (2002). Power extraction from ambient vibration.
In Proceedings of the SeSens (Workshop on Semiconductor Sensors, Veldhoven, Netherlands)
(pp. 680–683).
14. Szarka, G., Stark, B., & Burrow, S. (2012). Review of power management for energy harvesting
systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 27(2), 803–815. ISSN: 0885-8993.
15. Cammarano, A., Burrow, S. G., Barton, D. A. W., Carrella, A., & Clare, L. R. (2010). Tuning a
resonant energy harvester using a generalized electrical load. Smart Materials and Structures,
19, 055003.
16. Guyomar, D., Badel, A., Lefeuvre, E., & Richard, C. (2005). Toward energy harvesting using
active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 584–595.
17. Mitcheson, P. D., Stoianov, I., & Yeatman, E. M. (2012). Power-extraction circuits for
piezoelectric energy harvesters in miniature and low-power applications. IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, 27, 4514–4529.
References 63
18. Szarka, G. D., Burrow, S. G., & Stark, B.H. (2012). Ultra-low power, fully-autonomous boost
rectifier for electro-magnetic energy harvesters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
28(7), 3353–3362. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2012.2219594.
19. Maurath, D., Becker, P. F., Spreeman, D., & Manoli, Y. (2012). Efficient energy harvesting
with electromagnetic energy transducers using active low-voltage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State
Circuits, 47(6), 1369–1380.
20. Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006). Energy harvesting vibration sources for
microsystems applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, R175–R195.
21. Khaligh, A., Zeng, P., & Zheng, C. (2010). Kinetic energy harvesting using piezoelectric and
electromagnetic technologies—state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
57(3), 850–860.
22. Paulo, J., & Gaspar, P. D. (2010). Review and future trend of energy harvesting methods for
portable medical devices. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2)
23. Zhu, D., Tudor, M. J., Beeby, S. P. (2010). Strategies for increasing the operating frequency
range of vibration energy harvesters: A review. Measurement Science and Technology, 21,
022001-1–022001-29.
24. Cepnik, C., Lausecker, R., & Wallrabe, U. (2013). Review on electrodynamic energy
harvesters—a classification approach. Micromachines, 4(2), 168–196. http://www.mdpi.com/
2072-666X/4/2/168. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
25. Ulaby, F. T., Michielssen, E., & Ravaioli, U. (2010). Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnet-
ics (6th ed.). Prentice Hall, USA.
26. Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., & Rabaey, J. M. (2003). A study of low level vibrations as a power
source for wireless sensor nodes. Computer Communications, 26(11), 1131–1144.
27. Sazonov, E., Li, H., Curry, D., & Pillay, P. (2009). Self-powered sensors for monitoring of
highway bridges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9, 1422–1429.
28. Toh, T. T., Mitcheson, P. D., Holmes, A. S., & Yeatman, E. M. (2008). A continuously
rotating energy harvester with maximum power point tracking. Journal of Micromechanics
and Microengineering, 18, 104008-1-7.
29. Howey, D. A., Bansal, A., & Holmes, A. S. (2011). Design and performance of a centimetre-
scale shrouded wind turbine for energy harvesting. Smart Materials and Structures, 20,
085021.
30. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of analog CMOS integrated circuits. McGraw-Hill
31. Razavi, B. (2008). Fundamentals of microelectronics. New York: Wiley.
32. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2013). Microelectronic circuits. Oxford: Oxford University.
33. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of integrated circuits for optical communications. McGraw-Hill.
34. Hurst, P. J. (2001). Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits. New York: Wiley.
35. Spies, P. (2015). Handbook of energy harvesting power supplies and applications. CRC Press
Book, France.
Chapter 7
Electrostatic Transducers
7.1 Introduction
m
Zl z(t)
De Dp
1 2
ED CV (7.1)
2
The physical principle of energy conversion cycle depends on the conditioning
circuit common to all energy harvesting generators and how the variable capacitor
is connected to the corresponding electrical circuits. In general we can distinguish
two types of connection: switching and continuous systems.
7.3 Switching System 67
The switched connection between the transducer and the circuit involves a recon-
figuration of the system, through the operation of switch in different phases of the
generation cycle. The switched transducers can be further divided into two main
types: constant charge and constant voltage. In the constant charge if a variable
capacitor is pre-loaded to maximum capacity and then disconnected from any
external circuit before the capacitor geometry is modified by the motion, then the
extra energy will be stored in the electric field between the electrodes as a work
against the force electrostatic [16–25]. This energy can then be used to power a
circuit. The most common way in which this approach is implemented is shown in
Fig. 7.2.
The device is pre-charged to a low voltage in the first part of the cycle as shown
in the diagram QV of Fig. 7.2. The plates are arranged so that they can be separated,
thereby increasing the distance between them. The movement produces a constant
force between the two electrodes. The area outlined by QV diagram represents
the electricity generated. In the constant voltage mode, the capacitor is connected
to a constant voltage (possibly supplied by a battery), a reduction of capacity
between the electrodes caused by the relative motion of the plates would lead to
the charge to be removed from the condenser and pushed back into the voltage
source, thereby increasing the energy stored. If the plates are actuated in a sliding
motion, as indicated in Fig. 7.3, the force between the plates in the direction of
relative movement remains constant. The electronic circuitry to achieve a switching
of the transducer system can be quite different depending on the type of energy
conversion cycle. In Figs. 7.4 and 7.5 is shown an implementation of the circuit for
each mode of operation.
The switches are realized by MOSFET devices, which are operated by some
electronic control. The capacitor CV denotes the variable capacitor, while CR
denotes a storage capacitor (CRL: low voltage, CRH: high voltage). In the constant
voltage mode, the circuit must perform three different tasks: charge the variable
a b c
Q
+Q 2 Generate
+Q Pre- 3
+++++ +++++
+++++ +++++ charge
––– –– ––– – –
––– –– ––– – – Discharge
–Q
–Q
1
V
Fig. 7.2 Operation of an electrostatic transducer in constant charge mode. In (a) and (b) the
operational conditions and (c) the diagraph QV
68 7 Electrostatic Transducers
a b c
Q
2
+Q +Q
+++++ +++++ +++++ ++ Pre-
charge
––– –– ––– – – ––– –– ––– – –
Generate
–Q –Q
1 C increases
3
V
Fig. 7.3 Operation of an electrostatic transducer in constant voltage mode. In (a) and (b) the
operational conditions and (c) the diagraph QV
M1
Cv
L1
Control IC 1 2 (a)
M2 CR
Fig. 7.4 Electronic circuit for a switched electrostatic transducer in constant charge mode
D4
M3
CRH
Cv
D2
L2
Control IC 1 2
(b)
M4 D3 CRL
Fig. 7.5 Electronic circuit for a switched electrostatic transducer in constant voltage mode
capacitor to Vhigh voltage with the voltage constant and by reducing the capacity
from Cmax to Cmin ; moreover by transferring energy from the high-voltage to the
low-voltage store. In the other mode the associated circuit must implement the
following functions: charge the capacitor to a voltage level of Vlow by maintaining
7.4 Continuous Systems 69
constant the charge in the capacitor while the capacity is reduced from Cmax to Cmin ,
and the charge transfer from the variable capacitor to a store. The constant charging
phase is achieved by simply unplugging the variable capacitor by using electronic
or mechanical switches.
a b
Q
Q
Cpiezo
3
2
4
V
1
2 1
V 3
Fig. 7.6 Operation mode of a capacitor in continuous mode (a) or with a piezoelectric (b)
70 7 Electrostatic Transducers
a C1 b C2 C3
q1 q1 q2
Fig. 7.7 Electrical scheme for the operation of the electrostatic transducer in continuous mode
variable capacitor is constantly connected to the circuit which includes the load.
A capacitance change will always result in a transfer of charge through the load
resistance. An advantage of a continuous system is that the transducer system can
be implemented without the use of switches. The use of switches requires some
extra circuitry to control them and valuable energy is consumed by the control
circuit. There are two basic schemes to achieve a continuous system. In a pattern,
a single variable capacitor is used in series with a voltage generator (provides the
bias voltage) and a load resistor (Fig. 7.7a). In this case, the charge flows through
the voltage source. An alternative method (Fig. 7.7b) implements two additional
capacitors with its capacity that varies in the opposite way. One of the advantages of
the latter method is that transduction is quite insensitive to parasitic capacitances.
7.5 Design
A
CD
0 Er (7.2)
g
where
0 is the vacuum permittivity. A variation of these parameters can determine
a variation of the capacitance of the capacitor with parallel plates. Since it cannot be
simple to vary the relative permittivity Er of the material from the kinetic movement,
the area A and the gap g are commonly used to provide a variable area of overlap
or a capacitor with variable gap. In general, gap-closing and overlap-area variable
capacitors can be classified by the direction of movement of the electrodes with
respect to the substrate surface. This movement can be either flat or off level. In
both cases the mobile and fixed electrodes must be electrically isolated from each
other. The manufacture of movable and fixed electrodes in a device layer is based on
silicon technology on insulator (SOI), which is widely accessible in semiconductor
and MEMS technologies [2, 31–35]. There are four main designs of electrostatic
transducers to implement miniature generators:
7.5 Design 71
Fig. 7.8 Four types of electrostatic transducers: (a) parallel plate—gap closing, (b) parallel
plate—variable overlap, (c) comb drive, (d) rolling rod
The obtainable power density depends on the size of the generator, the test mass,
and the operating condition.
As an example, we can consider Fig. 7.9 as design corresponding to a parallel
plate—variable overlap.
The parameter g describes the fixed distance between the surfaces of the movable
and the fixed electrode. The capacitance C.x/ in function of the displacement x is
described by the following equation:
xmax C x
C.x/ D 2h (7.3)
g
where h is the height of the electrode. A similar procedure can be repeated for the
other design.
References
1. Park, J., & Mackqy, S. (2003). Practical data acquisition for instrumentation and system
control. Elsevier, Oxford.
2. Lacanette, K. (2003). National temperature sensors handbook. Handbook Ann. Mat. National
semiconcductor
3. National Instruments (1996). Data Acquisition Fundamentals, Application Note 007 (1996).
4. National Instruments (1996). Signal conditioning fundamentals for PC-based data acquisition
systems, Handbook National Instruments.
5. Taylor, J. (1986). Computer-based data acquisition system. Instrument Society of America,
USA.
6. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2013). Data Acquisition System, from fundamentals to applied design.
New York: Springer.
7. Roundy, S., Wright, P., & Pister, K. (2002). Micro-electrostatic vibration-to-electricity convert-
ers. In Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
IMECE2002 (Vol. 220, pp. 17–22).
8. Stordeur, M., & Stark, I. (1997). Low power thermoelectric generator: Self-sufficient energy
supply for micro systems. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Thermo-
electrics (pp. 575–577).
References 73
9. Shenck, N., & Paradiso, J. (2001). Energy scavenging with shoe-mounted piezoelectrics. Micro
IEEE, 21(3), 30–42.
10. Roundy, S. (2003). Energy Scavenging for Wireless Sensor Nodes with a Focus on Vibration to
Electricity Conversion. PhD thesis, University of California.
11. Tsutsumino, T., Suzuki, Y., Kasagi, N., Kashiwagi, K., & Morizawa, Y. (2006). Micro seismic
electret generator for energy harvesting. In Technical Digest PowerMEMS 2006, Berkeley,
USA, November 2006 (pp. 133–136).
12. Sterken, T., Altena, G., Fiorini, P., & Puers, R. (2007). Characterisation of an electrostatic
vibration harvester. In DTIP of MEMS and MOEMS, Stresa, Italy, April 2007.
13. Sterken, T., Baert, K., Puers, R., & Borghs, S. (2002) Power extraction from ambient vibration.
In Proceedings of the SeSens, Workshop on Semiconductor Sensors, Veldhoven, Netherlands,
November 2002 (pp. 680–683).
14. Szarka, G., Stark, B., & Burrow, S. (2012). Review of power management for energy harvesting
systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 27(2), 803–815. ISSN: 0885-8993.
15. Cammarano, A., Burrow, S. G., Barton, D. A. W., Carrella, A., & Clare, L. R. (2010). Tuning a
resonant energy harvester using a generalized electrical load. Smart Materials and Structures,
19, 055003.
16. Guyomar, D., Badel, A., Lefeuvre, E., & Richard, C. (2005). Toward energy harvesting using
active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 584–595.
17. Mitcheson, P. D., Stoianov, I., & Yeatman, E. M. (2012). Power-extraction circuits for
piezoelectric energy harvesters in miniature and low-power applications. IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, 27, 4514–4529.
18. Szarka, G. D., Burrow, S. G., & Stark, B. H. (2012). Ultra-low power, fully-autonomous boost
rectifier for electro-magnetic energy harvesters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
28(7), 3353–3362. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2012.2219594.
19. Maurath, D., Becker, P. F., Spreeman, D., Manoli, Y. (2012). Efficient energy harvesting with
electromagnetic energy transducers using active low-voltage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State
Circuits, 47(6), 1369–1380.
20. Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006). Energy harvesting vibration sources for
microsystems applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, R175–R195.
21. Khaligh, A., Zeng, P., & Zheng, C. (2010). Kinetic energy harvesting using piezoelectric and
electromagnetic technologies – state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
57(3), 850–860.
22. Paulo, J., & Gaspar, P. D. (2010). Review and future trend of energy harvesting methods for
portable medical devices. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2).
23. Zhu, D., Tudor, M. J., & Beeby, S. P. (2010). Strategies for increasing the operating frequency
range of vibration energy harvesters: A review. Measurement Science and Technology, 21,
022001-1–022001-29.
24. Cepnik, C., Lausecker, R., & Wallrabe, U. (2013). Review on electrodynamic energy harvesters
– a classification approach. Micromachines, 4(2), 168–196. http://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/
4/2/168. Accessed 20 January 2015.
25. Ulaby, F. T., Michielssen, E., & Ravaioli, U. (2010). Fundamentals of applied electromagnetics
(6th ed.). Prentice Hall, USA.
26. Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., & Rabaey, J. M. (2003). A study of low level vibrations as a power
source for wireless sensor nodes. Computer Communications, 26(11), 1131–1144.
27. Sazonov, E., Li, H., Curry, D., & Pillay, P. (2009). Self-powered sensors for monitoring of
highway bridges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9, 1422–1429.
28. Toh, T. T., Mitcheson, P. D., Holmes, A. S., & Yeatman, E. M. (2008). A continuously
rotating energy harvester with maximum power point tracking. Journal of Micromechanics
and Microengineering, 18, 104008-1-7.
29. Howey, D. A., Bansal, A., & Holmes, A. S. (2011). Design and performance of a centimetre-
scale shrouded wind turbine for energy harvesting. Smart Materials and Structures, 20,
085021.
74 7 Electrostatic Transducers
30. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of analog CMOS integrated circuits. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Razavi, B. (2008). Fundamentals of microelectronics. London: Wiley.
32. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2013). Microelectronic circuits. Oxford: Oxford University.
33. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of integrated circuits for optical communications. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
34. Hurst, P. J. (2001). Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits. John Wiley & Sons.
35. Spies, P. (2015). Handbook of energy harvesting power supplies and applications. CRC Press
book, France.
Chapter 8
Powering Microsystem
Idc
1 2
Vdc
HI
Load
Vin
LO
Idc
–
HI Current
1/Rin
Vdc + control/PWM
Fig. 8.2 Feedback control to force the phase of the current and voltage signals
2L
Rin D (8.1)
DT
where D and T are the duty cycle and the period of the switching waveform,
respectively, and L is the inductor value. Another approach to obtain an impedance
of resistive input is to employ a feedback to force the phase of the waveforms of
voltage and current; this technique is widely used for the correction of the power
factor in small-size power supplies. A block diagram of example system is shown
in Fig. 8.2.
The circuit is in current control mode, through a negative feedback on the PWM
controller in order to set the input current to the reference level. The reference
current is derived from the waveform of the input voltage: i.e., the instantaneous
voltage divided the desired input resistance Rin . In general, this circuit is difficult
to employ it for very low levels of micropowering system. However, an important
advantage is the operation of the converter with an inductor current in continuous
or discontinuous mode. The power conditioning circuits with some element of
the reactive input impedance determine the circulating energy between the power
electronics and the harvesting of energy at the fundamental frequency. Resonators
circuit can work in the “frequency tuning mode” to compensate for the reactive part
of the input block. In many situations occur when the transducer is described by
a mechanical energy system, common in piezoelectric devices. The linear circuits
known as rotators are able to synthesize the reactive impedance of input and
have found application in the suppression of the vibrations. However, they have
a significant consumption of energy to synthesize the reactive components. For the
energy harvesting, it is therefore necessary to base the layout around the switching
circuits, and an example is shown in Fig. 8.3. Since a reactive load implies a flow
of energy from the load to the source and vice versa, it is necessary to employ a
78 8 Powering Microsystem
+Vdc HI
Vin 1 2 Load
0 –Vdc LO
Iin
–
HI Current
1/Zin control /PWM
Vin +
V V
D
R
t t
converter that can operate in four quadrants. The converter operates in the average
current control mode with the reference current derived from the input voltage.
The diode rectifiers circuits are widely used in electronic design, in particular
in power supply and demodulation systems. The main objective is the signal
conversion AC to DC that can be made with different circuit configurations, each
with their advantages and disadvantages, used in various industries. The rectifier
circuits are classified into two main groups, namely single-phase and three-phase.
These stages are very important for industrial applications and for the transmission
of energy into direct current (HVDC). The half-wave rectifier circuit is the simplest
form as visualized in Fig. 8.4. For the majority of power applications, this type
of circuit is not sufficient because the harmonic content of the rectifier’s output
waveform is very large and consequently difficult to filter. However, it is a very
simple way to reduce the power to a resistive load (Fig. 8.4).
The full-wave rectifier circuit (Fig. 8.5), however, uses full waveform.
This makes the rectifier most effective, and there is conduction on both half-wave on
the cycle of the sinusoid, the smoothing (literally “spread the signal,” or transform
the AC signal into DC) becomes much easier and more effective. The classical
8.2 Rectifier Circuit 79
~
v v
IN +
OUT
t ~ t
−
circuit is based on four diodes in a bridge topology. The diodes can be replaced with
active elements to provide the switching and increase the efficiency. The choice
depends on the application of the circuit. While the full-wave circuits are mostly
used with the bridge configuration, half-wave circuits may offer a better solution
in some circumstances. For power applications are normally used power Schottky
diodes which require only a forward voltage of about 0.2–0.3 V.
The bridge rectifier (single phase) uses four rectifier diodes, each connected in
a closed-ring configuration (“bridge”) to produce the desired output. The main
advantage of this bridge circuit is that it requires a dual transformer. The diodes
(D1–D4 in Fig. 8.6) are arranged in series, only two diodes conduct current during
each half cycle of the sinusoidal waveform. During the positive half cycle, diodes
D1 and D2 are in conduction, while the diodes D3 and D4 are reverse biased and
current flows through the load as shown in Fig. 8.6. Conversely, during the negative
half cycle.
Bridge rectifiers integrated components are available in a range of different
voltages and dimensions that can be welded directly into a PCB circuit (Fig. 8.7).
Depending on the technology of the diode threshold voltage, each may vary in the
neighborhood of 0.6 V.
For a complete description, several parameters must to be considered: for
example, repetitive peak voltage (VRRM) and the Reverse Recovery Time. The
repetitive peak voltage (VRRM) is the actual value of maximum allowable reverse
voltage across the diode rectifier.
When switching from the conducting to the blocking state, a rectifier has stored
charge that must first be discharged before the diode blocks reverse current. This
discharge takes a finite amount of time known as the Reverse Recovery Time (trr ).
The smoothing capacitor placed in the output converts the wave into a DC
voltage. Generally for power circuits in current continues, the smoothing capacitor is
an electrolytic that has a capacitance value of the order of 100 F or more. However,
two parameters are important to consider when choosing a smoothing capacitor,
these are its operating voltage, which must be greater than the value of load output
80 8 Powering Microsystem
D4 D1
– +
+V
D2 D3 C
Load
0V
Wave with
capacitor
Ripple
Vdc
Wave without
capacitor
0V
of the rectifier, and its capacitance value, which determines the amount of ripple
(variable part of the continuous signal) which will be superimposed on the DC
voltage. As a general rule, you can think of a ripple voltage of less than 100 mV peak
to peak. The amount of ripple voltage can be virtually eliminated by adding a filter to
the output terminals of the rectifier bridge. This low-pass filter is constituted by two
capacitors, generally of the same value, and an inductance in order to induce a path
of high impedance for the alternating ripple component. Another alternative layout
most practical and economical is to use a voltage regulator, such as an LM78xx
(where “xx” stands for the output voltage) that can reduce the ripple of over 70 dB
offering at the same time a constant output current of more than 1 A.
An important aspect of the rectifier circuits is the loss in the output voltage,
caused by the voltage drop of the diodes (about 0.6 V for silicon and 0.3 V for
the Schottky diodes). This reduces the output voltage limiting, therefore, that
available output. The loss of voltage is very important for low-voltage rectifiers
(for example, 12 V or less), but is insignificant in high voltage applications such as
HVDC. The rectifiers are also used for the detection of the amplitude modulated
signal relatively to radio signals. Another typical use of rectifier circuits is the
power supply design. A power supply can be divided into a series of blocks
(Figs. 8.8 and 8.9), each of which performs a particular function: a transformer
and a rectifier circuit for converting the AC signal into DC. The power supplies
are designed to produce less ripple that can cause several problems. For example,
in audio amplifiers, too much ripple looks like an annoying buzzing noise; in video
circuitry, an excessive ripple causes defects in the image; in digital circuits can cause
erroneous results of logic circuits.
8.2 Rectifier Circuit 81
–
˜
˜ + ˜ ˜ –
+
PRIMARY CHARACTERISTICS
Package KBPM
IF(AV) 2.0 A
VRRM 50 Vto 1000V
IFSM 60 A
IR 5 µA
VF 1.1 V
TJ max 165°C
Diode variations In-Line
IL
+ + +
Diode Voltage
Ac Line Filter V0 Load
rectifier Regulator –
– –
t t t t t
The zener diodes are widely used in reverse bias to produce a stabilized output
voltage. When connected in parallel to a variable voltage generator in reverse bias,
82 8 Powering Microsystem
Current SOA
Generator Protection
Thermal
Protection
GND
2
Input DZ Output
VIN Vout
such as the rectifier diode circuits just discussed, the zener diode conducts when the
voltage reaches its reverse breakdown voltage. From that moment on, the relative
low impedance of the diode keeps a constant voltage at its terminals. In the circuit
shown in Fig. 8.10, an input voltage VIN is adjusted up to an output voltage VOUT
is stable. The breakdown voltage of the reverse bias of the diode DZ is stable
over a wide range of current and keeps VOUT relatively constant even if the input
voltage may fluctuate on a fairly wide range. Due to the low impedance of the
diode, the resistor RS is used to limit the current through the circuit. The value of
the resistance must satisfy two conditions: it must be small enough so that the
current through the zener diode is sufficient to maintain the conditions of reverse
breakdown; moreover, it must also be large enough for the current through DZ.
A small problem with stabilizer zener diodes circuits is the presence of electrical
noise in the attempt to stabilize the voltage. Normally this is not a problem for most
applications, but the addition of a decoupling capacitor of large capacitance through
the output of the zener may be needed to obtain a further stabilization of the voltage.
8.2 Rectifier Circuit 83
8.2.3 Considerations
The rectifier circuit is perhaps one of the most well-known circuits, formed by
diodes and capacitors. It’s widely used as the first stage in the conditioning circuit
in energy harvesting applications. However, the simple pattern as shown in the
preceding figures implicates some considerations. The classic circuit in Fig. 8.11
leads us to consider the Rs values, the classic case is having Rs tiny order of some
ohms, by resulting in a waveform shown in Fig. 8.12.
Generally, an impedance of the source will be comparable with that of the load,
then waveforms close to those of Fig. 8.12b. By a control of the waveforms, it can
be noted that the energy flow is directional uniform in peak rectifier. Namely, the
peak rectifier behaves as a non-linear resistive load. The peak rectifier is a simple
way to synthesize the impedance of the resistive input, by providing an important
adjustment function, which can be scaled to a wide range of power levels; but the
current harmonics may prove of falling in many of powering systems. However,
I1
Rs Is
Vdc
C RI
Vt
Vs
a b
i,v i,v
is peak
Vl
is vt
vt
a p /2 p wt a p /2 p wt
Fig. 8.12 Waveforms with (a) the load source impedance much smaller, and (b) the source
impedance close to that of the load
84 8 Powering Microsystem
I1
Cmass 1 Lc 2 Rc Ih
2
V Lcomp Cr RI
Rdamp Vh
–
The energy harvesting systems that use piezoelectric transduction have output
impedance which is highly reactive due to the capacity of the piezoelectric material
and therefore the ideal complex conjugate load has a very low-power factor. Since a
typical piezo produces few milliwatts, the attempt to synthesize the optimal loading
with a circuit similar to that of Fig. 8.3 is likely to cause a system with greater power
generation capacity; so designers IC systems have turned to a series of non-linear
approaches to improve the power without large overhead costs. A typical approach
is shown in Fig. 8.14 and is called synchronous switched harvesting on inductor
(SSHI), which involves the flipping of charge polarity on the piezoelectric material
twice per cycle when the mechanical part reaches its maximum displacement by
means of a physical inductance.
Another biasing approach is shown in Fig. 8.15. The switches S1 and S4, as well
as S2 and S3, operate in pairs. When the piezoelectric material reaches its maximum
deflection, one of the pairs of switches is turned on, discharging the energy from
8.3 Piezoelectric Biasing 85
I1
Ih
2
U1
1
2 Co RI
Vpiezo Vh
Cpiezo L
–
1
Rs
Fig. 8.14 Circuit of synchronous switched harvesting on inductor (SSHI) with rectifier
2 2
S1 S2
1 1
Rs1
2 L6 1 Co
Vout
Cpiezo
2
2
S4
S3
1
1 Vpiezo
–
the piezoelectric capacitance in the capacitor through the series inductor (discharge
phase in Fig. 8.16), all very quickly with respect to the mechanical excitation
frequency of the system. As soon as the discharge phase is completed, the voltage
on the piezoelectric capacitor reaches zero and the opposite switch pair actives
and injects a certain piezoelectric charge on the capacitor of opposite polarity.
So it increases the force with which the transducer is able to oppose the relative
movement between the mass and the base, thereby by increasing the electrical
damping. The piezoelectric material is then moved to its extreme opposite, thereby
by increasing the voltage. The process is repeated with the generation of the
output voltage. The piezoelectric capacitor remains in open circuit during the entire
movement of the beam, while in SSHI the piezoelectric element is short-circuited
by the switching of the rectifier diode. To extract energy from a transducer, the
force produced by the transducer which opposes the motion must be in phase
with the speed of the transducer. Due to the impedance of the output capacitive,
a piezoelectric transducer to open circuit has strength and speed 90ı out of phase
86 8 Powering Microsystem
and therefore has a power factor equal to zero. The discontinuity introduced in the
waveform (Fig. 8.16) effectively corrects the phase of the fundamental with nearly
unity power factor.
Idc
1 2
Vdc
HI
Shunt Load
Vin
LO
input, for example, using a converter with fixed input impedance and by using
a secondary shunt voltage regulator (Fig. 8.17). A possible layout is a flyback
converter operating in discontinuous open loop mode with a shunt regulator and
a low-power conditioning system [26–30].
8.5 MPPT
The power sources such as solar cells are commonly employed to work at a power
point (peak) by using a linear feedback system to ensure constant peak operation.
The type of layout is called MPPT also used for the energy harvesting. The
power converters tend to perform small adjustments to their working point (input
impedance), trying to find the point with the maximum output power or the point at
which the derivative respect to the operating point is zero power. The power can be
calculated from measured currents and voltages or deducible from other variables
when the voltage change is slow and compared to the capacitor charging rate. When
monitoring systems are used with the vibrations energy harvesting, it is important
to take note of the energy stored in the mechanical oscillator. When the dynamic
load is considered, it can be shown that the output power is a function of the
load impedance and then of impedance changing rate. The MPPT controllers are
in fact able to use all the power generated by the solar panel to charge the battery,
unlike traditional PWM controllers that send to the battery the current generated
by the panel. To understand this concept, we must first specify that the power of a
panel is the result of the following multiplication: Current supplied from the panel
for voltage generated by the panel. The working voltage generated by the panel
is typically around 16–18 V (not 12 V, as the battery voltage): this voltage surplus
is not considered in conventional voltage regulators, unlike the MMPT regulators.
We assume that the current generated by a photovoltaic panel is, in a certain
situation, 3 A: with a traditional PWM controller the current that is transferred to the
battery for charging is equal to 3 A. An MPPT controller instead analyzes the power
generated by the panel (P D V I), and therefore also considers the panel voltage:
88 8 Powering Microsystem
if therefore we suppose that the panel voltage is 17 V at that time the power supplied
by the panel is 17 V 3 A = 51 W. If the battery voltage is 13 V, by considering the
maximum power of 51 W, the charging current to be transmitted to the battery is
51 W/13 V = 3.9 A. We note therefore that the battery will be charged with a current
of 3.9 A with the MPPT controller, instead of 3 A with a traditional controller, and
the charging will take place, therefore, at a faster rate of 30 %, with the same panel
and of current delivered. In practice, it is as if we used a panel of 130 W instead
of one about 100 W, then the higher cost of an MPPT controller is balanced by the
savings on the cost of the panel.
8.6 Architecture
In the conditioning system with passive circuits, such as the rectifier, the problems
are concentrated on the input impedance: a zero voltage to the storage capacitor,
the harvesting circuit looks like a short circuit. The problem is exacerbated if the
capacitor has a relatively large capacity and can take many minutes to load. In
addition to this it is necessary that during start-up the load does not require a lot of
start-up energy; to alleviate this is necessary to enter in the circuit active component
connections. The addition of active elements in the power conditioning to control the
converters presents a further problem of power supply. If the output is AC harvesting
system, a diode network can be used to provide power and start the main converter.
A simplified block diagram of this simple design concept is shown in Fig. 8.18. The
further advantage is the ability to initiate the harvester circuit when it has a peak
output voltage less than that required to power the active circuitry. By incorporating
a provision multiplier diode is possible to start when the harvester has a peak output
voltage less than that required to power the active circuitry.
Diode Multiplier
Harvester
Capacitor Load
Switch
Converter
Regulation
Control circuit (Voltage)
Fig. 8.18 Block diagram of a power conditioning circuit with parallel diodes for starting of the
main converter
8.7 DC-DC Systems 89
Idc
1 2 LDO
Vdc
HI
Shunt Load
vin (WSN)
LO
A further complication arises with the energy storage capacitor, to minimize the
value of the capacity to promote the rapid start-up will result in greater fluctuations
in voltage for a given load profile, and therefore requires a voltage regulation circuit.
In Fig. 8.19 a circuit example with a voltage regulator is shown.
The energy is stored in a capacitor with shunt adjustment followed by a low-
dropout regulator (LDO) by providing, for example, to the WSN load a constant
3.3 V. When switched on, the system takes a little more than 100 s to fully charge
the capacitor (6.8 V). The load can then perform a transmission operation of 12 s.
The capacity must be selected so that its voltage is to a minimum (3.3 V) at the
end of the transmission period, by avoiding voltage variations. WSN then goes
to low-power mode and the capacitor voltage recovers enough to get in a next
transmission period after 81 s. The duty cycle of WSN must always remain below
15 %. A switching converter can be used in place of the linear regulator; however, it
is not always the case that the circuital additional complexity justifies the efficiency
gains.
The task of linear regulators is to establish a constant output voltage regardless of the
output current and input voltage. To check the adjustment element, an amplifier loop
90 8 Powering Microsystem
T1 +
IN IH
IH
R1 RL
Vout
LO
4
Vr
Vg1 2 –
V–
–
1 0
OUT
R2
3
V+
+
8
0
Vref
+
–
is used together with a more resistors network. The operational amplifier performs
the task by amplifying the signal, and then compare it with a reference voltage. In
Fig. 8.20 a classic example of the linear regulator is shown.
The loop system controls the voltage amplification that depends on the Vref
connected to the positive terminal of the operational amplifier. The disadvantage is
the power loss due to the voltage drop between input and output voltage. This means
that the efficiency is high when the difference between input and output voltage is
low. Furthermore, a linear regulator cannot have an output voltage larger than the
input. The advantage of this concept in comparison to the switching regulators is
the absence of the switching elements. Therefore, there is no ripple in the generated
output. In reference to Fig. 8.20 can be calculated the efficiency defined as:
Vout Iin Vref
Pout Vout Iout R2 Vout Vref
D D D D 1 (8.2)
Pin Vin Iin Vin Iin Vin Iin R2
The switching regulators are an alternative to linear regulators. They also fulfill the
task of generating a constant output voltage and independent from input voltage and
output current. The regulation element acts as a switch that can be in the state on
or off. The types of switching regulators can be divided into four main subtypes.
A buck converter delivers a lower output voltage and a boost converter with an
8.7 DC-DC Systems 91
output voltage higher of the input voltage. These two types have in common an
inductor as an energy storage element. For these two types of converter two different
modes of operation are defined: in the continuous conduction mode (CCM), the
current is always greater than zero, while in discontinuous conduction mode (DCM),
the current is zero for a certain period of time. The flyback converter uses a
transformer instead of an inductor and transfers the input energy during the off-
state of the switch to the output capacitor. This type of converter is mainly used
in powers of greater than 100 W output, for which it is not important state-of-the-
art applications for energy harvesting. Another important type of converter is the
charge pump: several switching transistors are used and only capacitors are used as
storage elements. A less common type of converter is Meissner, useful for energy
harvesting applications in which the energy transducer delivers output voltages less
than 500 mV. As in flyback converters, a transformer is used but in this case the
secondary winding is used to control the switching transistor.
The step-down converter (buck) provides a lower output voltage of its input.
Basically, the input voltage is periodically turned on and off and a low-pass
filter transfers the average value of the converter output. The basic scheme of the
converter is shown in Fig. 8.21. While a typical electric circuit of a buck converter
is shown in Fig. 8.22. A voltage proportional to the output voltage is compared with
a reference voltage according to the desired output voltage. The difference between
these two signals (Verr ) is amplified. The output of the comparator is a PWM signal
of the T1 switching transistor.
A step-up converter (boost) is used when in need a large voltage from an input
source. Regarding energy harvesting transducers, it is an important device for
thermogenerators and inductive generators, in which the output voltage is typically
less than 1 V. In Fig. 8.23 is shown the physical principle, while in Fig. 8.24 an
example of a circuit. In the first phase the switch is closed and the current of the
inductor ideally increases with a linear profile, therefore, the energy stored in the
inductor is increasing. In the second phase the switch is open and the energy stored
in the inductor is transferred to the exit where the capacitor C can be connected to
a second storage element. The variation of the current due to the open switch of the
inductor induces a voltage which is added to the input voltage. In this way, the two
phases are alternate periodically and the output voltage is always greater (or equal)
than converter input voltage.
92 8 Powering Microsystem
Switch = 0 L
1 2
RL
IL D C
+ VIN
Switch = 1
L
1 2 1 2
RL
D C
+ VIN IL
T1 L1 +
IN HI 1 2 IH
D1 RL1
COUT Vout
C1 LO
0 R3
Vg1 0 –
0
0
4
V– 4
R4
6 2
V–
– –
7 1
OUT OUT
+ 5 + 3
V+
V+
8
+ Voltage reference
The inverting converter is also called Buck-Boost because it refers to two types of
converter, a slightly more complex, which provides for the union of the two circuits
previously seen by using only one inductor in common with two switches and two
diodes, while the second that we will analyze in this paragraph can be seen as a
modification of one of the two. In this type of circuit two distinct meshes appear,
one that includes the switch placed in series and the inductor in parallel, and the
second created only by resistive and capacitive load. The diode is placed in series,
but in the opposite polarity to the previous configurations and constitutes a link
between the two circuital regions (Fig. 8.25).
8.7 DC-DC Systems 93
L D
1 2
RL
IL Switch = 0 C
VIN
+
–
L D
1 2
2
RL
IL C
VIN1 Switch = 1
+
– 1
L1 D1 +
IN HI 1 2 HI
RL
COUT R1 Vout
C LO
T1 0
Vg1 –
0
0 0
4
V– 4
6 2
V–
– –
7 1
OUT OUT R2
5 3
V+
V+
+ +
8
Voltage reference
+
–
Even this circuit operates with two states of operation, of course scanned by the
switch. To the initial conditions of course, all passive components will be discharged
and free of stored energy, but when the power transistor is switched on, the current
will be forced to flow from the diode on the inductor which stores magnetic energy.
When the switch is opened, the inductor is forcing the current on the second mesh,
by going to charge the capacitor and supplying the load. So, by returning to the
switch closed again, the inductor will load again, while the capacitor will provide
enough energy in the output having still stored electrical energy. Of course with
this operating cycle the output current and thus the polarity of the voltage will be
opposite to that of input; hence the name of inverting [2, 31–35].
94 8 Powering Microsystem
M1
NMOS D1
VO
2
L1
Vin Vsw R1
+ + C1
– –
1
u1 u2 C2
C3
R1
Q
C1
R2 R3
Since there are some energy transducers such as a thermoelectric generator (TEG)
based on the Seebeck effect or a solar cells with a parasitic ohmic internal resistance,
it is useful to think of the load matching in order to obtain the maximum power.
A transducer is generally modeled as a real voltage generator. If the interface
circuit for the transducer absorbs current, the measure will be affected by an error
proportional to the voltage drop across the internal resistance of the generator,
therefore is important that the acquisition circuit has high input impedance. It is
also important that the first stage of the acquisition has low output impedance,
so as to provide the acquired signal to downstream circuits regardless of the
current absorbed by them (Figs. 8.27 and 8.28). These capabilities are defined
impedance matching and are typically made with an operational amplifier in buffer
configuration.
It can be important to realize a connection that makes the maximum voltage
across the load or to maximize the current or power level. In other situations it may
be important to minimize the deformation of the waveform on the load compared
to that provided by the generator. Hence we can distinguish four mode of matching
between the generator and load:
Zu D Zg (8.3)
Taking into account some considerations, the energy matching condition results
from the following condition:
Zg D Zu (8.4)
R1 C1
D1
V1 R2 C2 R3
+
–
Transducer
R1 C1
D1
D2
V1 C2 R3
+
Transducer
4
V–
6 –
7
OUT
5 +
V+
8
R1 C1 M1
C2 R3
D1
V1
+
– M2
D2
4
V–
6
–
Transducer 7
OUT
+ 5
V+
8
Fig. 8.32 Converters AC/DC, synchronous full-wave rectifier
capacitor and the resistive load. The circuit shown in Fig. 8.30 is a half-wave
rectifier with a parallel connection of a resistance Rc element first of the diode D1.
The resistance is placed in that position because it reduces the charging time of
the output capacitor. The optimal value of Rc is what makes it possible to reach
the final voltage on the capacitor C2 without load in a minimum time. The circuit
shown in Fig. 8.31 is a full-wave rectifier that works as a voltage doubler. At the
resonance frequency, the piezoelectric element capacitance dominates its internal
resistance, and therefore the rectifier operates as a voltage doubler with a fixed
capacitor piezoelectric element. In the circuit shown in Fig. 8.32, the diodes are
replaced by transistors which operated in a synchronous mode in contrast with
the Fig. 8.30. In this solution, when no initial energy is available in the system, can
be started and then supplied power to the operational amplifiers to start synchronous
operation. The comparator U2 provides a high signal that turns on the transistor M2
when the input voltage has a negative value. The efficiency obtained by using a load
of 80 k in the circuits shown in Figs. 8.30, 8.31, and 8.32, is 34 %, 57 %, and 92 %,
respectively.
After the recovery and conversion of the energy, is needed to accumulate it through
an appropriate (storage) system. Typically, for a variety of electro-mechanical
applications, there are three main storage technologies:
• Fuel cells, mainly used for electric vehicles. A fuel cells is an electrochemical
device that allows to obtain electricity directly from certain substances, such as
oxygen or hydrogen, which takes place without any thermal combustion process.
The efficiency can be very high with a considerable mechanical stability; some
processes such as catalysis, however, pose practical limits to their efficiency
(Fig. 8.33).
8.10 Electrical Storage Buffer 99
– +
4OH–
4H+
2H2O
O2
2H2
Anode Cathode
Separator
Separator
8.10.1 Supercapacitors
20
10F Supercapacitor
15 25F Supercapacitor
150F Supercapacitor
10
0
0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
Fig. 8.35 Leakage power loss (mW) in the SC as function of the supercapacitor voltage (V)
The leakage current and power are given by the following expressions:
V.t/ V.t C t/
Il .t/ D C (8.5)
t
V 2 .t/
Pl .t/ D Il .t/V.t/ D C (8.6)
t
From these equations it is possible to derive the energy loss due to leakage:
Z t
El .t/ D Pl .t/dt (8.7)
0
The Fig. 8.35 shows how the power of the leakage increases with voltage across
of the supercapacitor, in particular when it is closer to the nominal voltage.
In addition, the following variables can be defined:
• Pcharge : power supplied by the transducer (at time t), assumed maximum and
converted to the appropriate voltage, which can be collected by the SC or less.
If it is not accepted, then it is dissipated as heat.
• Poverhead : sum of the conduction losses and switching losses.
• Eheld : energy possessed by the supercapacitor (at time t) less leakage and
switching losses.
• Eresidual : power unusable in SC with voltage below the minimum threshold of the
dc-dc converter. item PLOAD : power supplied to the load from the SC to the time t.
In terms of power is possible to define the charging power efficiency (c ) and the
driving power efficiency (d ) as follows:
Paccepted
c D (8.8)
Pchanged
Pload
d D (8.9)
Pdischarge
102 8 Powering Microsystem
In terms of energy is possible to define the charging energy efficiency, the energy
efficiency of storage, the driving energy efficiency, and overall end-to-end energy
efficiency:
Rt
Paccepted .t/dt
Echarging D R0 t (8.10)
0 Pcharge .t/dt
Rt
0 .Paccepted .t/ Pleak .t/ Poverhead .t//dt
Estorage D Rt (8.11)
0 Paccepted .t/dt
Rt
0 Pload .t/dt
Edriving D Rt Rt (8.12)
0 Pdischarge .t/dt C 0 Poverhead .t/dt C Eresidual .t/
There are three types of Energy Storage Elements (ESE) for energy harvesting
(EH) systems:
• Single Supercapacitor (SS): A Single Small Supercapacitor (SSS, about 1 F) can
charge quickly with a charging time long.
• Reservoir Supercapacitor Array (RSA): an array of SSS which allows to reduce
the losses of leakage.
• Dynamic Reconfigurable Supercapacitors: This type allows to reduce the leakage
and Eresidual and improves the efficiency of the output stage.
References
1. Park, J., & Mackqy, S. (2003). Practical data acquisition for instrumentation and system
control. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Lacanette, K. (2003). National temperature sensors handbook. Handbook Ann. Mat. National
semiconcductor.
3. National Instruments (1996). Data acquisition fundamentals, application note 007 (1996).
4. National Instruments (1996). Signal conditioning fundamentals for PC-based data acquisition
systems, Handbook National Instruments
5. Taylor, J. (1986). Computer-based data acquisition system. Instrument Society of America,
USA.
6. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2013). Data acquisition system, from fundamentals to applied design.
New York: Springer.
7. Roundy, S., Wright, P., & Pister, K. (2002). Micro-electrostatic vibration-to- electricity
converters. In Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and
Exposition IMECE2002 (Vol. 220, pp. 17–22).
8. Stordeur, M., & Stark, I. (1997). Low power thermoelectric generator: Self- sufficient energy
supply for micro systems. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Thermo-
electrics (pp. 575–577).
9. Shenck, N., & Paradiso, J. (2001). Energy scavenging with shoe-mounted piezoelectrics. IEEE
Micro, 21(3), 30–42.
10. Roundy, S. (2003). Energy scavenging for wireless sensor nodes with a focus on vibration to
electricity conversion. PhD thesis, University of California.
References 103
11. Tsutsumino, T., Suzuki, Y., Kasagi, N., Kashiwagi, K., & Morizawa, Y. (2006). Micro seismic
electret generator for energy harvesting In Technical Digest PowerMEMS 2006, Berkeley,
USA, November 2006 (pp. 133–136).
12. Sterken T., Altena G., Fiorini P., & Puers, R. (2007) Characterisation of an electrostatic
vibration harvester, DTIP of MEMS and MOEMS, Stresa, Italy, April 2007.
13. Sterken, T., Baert K., Puers, R., & Borghs, S. (2002). Power extraction from ambient vibration.
In Proceedings of the SeSens, Workshop on Semiconductor Sensors, Veldhoven, Netherlands,
November 2002 (pp. 680–683).
14. Szarka, G., Stark, B., & Burrow, S. (2012). Review of power management for energy harvesting
systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 27(2), 803–815. ISSN:0885-8993.
15. Cammarano, A., Burrow, S. G., Barton, D. A. W., Carrella, A., & Clare, L. R. (2010). Tuning a
resonant energy harvester using a generalized electrical load. Journal of Smart Materials and
Structure, 19, 055003.
16. Guyomar, D., Badel, A., Lefeuvre, E., & Richard, C. (2005). Toward energy harvesting using
active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 584–595.
17. Mitcheson, P. D., Stoianov, I., & Yeatman, E. M. (2012). Power-extraction circuits for
piezoelectric energy harvesters in miniature and low-power applications. IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, 27, 4514–4529.
18. Szarka, G. D., Burrow, S. G., & Stark, B. H. (2012). Ultra-low power, fully-autonomous boost
rectifier for electro-magnetic energy harvesters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
28(7), 3353–3362. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2012.2219594.
19. Maurath, D., Becker, P. F., Spreeman, D., Manoli, Y. (2012). Efficient energy harvesting with
electromagnetic energy transducers using active low-voltage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State
Circuits, 47(6), 1369–1380.
20. Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006). Energy harvesting vibration sources for
microsystems applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, R175–R195.
21. Khaligh, A., Zeng, P., & Zheng, C. (2010). Kinetic energy harvesting using piezoelectric and
electromagnetic technologies - state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
57(3), 850–860.
22. Paulo, J., & Gaspar, P. D. (2010). Review and future trend of energy harvesting methods for
portable medical devices. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2).
23. Zhu, D., Tudor, M. J., & Beeby, S. P. (2010). Strategies for increasing the operating frequency
range of vibration energy harvesters: A review. Measurement Science and Technology, 21,
022001-1–022001-29.
24. Cepnik, C., Lausecker, R., & Wallrabe, U. (2013). Review on electrodynamic energy harvesters
- a classification approach Micromachines, 4(2), 168–196. http://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/
4/2/168. Accessed 20 January 2015.
25. Ulaby, F. T., Michielssen, E., & Ravaioli, U. (2010). Fundamentals of applied electromagnetics
(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, Oxford.
26. Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., & Rabaey, J. M. (2003). A study of low level vibrations as a power
source for wireless sensor nodes. Computer Communications, 26(11), 1131–1144.
27. Sazonov, E., Li, H., Curry, D., & Pillay, P. (2009). Self-powered sensors for monitoring of
highway bridges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9, 1422–1429.
28. Toh, T. T., Mitcheson, P. D., Holmes, A. S., & Yeatman, E. M. (2008) A continuously
rotating energy harvester with maximum power point tracking. Journal of Micromechanics
and Microengineering, 18, 104008-1-7.
29. Howey, D. A., Bansal, A., & Holmes, A. S. (2011). Design and performance of a centimetre-
scale shrouded wind turbine for energy harvesting. Smart Materials and Structures, 20,
085021.
30. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of analog CMOS integrated circuits. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Razavi, B. (2008). Fundamentals of microelectronics. London: Wiley
104 8 Powering Microsystem
32. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2013). Microelectronic circuits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of integrated circuits for optical communications. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
34. Hurst, P. J. (2001). Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits. New York: Wiley.
35. Spies, P. (2015). Handbook of energy harvesting power supplies and applications. Boca Raton:
CRC Press Book, France.
Chapter 9
Low-Power Circuits
9.1 Introduction
Most of the signals applied to the inputs of an electronic system are originated from
the devices called sensors which, on the basis of their input–output characteristic,
convert non-electrical quantities (for example, a temperature) into corresponding
electrical values in analog form (for example, a voltage). Furthermore, most of the
signals present at the outputs of an electronic system are used to drive devices called
actuators. For this reason, although the processing of the information takes place
typically in digital form, all electronic systems require the presence of circuits for
processing analog signals, if only to convert these analog signals into digital signals
(analog/digital conversion or A/D) and vice versa (D/A conversion). The main
operations that can be performed on analog signals are the amplification (which
is equivalent to multiplying the signal by a constant), the weighted sum of several
signals, the operations of derivation and integration in time, and the filtering in the
frequency domain [1–15].
The earliest electronic circuits were fairly simple. They were composed of a
few tubes, transformers, resistors, capacitors, and wiring. As more was learned
by designers, they began to increase both the size and complexity of circuits.
Component limitations were soon identified as this technology developed. The
transition from vacuum tubes to solid-state devices took place rapidly. As new types
of transistors and diodes were created, they were adapted to circuits. The reductions
in size, weight, and power use were impressive. Microelectronic technology today
includes thin film, thick film, hybrid, and integrated circuits and combinations of
these. Such circuits are applied in DIGITAL, SWITCHING, and LINEAR (analog)
3 Eg
n D 5:2 1015 T 2 e 2KT (9.1)
with k D boltzmann constant D 1:38 1023 J/K. For insulator materials Eg '
2:5 eV, instead, for conductor is about less than 1 eV. As example we can calculate
the density of electrons for silicon at T D 300 K:
3 1:721019
n D 5:2 1015 T 2 e 2KT 1010 e=cm3 (9.2)
The intrinsic semiconductors can’t be used for electrical application due to very high
resistance but also a small number of “free electrons” with respect to the conductor.
In an extrinsic semiconductor the situation is different: there is a p-Si and an n-Si.
In the first case majority carriers (holes) are p D NA , semiconductor is doped with
a density of NA (i.e., boron atom) and minority carriers n D p2i =NA ; in the other
case, instead, majority carriers (electrons) n D NA with semiconductor is doped
with a density of ND (i.e., phosphorus), minority carriers p D n2i =ND . The concept
of doping extends the flow of current in a semiconductor.
9.2.1.1 Drift
V
h
W
I D v W h n q (9.3)
Jn D n E n q (9.4)
where J is the current density, W h is the cross section, and n q is the charge density
in column of the semiconductor. In presence of both electrons and holes:
J D Jn C Jp D q.n n C p p/E (9.5)
9.2.1.2 Diffusion
The mechanism of the diffusion is the movement of the charge from a zone of high
concentration to zone of low concentration (current). The mathematical relation that
explains this phenomena is the following:
dn
I DAqDn (9.6)
dx
108 9 Low-Power Circuits
dn
Jn D qDn (9.7)
dx
dp
Jp D qDp (9.8)
dx
9.2.2 PN Junction
From the doping we have obtained p-type and n-type semiconductors. A electric
field or a concentration gradient leads to the movement of the charges (electrons
and holes). We suppose to dope two adjacent pieces of semiconductors (Fig. 9.2);
in this configuration there will be a flow of electrons from n to p side and a flow of
holes in opposite direction (Fig. 9.3).
At the end of this process of “equilibrium,” an electric field (depletion region)
will emerge as indicated in Fig. 9.3. The junction reaches equilibrium once the
Cathode (n)
n p
Anode (p)
Si Si Si Si
–
P e B
Si Si Si Si
n p n p n p
– – – – + + + + – – – + – + + + – – – + + – – + + +
– – – – – + + + + + – – – – + + + + – – – + + +
– – – – + + + + – – – + – + + + – – – + + – – + + +
– – – – – + + + + + – – – – + + + + + – – – + + + + +
– – – – + + + + – – – – + + + – – – – – + + +
– – – – – + + + + + – – – – + – + + + + – – – + + – – + + +
– – – – + + + + – – – + + + + – – – + + + + +
– – – – – + + + + + – – – – – + + + + – – – – – + + +
Free electrons Free holes Depletion region
electric field is strong enough to completely stop the diffusion current [16–25].
The existence of electric field due to depletion region suggests that PN junction
has a built-in potential defined in the following equation:
Dp pp
V.x2 / V.x1 / D ln (9.9)
p pn
The external voltage rises the electric field of depletion region prohibiting the flow
of current. The device works as capacitor:
VR1
VR2
n p n p
– – – + + – – + + + – – – + + – – + + +
– – – + + + – – – + + +
– – – + + – – + + + – – – + + – – + + +
– – – + + + + + – – – + + + + +
– – – – – + + + – – – – – + + +
– – – + + – – + + + – – – + + – – + + +
– – – + + + + + – – – + + + + +
– – – – – + + + – – – – – + + +
– + + ++ – – – – + – – – – +– + + + +
– + + ++ – – – – + – – – – +– + + + +
– + + ++ – – – – + – – – – +– + + + +
VR1 VR2
s
Cj0 q
si q NA ND 1
Cj D q I Cj0 D (9.11)
1 VR 2 NA C ND V0
V0
The external voltage decreases the electric field of the depletion area allowing
greater diffusion current (Fig. 9.4):
VR
ID D Is exp 1 (9.12)
VT
is the “reverse saturation current” and Ln and Lp are the electrons and holes
“diffusion length” (i.e., Ln D 20 m , Lp D 30 m)
9.2.3 Diode
The diode is a two terminal device with I-V characteristic indicated in Fig. 9.5. Some
application can be described in the following text:
• Wave rectifier: the circuit is visualized in Fig. 9.6: the ripple amplitude can be
calculated by:
Vp VD;on
Vr (9.14)
RL C1 fin
The union of two junctions p–n (i.e., two diodes together) form the bipolar transistor
junction (BJT). Bipolar because the current is sustained by electrons and holes
(such as the diode). Compared to the diode, the BJT (three terminals) can be used
as a signal amplifier. Although the MOS technology (see next paragraph) is more
widespread, the technology bipolar remains significant (or predominant, in certain
cases) in several applications:
• Electronics vehicle
• Systems wireless
• Digital circuits ECL
• Draft discrete circuits.
The emitter follower circuit is particularly useful for applications where high
input impedance is required. It is typically used as a buffer in a wide variety
of areas. Emitter follower is a common collector transistor configuration. It can
easily be designed by circuit RC. The emitter follower is also known as a voltage
follower, or a negative current feedback circuit, with high input impedance and
low output impedance. The outline of the emitter follower is shown in Fig. 9.9 and
the corresponding equivalent small signal circuit in Fig. 9.10. We can calculate the
effective resistance seen from terminal B by:
112 9 Low-Power Circuits
D4 D1
– +
D2 D3 C1 RL
ripple Vdc
0V
This value is relatively high. In general, RE ==RL is around k˝ and ˇ 100, so the
resistance seen from terminal B is in the hundreds of k˝. It is evident from Fig. 9.10
that input resistance depends on load resistance. Let us named the input resistance
as Rin :
The effective resistance is the parallel between Rib and Rb . A common collector
configuration can be used as an amplifier in such a circuit, where a large input
9.2 Review of Microelectronics 113
V0 RE ==RL Rin
AD D (9.17)
Vs re C .RE ==RL / Rs C Rin
It becomes evident that as long as re .RE ==RL ) and Rs Rin the gain
approaches unity.
The emitter follower can be designed using the main steps described below:
• Choose a transistor: the transistor should be selected according to the system
requirements.
• Select emitter resistor: selecting a working point (for example, select an emitter
voltage of about half the supply voltage).
• Determine the base current: base current is the collector current divided by ˇ
(or hfe ).
114 9 Low-Power Circuits
power supply
R1
iC
RS +
vCE
–
+
VS
– R2 RE
v0
RL
iE i0
RS
ib rπ ic
+ ia
vs –
ie
RB
RE RL
io vo
• Determine the base resistor values: select the value of the resistor(s) to provide
the voltage required at the base.
• Determine the value of the input and output capacitor: The value of the
input/output capacitor should equal to the resistance of the input/output circuit
at the lowest frequency of operation.
When using the emitter follower circuit, there are two main practical points to
note:
• The collector may need decoupling: in some cases the emitter follower may
oscillate, in particular if long leads are present. One of the easier ways to prevent
9.2 Review of Microelectronics 115
R2
10k
C1
2N3904
1.5µF
V2 Out
+
– R3 R1
10k 1k
V[out]
7.2V
6.9V
6.6V
6.3V
6.0V
5.7V
5.4V
5.1V
4.8V
4.5V
4.2V
3.9V
136ms 144ms 152ms 160ms 168ms 176ms
S G D
D
Oxide Drain
Metal gate
Source
G
B
n+ n+
L Substrate (or body)
p
B S
There are four types of MOS transistors: two to channel n and two to channel p.
The MOSFET n-channel (nMOS) is formed on a p-type substrate:
• nMOS enrichment (enhancement) or normally off
• nMOS depletion (depletion) or normally on.
The MOSFET p-channel (pMOS) is formed on a substrate of n-type:
• pMOS enrichment (enhancement) or normally off
• pMOS depletion (depletion) or normally on.
In most MOSFET applications, an input signal is the gate (G) voltage Vg and the
output is the drain (D) current Id . The ability of MOSFET to amplify the signal is
given by the output/input ratio: the transconductance, gm D dI=dVgs .
In Fig. 9.15 reports the characteristic curve Id Vds ; there are three regions of
work:
• Cutoff: in this case its necessary induce the channel, Vgs Vt (Vt is the threshold
voltage) for nMOS.
• Triode: the channel must be induce and also keep Vds small enough so the channel
is continuous (not pinched off): Vds Vgs Vt .
• Saturation: in this mode need to induce the channel, Vds Vgs Vt then ensure
that the channel is pinched off at the drain end. In Fig. 9.16 is visualized the plot
of Id versus Vgs for an enhancement type nMOS device in saturation.
In the saturation mode, this device is an ideal current source (Fig. 9.17). In reality,
there is to consider a finite output resistance (r0 ); the outline of Fig. 9.18 can be
described as in Fig. 9.17.
While the transconductance gm gives the variations of the drain current due to
variations of the voltage Vgs , there is another fundamental parameter of the Mosfet
that takes the name of the output conductance, which is the variation of the drain
current Ids due to variations of the voltage Vds .
The output conductance assumes a much greater importance, and the reason is
the effect of the so-called channel length modulation due to Vds : it is the effect
for which the effective length of the channel decreases with increasing Vds and in
118 9 Low-Power Circuits
Vds=Vgs–Vt
Vgs
Vgs ≤ Vtn (cutoff)
Vds
ID
Vt Vgs
the saturation zone, the current increases with the Vds . From an analytical point of
view the effect of the modulation of the channel length can be written as follows:
Ids D k.Vgs Vt / 2 .1 C Vds /. It is clear that provides a linear dependence of the
Ids vs Vds in according to named as parameter of the channel length modulation; k
is the transconductance factor proportional to the geometry of the Mosfet.
Example of application with Mosfet can be the common source amplifier
visualized in Figs. 9.19 and 9.20. The input signal is applied to the gate through
the coupling capacitor C1 . The output is on the drain and connected to the load
9.2 Review of Microelectronics 119
id
gate
+ drain
gmvgs
vgs
– source
–
gate drain
+ +
id
gmvgs ro
vgs vds
– source –
Vdd
Vdd
RD
R1 C2 i0
+
C1
R + M1 RL
V0
–
+ Vin
–
V(t)
R2 Rs Cs
i0
iin D
R G + +
+ RL
rd
Vgs RD
Vin(t) R2 R1 V0
+
– V(t) gmVgs
– – –
S
RG
RL
+15V
R1 Rc Rc R1
c vout vout' c
vi Q1 Q2 vi'
2N3904 2N3904
c c
A
R2 R2
Rr Rr
RE
Rc Rc 2RE C Rr C rtr
Ad D I Ac D I CMRR D (9.18)
2.Rr C rtr / 2RE C Rr C rtr 2.Rr C rtr /
where rtr is the transresistance, usually indicated also as re . The 741 (a common
op-amp chip) has a CMRR of 90 dB, which is reasonable in most cases. A value
of 70 dB may be adequate for applications insensitive to the effects on amplifier
output; some high-end devices may use op-amps with a CMRR of 120 dB or more.
The common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) relates to the ability of the op-amp to
reject a common-mode input voltage. This is very important because common-mode
signals are frequently encountered in op-amp applications.
Common application of differential amplifiers is in the control of motors or
servos, as well as in signal amplification. In discrete electronics, a common arrange-
ment for implementing a differential amplifier is the long-tailed pair, typically found
as a differential element in most op-amp integrated circuits. A long-tailed pair can
be used as an analog multiplier with a differential voltage as one input and biasing
current as another. There are many differential amplifier ICs on the market today.
The AD8132 from Analog Devices (ADI) is a low-cost differential (or single-ended)
amplifier with one resistor for setting the gain. The AD8132 is a major improvement
on op-amps, especially for driving differential input ADCs or signals over long
lines. The AD8132 can be used for differential signal processing (gain and filter-
ing) throughout a signal chain, significantly simplifying the conversion between
differential- and single-ended components. Linear Technology also provides many
differential amplifiers for different applications. For example, its LTC6409 offers a
very high speed and low distortion, and is stable in a differential gain of 1.
122 9 Low-Power Circuits
9.2.7 Feedback
Amplifiers can be considered not perfectly linear. The gain (or amplification) of the
amplifier changes with power supply or temperature due to the variations of the
working point of the transistors. These and other real limitations of the amplifiers
can be minimized with the use of negative feedback. The good functionality of an
amplifier and sometimes limited by the presence of extraneous signals, such as the
hum of power supply and coupling with other amplifiers neighbors. In some specific
cases, the negative feedback can reduce these effects, while in other cases it does
not induce any improvement. An important example are the amplifiers and hi-fi
audio systems, which are powered with DC voltage obtained by rectifying AC power
supply and not perfectly stable.
In Fig. 9.22 is shown a possible feedback outline. The output signal of the
amplifier is always smaller than power supply voltages and its shape can be a
clear demonstration that the output is not linear. The result of this non-linearity
is manifested as a distortion of the output signal.
The use of negative feedback allows to realize amplifiers with better perfor-
mance. The main effects of feedback loop can be the following:
• greater stability of gain
• less distortion
• greater bandwidth
• reduction of the noise.
In general, the behavior of the individual block of negative feedback can be
described by transfer function (Fig. 9.23).
The G block is called forward, the block H is the feedback: the output signal
Vout (t) is sent back, through H, in input and is controlled by comparator. The
difference signal represents the error of the system, it acts as a input signal to the
block forward to have in output the corrected signal.
Open Loop
Σ Amplifier
Vin Vin - β.Vout Vout
+ G
–
Vf
(β.Vout) Vout
H
Feedback Network
If the system is sufficiently fast, any changes of G block do not affect the output
signal. More generally, if the input signal changes in time, the negative feedback
system gives the necessary corrections to ensure that the output signal is a faithful
repetition (with amplification) of the output.
Otherwise a positive feedback can be used to design oscillators. Positive feedback
is responsible for the squealing of microphones when placed too close to the speaker
through which their input signals are amplified.
When the loop gain is positive and above 1, there will typically be exponential
growth, increasing oscillations or divergences from equilibrium.
system of the known transfer function in open loop and in particular its polar plot or
Nyquist plot. The Nyquist plot of a closed system in feedback is a representation in
the Gaussian plane of the value of frequency response function in open loop, G.j!/,
in terms of the real part and imaginary part, with the variation of the pulsation !.
It is virtually impossible to find electronic devices in our daily lives that do not
contain digital circuits, and with most of them having CMOS logic devices at their
heart. There are a large number of CMOS devices, divided in a number of families.
Using only very few components, it is possible to build fairly elaborate pulse and
signal generators.
Depending on the doping material used, there are mainly two types of metal-
oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs): the n-channel, or nMOS,
and p-channel, or pMOS. In N-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (NMOS) logic,
n-type MOSFETs are used to implement logic gates and other digital circuits. These
circuits are mostly used for switching due to their high speed nature, whereas PMOS
circuits are slow to transition from high to low state, and their asymmetric input
logic levels makes them susceptible to noise. However, metal-oxide-semiconductor
(CMOS) technology offers some attractive practical advantages over NMOS tech-
nology: high noise immunity and low static-power consumption. CMOS uses a
combination of p- and n-channel MOSFETs as building blocks, but here both low-
to-high and high-to-low output transitions are fast since the pull-up transistors have
low resistance when switched on, unlike the load resistors in NMOS logic. In
addition, the output signal swings the full voltage between the low and high rails.
This strong, nearly symmetric response also makes CMOS more resistant to noise
[31, 32].
In NMOS circuits the logic functions are realized by arrangements of NMOS
transistors, combined with a pull-up device that acts as a resistor. The concept of
CMOS circuits is based on replacing the pull-up device with a pull-up network
(PUN) that is built using PMOS transistors, such that the functions realized by
the PDN and PUN networks are complements of each other. Then a logic circuit,
such as a typical logic gate, is implemented as indicated in Fig. 9.24. It comprises
a network of NMOS transistors (pull-down network) and a network of PMOS
transistors (pull-up network), but each consisting of an equal number of transistors.
Each input variable requires an NMOS transistor in the pull-down network and a
PMOS transistor in the pull-up network.
9.2 Review of Microelectronics 125
VDD
Pull-up network
(PUN)
Vf
Vx1
Pull-down network
Vx2 (PDN)
A CMOS inverter (Fig. 9.25) is composed of two MOSFETs, with their gates
connected to the inverters input line, and their drains to the output line. The input
resistance of the CMOS inverter is extremely high, as the gate of an MOS transistor
is virtually a perfect insulator and draws no input direct current. Since the input
node of the inverter only connects to the transistor gates, the steady-state input
current is nearly zero. A single inverter can theoretically drive an infinite number of
gates (or have an infinite fan-out). A CMOS inverter dissipates a negligible amount
of power during steady-state operation, which occurs only during switching. This
makes CMOS technology useable in low-power and high-density applications.
Current mirrors replicate the input current of a current sink or current source in
an output current, which may be identical or a scaled version. Current mirrors are
used to provide bias currents and active loads to circuits. Apart from some special
circumstances, a current mirror (Figs. 9.26 and 9.27) is one of the basic building
blocks of the operational amplifier; it is a circuit designed to keep the output current
126 9 Low-Power Circuits
vcc R1
IR
IO
+
IB1 IB2
T1 T2
IE1 IE2
gmVGS goVDS
VGS VDS
The range of voltages within which the mirror works is called the “compliance
range,” and the voltage marking the behavior in active/linear region is called the
“compliance voltage.” There are also a number of secondary performance issues
with mirrors, such as temperature stability for example.
Current mirror circuits are usually designed with a BJT, such as an NPN transistor,
where a positively doped (P-doped) semiconductor base is sandwiched between
two negatively doped (N-doped) layers of silicon. These transistors are specifically
designed to amplify or switch current flow. In some current mirror design specifica-
tions, the NPN transistor works as an inverting current amplifier, which reverses the
current direction, or it can regulate a varying pulse current through amplification to
create output mirror properties. One of the reasons that BJTs are used for current
mirror design is due to the base-emitter (or PN part) of the transistor functioning
reliably like a diode. Diodes regulate both the amount of current that passes and
the forward voltage drop for that current. The basic current mirror can also be
implemented using MOSFET transistors (Fig. 9.28). In Fig. 9.28, M1 is operating
in the saturation or active mode, and so is M2 . In this setup, the output current IOUT
is directly related to IREF . The drain current of a MOSFET ID is a function of both
the gate-source voltage and the drain-to-gate voltage of the MOSFET given by a
relationship derived from the functionality of the MOSFET. In the case of transistor
M1 of the mirror, ID = IREF . Reference current (IREF ) is a known current and can be
provided by a resistor or by a “threshold-referenced” or “self-biased” current source
to ensure that it is constant and independent of voltage supply variations.
Iref
Iout
Vout
M1 M2
9.3 Low-Power MOSFET 129
Fig. 9.29 gm
Transconductance gm
VGS
VT
By reason of the very high gate resistance (input), its high switching speed and
ease of manage, the MOSFET is ideal for layout with operational amplifiers or
standard logic gates. In this case, the input voltage of the gate-source should be
chosen properly, the device must have a low value of Rds (on) in proportion to
the input voltage. The power MOSFETs can be used to control the movement of
the DC motors or stepper motors brushless directly from the logic computer or by
using the PWM modulation. As a DC motor offers high starting torque proportional
to the current, the MOSFET in PWM mode can be used as a speed regulator which
provides a smoother and quieter operation of the engine. Since the engine load is
inductive, a simple diode is connected across the load to dissipate any electromotive
force generated by the motor when the MOSFET is in the “OFF” state. A network
locking formed by a zener diode in series with the diode can also be used to permit
faster switching and an improved control of the peak inverse voltage and the drop-
out time (Fig. 9.30).
The main stages of amplifiers using Mosfet can be described in three configurations:
common source, common drain, and common gate. In a common-source amplifier,
for example, the input signal is the signal applied to the gate, extracted in
output from the drain as current or voltage with respect to ground. The stage
+VDD
Motor M
D ID
+5v
RG D1
G
TTL
S
R2
common-source has input resistance very high and aids in the functioning as
transconductor and fits perfectly also as a voltage amplifier. This simply means that
by reason of high output resistance, the voltage gain (the voltage ratio of the output
signal and the input level) depends on the load resistance. This dependence on the
load resistance limits its usefulness as a voltage generic amplifier. In a common
drain or source amplifier is applied the input signal with respect to ground on the
gate terminal of the MOSFET. The main application is related to the buffer, because
its input resistance is extremely high, while its output resistance is reasonably low.
Unlike a voltage buffer ideal, a source follower MOSFET (common-drain amplifier)
provides a gain that is always less than one. Although the common source is
capable of substantial power gains of the signal, the voltage gain limits its utility
in the application of small signal. The input port of a common gate amplifier has a
relatively small input resistance and applies the input signal in current. The output
response to the input current applied is significantly extracted as a current signal and
the gain is always less than unity. The common gate amplifier can be represented as
the dual tracker source or source follower.
An ideal amplifier is an electronic circuit which generates an output signal y.t/ given
by the product of the signal input x.t/ and a constant A. Since both x.t/ and y.t/ are
electrical quantities (voltages or currents), an amplifier can be considered a two-port
device: to the input port of a voltage or current signal is applied (possibly without
9.4 Analog Circuits 133
Output variables
Voltage Current
iOUT
+
V(V) vIN AvvIN vOUT vIN gmvIN
iOUT
+
I(A) iIN RmiIN vOUT iIN AiiIN
disrupting the circuit that has generated such a signal), while the output port, the
amplifier forces a voltage or a current proportional to the input signal by a constant
amplification. By depending on the nature (voltage or current), the signals of these
amplifiers are classified into four categories as shown in Fig. 9.31.
Contrary to the ideals amplifiers, real circuits have input and finite output
resistance. This means that the input port of the actual voltage and transconductance
amplifiers is not designed as an open circuit and that the input port of the
transresistance amplifiers and current is not a short circuit. The actual amplifiers
work correctly only if the generated output signal (voltage or current) takes a value
within a specific range known as the amplifier output dynamic. It is also noted
that even in the case in which the signal applied to the amplifier input is included
inside its input dynamic range, the signal generated at the output port of a real
amplifier may not be able to drive properly the connected load by providing to
a further limitation of the output dynamics. This limitation does not only depend
on the desired output signal, but mainly by the value of the load. In addition to
the limitation of bandwidth, the actual amplifiers are affected by a limitation that
concerns the maximum slew rate, namely the maximum value of the time derivative
of the output voltage. The slew rate limitation is manifested when the output of an
amplifier is no longer able to chase the correct output voltage because it changes too
quickly. The electronic amplifiers based on semiconductor devices (transistors) are
heavily affected by non-idealities and their parameters are poorly controlled due to
134 9 Low-Power Circuits
x + ε y
A
–
βy
1
D x ˇy D x (9.21)
1 C Aˇ
Output variables
Voltage Current
+ +
+ – + –
V(V) vIN vIN
vOUT
R2 iOUT
R1 R
Input R2 1
variables vOUT = 1 + v iOUT = v
R1 IN R IN
R2
vOUT = RiIN iOUT = 1 + i
R1 IN
A simple and important circuit based on the use of op-amps is shown in Fig 9.34.
Such a circuit is known as a voltage follower, voltage buffer, or voltage follower: that
is, an ideal voltage amplifier with amplification equal to one. The voltage follower
importance is linked to the concept of load. If you want to generate a specific voltage
across a load connected to a port of a circuit, then to connect the load as shown at
the top of Fig. 9.35 is typically not possible, because it is the load introduces a
disturb effect on the voltage. However, by connecting a voltage follower with the
operational amplifier between the source and the load as shown in the lower part of
Fig. 9.35, the voltage source is not disrupted because the absorbed current from the
non-inverting op-amp is nothing with output voltage Vout D VIN .
In the last paragraphs we have described the operational amplifiers like any other
electronic circuit, it requires a supply voltage continuously in order to work.
Although it is permissible to assume that these voltages are constant, often they are
actually disturbed with residual oscillations which should not influence the output
voltage of an op-amp, however, the output voltage of an actual operational amplifier
in practice shows an error proportional to the fluctuations of the supply voltage.
136 9 Low-Power Circuits
+ –
vIN vOUT
vo vL RL
vL π vO
+
iL
vo
–
vL RL
vL = vO
A
PSRR D (9.22)
Aps
9.7 Low Noise Pre-amplifiers 137
Vout
AD (9.23)
Vd
Vout
Aps D (9.24)
Vps
Since both A and Aps depend on the frequency, the PSRR of an operational
amplifier depends on the frequency. At low frequencies, PSRR can have values
greater than 120 dB, whereas at higher frequencies (order of 100 kHz) the PSRR
could be about 30–40 dB.
Low noise amplifier (LNA) is an electronic amplifier used to amplify possibly very
weak signals. A pre-amplifier is an electronic device which amplifies an analog
signal. Generally is the stage which anticipates the high power amplifier.
In this example we design a simple pre-amplifier with background noise of
the order of 0.8 nV/Hz @ 1 kHz. The circuit diagram is shown in Fig. 9.36. The
main components used are LT1128 dell Linear Tech and the JFET IF3602 of
InterfetCorporation. LT1128 (Figs. 9.37 and 9.38) is an operational amplifier ultra
noise at high speed. Main characteristics are the following:
• Noise voltage: 0.85 nV/Hz @ 1 kHz
• Bandwidth: 13 MHz
• Slew rate: 5 V/uS
• Offset voltage: 40 uV.
The IF3602, instead, is a Dual-N JFET used as stage for input of the operational
amplifier.
R20
100k
0
V4
1Vac +
3 VDD
0Vdc –
R22
1 500
2
0 VDD
Q19 ee 7
R17 U1
5 R1 3
R19 5 + 6
–
600 2 V
C1
R18 LT1128
100n
5 4 VEE
5 R23 V2
6 Q20
–
+
VDD gV
R24
R2
5 0
500
H PACKAGE 1028
8-LEAD TO-5 METAL CAN 1128
The op-amp is one type of differential amplifier (Fig. 9.39). The inputs of the dif-
ferential amplifiers consist of a VC and a V input, and ideally the op-amp amplifies
only the difference in voltage between the two, which is called the differential input
voltage. The operational amplifier can be realized with bipolar junction transistor
(BJT, as in the case of the LT1128) or MOSFET, which works at higher frequencies,
with an input impedance higher and a lower energy consumption. The differential
structure is used in those applications where it is necessary to eliminate the
undesired common components to the two inputs. In this way, in output are
eliminated eventual DC components on the input signal such as, the thermal drift.
References 139
The noises of internal current and voltage of the amplifiers depend on the intrinsic
physical phenomena and are by their nature random, aperiodic, and uncorrelated.
Typically have a distribution of amplitude of Gaussian. The relationship between
the peak to peak value and the effective value of these components is statistical.
A possible qualitative rule is that the RMS value multiplied by 6 does not exceed
the peak to peak in the 99.73 % of cases.
References
1. Park, J., & Mackqy, S. (2003). Practical data acquisition for instrumentation and system
control. Oxford: Elsevier.
2. Lacanette, K. (2003). National temperature sensors handbook. Handbook Ann. Mat. National
semiconcductor.
3. National Instruments (1996). Data acquisition fundamentals, Application Note 007.
4. National Instruments (1996). Signal conditioning fundamentals for PC-based data acquisition
systems, Handbook National Instruments.
140 9 Low-Power Circuits
5. Taylor, J. (1986). Computer-based data acquisition system. Research Triangle Park: Instrument
Society of America.
6. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2013). Data acquisition system, from fundamentals to applied design.
New York: Springer.
7. Roundy, S., Wright, P., & Pister, K. (2002). Micro-electrostatic vibration-to- electricity
converters. In Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and
Exposition IMECE2002 (Vol. 220, pp. 17–22).
8. Stordeur, M., & Stark, I. (1997). Low power thermoelectric generator: Self- sufficient energy
supply for micro systems. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Thermo-
Electrics (pp. 575–577).
9. Shenck, N., & Paradiso, J. (2001). Energy scavenging with shoe-mounted piezoelectrics. IEEE
Micro, 21(3), 30–42.
10. Roundy, S. (2003). Energy scavenging for wireless sensor nodes with a focus on vibration to
electricity conversion. PhD thesis, University of California.
11. Tsutsumino, T., Suzuki, Y., Kasagi, N., Kashiwagi, K., & Morizawa, Y. (2006, November).
Micro seismic electret generator for energy harvesting. In Technical Digest PowerMEMS 2006,
Berkeley, USA (pp. 133–136).
12. Sterken, T., Altena, G., Fiorini, P., & Puers, R. (2007, April). Characterisation of an
electrostatic vibration harvester, DTIP of MEMS and MOEMS, Stresa, Italy.
13. Sterken, T., Baert, K., Puers, R., & Borghs, S. (2002, November). Power extraction from ambi-
ent vibration. In Proc. SeSens. Workshop on semiconductor sensors, Veldhoven, Netherlands
(pp. 680–683).
14. Szarka, G., Stark, B., & Burrow, S. (2012). Review of power management for energy harvesting
systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27(2), 803–815. ISSN: 0885-8993.
15. Cammarano, A., Burrow, S. G., Barton, D. A. W., Carrella, A., & Clare, L. R. (2010). Tuning
a resonant energy harvester using a generalized electrical load. Smart Materials and Structure,
19, 055003.
16. Guyomar, D., Badel, A., Lefeuvre, E., & Richard, C. (2005). Toward energy harvesting using
active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 584–595.
17. Mitcheson, P. D., Stoianov, I., & Yeatman, E. M. (2012). Power-extraction circuits for
piezoelectric energy harvesters in miniature and low-power applications. IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, 27, 4514–4529.
18. Szarka, G. D., Burrow, S. G., & Stark, B. H. (2012). Ultra-low power, fully-autonomous boost
rectifier for electro-magnetic energy harvesters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
28(7), 3353–3362. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2012.2219594.
19. Maurath, D., Becker, P. F., Spreeman, D., Manoli, Y. (2012). Efficient energy harvesting with
electromagnetic energy transducers using active low-voltage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State
Circuits, 47(6), 1369–1380
20. Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006). Energy harvesting vibration sources for
microsystems applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, R175–R195.
21. Khaligh, A., Zeng, P., & Zheng, C. (2010). Kinetic energy harvesting using piezoelectric and
electromagnetic technologies–state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
57(3), 850–860.
22. Paulo, J., & Gaspar, P. D. (2010). Review and future trend of energy harvesting methods for
portable medical devices. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2).
23. Zhu, D., Tudor, M. J., & Beeby, S. P. (2010). Strategies for increasing the operating frequency
range of vibration energy harvesters: A review. Measurement Science and Technology, 21,
022001-1–022001-29.
24. Cepnik, C., Lausecker, R., & Wallrabe, U. (2013). Review on electrodynamic energy harvesters
– a classification approach. Micromachines, 4(2), 168–196. http://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/
4/2/168. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
25. Ulaby, F. T., Michielssen, E., & Ravaioli, U. (2010). Fundamentals of applied electromagnetics
(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
References 141
26. Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., & Rabaey, J. M. (2003). A study of low level vibrations as a power
source for wireless sensor nodes. Computer Communications, 26(11), 1131–1144.
27. Sazonov, E., Li, H., Curry, D., & Pillay, P. (2009). Self-powered sensors for monitoring of
highway bridges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9, 1422–1429.
28. Toh, T. T., Mitcheson, P. D., Holmes, A. S., & Yeatman, E. M. (2008). A continuously
rotating energy harvester with maximum power point tracking. Journal of Micromechanics
and Microengineering, 18, 104008-1-7.
29. Howey, D. A., Bansal, A., & Holmes, A. S. (2011). Design and performance of a centimetre-
scale shrouded wind turbine for energy harvesting. Smart Materials and Structures, 20,
085021.
30. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of analog CMOS integrated circuits. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Razavi, B. (2008). Fundamentals of microelectronics. Chichester: Wiley.
32. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2013). Microelectronic circuits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of integrated circuits for optical communications. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
34. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2015). Microelectronics from fundamentals to applied design. Cham:
Springer.
35. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2014). Embedded system design for high speed data acquisition and
control system. Cham: Springer.
Chapter 10
Low-Power Solutions for Biomedical/Mobile
Devices
10.1 Introduction
Sensor networks have internal wireless modules solutions for the transmission
of the information to a remote computer and then a smartphone. The sensors
with a wireless connection can be supplied autonomously with energy harvesting
techniques, by using further battery to extend the life of the system. The worst case
scenario in wearable devices is the inability to take advantage of the mechanical
energy in patients with immobility in bed for various health reasons, where wearable
devices must rely on battery-powered solutions. There is no mechanical energy, the
intensity of light is too low to power a low-power device. Therefore only a part of
the head and sometimes the area of the wrists represent the only areas relatively
suitable for the harvesting of energy: thermal and light. The available low power is
connected to the level of internal illumination and the heat transfer from the person
that is considerably low, the latter determined by the natural convection around the
head. On one side there is provided a device that generates electricity from the
internal temperature difference of the human body, create the thermoelectric micro-
generators (TEG). They are able to generate a few microwatts of electrical power.
A BiCMOS device is made using standard materials to maintain the reduced cost.
The low thermal conductivity of these materials appears to be the main factor to
increase the output power. The materials used are the poly-Si and poly-SiGe. On the
other side, there is a piezoelectric device that converts the kinetic energy of a mass
free to move inside of a rigid frame into electrical energy due to the impact of this
mass with the two ends of the frame. The real-time monitoring of the patient’s vital
signs requires the use of wearable sensors and mobile devices [1–15].
a b
0.04 20
V (m/s) 15 a (m/s^2)
0.02
10
0 5
0
–0.02 –5
–10
–0.04
–15
–0.06 –20
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
t(s) t(s)
as, for example, materials such as poly-Si and poly-SiGe, in BiCMOS configuration
(Bipolar Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor), which is a technology that
integrates CMOS and BJT on the same semiconductor chip. The advantage of this
procedure can be described in the following points:
• Two different technologies.
• Overall capacity of a BiCMOS gate is almost equal to that of the only BJT.
• The possibility to combine in the same integrated analog and digital electronics.
A TEG generator consists of n-type and p-type thermoelectric material. These
are electrically connected in series by means of metal bridges and are arranged to
use the best available area. The generator layer is positioned between the silicon
substrate and the heat stabilizer. A thermal gradient between the lower end of the
device and the environment at the upper end is creating a vertical heat flow, which
can be partially converted into electrical energy by the effects of thermoelectricity
[16–20]. Research into Body Area Network (BAN) and their applications are
experiencing growing interest, especially in monitoring the status of the human body
health, monitor their movements and activities. Wearable wireless sensors make
this possible, by collecting information on the individual or single community, to
anticipate their requests before they are expressed. Another possible application is
under Ambient-Assisted Living (AAL): by collecting physiological information in
real time to prevent hazardous events such as heart attack.
146 10 Low-Power Solutions for Biomedical/Mobile Devices
The radio frequency energy is nowadays a very interesting source for the power
supply in wireless sensor networks; through the wireless power distribution systems
it is possible to obtain an infrastructure ad hoc able to power networks of hundreds
or thousands nodes, with a single source of transmission. Today, the real challenge in
the research and development of these technologies is to recover power transmitted
from public telecommunications services, such as broadcast TV and radio or mobile
telephone communications.
The EH radio wave system is constituted by a system commonly called rectenna
composed of the receiving antenna, the matching network, and the rectifier circuit,
and a power management system that includes the dc-dc converter, the accumulation
system (supercapacitors), and the load (consumer). One drawback to the sensor
nodes is represented by the element of energy reserve, generally constituted by bat-
teries, because the maintenance for the replacement of batteries with a large number
of nodes is very expensive and also to aggravate the maintenance costs. Therefore,
there is need to make autonomous from an energetic point of view, the many sensor
nodes located in the various environments. The solution proposed to lengthen the
lifetime of the batteries or completely prevent its use is based precisely on the
recovery of energy from environmental sources, particularly from the airwaves.
The benefits to these technologies can indirectly arise from recent developments
in micro- and nano-technologies, which have led to the creation of ever-smaller
devices and with energy consumption which are reduced accordingly. The energy
harvesting system compared to traditional power systems is the great saving in
implementation and operating costs The rectenna constitutes the transducer of an
EH radio frequency system, and is therefore capable of converting the incident RF
signal on the antenna into a DC signal to be amplified and accumulated in the power
management circuit. The antenna is the transmitter of the radio frequency in the
EH system. When an electric field impacts with a certain intensity on it, an induced
voltage that is generated must be rectified through a rectifier circuit [21–30].
As shown in Fig. 10.3, it is a ferrite core with a number of turns wound around
it. The purpose is to obtain a sort of small loop antenna (magnetic dipole) around
the ferrite core. This antenna, together with electronics that there is downstream,
can directly replace the batteries in specific applications, for example, for WSNs. It
constitutes a good solution to the low frequencies, in particular, for medium-wave
transmissions.
Figure 10.4 shows the antenna equivalent circuit also described in resonance
condition; RR is the radiation resistance of the loop, that is:
10.3 RF Solutions for Mobile 147
C
Equivalent Circuit At Resonance
Fig. 10.4 Equivalent circuit of the ferrite rod antenna
2
e nA
RR D 31; 200 (10.1)
2
where n is the number of turns, A is the loop section, e is the relative magnetic
permeability of the ferrite. Rf is the loss resistance of the rod, that is:
00 Af
Rf D 2f e 0
0 n2 (10.2)
lf
where f is the operating frequency, 0 and 00 are the real and imaginary parts of
the magnetic permeability of the ferrite, respectively, Af is the cross sectional area
of the rod, and lf the length of the rod. The inductance of this antenna is instead
given by:
Af
Lf D e 0 n2 (10.3)
lf
f0
QD (10.4)
f
The circular spiral antenna (Fig. 10.5) ensures a high power density and this is one
of the most used for the recovery of energy from radio waves. This antenna may be
supplied by a microstrip line and in this case it has the equivalent circuit of Fig. 10.6.
The total magnetic energy stored in the circular spiral is expressed through an
inductance defined as:
10.3 RF Solutions for Mobile 149
C1 C2 D1
L1 D2 C3 RL
R1
N 2 Dm 2; 46 2
LD ln C 0; 2. / (10.5)
2
where is the magnetic permeability of the material, is the fill-ratio, N the number
of windings, and Dm the mean diameter of the inductor.
The folded dipole, with respect to a common dipole =2, allows to have a radiation
resistance (approximately 300 for a folded dipole two-wire), a voltage Vout , and
a higher operating band. It is usually coupled with a voltage multiplier rectifier to
further increase the value of the dc voltage available.
The power density is the most important parameter for the RF energy harvesting;
the expected level of the received power depends on level of transmitted power and
the distance from the transmitter, while it appears to be independent of frequency
(Fig. 10.7).
The microstrip antenna (patch antenna) is the common antenna used for modern
cell (Figs. 10.8 and 10.9); it works well at high frequencies but has narrow band, so
that even small frequency deviations may cause large losses of the recovered power.
As the rectifier circuit can be used a single Schottky diode which allows to have a
higher conversion efficiency [31].
There are various configurations of microstrip antennas (L-shape, E-shape,
and U-shape), all of narrow-band type (narrow band). In Fig. 10.9 is shown the
equivalent circuit of a microstrip antenna composed of two inductors and a shunt
capacitance.
150 10 Low-Power Solutions for Biomedical/Mobile Devices
Cs
T T
The sector of the energy harvesting recently had a growing interest, and there-
fore many studies have been directed towards the design of integrated circuits
for converters. In particular, the company of “Linear Technology” has recently
produced a wide range of ultra-low power integrated circuits for applications of
EH. These circuits may primarily to convert vibrational energy (piezo), solar and
thermal (thermopile, thermocouple) and have a high conversion efficiency. Some
of these may also be exploited for the radio wave energy conversion. These ICs
are particularly relevant for applications in industrial automation, transportation,
automotive, and wireless sensors. The LTC3108 of Linear Technology is a boost
converter with high efficiency which can operate with very low input voltages,
ranging from 20 mV to 0.5 V, and therefore can be used for energy harvesting system
in radio frequency.
The integrated LTC3108 can also work as AC Energy Harvester due to internal
rectifier circuit; in such case, it is possible to connect the source directly to the
circuit. The expected pattern is the following (Fig. 10.10), in which the input is
10.5 Ultra-Low Power 2.4 GHz RF Energy Harvesting and Storage System 151
U1
OUT
SW Vout
SC
50
VS1 Vout2
LTC3108
VS2 VLDO
C5
2.2μ
Vaux PGD
C3 GND
1μ
Fig. 10.11 Block diagram of the circuit ultra-low power 2.4 GHz
X0
Lt
y0
Ws W
Ls
Wg
T1
0 2 2
1 2
Input SW1
330u 330u Output
1 1
0.1u
2p
Vbat HI
1M
1.6 v
battery
1M
Output dc-dc
150p 0.1u
10M
1nF
References
1. Park, J., & Mackqy, S. (2003). Practical data acquisition for instrumentation and system
control. Oxford: Elsevier.
2. Lacanette, K. (2003). National temperature sensors handbook. Handbook Ann. Mat. National
semiconcductor.
3. National Instruments (1996). Data Acquisition Fundamentals, Application Note 007.
4. National Instruments (1996). Signal Conditioning Fundamentals for PC-Based Data Acquisi-
tion Systems.
5. Taylor, J. (1986). Computer-based data acquisition system. Research Triangle Park: Instrument
Society of America.
6. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2013). Data acquisition system, from fundamentals to applied design.
New York: Springer.
7. Roundy, S., Wright, P., & Pister, K. (2002). Micro-electrostatic vibration-to- electricity
converters. In Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and
Exposition IMECE2002 (Vol. 220, pp. 17–22).
8. Stordeur, M., & Stark, I. (1997). Low power thermoelectric generator: Self- sufficient energy
supply for micro systems. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Thermo-
Electrics (pp. 575–577).
9. Shenck, N., & Paradiso, J. (2001). Energy scavenging with shoe-mounted piezoelectrics. IEEE
Micro, 21(3), 30–42.
10. Roundy, S. (2003). Energy scavenging for wireless sensor nodes with a focus on vibration to
electricity conversion. PhD thesis, University of California.
11. Tsutsumino, T., Suzuki, Y., Kasagi, N., Kashiwagi, K., & Morizawa, Y. (2006, November).
Micro seismic electret generator for energy harvesting. In Technical Digest PowerMEMS 2006,
Berkeley, USA (pp. 133–136).
12. Sterken, T., Altena, G., Fiorini, P., & Puers, R. (2007, April). Characterisation of an
electrostatic vibration harvester, DTIP of MEMS and MOEMS, Stresa, Italy.
154 10 Low-Power Solutions for Biomedical/Mobile Devices
13. Sterken, T., Baert, K., Puers, R., & Borghs, S. (2002, November). Power extraction from ambi-
ent vibration. In Proc. SeSens. Workshop on semiconductor sensors, Veldhoven, Netherlands
(pp. 680–683).
14. Szarka, G., Stark, B., & Burrow, S. (2012). Review of power management for energy harvesting
systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27(2), 803–815. ISSN: 0885-8993.
15. Cammarano, A., Burrow, S. G., Barton, D. A. W., Carrella, A., & Clare, L. R. (2010). Tuning
a resonant energy harvester using a generalized electrical load. Smart Materials and Structure,
19, 055003.
16. Guyomar, D., Badel, A., Lefeuvre, E., & Richard, C. (2005). Toward energy harvesting using
active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 584–595.
17. Mitcheson, P. D., Stoianov, I., & Yeatman, E. M. (2012). Power-extraction circuits for
piezoelectric energy harvesters in miniature and low-power applications. IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, 27, 4514–4529.
18. Szarka, G. D., Burrow, S. G., & Stark, B. H. (2012). Ultra-low power, fully-autonomous boost
rectifier for electro-magnetic energy harvesters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
28(7), 3353–3362. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2012.2219594.
19. Maurath, D., Becker, P. F., Spreeman, D., Manoli, Y. (2012). Efficient energy harvesting with
electromagnetic energy transducers using active low-voltage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State
Circuits, 47(6), 1369–1380.
20. Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006). Energy harvesting vibration sources for
microsystems applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, R175–R195.
21. Khaligh, A., Zeng, P., & Zheng, C. (2010). Kinetic energy harvesting using piezoelectric and
electromagnetic technologies–state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
57(3), 850–860.
22. Paulo, J., & Gaspar, P. D. (2010). Review and future trend of energy harvesting methods for
portable medical devices. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2).
23. Zhu, D., Tudor, M. J., & Beeby, S. P. (2010). Strategies for increasing the operating frequency
range of vibration energy harvesters: A review. Measurement Science and Technology, 21,
022001-1–022001-29.
24. Cepnik, C., Lausecker, R., & Wallrabe, U. (2013). Review on electrodynamic energy har-
vesters – a classification approach. Micromachines, 4(2), 168–196. http://www.mdpi.com/
2072-666X/4/2/168. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
25. Ulaby, F. T., Michielssen, E., & Ravaioli, U. (2010). Fundamentals of applied electromagnetics
(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
26. Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., & Rabaey, J. M. (2003). A study of low level vibrations as a power
source for wireless sensor nodes. Computer Communications, 26(11), 1131–1144.
27. Sazonov, E., Li, H., Curry, D., & Pillay, P. (2009). Self-powered sensors for monitoring of
highway bridges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9, 1422–1429.
28. Toh, T. T., Mitcheson, P. D., Holmes, A. S., & Yeatman, E. M. (2008). A continuously
rotating energy harvester with maximum power point tracking. Journal of Micromechanics
and Microengineering, 18, 104008-1-7.
29. Howey, D. A., Bansal, A., & Holmes, A. S. (2011). Design and performance of a centimetre-
scale shrouded wind turbine for energy harvesting. Smart Materials and Structures, 20,
085021.
30. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of analog CMOS integrated circuits. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Razavi, B. (2008). Fundamentals of microelectronics. Chichester: Wiley.
32. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2013). Microelectronic circuits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Gudan, K. (2015). Ultra-low power 2.4GHz RF energy harvesting and storage system with
25dBm sensitivity. San Diego: IEEE. ISBN 978-1-4799-1937-6.
34. Briand, D. (2015). Micro energy harvesting. Weinheim: Wiley.
35. Spies, P. (2015). Handbook of energy harvesting power supplies and applications. Boca Raton:
CRC Press.
Chapter 11
Applications of Energy Harvesting
11.1 Introduction
Energy harvesting makes use of ambient energy to power small electronic devices
such as wireless sensors, microcontrollers, and displays. Typical examples of these
environmental sources are sunlight and any artificial source such as vibration or
heat from engines or the human body. The energy transducers such as solar cells,
thermogenerators, and piezoelectric convert this energy into electrical energy. The
goal of each energy harvesting system is to replace the batteries used to power by
extending the charging intervals for the storage element. A first field of application is
the automation with self-powered switches. Further applications are the monitoring
systems for large industrial plants or structural monitoring of huge buildings.
Another promising market is the consumer area with purses, clothing which show
the energy transducers integrated in the form of solar cells or TEG or RF transmitters
to recharge consumer products such as mobile phones or audio players. A general
overview of energy estimated to be harvested in different application is summarized
in Tables 11.1 and 11.2, instead, compare the power consumption of different
microcontrollers state of the art in some modes of operation.
The building automation systems are networks of electronic devices for the control
of different functions. They manage lights, heaters, air conditioning systems, doors,
valves, and safety systems. The benefits of building automation have reduced energy
and maintenance costs, increased safety and comfort. Typical energy savings with
the aid of building automation systems are about 30 %. A typical reduction is
the wiring that may be reduced about 70 %. It also reduces operating costs, since
no energy is required for devices powered by energy harvesting. In addition, it
temperature around 20 ı C, the heat sinks must be used to maintain a thermal gradient
sufficient. When different temperature differences are present, the maximum power
point trackers (MPPT) are useful to match the power management for the maximum
power of the TEG. The vibrations can also be used in buildings to get electricity.
The problem is that only a small vibration in small frequencies are available, which
require large generators with large seismic masses. Typical 0.01 g and a frequency
range between 1 and 10 Hz are values available [1–20].
Sensor
Node
Wireless
Sensor
Node
Server
Base station
Sensor
Node
Database
Sensor
Node
security but, at the same time, limiting maintenance costs. The problem becomes
even more relevant when necessary in the evaluation of the performance level of
potentially damaged by traumatic events structures, such as the seismic events.
At the same time, safeguarding the immense architectural and cultural heritage
represented by historic centers of many Italian cities, it requires careful monitoring
of his state of health and the structural effects of the increasing level of vehicular
traffic. The structures able to detect the operating temperatures, pressures which
could reduce the weight and costs of composite materials. The weak point would
connectors and cables for the passage of the sensor information to the outside of
the structure. Wireless transmissions with extremely miniaturized electronics could
solve this problem halfway, by leaving the question of power but with applicable
techniques related to RF and thermal. The large number of individual measuring
points and then large number of sensor nodes densely distributed in possibly random
configurations in the environment detection require the use of wireless sensors. The
cooperation between the sensor nodes is used as the local processing capability to
perform the merge data or other calculation functions.
11.5 Automotive
Tire Pressure Monitoring systems were adopted in 1986 in a Porsche 959. The
technology has been used in top luxury range of vehicles such as the Audi A6,
Mercedes Benz S Class, and BMW7 Series to increase safety and the economy
maintenance. Indirect TPMS do not use pressure sensors. These systems measure
the air pressure in the wheel by monitoring individual wheel revolutions. Other
developments may also simultaneously detect under-inflation until all four tires
using vibration analysis of individual wheels or analysis of the effects of displace-
ment of the load during acceleration or cornering. These systems require additional
sensors suspension, which makes it more complex and expensive. To transfer the
pressure and other data from the wheel to the vehicle control unit uses radio
frequency (RF) communication or electromagnetic coupling. Due to the rotation
of the wheel, no wired communication may be employed. The power of the sensor
in the tire represents a challenge in direct TPM systems. Here batteries have the
same problems in many other applications, such as limited life, low temperature
range, weight, and additional costs. Due to the high amount of energy of vibration,
TPMS are a potential application field for the vibration energy harvesting. The small
required volume and low price facilitate the use of free self-powered systems. More
suitable for use in tires are piezoelectric and electrostatic principles, mainly because
of their small weight and size implementation related integration costs [21–30].
11.6 Projects
The system of Fig. 11.2 is designed to power a wireless sensor node that consumes
40 mW in active mode, with the average power of the load in according to the
average power generated. The coupling of the temporal power is achieved by
a supercapacitor and under-voltage lock-out which connects the load only when
sufficient power is available for a cycle of operation. The topology of the power
stage of the rectifier is shown in Fig. 11.3.
An advantage of the separation between start-up and main power circuits is that
the charge pump can quickly establish a provision to support the requirements of
the auxiliary circuitry, by allowing the rectifier to charge the super capacitor in
an optimal way. The thermoelectric generators have recently been used as power
supplies for strain gauges on planes. Strain gauges and the power supply are located
outside the cab, and then are subjected to strong temperature variations in the course
of a flight cycle. In order for the system to convert the greatest amount of latent heat
energy to the possible change of phase in electrical form material, the thermoelectric
generators are connected to a switching circuit capable of performing tracking the
maximum power point (Fig. 11.4). A critical aspect is the inversion of the polarity
between the ascent and descent of the aircraft, in this cases a rectifier is used in the
system. It may not be a passive rectifier because the voltage required to effectively
overcome the diode in the voltage state is not feasible for the TEG under these
thermal gradients. Therefore, the rectifier must be one active with MOSFET.
160 11 Applications of Energy Harvesting
Start-up circuit
Voltage
multipler HFET
(V)
Load circuit
Sensor
Pquies
Polarity Gate Linear
detection drive regulator
VDD = 1.5 V
Control circuit
OUT
Vin (t)
1 2
Load
+
–
PWM2
PWM1
Iin (t)
Solar energy is derived from the electromagnetic waves produced by the sun. The
solar radiation has the advantage to be available almost fully used without the pro-
duction of polluting waste. The limits that may be encountered are discontinuities,
caused by the alternation of day and night and weather conditions, the other is the
low intensity which implies the need to have large areas of “energy storage.” There
are two different approaches for using solar energy. In the case of thermal utilization,
the collectors transform the sun rays into heat energy that can be used both for
producing hot water and to support the heating system. The sun’s rays are converted
into electrical energy using solar cells that are combined in modules within which a
number of cells are connected in series and parallel combinations in order to obtain
the voltage and the output current within the desired intervals. Also in this way
11.7 Solar Infrastructure 161
Sensor Vrect
Vteg
3
+
–
4 7
OUT
V– V+
6
Voltage Inverter
the power of a single module of practical utility reaches values (every single cell
supplies only a few watts). The photovoltaic panels are systems that use lenses to
concentrate the solar radiation on the cell, while still seeking to increase efficiency
and reduce costs. A photovoltaic system is called “island” when it does not connect
to any electrical service network and is therefore autonomous. Leverages on the
place of production the energy collected and then preserved by an accumulator. The
main components of a photovoltaic system “island” are generally PV array to gather
energy through photovoltaic modules arranged in favor of the sun. By depending on
the situation, the reference field is optimized to have a given voltage, usually either
12 or 24 V. Consequently, the majority of photovoltaic modules used in this type of
plant has output voltages equal to 12 or 24 V, the so-called electrical strings that form
the field are constituted of very few modules, up to the limit of the single module per
string. Photovoltaic systems “grid-connect” are connected to an existing electricity
distribution network and managed by third parties. Photovoltaic systems “hybrid”
remain connected to the electrical distribution network, but mainly use solar energy
and accumulator. Moreover, a control unit can be used by connecting the building
to the electricity grid for the supply [31–35].
162 11 Applications of Energy Harvesting
The kinetic energy of wind is used to rotate a propeller or wheel, whose mechanical
energy is then converted into electrical energy. Its exploitation, relatively simple
and inexpensive, is implemented through wind machines divided into two distinct
groups depending on the basic module type used defined wind generator. The
kinetic wind energy utilization is very old: sailing and windmills constitute the most
significant examples. The currently most widely used wind turbines have become
integrated part of our landscape and the parts that make up a modern turbine are
essentially the following: (1) The machine blades are fixed on a hub and make up
in the rotor. The hub is connected to a rotating shaft that can be connected in turn,
by depending on the type of turbines, to a synchronous generator or to a multiplier
of revolutions and then to an asynchronous generator, currently most widespread
solution. (2) The power cables. The above components are located in the nacelle
positioned on a bearing support, so as to be easily adjustable according to the wind
direction. L’entire spacecraft is positioned on a tower, which can be lattice or conical
tubular. The most common system is to be varied the angle of incidence of the blade
to the wind through hydraulic or electrical systems. A control system continuously
checks the position of the blade and the power generated by changing continuously
the angle of incidence. This method represents a significant advantage over the
traditional system, which had a fixed angle of attack of the blades to the hub. The
advantage consists in having a higher range of functioning at different wind speeds
and lower vibrational stresses on the structure. The mini-wind turbine or even micro
wind has the potential to convert the wind’s kinetic energy into electrical energy,
usable for the operation of electrical appliances throughout the home. In a particular
way, for the installation of this type of wind power system, the low-power system
from 0 to 20 kw, it can be installed in stand-alone systems to isolated users, in the
best-known version of stand-alone, or in systems connected with the network, or the
best known grid-connected.
11.9 Conclusions
consumer market solar cells represent the main choice, but more solutions in
terms of vibration and RF are entering the market. The rapidly expanding of
wearable devices is set to revolutionize the technology and current processes in
all areas, by creating new market opportunities and new business models. The
market will continue to evolve as several start-ups and established companies
have a strong interest in research and development, in particular for implementing
multiple functions on a single device. The development of IoT promises to be
exciting and have a great economic impact due to the development of semiconductor
devices, and to the advancement of wireless technology, by allowing smaller
devices and more efficient at the same time. IoT is a fundamental requirement for
power management: mobile devices obviously require batteries, but the possibility
of replacing them completely or restrict the replacement/charging is a factor of
considerable importance given the advent of further devices connected in the near
future. Thanks to new small autonomous devices that can retrieve small amounts of
energy arising from vibrations from the motorcycle and the electromagnetic waves
in the ether (such as those of mobile phones or TV). Several prototypes have been
designed from shoes with electromagnetic recovery to tensile structures in the road
coverage that can capture the energy derived from the traffic drafts; even the clothing
capable of incorporating the energy produced by the movement of legs and arms,
up to road surfaces able to absorb the vibrations of the vehicles and transform
them into electrical energy. Mechanical vibrations, which are continually subject
the streets and sidewalks, generate differences in electrical potential in piezoelectric
devices “drowned” in areas subject to the passage of vehicles or pedestrians. The
goal is to suppy in a sustainable way the lights sensors for traffic monitoring, street
lighting, illuminated signs. A futuristic scenario is from one side to do devices
without batteries, in many research centers are doing studies to optimize the power
consumption in processors and electronic devices, and on the other side to recover
the energy already available in the surrounding environment to be able to store and
reuse for the self-supply in energy-efficient technologies such as wireless networks,
sensors, LCD screens, MP3 players, GPS systems, and mobile phones.
References
1. Park, J., & Mackqy, S. (2003). Practical data acquisition for instrumentation and system
control. Oxford: Elsevier.
2. Lacanette, K. (2003). National temperature sensors handbook. Handbook Ann. Mat. National
semiconcductor
3. National Instruments (1996). Data acquisition fundamentals, Application Note 007.
4. National Instruments (1996). Signal conditioning fundamentals for PC-based data acquisition
systems, Handbook National Instruments.
5. Taylor, J. (1986). Computer-based data acquisition system. Research Triangle Park: Instrument
Society of America.
6. Di Paolo Emilio, M. (2013). Data acquisition system, from fundamentals to applied design.
New York: Springer.
164 11 Applications of Energy Harvesting
7. Roundy, S., Wright, P., & Pister, K. (2002). Micro-electrostatic vibration-to- electricity
converters. In Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and
Exposition IMECE2002 (Vol. 220, pp. 17–22).
8. Stordeur, M., & Stark, I. (1997). Low power thermoelectric generator: Self- sufficient energy
supply for micro systems. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Thermo-
Electrics (pp. 575–577).
9. Shenck, N., & Paradiso, J. (2001). Energy scavenging with shoe-mounted piezoelectrics. IEEE
Micro, 21(3), 30–42.
10. Roundy, S. (2003). Energy scavenging for wireless sensor nodes with a focus on vibration to
electricity conversion. PhD thesis, University of California.
11. Tsutsumino, T., Suzuki, Y., Kasagi, N., Kashiwagi, K., & Morizawa, Y. (2006, November).
Micro seismic electret generator for energy harvesting. In Technical Digest PowerMEMS 2006,
Berkeley, USA (pp. 133–136).
12. Sterken, T., Altena, G., Fiorini, P., & Puers, R. (2007, April). Characterisation of an
electrostatic vibration harvester, DTIP of MEMS and MOEMS, Stresa, Italy.
13. Sterken, T., Baert, K., Puers, R., & Borghs, S. (2002, November). Power extraction from ambi-
ent vibration. In Proc. SeSens. Workshop on semiconductor sensors, Veldhoven, Netherlands
(pp. 680–683).
14. Szarka, G., Stark, B., & Burrow, S. (2012). Review of power management for energy harvesting
systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27(2), 803–815. ISSN: 0885-8993.
15. Cammarano, A., Burrow, S. G., Barton, D. A. W., Carrella, A., & Clare, L. R. (2010). Tuning
a resonant energy harvester using a generalized electrical load. Smart Materials and Structure,
19, 055003.
16. Guyomar, D., Badel, A., Lefeuvre, E., & Richard, C. (2005). Toward energy harvesting using
active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 584–595.
17. Mitcheson, P. D., Stoianov, I., & Yeatman, E. M. (2012). Power-extraction circuits for
piezoelectric energy harvesters in miniature and low-power applications. IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, 27, 4514–4529.
18. Szarka, G. D., Burrow, S. G., & Stark, B. H. (2012). Ultra-low power, fully-autonomous boost
rectifier for electro-magnetic energy harvesters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
28(7), 3353–3362. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2012.2219594.
19. Maurath, D., Becker, P. F., Spreeman, D., Manoli, Y. (2012). Efficient energy harvesting with
electromagnetic energy transducers using active low-voltage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State
Circuits, 47(6), 1369–1380.
20. Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006). Energy harvesting vibration sources for
microsystems applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, R175–R195.
21. Khaligh, A., Zeng, P., & Zheng, C. (2010). Kinetic energy harvesting using piezoelectric and
electromagnetic technologies–state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
57(3), 850–860.
22. Paulo, J., & Gaspar, P. D. (2010). Review and future trend of energy harvesting methods for
portable medical devices. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2).
23. Zhu, D., Tudor, M. J., & Beeby, S. P. (2010). Strategies for increasing the operating frequency
range of vibration energy harvesters: A review. Measurement Science and Technology, 21,
022001-1–022001-29.
24. Cepnik, C., Lausecker, R., & Wallrabe, U. (2013). Review on electrodynamic energy harvesters
– a classification approach. Micromachines, 4(2), 168–196. http://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/
4/2/168. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
25. Ulaby, F. T., Michielssen, E., & Ravaioli, U. (2010). Fundamentals of applied electromagnetics
(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
26. Roundy, S., Wright, P. K., & Rabaey, J. M. (2003). A study of low level vibrations as a power
source for wireless sensor nodes. Computer Communications, 26(11), 1131–1144.
27. Sazonov, E., Li, H., Curry, D., & Pillay, P. (2009). Self-powered sensors for monitoring of
highway bridges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9, 1422–1429.
References 165
28. Toh, T. T., Mitcheson, P. D., Holmes, A. S., & Yeatman, E. M. (2008). A continuously
rotating energy harvester with maximum power point tracking. Journal of Micromechanics
and Microengineering, 18, 104008-1-7.
29. Howey, D. A., Bansal, A., & Holmes, A. S. (2011). Design and performance of a centimetre-
scale shrouded wind turbine for energy harvesting. Smart Materials and Structures, 20,
085021.
30. Razavi, B. (2002). Design of analog CMOS integrated circuits. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Razavi, B. (2008). Fundamentals of microelectronics. Chichester: Wiley.
32. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2013). Microelectronic circuits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Gudan, K. (2015). Ultra-low power 2.4GHz RF energy harvesting and storage system with
25dBm sensitivity. San Diego: IEEE. ISBN 978-1-4799-1937-6.
34. Briand, D. (2015). Micro energy harvesting. Weinheim: Wiley.
35. Spies, P. (2015). Handbook of energy harvesting power supplies and applications. Boca Raton:
CRC Press.
Index
S thermocouples, 3
Schottky, 42 Thermodynamics, 59
Seebeck, 24, 55 Thermoelectric, 55
semiconductor, 106 Thermoelectric generator, 59
Semicondutors, 57 Thermogenerators, 155
sensors, 1 thin film, 105
settling time, 8 TPM, 158
SHM, 157 transconductor, 132
shot noise, 7 transducers, 1
Silicon, 69
silicon, 106
Silicon dioxide, 129 V
SNR, 120 Variable overlap, 70
Solar, 88 Vibration, 21
Solar infrastructure, 160 vibration, 11
Solar radiation, 27 Vibrations, 49
Solar wind, 27 Voltage control, 86
Space radiation, 27 voltage regulator, 13
storage, 18
Sun spectrum, 28
Supercapacitor, 26 W
Supercapacitors, 98 Wearable, 143
Switched system, 67 Wi, 37
Switching regulators, 90 Wind infrastructure, 160
Wireless sensors, 157
T WSN, 18
Teflon, 69
TEG, 143, 155
Thermal, 22 Y
thermal, 12 Young, 49
Thermal gradient, 24
Thermal noise, 7
thermistors, 3 Z
Thermocouple, 59 Zener diode, 81