Lecture 6 Compression Members
Lecture 6 Compression Members
By:
• Introduction
• Compression Members Types
• Column Theory and Buckling Modes
• Critical Buckling Stress
• Effective Length
• AISC Requirements
• Local Stability
• AISC Tables for Compression Members
• Column Design
• More on Effective Length
• Effective Length of Inelastic Columns
where
E = modulus of elasticity of the material,
I = moment of inertia of the cross-sectional area with respect to the minor
principal axis,
L is the length of the member between points of support.
• For Equation 4.1 to be valid, the member must be elastic, and its ends must be free to
rotate but not translate laterally. This end condition is satisfied by hinges or pins, as
shown in Figure 4.2.
• The derivation of Equation 4.1 is given here to illustrate the importance of the end
conditions.
The differential equation giving the deflected shape of an elastic member subjected to
bending is
𝒅𝟐 𝒚 𝑴
=- (4.2)
𝒅𝒙𝟐 𝑬𝑰
where
x locates a point along the longitudinal axis of the member, y is the deflection of the axis at
that point, and M is the bending moment at the point. E and I were previously defined, and
here the moment of inertia I is with respect to the axis of bending (buckling). If we begin at
the point of buckling, then from Figure 4.3 the bending moment is 𝑃𝑐𝑟 y.
Equation 4.2 can then be written as
𝑷𝒄𝒓
𝒚" + 𝐲=𝟎
𝑬𝑰
y = A cos(cx) + B sin(cx)
The various values of n correspond to different buckling modes; n = 1 represents the first
mode, n = 2 the second, and so on.
A value of zero gives the trivial case of no load. These buckling modes are illustrated in
Figure 4.4. Values of n larger than 1 are not possible unless the compression member is
physically restrained from deflecting at the points where the reversal of curvature would
occur.
Tangent-Modulus Theory
• Engesser’s Conclusion was challenged with the basis that buckling begins with no
increase in load.
• The tangent-modulus theory oversimplifies the inelastic buckling by using only one
tangent modulus. In reality, the tangent modulus depends on the stress, which is a
function of the bending moment that varies with the displacement w.
• The tangent-modulus theory tends to underestimate the strength of the column, since it
uses the tangent modulus once the stress on the concave side exceeds the proportional
limit while the convex side is still below the elastic limit.
• The reduced-modulus theory tends to overestimate the strength of the column, since it is
based on stiffness reversal on the convex side of the column.
• The reduced-modulus theory oversimplifies the inelastic buckling by using only one
tangent modulus. In reality, the tangent modulus depends on the stress which is a
function of the bending moment that varies with the displacement w.
Shanley’s Theory
• The critical load of inelastic buckling is in fact a function of the transverse displacement w.
• Practically there are manufacturing defects in mass production and geometric
inaccuracies in assembly.
• This is the reason why many design formulas are based on the overly-conservative
tangent-modulus theory.
Shanley’s Theory
LRFD
Example of
Table 4 - 22
Design
Steps Of Design