Scribd
Upload
102 views3 pages

Capture

1) The document is a statement made by Monty-Alan: Cutsforth in a Yuma Municipal Court case, where he is appearing as the grantor and beneficiary of the estate of the named defendant. 2) Cutsforth demands that the prosecutor present evidence of a valid claim against him and documentation showing the prosecutor has proper standing to represent the plaintiff. 3) Cutsforth argues that without such evidence and documentation, he is being denied due process and the case should be dismissed. He warns the judge that failing to ensure his due process rights could result in personal liability for the judge. 4) Cutsforth appoints the judge as trustee over the

Uploaded by

Mr Cutsforth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
102 views3 pages

Capture

1) The document is a statement made by Monty-Alan: Cutsforth in a Yuma Municipal Court case, where he is appearing as the grantor and beneficiary of the estate of the named defendant. 2) Cutsforth demands that the prosecutor present evidence of a valid claim against him and documentation showing the prosecutor has proper standing to represent the plaintiff. 3) Cutsforth argues that without such evidence and documentation, he is being denied due process and the case should be dismissed. He warns the judge that failing to ensure his due process rights could result in personal liability for the judge. 4) Cutsforth appoints the judge as trustee over the

Uploaded by

Mr Cutsforth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Monty-Alan: Cutsforth

c/o 4599 W Irma St


Yuma Arizona Republic
928-919-6524

IN THE CITY OF YUMA MUNICIPAL COURT

Honorable Jenny Farmer-Umphress, CM2023000626

Judge, Im here in propria persona making a special appearance as grantor and


beneficiary of the estate being administered in this case relating to the NAMED
DEFENDANT. I invoke the laws of the Republic on and for the record, I am not here in
a representative capacity. This is a court of record correct? YES? Great. For the record,
I reserve all rights at all times, and waive none ever. Now, before we proceed, there
are some administrative matters to attend to which will serve to expedite this matter
for the court. I need to address the prosecutor, Attorney for the plaintiff for his
remaining silent, and will proceed accordingly. I’m here to help administer this matter
expeditiously, for the benefit of the court. If the prosecutor has a valid claim against
me, the man who is beneficiary to the estate of the defendant, Let me see it and I will
tell you if I am the named party or not. I demand the Prosecutor please present me
with the verified claim, I am not I’m here in regard to this matter. There seems to be
some miscommunication here. I have not been presented with anything that names
me as a defendant to any legitimate claim, in my capacity ‘as beneficiary of the named
estate in my venue. I have not seen the bonds supporting the action. I have not seen
anything which gives the prosecutor proper standing in this court to address me on
this matter. Therefore, I'm obviously at a serious disadvantage due to the lack of
disclosure, discovery or transparency in this matter. Let the record reflect that the
prosecutor has not presented to the court , or me any documentation which supports a
verified claim against me or a valid contract, signed not under duress with full
disclosure, let the record reflect as was stated prior, I'm the grantor and beneficiary of
the named estate living upon the land in the Republic, I believe this court did err and
presumes me to be stand in for the defendant as trustee, which is a mistake which I
need to correct for the record, so the record stands corrected, as that is not my capacity
and if you claim so you need to establish documentary evidence and enter it into the
record now again I ask who here in this court who could hear my voice has a claim
against me? The same statement made in writing to police officers at the police station.
Please come forward with your claim who can present a valid contract to which I'm
being held liable as a man upon the land in my venue, which is the law of the Republic.
I need to see the contract between this prosecutor, attorney at law, the power of
attorney issued by the plaintiff to establish that he has proper standing as agent for the
plaintiff representing the plaintiff. I need him to enter it onto the record of this
proceeding to establish that he has proper standing as an agent for the plaintiff to even
talk to me about this matter or the court. You must do it now before we can proceed.
Let the record reflect the prosecutor cannot produce any evidence to the court
that he is who he says he is and is an impostor illegally passing himself off as someone
who he is not.
Judge I move this court for dismissal on grounds that the prosecutor is not
established proper standing as an attorney at law license to represent his clients in this
court and the plaintiff is without proper representation and has no standing in the
court.
Excuse me judge, but I will not be denied due process and if you attempt to deny
me the due process I am entitled to, which you are required to ensure by your contact
with me via your oath, then you’ll be acting ultra vires and YOU would be in contempt
of your duty, your oath and my God given rights which will put YOU right smack dab
in the middle of accepting full personal liability for the damage YOU may cause in any
ultra vires acts which interfere with my rights as a man upon the land in my venue.
Remember, I operate in my venue, not in yours! In the alternative, if you wish to
incorrectly presume me to be a ‘person’ who is the named defendant without any
evidence or proper claim establishing such, you'd be interfering in my ability to
conduct commerce. It would be illegal restraint of trade per 15 USC sections 1 & 2, add
the RICO laws in addition to Federal criminal statutes relating to the deprivation of
rights under the color of law among others. Those are just a few of the laws YOU would
be in contempt of your oath of office if you continue along this track and neither one of
us wants see that, Do We? We should settle this matter properly and amicably
according to law don’t you think? Now, I certainly wouldn’t want you and Mr.
Prosecutor to be ‘acting in concert, on the record, to steamroll me on this matter in
contravention of all law, duty and well established jurisprudence. Now, do your duty
to demand the prosecutor to property establish Himself and this case before the court
as I have required or dismissed the case those are your only lawful options how do you
wish to proceed?
Since you and the prosecutor seem to be on the same page and I am in the dark
as to how this court is operating outside of law and equity, I hereby appoint you as
trustee over the estate of the defendant, to protect my interests and administer this
matter in a fiduciary capacity on my behalf. Please proceed as my trustee! Thank you!
without prejudice,

____________________________
Grantor, Beneficiary

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy