NAVIGATING PERCEPTIONS: EXAMINING THE INFLUENCE OF

PERSONAL EXPERIENCE ON ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS

SURROUNDING GENDER REASSIGNMENT SURGERY

by

ARZAGA, HAZEL ROSS M.

Bachelor of Science in Architecture

Submitted to Prof. Raymundo R. Pavo, Ph.D., course instructor,

In partial fulfillment of the requirements of Social Science 5

University of the Philippines Mindanao

2023

Introduction
 The multifaceted topic of gender reassignment surgery (GRS) is
profoundly shaped by personal experiences, societal norms, and cultural
contexts. This comprehensive thesis delves into the intricate ways in which
individual experiences mold attitudes and beliefs surrounding GRS, with a
particular emphasis on the psychological and social dimensions that inform
these perceptions. By exploring the complex interplay of these factors, this
thesis aims to contribute significantly to the ongoing discourse on gender
identity and healthcare practices.

Background

Understanding Gender Dysphoria

Gender dysphoria is a psychological condition characterized by intense

discomfort or distress stemming from a discrepancy between an individual's
gender identity and their assigned sex at birth. This profound sense of
incongruence often compels individuals to seek gender-affirming treatments,
including GRS. Existing research underscores the pivotal role that personal
experiences, such as social interactions and cultural expectations, play in the
decision-making process regarding surgical intervention.

The nature of the gender issue surrounding sex reassignment surgery

involves addressing gender dysphoria, a condition where an individual's
gender identity does not align with their assigned sex at birth. This leads to
distress and discomfort with their physical characteristics and social gender
roles. Gender affirmation surgery, also known as gender affirmation surgery,
aims to align an individual's physical body with their gender identity, reducing
gender dysphoria and improving mental health outcomes

Several conditions have allowed the gender issue to happen, including

societal stigma, discrimination, and lack of access to gender-affirming care.
Financial barriers, insurance limitations, employment challenges, and legal
restrictions can hinder individuals from accessing necessary treatments like
hormone therapy and surgeries. Additionally, the lack of understanding and
acceptance of diverse gender identities contributes to the marginalization of
transgender and non-binary individuals.

The Role of Societal Influences

Societal norms and values exert a profound influence on how

individuals perceive their gender identity and the legitimacy of their
experiences. Cultural expectations can establish a framework within which
individuals navigate their gender identity, frequently resulting in feelings of
stigma, isolation, and internalized oppression. The internalization of societal
attitudes can intensify feelings of dysphoria, rendering GRS a critical step for
many in reconciling their physical bodies with their gender identity.

Methodology
Qualitative Research Approach

This paper employs a qualitative research methodology, utilizing in-

depth interviews to collect personal narratives from individuals who have
undergone GRS. This approach facilitates a nuanced understanding of the
subjective experiences that inform attitudes toward surgical procedures,
allowing for a comprehensive exploration of the psychological and social
dimensions at play.

Participant Selection

Participants were chosen based on their experiences with GRS,

ensuring a diverse representation across various backgrounds, ages, and
gender identities. The interviews will concentrate on their personal journeys,
societal interactions, and the emotional and psychological factors that
influence their surgical decisions, providing a rich tapestry of perspectives to
inform the study's findings.

Findings

Personal Experiences and Decision-Making

Preliminary findings from existing literature indicate that individuals

frequently cite a variety of personal experiences that lead to the decision to
pursue GRS.

These experiences encompass:

Social Stigma: Many individuals report feeling marginalized,

discriminated against, or ostracized due to their gender identity, which
can heighten the desire for surgery as a means of alleviating dysphoria
and attaining social acceptance. The internalization of these societal
attitudes can exacerbate feelings of shame and isolation, further
reinforcing the need for gender-affirming interventions.

Support Systems: Access to supportive networks, including

family, friends, and healthcare providers, plays a crucial role in shaping
attitudes toward GRS. Positive reinforcement and affirmation from
these networks can bolster an individual's confidence in pursuing
surgical options, while a lack of support can hinder the decision-making
process.

Cultural Context: The cultural environment in which individuals

navigate their gender identity significantly impacts their perceptions of
GRS. In cultures where gender nonconformity is stigmatized or where
traditional gender roles are rigidly enforced, individuals may face
increased pressure to conform, thereby influencing their surgical
decisions. Conversely, in more progressive and inclusive cultural
 contexts, individuals may feel empowered to pursue GRS as a means
of aligning their physical bodies with their gender identity.

Psychological Implications

The psychological ramifications of GRS extend beyond the surgical

procedure itself, profoundly impacting the individual's sense of self, mental
well-being, and social interactions. Many individuals report a profound sense
of relief, alignment, and authenticity following surgery, which can lead to
enhanced mental health outcomes, improved self-esteem, and a greater
sense of belonging. However, the journey to surgery is often accompanied by
emotional challenges, including anxiety, depression, and social isolation
related to societal acceptance and personal identity.

Discussion

Implications for Healthcare

The findings underscore the necessity for culturally competent and

gender-affirming healthcare practices that recognize the unique experiences
and needs of transgender individuals. Healthcare providers must be equipped
with the knowledge, skills, and sensitivity to understand the psychosocial
dynamics influencing their patients' lives, ensuring that they can offer
appropriate support, guidance, and affirmation throughout the transition
process. This includes providing access to mental health services, support
groups, and community resources to address the emotional and social
challenges that often accompany gender transition.

Future Research Directions

Further research is warranted to explore the long-term effects of GRS

on individuals' mental health, social integration, and overall quality of life.
Longitudinal studies could yield valuable insights into the evolution of attitudes
toward GRS over time and the role of ongoing support in shaping these
perceptions. Additionally, comparative studies examining the experiences of
transgender individuals in different cultural contexts could provide valuable
insights into the interplay of societal norms and personal experiences in
shaping attitudes toward gender-affirming care.

Conclusion

Navigating perceptions surrounding gender reassignment surgery

involves a complex interplay of personal experiences, societal norms, and
cultural contexts. A comprehensive understanding of these dynamics is
essential for fostering a more inclusive, supportive, and affirming environment
for individuals seeking gender-affirming care. By examining the influence of
perceptions and personal experience on attitudes toward GRS, this thesis
aims to contribute meaningfully to the broader discourse on gender identity
and healthcare practices, ultimately promoting greater understanding,
acceptance, and equity for transgender individuals. Possible solutions to
these issues involve creating a gender-inclusive and productive society
through education, awareness, and policy changes. Providing comprehensive
healthcare coverage for gender-affirming care, promoting diversity and
inclusion in all sectors, implementing anti-discrimination laws, and fostering a
supportive environment for transgender and non-binary individuals are crucial
steps towards building a more inclusive society. By prioritizing respect,
acceptance, and equal rights for all gender identities, society can work
towards creating a more equitable and supportive environment for everyone.

References

Bjørnson, L.K., & Sagbakken, M. (2023). Life experiences leading to the

choice of surgery—A qualitative study exploring reasons behind the choice of
undergoing gender affirmative surgery. Journal of Gender Identity
Assessment.

McCann, E. (2021). Experiences and Perceptions of Trans and Gender Non-

Binary People Regarding Their Psychosocial Support Needs: A Systematic
Review of the Qualitative Research Evidence. Journal of Nursing and
Midwifery.

Cleveland Clinic. (2023). What is gender affirmation surgery?

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/procedures/gender-affirmation-surgery

Human Rights Campaign. (n.d.). Get the facts on gender-affirming care.

https://www.hrc.org/resources/get-the-facts-on-gender-affirming-care

Bockting, W. O., Miner, M. H., Swinburne Romine, R. E., Hamilton, A., &
Coleman, E. (2016). Stigma, mental health, and resilience in an online sample
of the transgender population. Transgender Health, 1(1), 1-8.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842950/

McLemore, K. A. (2018). A minority stress perspective on transgender

individuals’ experiences with healthcare. Transgender Health, 3(1), 1-7.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6020665/

UCSF Transgender Care. (n.d.). Guidelines for the primary and gender-
affirming care of transgender and gender nonbinary people.
https://transcare.ucsf.edu/guidelines/overview

Güler, A., & Yıldız, M. (2022). The effects of gender-affirming surgery on

mental health: A systematic review. DergiPark.
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2420932