Chapter 2: Research philosophy

Key points
1. OVERVIEW
2. Evolution
3. Types
4. Exemplary topics
1. OVERVIEW
Research philosophy refers to the underlying beliefs and assumptions about the nature of
knowledge, reality, and how we come to understand them. It is a critical component of the
research process, influencing not only the choice of methods but also how data is interpreted and
conclusions are drawn. According to Saunders, Lewis, and Thornhill (2019), research philosophy
encompasses assumptions related to ontology (the nature of reality), epistemology (the nature of
knowledge), and axiology (the role of values in research). These assumptions help researchers
determine the appropriate approach to studying a phenomenon. For instance, positivism, rooted
in the natural sciences, assumes that reality is objective and can be measured through observation
and experiment. Positivists often employ quantitative methods to uncover patterns and test
hypotheses (Bryman, 2016). In contrast, interpretivism argues that reality is socially constructed,
emphasizing the importance of understanding the subjective meanings individuals attach to their
experiences. This philosophy often aligns with qualitative methods that explore complex social
phenomena in depth (Creswell, 2018).Critical realism bridges the gap between these two
paradigms by acknowledging that while there is a reality independent of our perceptions, our
understanding of it is mediated by social structures and human interpretation (Bhaskar, 2013).
Thus, researchers operating within this paradigm may use mixed methods to explore both
observable phenomena and the underlying mechanisms driving them.
Overall, an explicit acknowledgment of one’s research philosophy is vital as it ensures coherence
between research aims, methodology, and interpretation, enhancing the study's rigor and
credibility.
2. EVOLUTION OF RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY

The evolution of research philosophy reflects the changing perspectives on how knowledge is
generated and understood across time and disciplines. In the early stages of intellectual inquiry,
the dominant paradigm was positivism, which emerged from the natural sciences during the
Enlightenment. Positivism is grounded in the belief that knowledge is objective and can be
obtained through systematic observation, experimentation, and logical analysis. Auguste Comte
(1798–1857), a key proponent of positivism, argued that scientific inquiry should be the model
for all knowledge production, focusing on empirical evidence and generalizable laws.
As scholars began to explore more complex social and human phenomena, the limitations of
positivism became evident. This gave rise to interpretivism in the late 19th and early 20th
centuries. Influenced by thinkers like Wilhelm Dilthey and Max Weber, interpretivism
emphasized understanding the subjective meanings and contexts behind human behavior. It
posited that reality is socially constructed; requiring qualitative methods such as interviews and
ethnography to explore people's lived experiences.
The mid-20th century saw the emergence of critical theory and critical realism, which sought
to address the shortcomings of both positivism and interpretivism. Critical theorists like Jürgen
Habermas critiqued the notion of value-free research, highlighting the role of power, ideology,
and social structures in shaping knowledge. Similarly, critical realism, developed by Roy

1
Bhaskar, argued for a layered understanding of reality. While acknowledging an objective
reality, it emphasized that this reality is often mediated by human interpretation and hidden
social mechanisms.
In contemporary research, there has been a growing embrace of pragmatism and
postmodernism. Pragmatism focuses on practical outcomes and problem-solving, often
blending qualitative and quantitative methods to address research questions. Postmodernism, on
the other hand, challenges grand narratives and universal truths, advocating for a plurality of
perspectives and a recognition of the subjective nature of knowledge.
Overall, the evolution of research philosophy demonstrates a shift from seeking absolute
objectivity and universal laws to embracing complexity, context, and the interplay between
objectivity and subjectivity in the research process.

3. TYPES
A. Positivism
 Core Idea: Positivism, grounded in the Enlightenment, emphasizes empirical
observation and the scientific method to understand the world. This philosophy
asserts that knowledge can only be derived from observable phenomena and that
facts can be objectively measured, often through quantitative research. Positivists
seek to develop general laws or theories that can predict outcomes in a deterministic
manner. The focus is on hypothesis testing, causal relationships, and replicability in
experiments.
 Key Figures: Auguste Comte, Herbert Spencer.
 Methodology: Surveys, experiments, and statistical analysis.
B. Interpretivism
 Core Idea: Interpretivism stands in contrast to positivism by arguing that the social
world cannot be understood in the same way as the natural world. Instead, it
emphasizes the subjective nature of human experiences, focusing on the meanings
people assign to actions, symbols, and events. It challenges the objectivity claimed
by positivists and calls for a deeper understanding of context and meaning through
qualitative methods.
 Key Figures: Max Weber, Wilhelm Dilthey.
 Methodology: Qualitative research methods, such as interviews, ethnography, and
case studies.
C. Constructivism
 Core Idea: Constructivism posits that knowledge is actively constructed through
experiences, interactions, and reflections. It argues that individuals create their own
understanding of the world based on their personal experiences and social contexts.
In this view, reality is not an objective truth waiting to be discovered, but a
subjective construction that is negotiated and shaped through language and social
interactions.
 Key Figures: Jean Piaget, Lev Vygotsky.
 Methodology: Qualitative methods, participant observation, narrative analysis, and
collaborative inquiry.
D. Pragmatism
 Core Idea: Pragmatism emphasizes practical consequences and real-world
applications of knowledge. Knowledge is seen as a tool for problem-solving, and

2
 truth is defined by what works in practice. Pragmatists reject rigid distinctions
between theory and practice, arguing that theories should be tested and refined based
on their ability to solve problems in the real world. They advocate for a pluralistic
approach, using whatever methods are best suited to the research problem.
 Key Figures: John Dewey, William James, Charles Peirce.
 Methodology: Mixed-methods, action research, and case studies.
E. Phenomenology
 Core Idea: Phenomenology focuses on the lived experiences of individuals and
how they perceive and interpret their world. It seeks to uncover the essence of
human experience by describing it from the first-person perspective.
Phenomenologists aim to bracket their preconceptions (a process known as
"epoché") to understand the subjective meanings people attach to their experiences.
 Key Figures: Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger.
 Methodology: In-depth interviews, thematic analysis, and phenomenological
analysis.
F. Naturalism
 Core Idea: Naturalism asserts that everything can be understood through natural
causes and laws. It holds that human behavior, society, and knowledge should be
studied in the same way as natural phenomena, using the methods of science.
Naturalists emphasize empirical observation, experimentation, and the search for
patterns in the natural and social worlds.
 Key Figures: John Dewey, Richard Dawkins.
 Methodology: Experimental research, longitudinal studies, and quantitative analysis.
G. Idealism
 Core Idea: Idealism argues that reality is fundamentally mental or spiritual. In
contrast to realism, which posits an external reality independent of our minds,
idealism holds that our perceptions, ideas, and consciousness shape the world we
experience. Researchers adopting an idealist approach focus on how mental
constructs, perceptions, and ideas influence our understanding of the world.
 Key Figures: Immanuel Kant, George Berkeley.
 Methodology: Conceptual analysis, philosophical inquiry, and metaphysical
exploration.
H. Objectivism
 Core Idea: Objectivism maintains that objective reality exists independently of
human perception, and that knowledge is the discovery of this reality. This
philosophy emphasizes rationality, logic, and reason as the means to obtain objective
knowledge. Objectivist research seeks to uncover truths that exist regardless of
personal biases or social constructs.
 Key Figures: Ayn Rand, Aristotle (in some contexts).
 Methodology: Systematic observation, deductive reasoning, and scientific
experimentation.
I. Relativism
 Core Idea: Relativism challenges the notion of absolute truth, asserting that truth and
knowledge are relative to different individuals, cultures, or historical contexts.
Researchers operating under this philosophy reject the idea of universal standards for
knowledge and emphasize the importance of understanding multiple perspectives.

3
  Key Figures: Thomas Kuhn, Michel Foucault (in some interpretations).
 Methodology: Qualitative research, discourse analysis, and comparative studies.
J. Dialectical Materialism
 Core Idea: Rooted in Marxist theory, dialectical materialism emphasizes that material
conditions—such as economic systems—drive historical change. It asserts that social,
political, and cultural phenomena are shaped by material realities and class struggles.
This approach advocates for a critical analysis of social structures and their
contradictions.
 Key Figures: Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels.
 Methodology: Historical materialism, social analysis, and critique of capitalist
systems.
K. Rationalism
 Core Idea: Rationalism asserts that reason, rather than sensory experience, is the
primary source of knowledge. This philosophy emphasizes the role of innate ideas,
logic, and deduction in the acquisition of knowledge. Rationalists argue that certain
truths can be known a priori, through intellectual reasoning alone.
 Key Figures: René Descartes, Baruch Spinoza.
 Methodology: Deductive reasoning, formal logic, and mathematical modeling.
L. Empiricism
 Core Idea: Empiricism holds that knowledge is derived primarily from sensory
experience and observation. This philosophy emphasizes the importance of evidence-
based reasoning, where empirical data are used to form conclusions. Empiricists
argue that all knowledge is contingent upon experience and that we can only know
what we can observe and measure.
 Key Figures: John Locke, David Hume.
 Methodology: Experimental research, observation, and inductive reasoning.
M. To summarize
Research Core Idea Key Figures Methodology References
Philosophy
Positivism Empirical observation and scientific Auguste Comte, Surveys, experiments, Comte (1830-
methods; knowledge from observable Herbert Spencer statistical analysis 1842); Spencer
phenomena. (1851)
Interpretivism Focus on subjective meanings and Max Weber, Qualitative methods Weber (1904);
experiences; social world understood Wilhelm Dilthey (interviews, Dilthey (1883)
through individual interpretations. ethnography, case
studies)
Constructivism Knowledge is actively constructed Jean Piaget, Lev Qualitative methods, Piaget (1954);
through experience and interaction; Vygotsky participant observation, Vygotsky (1978)
reality is subjectively constructed. narrative analysis
Pragmatism Knowledge serves practical problem- John Dewey, Mixed-methods, action Dewey (1916);
solving; theories tested based on real- William James, research, case studies James (1907);
world applications. Charles Peirce Peirce (1877)
Feminist Critiques marginalized perspectives, Sandra Harding, Participatory research, Harding (1986);
Research aiming for social justice and Donna Haraway autoethnography, Haraway (1991)
Philosophy transformation. collaborative
methodologies
Phenomenology Focuses on lived experiences and Edmund Husserl, In-depth interviews, Husserl (1931);
subjective meanings through first- Martin thematic analysis, Heidegger
person perspectives. Heidegger phenomenological (1927)
analysis

4
 Naturalism Knowledge gained through natural John Dewey, Experimental research, Dewey (1916);
causes and laws; human behavior Richard Dawkins longitudinal studies, Dawkins (2006)
studied like natural phenomena. quantitative analysis
Idealism Reality is shaped by the mind or Immanuel Kant, Conceptual analysis, Kant (1781);
consciousness; perceptions and ideas George Berkeley philosophical inquiry Berkeley (1710)
influence understanding of the world.
Objectivism Objective reality exists independent of Ayn Rand, Systematic observation, Rand (1961);
perception; knowledge is about Aristotle (in deductive reasoning, Aristotle (350
discovering this reality. some contexts) experimentation BCE)
Relativism Truth and knowledge are relative to Thomas Kuhn, Qualitative research, Kuhn (1962);
individuals, cultures, or contexts; rejects Michel Foucault discourse analysis, Foucault (1972)
absolute truths. comparative studies
Dialectical Material conditions (e.g., economic Karl Marx, Historical materialism, Marx (1867);
Materialism systems) drive historical change; social Friedrich Engels social analysis, critique Engels (1845)
structures shaped by class struggles. of capitalism
Rationalism Knowledge is gained through reason René Descartes, Deductive reasoning, Descartes
and logic, rather than sensory Baruch Spinoza formal logic, (1637); Spinoza
experience; emphasizes a priori mathematical modeling (1677)
knowledge.
Empiricism Knowledge is derived from sensory John Locke, Experimental research, Locke (1690);
experience and observation; empirical David Hume observation, inductive Hume (1748)
data used to form conclusions. reasoning
4. Exemplary topics
Research Philosophy Exemplary Research Topic
Positivism "The Impact of Social Media Usage on Academic Performance: A Quantitative Study
of High School Students"
Interpretivism "Understanding the Meaning of Workplace Empowerment Among Female Employees
in Tech Startups: A Qualitative Study"
Constructivism "How Children Construct Their Understanding of Environmental Conservation
Through Hands-on Learning Experiences in School"
Pragmatism "Using Action Research to Improve Employee Motivation and Performance in Remote
Work Environments"
Phenomenology "The Lived Experience of Refugees in Urban Settlements: A Phenomenological
Exploration of Adaptation and Identity"
Naturalism "The Effects of Urban Pollution on Respiratory Health in Children: A Naturalistic
Longitudinal Study"
Idealism "The Influence of Social Perceptions on Mental Health: An Idealist Exploration of
Reality Construction in Social Contexts"
Objectivism "The Objective Reality of Climate Change: Scientific Data Analysis and Public Policy
Recommendations"
Relativism "Cultural Variations in Ethical Decision Making: A Comparative Study of Business
Practices in Eastern and Western Countries"
Dialectical Materialism "Class Struggles and Their Impact on Urban Housing Development: A Dialectical
Materialist Perspective"
Rationalism "The Role of Deductive Reasoning in Solving Complex Mathematical Problems: A
Rationalist Approach to Cognitive Processes"
Empiricism "The Relationship Between Sleep and Academic Performance: An Empirical Study of
College Students"

5. Comparison of Research Philosophy, Research Approach, Research Design,

Research Methodology, Research Method, and Research Technique
Aspect Research Research Research Design Research Research Research Technique
Philosophy Approach Methodology Method

5
Definition The belief system The strategy for The overall The systematic Specific Specific tools or
guiding how how research is framework or plan that defines procedures for instruments used for
research is approached based blueprint for the how the research data collection implementing methods.
conducted. on philosophy. study. will be and analysis.
conducted.
Purpose Shapes Guides how data Ensures systematic Provides Provides a Facilitates execution of
assumptions about will be collected collection of data to guidelines for structured way to data collection or
reality, knowledge, and analyzed. address research selecting gather and analysis.
and values. questions. methods and analyze data.
techniques.
Key Question What is the nature How will the What structure will How will the Which data Which instruments/tools
of knowledge and research proceed be used to conduct research collection/analysi will be used to apply the
reality in the theoretically? the research? methods be s methods will be method?
research? integrated and employed?
applied?
Types - Positivism - Deductive - Exploratory - Quantitative - Surveys, - Questionnaires
- Interpretivism - Inductive - Descriptive - Qualitative Experiments - Statistical Software
- Pragmatism - Abductive - Explanatory - Mixed - Interviews, (SPSS, Excel)
- Critical Realism - Experimental Methods Focus Groups - Coding Tools (NVivo)
- Case Study - Observations - Observation Checklists
Focus Ontological, The logic of how Provides structure for Specifies the Practical way to Execution-level details
epistemological, data connects to aligning research processes for gather empirical (e.g., software or survey
and axiological theories. activities with goals. carrying out the or subjective data. forms).
assumptions. research.
Level of High (theoretical Medium Medium (broad Medium (focus Low (practical, Very low (specific,
Abstraction and conceptual). (strategic, linking structure of the on focusing on operational).
philosophy to study). systematization). procedures).
design).
Examples - Positivism for - Deductive for - Experimental for - Mixed methods - Surveys for - SPSS for data analysis.
objective hypothesis causal studies. for a quantitative data. - NVivo for qualitative
measurements. testing. - Descriptive for comprehensive - Interviews for coding.
- Interpretivism for - Inductive for systematic study. qualitative
subjective insights. theory generation. observation. - Quantitative insights.
for statistical
trends.
Interrelation Determines the Drives the choice Shapes the Guides the use Implements the Implements specific
worldview of design based methodological plan of methods and design's methods tools to carry out
influencing on philosophy. aligning with the techniques for data methods.
research. approach. systematically. gathering/analysis
.
Key Takeaways:
1. Philosophy: Establishes foundational assumptions (e.g., Positivism, Interpretivism).
2. Approach: Determines the research direction (Deductive, Inductive).
3. Design: Provides the structural framework (Descriptive, Experimental).
4. Methodology: Defines the systematic way in which research will be conducted
(Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed).
5. Method: Specifies the procedure (e.g., Survey, Interview).
6. Technique: Uses particular tools to implement methods (e.g., software, observation
sheets).

6
 Chapter 3: Theoretical Framework, Conceptual Framework, hypothesis, dimensions,
variables and items
Key points
 Theoretical Framework,.
 Conceptual Framework,
 Hypothesis,
 Dimensions,
 Variables and
 Items
1. Overview
In research, both the theoretical framework and the conceptual framework serve to guide and
structure the investigation, offering a foundation for analyzing the research problem. However,
they differ in their scope, purpose, and application in the research process. The theoretical
framework provides a detailed structure that explains the relationship between key concepts or
variables based on established theories. It is grounded in existing knowledge and draws on pre-
existing theories and models from the academic literature to create a lens through which the
researcher can view and interpret the study.
2. Key Aspects of Theoretical Framework:
1. Basis in Existing Theory: A theoretical framework is rooted in established theories,
concepts, or models developed by other scholars or researchers. These theories provide a
foundation for understanding the phenomenon under study.
2. Purpose: Its main function is to guide the research by explaining how and why certain
variables are related. It helps in forming hypotheses and designing the methodology.
3. Scope: It is often broader in scope and is built from well-established and tested theories
in the field. The researcher uses it to ground the study within the larger academic
discourse.
4. Application: It is used to explain relationships and predict outcomes. The framework
helps in forming hypotheses or propositions that the study will test.
Example: If the study focuses on employee motivation, the theoretical framework
may include theories like Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg's Two-

7
 Factor Theory, or Vroom’s Expectancy Theory, to explain the factors
influencing motivation at work.
5. Role in Study: The theoretical framework provides a lens for interpreting findings and
placing them within the context of existing knowledge. It offers a theoretical explanation
for the observed phenomena.
3. Conceptual Framework
The conceptual framework is a visual or written representation that maps out the key concepts,
variables, and relationships the researcher intends to explore. It is more flexible than the
theoretical framework and is often used in qualitative research. Unlike the theoretical framework,
the conceptual framework is typically more specific to the study at hand and may not be
grounded in existing theories.
4. Key Aspects of Conceptual Framework:
1. Emergent and Flexible: The conceptual framework is often developed during the course
of the study as the researcher identifies key variables and their relationships. It is more
dynamic and adaptable to the study's needs.
2. Purpose: The primary goal is to illustrate how the researcher intends to investigate the
research problem, outlining the key concepts and the presumed relationships among
them.
3. Scope: It is typically narrower in scope compared to the theoretical framework and is
unique to the specific research project. It represents the researcher’s understanding and
visualization of the study’s main components.
4. Application: It is often used to identify and define the concepts that will be studied, and
to propose potential relationships between them. This framework is more practical and
guides the operationalization of concepts.
Example: In a study on the impact of social media usage on adolescent self-
esteem, the conceptual framework might include concepts such as social media
exposure, self-esteem, and peer influence, showing how these variables are
expected to interact.
5. Role in Study: The conceptual framework aids in organizing and clarifying the research
process. It serves as a guide for data collection and analysis by defining what is being
studied and how the researcher plans to measure and analyze the variables.

8
 6. Comparison of Theoretical Framework and Conceptual Framework
Aspect Theoretical Framework Conceptual Framework
Source Derived from existing theories and Based on the researcher’s understanding of the
models. problem.
Scope Broader, often generalizable across similar Narrower, more specific to the research problem.
studies.
Purpose Explains relationships between variables Visualizes key concepts and their relationships for
and guides hypotheses. the study.
Use in Helps in explaining and predicting Guides the operationalization of concepts for study.
Research phenomena.
Flexibility More rigid, tied to established theories. More flexible and can evolve as the study progresses.
Example Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs in a study Mapping relationships between social media use and
on motivation. self-esteem in adolescents.
Foundation Grounded in previous academic research Emergent from the researcher’s observations and
and theories. data collection.
Summary:
While both frameworks serve to organize and guide the research process, the theoretical
framework is more deeply embedded in established theories, offering broad explanations of
phenomena. In contrast, the conceptual framework is more flexible and specific to the study,
illustrating how the researcher plans to investigate the variables in the research. Understanding
the difference between these two frameworks is crucial for researchers, as they provide distinct
yet complementary ways of conceptualizing and investigating research problems.
Let's choose a research topic and develop both a theoretical framework and a conceptual
framework for it.
Research Topic: The Impact of Social Media on Adolescent Self-Esteem
Theoretical Framework:
Explanation:
The theoretical framework will draw upon established theories to explain the relationship
between social media use and adolescent self-esteem. Several psychological and sociological
theories can be applied to guide the research.
Key Theories:
1. Social Comparison Theory (Festinger, 1954):
o Explanation: Social Comparison Theory suggests that individuals determine their
self-worth by comparing themselves to others. In the context of social media,
adolescents may compare their lives to the idealized versions presented online,
which could affect their self-esteem, either positively or negatively.

9
 o Application: The theory will help explain why adolescents’ self-esteem might
fluctuate based on the social media images and posts they encounter. Those who
engage in frequent comparison may experience feelings of inadequacy, leading to
lower self-esteem.
2. Uses and Gratifications Theory (Katz, Blumler, & Gurevitch, 1973):
o Explanation: This theory focuses on how individuals actively seek out media to
fulfill specific needs, such as social connection, entertainment, or information.
Adolescents may use social media to gain social validation, which can impact
their self-esteem based on how well they are validated.
o Application: This theory will help explain how social media can serve as a
platform for adolescent self-affirmation, where receiving likes, comments, and
validation boost self-esteem, while lack of engagement may lead to feelings of
rejection.
3. Self-Discrepancy Theory (Higgins, 1987):
o Explanation: This theory posits that self-esteem is influenced by the discrepancy
between one's actual self (who they are) and their ideal self (who they wish to be).
On social media, adolescents may encounter a constant reinforcement of the
idealized version of others, leading to a larger gap between their actual and ideal
selves, which can negatively impact their self-esteem.
o Application: The theory will help explain how the constant exposure to perfect
portrayals of others’ lives on social media contributes to adolescents’ feelings of
inadequacy.
Conceptual Framework:
Explanation:
The conceptual framework will map out the specific variables and relationships between them,
based on the theoretical framework. This framework will be used to guide the empirical aspects
of the study, such as data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
Key Concepts and Variables:
1. Independent Variable: Social Media Usage
o Definition: The amount of time adolescents spend on social media platforms
(e.g., Instagram, Facebook, TikTok).

10
 o Measurement: Measured by self-reported time spent on social media or the
frequency of social media interaction.
2. Mediating Variable: Social Comparison
o Definition: The tendency of adolescents to compare themselves to others based
on what they see on social media platforms.
o Measurement: Assessed through surveys or questionnaires focusing on the
frequency and nature of social comparisons.
3. Mediating Variable: Social Validation
o Definition: The need for external affirmation or validation through likes,
comments, and social interactions on social media.
o Measurement: Measured by assessing how adolescents seek validation on social
media (e.g., how much they value likes and comments).
4. Dependent Variable: Adolescent Self-Esteem
o Definition: The overall sense of worth or value that adolescents place on
themselves.
o Measurement: Typically measured using established self-esteem scales such as
the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965).
Or
The basic hypotheses were depicted as follows:

11
Specific hypotheses were depicted as follows:

This conceptual framework provides a comprehensive and evidence-based foundation for the
proposed research, guiding the investigation of the complex interplay among the key variables
and their influence on policy implementation effectiveness in the Oromia region. The conceptual
framework hypothesizes that reformational leadership can positively influence knowledge
management capabilities, which in turn can enhance policy implementation effectiveness.
Additionally, the framework suggests that sectorial synergy can moderate the relationship
between knowledge management capabilities and policy implementation effectiveness, as well as
the indirect relationship between reformational leadership and policy implementation
effectiveness through the mediating role of knowledge management capabilities.
7. Hypotheses in Research
A hypothesis is a tentative statement or prediction about the relationship between two or more
variables in a study. It is based on existing knowledge, theories, or previous research findings

12
and serves as the foundation for conducting empirical investigations. In the research process,
hypotheses are used to guide data collection, analysis, and the interpretation of results.
Hypotheses are central to both quantitative and qualitative research, although they are most
commonly associated with quantitative studies.
Here is an updated table of 15 types of hypotheses along with testing mechanisms used to
evaluate them, and corresponding references for each hypothesis type.
Type of Description Example Testing Mechanism Reference
Hypothesis
Null States that there is no "Exercise has no effect on Use of p-values to determine if Field, A.
Hypothesis relationship or difference mental health in the null hypothesis can be (2013).
(H₀) between variables. adolescents." rejected. Typically tested with
t-tests or chi-square tests.
Directional Predicts the specific "Increased exercise leads Directional testing using one- Neuman, W. L.
Hypothesis direction of the to improved mental health tailed t-tests or regression (2013).
relationship or effect in adolescents." analysis to test for the specific Pearson.
between variables. direction of the relationship.
Non- Suggests that a relationship "Exercise affects mental Two-tailed testing using t-tests Flick, U.
Directional exists, but does not specify health in adolescents." or ANOVA to assess the (2018). A
Hypothesis the direction. presence of a relationship,
without predicting the
direction.
Simple Involves a relationship "More study hours lead to Regression analysis or Sekaran, U., &
Hypothesis between two variables, one better academic correlation tests to evaluate Bougie, R.
independent and one performance." the relationship between the (2016).
dependent. two variables.
Complex Involves more than two "Study hours, sleep quality, Multiple regression analysis, Burns, R. B.
Hypothesis variables, often looking at and diet collectively structural equation modeling (2000).
interactions between influence academic (SEM), or path analysis to test
multiple factors. performance." the relationships among
several variables.
Causal Suggests that one variable "High social media use Experimental design or Shadish, W. R.,
Hypothesis causes a change in another causes poor sleep quality." regression analysis to test Cook, T. D., &
variable. causality, often using control Campbell, D. T.
groups or longitudinal studies. (2002).
Statistical A statement that can be "The average income of t-tests, chi-square tests, Montgomery,
Hypothesis tested statistically to Group A is higher than ANOVA to test differences in D. C. (2017).
determine whether it is true Group B." group means, or proportions.
or false.
Hypothesis of Suggests a difference "Males and females have Independent samples t-test, Kerlinger, F. N.,
Difference exists between two or more different stress levels ANOVA, or chi-square tests to & Lee, H. B.
groups or conditions. during exams." compare means or proportions (2000).
between groups.
Correlational Predicts a relationship "There is a positive Pearson correlation coefficient Fraenkel, J. R.,
Hypothesis between two variables but correlation between (r) to test the strength and Wallen, N. E.,
does not specify cause and physical activity and direction of the relationship. & Hyun, H. H.
effect. cognitive function in older (2015).
adults."
One-Tailed A hypothesis that predicts a "Increased study hours will One-tailed t-tests or z-tests to Bryman, A.
Hypothesis specific direction of the lead to higher test scores." assess whether the effect is in (2012).
effect (often used with the specified direction.
directional hypotheses).

13
Two-Tailed A hypothesis that predicts a "There is a difference in Two-tailed t-tests or ANOVA Cohen, L.,
Hypothesis difference but does not test scores between to compare differences in Manion, L., &
specify the direction students who study in the means between groups. Morrison, K.
(commonly used with non- morning and those who (2017).
directional hypotheses). study in the evening."
Lateral Suggests that one factor "The impact of exercise on Moderated regression analysis, Baron, R. M., &
Hypothesis might interact or influence mental health is moderated interaction terms in regression Kenny, D. A.
the relationship between by social support." models, or path analysis to test (1986).
two primary variables. the moderating effect of a
third variable.
8. THE IDEAS OF RESEARCH DIMENSION, VARIABLES AND ITEMS
In research, understanding the research dimension, variable, and items is fundamental to
structuring the study and determining how data will be collected, measured, and analyzed. Below
is an explanation of each term:
Research Dimension
The research dimension refers to the broad categories or aspects of the study that help define the
focus of the research. Dimensions are typically conceptual or theoretical constructs that represent
a certain facet of the research topic. Dimensions can be multi-faceted and allow researchers to
investigate a phenomenon from different angles.
Example:
 Customer Satisfaction: A dimension in marketing research that could include various
factors such as product quality, customer service, price, etc.
 Organizational Performance: Could include dimensions like financial performance,
employee satisfaction, and operational efficiency.
Variables
A variable is any factor, trait, or condition that can exist in differing amounts or types and is
measurable in a study. Variables are crucial because they represent the elements that the research
is investigating. There are different types of variables:
1. Independent Variable (IV): The variable that is manipulated or categorized to observe
its effect on the dependent variable.
o Example: In a study about the effect of study hours on test scores, "study hours" is
the independent variable.
2. Dependent Variable (DV): The outcome or variable that is affected by the independent
variable.
o Example: In the same study, "test scores" would be the dependent variable.

14
 3. Control Variables: Variables those researchers keep constant to minimize their effect on
the dependent variable.
o Example: Gender, age, or study environment might be controlled in the study of
test scores.
4. Moderating Variable: A variable that influences the strength or direction of the
relationship between the independent and dependent variables.
o Example: "Study techniques" could moderate the effect of study hours on test
scores, strengthening or weakening the relationship.
5. Mediating Variable: A variable that explains the relationship between the independent
and dependent variables.
o Example: "Motivation" could mediate the relationship between study hours (IV)
and test scores (DV).
Items
In the context of research, items refer to the specific questions, statements, or measurements that
are used to assess a particular variable. Items are the components of instruments such as
questionnaires, scales, or tests that collect data.
Relationship between Dimensions, Variables, and Items
 Dimensions represent the broad conceptual aspects of the research topic.
 Variables are the measurable components within those dimensions.
 Items are the individual questions or measures used to collect data for each variable.
Example in Research:
 Research Topic: "The Impact of Employee Engagement on Job Performance"
o Dimension: Employee Engagement (could include sub-dimensions like emotional
engagement, cognitive engagement, and physical engagement).
o Variable:
 Independent Variable (IV): "Employee Engagement"
 Dependent Variable (DV): "Job Performance"
o Items: Specific questions or scales to measure employee engagement and job
performance. Examples of items might include:
 "How often do you feel enthusiastic about your work?" (for emotional
engagement)

15
  "How much effort do you put into your daily tasks?" (for physical
engagement)
 "I consistently meet or exceed performance goals" (for job performance)
or
No Label PREDICTOR VARIABLES: REFORMATIONAL SCALES
LEADERSHIP[RLSP]
VARIABLE 1: REFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP PHILOSOPHY[RLP]
1. RLP1 The leaders believe that a re-formational leader inspires and motivates 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
followers to exceed their own expectations and achieve exceptional results.
2. RLP2 The leaders actively seek to empower and develop the skills and abilities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
of followers to foster their personal and professional growth.
3. RLP3 The leaders believe that a re-formational leader sets a compelling vision 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
and communicates it effectively to inspire & align followers towards a
common goal.
4. RLP4 The leaders actively encourage innovation and creativity among followers, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
fostering an environment that supports experimentation & learning from
failures.
5. RLP5 The leaders believe that a re-formational leader leads by example, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
demonstrating integrity, authenticity, and ethical behavior in all actions.
6. RLP6 The leaders actively listen to the needs and concerns of followers, valuing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
their input and involving them in decision-making processes.
7. RLP7 The leaders believe that a re-formational leader provides constructive 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
feedback and guidance to help followers develop their skills & reach their
full potential.
8. RLP8 The leaders actively promote a culture of collaboration and teamwork, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
encouraging open communication and mutual support among followers.
9. RLP9 The leaders believe that a re-formational leader recognizes and celebrates 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
the achievements and contributions of followers, fostering a positive and
inclusive work environment.
10. RLP10 The leaders actively promote a sense of purpose and meaning in the work 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
of followers to their individual roles to the larger organizational mission.

16