9th Mathametics EM - WWW - Tntextbooks.in-47-82
9th Mathametics EM - WWW - Tntextbooks.in-47-82
in
Y
1 3 C B
2.5
cm
2
9.3
1
2
2
cm
9.3
cm
- 2 2 3 1.5
18
–4 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3
0.5 4
A
cm O
-0.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 X
-0.5 3
REAL NUMBERS
“When I consider what people generally want in
calculating, I found that it always is a number”
- Al-Khwarizmi
Learning Outcomes
ÂÂ To know that there exists infinitely many rational numbers between two given
rational numbers.
ÂÂ To represent rational and irrational numbers on number line and express them in
decimal form.
ÂÂ To visualize the real numbers on the number line.
ÂÂ To identify surds.
ÂÂ To carry out basic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division
using surds.
ÂÂ To rationalise denominators of surds.
ÂÂ To understand the scientific notation.
2.1 Introduction
Numbers, numbers, everywhere!
ÂÂ Do you have a phone at home? How many digits does its dial have?
ÂÂ What is the Pin code of your locality? How is it useful?
ÂÂ When you park a vehicle, do you get a ‘token’? What is its purpose?
ÂÂ Have you handled 24 ‘carat’ gold? How do you decide its purity?
ÂÂ How high is the ‘power’ of your spectacles?
Real Numbers 41
Certain conventions lead to more varieties of numbers. Let us agree that certain
conventions may be thought of as “positive” denoted by a ‘+’ sign. A thing that is ‘up’ or
‘forward’ or ‘more’ or ‘increasing’ is positive; and anything that is ‘down’ or ‘backward’ or
‘less’ or ‘decreasing’ is “negative” denoted by a ‘–’ sign.
You can treat natural numbers as positive numbers and rename them as positive
integers; thereby you have enabled the entry of negative integers –1, –2, –3, … .
Note that –2 is “more negative” than –1. Therefore, among –1 and –2, you find that –2 is
smaller and –1 is bigger. Are –2 and –1 smaller or greater than –3? Think about it.
The number line at this stage may be given as follows:
–4 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 4
Fig. 2.3
When you look at the figures (Fig. 2.2 and 2.3) above, you are sure to get amused by the
gap between any pair of consecutive integers. Could there be some numbers in between?
You have come across fractions already. How will you mark the point that shows 12 on
1 1 1 3
Z ? It is just midway between 0 and 1. In the same way, you can plot , , , 2 ... etc.
3 4 5 4
These are all fractions of the form ba where a and b are integers with one restriction that
b ≠ 0. (Why?) If a fraction is in decimal form, even then the setting is same.
Because of the connection between fractions and ratios of lengths, we name them as
Rational numbers. Here is a rough picture of the situation:
Fig. 2.4
A rational number is a fraction indicating the quotient of two integers, excluding division
by zero.
Since a fraction can have many equivalent fractions , there are many possible forms for
the same rational number. Thus 13 , 62 , 24
8
all these denote the same rational number.
a+ b a + b - 2b = a - b
` 2 j- b= 2 2
which is > 0 since a>b.
Therefore, ` a 2 b j > b
+
... (2)
From (1) and (2) we see that a >` a 2 b j >b, which can be visualized as follows:
+
Real Numbers 43
a+ b
b 2 a
Fig. 2.5
Thus, for any two rational numbers, their average/mid point is rational. Proceeding
similarly, we can generate infinitely many rational numbers.
Example 2.1
Find any two rational numbers between 12 and 32 .
Solution 1
A rational number between 12 and 32 = 12 ` 12 + 32 j = 12 ` 3 6 4 j = 12 ` 76 j = 12
7
+
Let us take the same example: Find any two rational numbers between 12 and 32
Solution 2
< gives 12 < 1 + 2 < 32 or 12 < 53 < 32 gives 12 < 1 + 3 < 53 < 3 + 2 < 32 or 12 < 74 < 53 < 58 1 32
1 2 + + +
2 3 2 3 2 5 5 3
Solution 3
Any more new methods to solve? Yes, if decimals are your favourites, then the above
example can be given an alternate solution as follows:
1
2
= 0.5 and 32 = 0.66...
Hence rational numbers between 12 and 32 can be listed as 0.51, 0.57,0.58,…
Solution 4
There is one more way to solve some problems. For example, to find four rational
numbers between 94 and 35 , note that the LCM of 9 and 5 is 45; so we can write 94 = 20
45
and
3 27
=
5 45
.
Therefore, four rational numbers between 94 and 35 are 21 ,
22 23 24
, ,
45 45 45 45
, ...
Exercise 2.1
–5 –4 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 4 5
3. Find any five rational numbers between (i) 14 and 15 (ii) 0.1 and 0.11 (iii) –1 and –2
An irrational number is a number that cannot be expressed as an ordinary ratio of two integers.
4. The golden ratio, also known as golden mean, or golden section, is a number often
stumbled upon when taking the ratios of distances in simple geometric figures such
as the pentagon, the pentagram, decagon and dodecahedron, etc., it is an irrational
number.
Real Numbers 45
Remember that 2 is the length of the diagonal of the square whose side is 1 unit
(How?)Simply construct a square and transfer the length of one of its diagonals to our
number line. (see Fig.2.7).
1
1 2
- 2 2
–4 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 4
Fig.2.7
2
Representation of a Rational
=
2
Note
These show that the process could lead to a decimal with finite
number of decimal places. They are called terminating decimals.
Can the decimal representation of a rational number lead to forms of decimals that do not
terminate? The following examples (with non-zero remainder) throw some light on this point.
Example 2.2
Represent the following as The reciprocals of Natural Numbers are
decimal form (i) 114 11 Rational numbers. It is interesting to note
-
(ii)
75 their decimal forms. See the first ten.
Solution S.No. Reciprocal Decimal
Representation
0.3636…. 0.1466…
11 4.0000 75 11.0000 1 1 =
1
1.0 Terminating
33 75
70 350 2 1 =
0.5 Terminating
66 300 2
40 500 3 1 = Non-terminating
33 450 0.3
3 Recurring
70 500
4 1 = Terminating
66 450 4
0.25
4 50 5 1 =
h h 5
0.2 Terminating
Thus we see that, 114 = - 0.36 11
-
75
= 0.146 6 1 = Non-terminating
0.1 6
6 Recurring
Real Numbers 47
Note
In this case the decimal expansion does not terminate!
The remainders repeat again and again! We get non-terminating but recurring block of digits.
For example,
25 =
(i) 7
3.571428 has the length of the period of decimal = 6
27 =
(ii) 110 0.2 45 has the length of the period of decimal = 2
Example 2.3 1
Express the rational number 27 in recurring decimal form by using
Solution
We know that 13 = 0.3
1 = 1 #1 = 1 #
Therefore, 27 9 3 9
0.333... = 0.037037... = 0.037
59 = 5 = + 5
Also, 27
2
27
2
27
= 2 + `5 # 1 j
27
= 2 + (5 # 0. 037) = 2 + (5 # 0.037037037...) = 2 + 0.185185... = 2.185185... = 2. 185
9 + 4 + 5
2.945 = 2 + 10 100 1000
900 + 40 + 5
= 2 + 1000 1000 1000
(making denominators common)
945
= 2 + 1000
2945 589
= 1000 or
200
which is required
2945
(In the above, is it possible to write directly 2.945 = 1000 ?)
Example 2.4 p
Convert the following decimal numbers in the form of q , where p
and q are integers and q ! 0 : (i) 0.35 (ii) 2.176 (iii) – 0.0028
Solution
35 7
(i) 0.35 = 100 = 20
2176 272
(ii) 2.176 = 1000 = 125
28
- 7 -
(iii) –0.0028 = 10000 = 2500
x = 22
9
, the required value.
We use the same exact logic to convert any number with a non terminating repeating
part into a fraction.
Example 2.5
Convert the following decimal numbers in the form of
p
^ p, q ! Z and q ! 0h .
q
(i) 0.3 (ii) 2.124 (iii) 0.45 (iv) 0.568
Solution
(i) Let x = 0.3 = 0.3333… (1)
(Here period of decimal is 1, multiply equation (1) by 10)
10 x = 3.3333... (2)
(2) – (1): 9 x = 3 or x = 13
Note
To determine whether the decimal form of a rational number will terminate or non - terminate,
we can make use of the following rule
p p
If a rational number q , q ! 0 can be expressed in the form m # n , where p ! Z and
2 5
m, n ! W , then rational number will have a terminating decimal expansion. Otherwise,
the rational number will have a non- terminating and recurring decimal expansion
Example 2.6
Without actual division, classify the decimal expansion of the
following numbers as terminating or non – terminating and recurring.
(i) 13 71 43 31
-
64
(ii) 125 (iii) 375 (iv) 400
Solution
(a) 13
64
= 136 , So 13
64
has a terminating decimal expansion.
2
- 71 - 71 - 71
(b) 125
= , So 125
has a terminating decimal expansion.
5 3
(c) 43
375
= 1 43 3 , So 375
43
has a non – terminating recurring decimal expansion.
3 #5
(d) 31
400
= 4 31 2 , So 400
31
has a terminating decimal expansion.
2 5 #
Exercise 2.2
1. Express the following rational numbers into decimal and state the kind of decimal expansion
2 3 22 327
(i) (ii) - 5 (iii) (iv)
7 11 3 200
1
2. Express 13 in decimal form. Find the length of the period of decimals.
Real Numbers 51
1
3. Express the rational number 33 in recurring decimal form by using the recurring
decimal expansion of 11 . Hence write 71
1
33
in recurring decimal form.
4. Express the following decimal expression into rational numbers.
(i) 0.24 (ii) 2.327 (iii) –5.132
(iv) 3.17 (v) 17.2 15 (vi) - 21.2137
5. Without actual division, find which of the following rational numbers have terminating
decimal expansion.
7 21 9 219
(i) (ii) (iii) 4 (iv)
128 15 35 2200
2.3.6 Decimal Representation to Identify Irrational Numbers
It can be shown that irrational numbers, when expressed as decimal numbers, do not
terminate, nor do they repeat. For example, the decimal representation of the number π
starts with 3.14159265358979..., but no finite number of digits can represent π exactly, nor
does it repeat.
Consider the following decimal expansions:
(i) 0.1011001110001111… (ii) 3.012012120121212…
(iii) 12.230223300222333000… (in) 2 = 1.4142135624…
Are the above numbers terminating (or) recurring and non- terminating? No… They
are neither terminating, nor non–terminating and recurring. Hence they are not rational
p
numbers. They cannot be written in the form of q ,where p, q , ! Z and q ! 0 . They are
irrational numbers.
A number having non- terminating and non- recurring decimal expansion is an irrational number.
Example 2.8
Find the decimal expansion of 3 .
Solution
1.7320508… We often write 2 = 1.414,
1 3.00,00,00,00,00,… 3 = 1.732, π = 3.14 etc. These
1 are only approximate values and
27 200 not exact values. In the case of
189 the irrational number π, we take
343 1100
1029 frequently 22 7
(which gives the
3462 7100 value 3.142857) to be its correct
6924 value but in reality these are
346405 1760000
only approximations. This is
1732025
because, the decimal expansion
34641008 279750000
277128064 of an irrational number is non-
2621936 terminating and non-recurring.
None of them gives an exact value!
It is found that the square root of every positive non perfect square number is an
irrational number. 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , … are all irrational numbers.
Example 2.9
Classify the numbers as rational or irrational:
2
(i) 10 (ii) 49 (iii) 0.025 (iv) 0.76 (v) 2.505500555... (vi) 2
Solution
(i) 10 is an irrational number ( since 10 is not a perfect square number).
7
(ii) 49 = 7 =
1
, a rational number(since 49 is a perfect square number).
Note
p
The above example(vi) it is not to be misunderstood as form, because both p and q must
q
be integers and not an irrational number.
Example 2.10
Find any 3 irrational numbers between 0.12 and 0.13 .
Solution
Three irrational numbers between 0.12 and 0.13 are
0.12010010001…, 0.12040040004…, 0.12070070007…
Note
We state (without proof) an important result worth remembering.
If ‘a’ is a rational number and b is an irrational number then each one of the
following is an irrational number:
b
(i) a + b ; (ii) a – b ; (iii) a b ; (iv) a ; (v) a .
b
For example, when you consider the rational number 4 and the irrational number 5 ,
5
then 4 + 5 , 4 – 5 , 4 5 , 4 , 4 ... are all irrational numbers.
5
Real Numbers 53
Example 2.11
Give any two rational numbers lying between 0.5151151115…. and
0.5353353335…
Solution Two rational numbers between the given two irrational numbers are 0.5152 and 0.5352
Example 2.12 Find whether x and y are rational or irrational in the following.
(i) a = 2 + 3 , b = 2 - 3 ; x = a + b, y = a - b
(ii) a = 2 + 7, b =
2 - 7 ; x = a + b, y = a - b
(iii) a = 75 , b = 3 ; x = ab, y = ba Note
From these
(iv) a = 18 , b = 3 ; x = ab, y = ba examples, it is clear that the sum ,
difference, product, quotient of any two
Solution
irrational numbers could be rational or
(i) Given that a = 2 + 3 , b = 2 - 3 irrational.
x = a + b = (2 + 3 ) +(2 – 3 ) = 4 ,
a rational number.
y = a – b = (2 + 3 ) – (2– 3 ) = 2 3 , an irrational number.
x = ab = 18 # 3 = 18 # 3 = 6 # 3 # 3 = 3 6 , an irrational number.
18
y = ba = = 18 =
3
6 , an irrational number.
3
Example 2.13
Represent 9.3 on a number line.
Solution
ÂÂ Draw a line and mark a point A on it.
ÂÂMark a point B such that AB = 9.3 cm.
ÂÂMark a point C on this line such that BC = 1 cm.
ÂÂFind the midpoint of AC by drawing perpendicular bisector of AC and let it be O
ÂÂ With O as center and OC = OA as radius, draw a semicircle.
54 9th Standard Mathematics
9.3 cm
cm 0 cm
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
cm 9.3 cm
Fig.2.8
Exercise 2.3
Real Numbers
Rational Irrational
Numbers Numbers
Non-terminating Non-terminating
Terminating
and Recurring and non-recurring
Real Numbers 55
Any real number can be determined by a possibly infinite decimal representation, (as we
have already seen decimal representation of the rational numbers and the irrational numbers).
Example 2.14
Represent 4.863 on the number line.
Solution
4.863 lies between 4 and 5(see Fig. 2.9)
(i) Divide the distance between 4 and 5 into 10 equal intervals.
(ii) Mark the point 4.8 which is second from the left of 5 and eighth from the right of 4
(iii) 4.86 lies between 4.8 and 4.9. Divide the distance into 10 equal intervals.
(iv) Mark the point 4.86 which is fourth from the left of 4.9 and sixth from the right of 4.8
(v) 4.863 lies between 4.86 and 4.87. Divide the distance into 10 equal intervals.
(vi) Mark point 4.863 which is seventh from the left of 4.87 and third from the right of
4.86.
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0
4.80 4.81 4.82 4.83 4.84 4.85 4.86 4.87 4.88 4.89 4.90
4.860 4.861 4.862 4.863 4.864 4.865 4.866 4.867 4.868 4.869 4.870
Fig. 2.9
Example 2.15
Represent 3.45 on the number line upto 4 decimal places.
Solution
3.45 = 3.45454545…..
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0
3.40 3.41 3.42 3.43 3.44 3.45 3.46 3.47 3.48 3.49 3.50
3.450 3.451 3.452 3.453 3.454 3.455 3.456 3.457 3.458 3.459 3.460
3.4540 3.4541 3.4542 3.4543 3.4544 3.4545 3.4546 3.4547 3.4548 3.4549 3.4550
Fig. 2.10
Exercise 2.4
Real Numbers 57
2
What happens when n = 2? Then we get r 2 = x, so that r is x , our good old friend,
the square root of x. Thus 2 16 is written as 16 , and when n =3, we get the cube root of x,
namely 3 x . For example, 3
8 is cube root of 8, giving 2. (Is not 8 = 23?)
How many square roots are there for 4? Since (+2)×(+2)
= 4 and also (–2)×(–2) = 4, we can say that both +2 and –2 are Thinking Corner
square roots of 4. But it is incorrect to write that 4 = ± 2 .
Which one of the
This is because, when n is even, it is an accepted convention to
following is false?
n
reserve the symbol x for the positive n root and to denote
th
(1) The square root of
the negative nth root by – n x . Therefore we need to write 9 is 3 or –3.
4 = 2 and − 4 =− 2.
(2) 9 = 3
When n is odd, for any value of x, there is exactly one real
(3) − 9 = − 3
nth root. For example, 3 8 = 2 and 5 −32 =− 2.
(4) 9 = ±3
2.5.1 Fractional Index
n
Consider again results of the form r = x.
In the adjacent notation, the index of the radical (namely Root Index Radical Symbol
n which is 3 here) tells you how many times the answer (that 3
64 = 4
is 4) must be multiplied with itself to yield the radicand.
To express the powers and roots, there is one more way Radicand Number
of representation. It involves the use of fractional indices.
1
n
We write x as x .n
Observe in the following table just some representative patterns arising out of this new acquaintance:
Power Radical Notation Index Notation Read as
1
26 = 64 2 = 646
2 = 64 6 2 is the 6th root of 64
1
25 = 32 2 = 5 32 2 = 32 5 2 is the 5th root of 32
1
24 = 16 2 = 164
2 = 16 4 2 is the 4th root of 16
1 2 is the cube root of 8
23 = 8 2= 8 3
2=8 3
meaning 2 is the 3rd root of 8
Example 2.16
Express the following in the form 2n :
1
(i) 8 (ii) 32 (iii) (iv) 2 (v) 8.
4
Solution
3
(i) 8 = 2 × 2 × 2 ; therefore 8 = 2
5 1 1 1 −2
(ii) 32 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 = 2 (iii) = = 2 =2
4 2×2 2
1/2
(iv) 2 = 2
1 3 3
2
(v) 8 = 2 × 2 × 2 = 2 which may be written as 2 2
m
Meaning of x n , (where m and n are Positive Integers)
m
We interpret xn either as the nth root of the mth power of x or as the mth power of
the nth root of x.
m 1 1
symbols, x n
In= x )
m n
(= or ( )m
n x n
x m or (n x )m
-2
Example 2.17 5
Find the value of (i) 81 4
(ii) 64 3
Solution
5
4 4 5
( 81)
5
5
(i) 81 = 4 4
= 3 = 3 = 3 × 3 × 3 × 3 × 3 = 243
−2
1 1 1 1
(ii) 64 3
= = = (How?) =
( )
2 2 2 16
3
3
64 4
64
Exercise 2.5
Why surds are important? For calculation purposes we assume approximate value as
2 = 1.414 , 3 = 1.732 and so on.
( ) ( )
2 2 2 2
2 = (1.414) = 1.99936 ≠ 2 ; 3 = (1.732) = 3.999824 ≠ 3
Hence, we observe that 2 and 3 represent the more accurate and precise values than
their assumed values. Engineers and scientists need more accurate values while constructing
the bridges and for architectural works. Thus it becomes essential to learn surds.
Progress Check
2
3,
3
10 ,
4
6 and 8 5
are surds of different order.
(ii) Simplest form of a surd : A surd is said to be in simplest form, when it is expressed
as the product of a rational factor and an irrational factor. In this form the surd has
(a) the smallest possible index of the radical sign.
(b) no fraction under the radical sign.
(c) no factor is of the form an, where a is a positive integer under index n.
Real Numbers 61
Example 2.18
Can you reduce the following numbers to surds of same order :
4
(i) 3 (ii) 3 (iii) 3 3
Solution
1 1 1
4 3
(i) 3 = 3 2
(ii) 3 =3 4
(iii) 3 =3 3
6 3 4
= 3 = 3 = 3
12 12 12
12 6 12 3 12 4
= 3 = 3 = 3
12 12 12
= 729 = 27 = 81
Example 2.19
2. Show that 3
7 > 45.
Solution
1. (i) 8 = 4 ×2 = 2 2
3 3
(ii) 192 = 4×4×4×3 = 43 3
12 4
2. 3
7 = 7 = 12 2401
1 3
4 12 3
5 = 5 = 5 4 12
= 5 = 12 125
Therefore, 3
7 > 45.
(iii) Pure and Mixed Surds : A surd is called a pure surd if its coefficient in its simplest form
3 4 5
is 1. For example, 3, 6, 7, 49 are pure surds. A surd is called a mixed surd if
its co-efficient in its simplest form is other than 1. For example, 5 3 , 2 4 5 , 3 4
6 are
mixed surds.
(iv) Simple and Compound Surds : A surd with a single term is said to be a simple surd.
For example, 3 , 2 5 are simple surds. The algebraic sum of two (or more) surds is
called a compound surd. For example, 5 + 3 2, 3 − 2 7 , 5 − 7 2 + 6 3 are
compound surds.
62 9th Standard Mathematics
(v) Binomial Surd : A binomial surd is an algebraic sum (or difference) of 2 terms both of
which could be surds or one could be a rational number and another a surd. For
1
example, − 19, 5 + 3 2, 3 − 2 7 are binomial surds.
2
Example 2.20 3 2 4
Arrange in ascending order: 2, 4, 3
Solution
3 2 4
The order of the surds 2, 4 and 3 are 3, 2, 4.
L.C.M. of 3, 2, 4 = 12.
1 4 1 6
3 12 12 4 12
4 = 4 2 = 4 12 = 4 = 12 4096
3 2 12 6
2 = 2 = 2 = 2 = 16 ;
1 3
3 = 3 4 = 312 = 3 = 12 27
4 12 3
The ascending order of the surds 3 2, 4 3, 2 4 is 12 16 < 12 27 < 12 4096
3
that is, 2, 4 3, 2 4 .
2. n 1 1
a × n b = n ab 1
a ×b = (ab )
n n n
3. m n n m 1 1
a = mn a = a
(a )1 m
n
=a
1
mn
= a ( )
1 n
m
4. n 1 1
a a
=n a n a n
n
b b =
1 b
n
b
We shall now discuss certain problems which require the laws of radicals for simplifying.
Example 2.21
Express each of the following surds in its simplest form (i) 3 108
−2
(ii) 3
(1024) and find its order, radicand and coefficient.
Real Numbers 63
Solution
3
(i) 108 = 3 27 × 4 2 108
3 3 2 54
= 3 ×4
3 27
3 3
= 3 × 3 4 (Laws of radicals - ii)
3 9
3 3
= 3× 3 4
( Laws of radicals- i) 1
order = 3; radicand = 4; coefficient = 3
2 1024 −2
3
−2
(ii) (1024) = 3 2 × 2 × 2 × 2
3 3 3
( 2 512 )
2 256
−2
3 3
= 3 2 ×2 ×2 ×2
3
(
[Laws of radicals - (i)]
2 128 )
2 64
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 −2
= 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 [Laws of radicals – (ii)] 2
32
2 16
−2
= 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 2 [Laws of radicals – (i)]
2 8
2 4
2 2
−2 1 1 2 2
= 8 × 3 2 = ×
1
8 2
3
1 1
= 3
64 4
1 1
order = 3 ; radicand = ; coefficient =
4 64
(These results can also be obtained using index notation).
Note
Example 2.22
(i) Add 3 7 and 5 7 . Check whether the sum is rational or
irrational. (ii) Subtract 4 5 from 7 5 . Is the answer rational or irrational?
Solution
(i) 3 7 + 5 7 = (3 + 5) 7 = 8 7 . The answer is irrational.
(ii) 7 5 - 4 5 = (7 − 4) 5 = 3 5 . The answer is irrational.
Example 2.23
Simplify the following:
= 3 7 − 5 7 + 2 7
= 3 7 + 2 7 − 5 7 ( )
= 5 7 − 5 7
= 0
3 3 3 3 3 3
= 2 2 ×5 + 3 5 ×5 − 4 4 ×5
= 2 × 2 3 5 +3 × 5 3 5 −4 × 4 3 5
= 4 3 5 + 15 3 5 − 16 3 5
= (4 + 15 − 16) 3 5 = 3 3
5
Real Numbers 65
Example 2.24
3 3
Multiply 40 and 16 .
Solution
3
40 × 3 16 = ( 3
2×2×2×5 ) × ( 2×2×2×2)
3
= (2 × 3
5 ) × (2 × 2 ) = 4 × ( 2 × 5 )
3 3 3
= 4 × 3 2 ×55
= 4 3 10
Example 2.25
Example 2.26
9 6
Divide 8 by 6.
Solution
1
9 9
8 8
= 1
(Note that 18 is the LCM of 6 and 9)
6
6 6
6
2
18
8
= 3
(How?)
18
6
1 1
82 18 8×8 Activity - 1
18
= 3 (How ?) =
6 6 × 6 × 6 Is it interesting to see this pattern ?
1
1 1
8 18 3 18 4 4 5 5
2 2 6 2 4 =4 and 5 =5
= = = = 6 15 15 24 24
27 3 3 3
Verify it. Can you frame 4 such new
surds?
Activity - 2
E 2
2
2 18
1.5 3 1.5
D 1
1
2 0.5
0.5
A A
O O
Xʹ -0.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Xʹ -0.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 X X
-0.5 -0.5 3
Yʹ Yʹ
Are they equal? Discuss. Can you verify the same by taking different squares of different
lengths?
Real Numbers 67
Exercise 2.6
1. Simplify the following using addition and subtraction properties of surds:
(i) 5 3 + 18 3 − 2 3 (ii) 4 3 5 + 2 3 5 − 3 3 5
Thinking Corner
1. In the example (i) above, can 12 also be a rationalising factor? Can you think of
any other number as a rationalising factor for 3 ?
7 3
2. Can you think of any other number as a rationalising factor for 5 in example (ii) ?
3. If there can be many rationalising factors for an expression containing a surd, is there
any advantage in choosing the smallest among them for manipulation?
68 9th Standard Mathematics
Progress Check
Identify a rationalising factor for each one of the following surds and verify the
same in each case:
3 1
(i) 18 (ii) 5 12 (iii) 49 (iv)
8
( )( ) ( )
2
2
3+ 2 3− 2 = 3 − 2
= 9 −2
= 7, a rational.
What is the rationalising factor for a + b where a and b are rational numbers? Is it
a- b ? Check it. What could be the rationalising factor for a + b where a and b are
rational numbers? Is it a - b ? Or, is it − a + b ? Investigate.
Surds like a + b and a - b are called conjugate surds. What is the conjugate of
b + a ? It is − b + a . You would have perhaps noted by now that a conjugate is usually
obtained by changing the sign in front of the surd!
Example 2.27 7 5+ 3
Rationalise the denominator of (i) (ii)
14 5− 3
Solution
(i) Multiply both numerator and denominator by the rationalising factor 14 .
7 7 14 7 14 14
= × = =
14 14 14 14 2
( )×( )=( )
2
5+ 3 5+ 3 5+ 3 5+ 3
(ii) =
5− 3 (5 − 3 ) (5 + 3 ) 5 − ( 3 ) 2
2
5 + ( 3) + 2× 5× 3
2
2
=
25 − 3
25 + 3 + 10 3 28 + 10 3 2 ×[14 + 5 3 ]
= = =
22 22 22
14 + 5 3
=
11
Real Numbers 69
Exercise 2.7
48 + 32 5 3+ 2
(i) (ii)
27 − 18 3+ 2
2 6- 5 5 5
(iii) (iv) −
3 5 -2 6 6 +2 6 −2
7 −2
3. Find the value of a and b if = a 7 +b
7 +2
2 1
4. If x = 5 + 2, then find the value of x + 2
x
8 -5 2
5. Given 2 = 1.414 , find the value of (to 3 places of decimals).
3 -2 2
2.8 Scientific Notation
Suppose you are told that the diameter
of the Sun is 13,92,000 km and that of the
Earth is 12,740 km, it would seem to be a
daunting task to compare them. In contrast, if
13,92,000 is written as 1.392 ×106 and 12,740
as 1.274×104, one will feel comfortable. This
sort of representation is known as scientific notation.
6
1.392 ⋅ 10 14 2
Since 4
⋅ 10 108.
1.274 ⋅ 10 13
You can imagine 108 Earths could line up across the face of the sun.
Scientific notation is a way of representing numbers that are too large or too small, to be
conveniently written in decimal form. It allows the numbers to be easily recorded and handled.
(iii) If the decimal is shifted to the left, the exponent n is positive. If the decimal is
shifted to the right, the exponent n is negative.
n
Expressing a number N in the form of N = a ×10 where, 1 ≤ a < 10 and ‘n’ is an
integer is called as Scientific Notation.
Example 2.28
Express in scientific notation (i) 9768854 (ii) 0.04567891
(iii) 72006865.48
Solution
6
(i) 9 7 6 8 8 5 4 . 0 = 9.768854 ´ 10
6 5 4 3 2 1
7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Real Numbers 71
(ii) Move the decimal point by the number of places specified by the power of 10, to
the right if positive, or to the left if negative. Add zeros if necessary.
(iii) Rewrite the number in decimal form.
Example 2.29
Write the following numbers in decimal form:
4 −5
(i) 6.34 ´ 10 (ii) 2.00367 × 10
Solution
4
(i)V 6.34 ´ 10
Þ 6 . 3 4 0 0 = 63400
1 2 3 4
−5
(ii) 2.00367 × 10
0 0 0 0 0 2 .00367
5 4 3 2 1
= 0.0000200367
Example 2.31
Write the following in scientific notation :
4 3
(i) (50000000) (ii) (0.00000005)
3 4 3 4
(iii) (300000) ×(2000) (iv) (4000000) ÷ (0.00002)
Solution
( ) ( )
4 4 3 3
(i) (50000000) = 5.0 × 10 (ii) (0.00000005) = 5.0 × 10
7 −8
( )
3
( )
4 3
= (5.0) × 10
4 −8
= (5.0) × 10
7
−24
= 625.0 × 10
28
= (125.0)× (10)
2 −24
= 6.25 × 10 ×10
2 28
= 1.25 × 10 × 10
30 −22
= 6.25 × 10 = 1.25 × 10
3 4 3 4
(iii) (300000) × (2000) (iv) (4000000) ÷ (0.00002)
( ) ( )
3 4
( ) ( )
5 3 3 4
−5
= 3.0 × 10 × 2.0 × 10 = 4.0 × 10
6
÷ 2.0 × 10
Thinking Corner
1. Write two numbers in scientific notation whose product is 2. 83104.
2. Write two numbers in scientific notation whose quotient is 2. 83104.
Exercise 2.8
Real Numbers 73
5. Simplify:
(i) (2.75 × 107) + (1.23 × 108) (ii) (1.598×1017) – (4.58 ×1015)
(iii) (1.02 × 1010) × (1.20 × 10–3) (iv) (8.41 × 104) ' (4.3 × 105)
Activity - 3
The following list shows the mean distance of the planets of the solar system from the
Sun. Complete the following table. Then arrange in order of magnitude starting with the
distance of the planet closest to the Sun.
Exercise 2.9
5 8 14 1
(1) (2) (3) (4)
64 9 15 12
5. Which one of the following is an irrational number
9 7
(1) 25 (2) (3) (4) π
4 11
6. An irrational number between 2 and 2.5 is
(1) 11 (2) 5 (3) 2.5 (4) 8
7. The smallest rational number by which 13 should be multiplied so that its decimal
expansion terminates with one place of decimal is
1 3
(1) (2) (3) 3 (4) 30
10 10
8. If 17 = 0.142857 then the value of 57 is
8 7
(1) (2) (3) 0.01 (4) 13
18 3
13. 27 + 12 =
14. If 80 = k 5, then k =
(1) 2 (2) 4 (3) 8 (4) 16
15. 4 7× 2 3 =
(1) 6 10 (2) 8 21 (3) 8 10 (4) 6 21
2 3
16. When written with a rational denominator, the expression can be simplified as
3 2
2 3 6 2
(1) (2) (3) (4)
3 2 3 3
Real Numbers 75
( )
2
17. When 2 5 − 2 is simplified, we get
(1) 4 5 + 2 2 (2) 22 - 4 10 (3) 8 - 4 10 (4) 2 10 - 2
−3 −3
18. (0.000729) 4 × (0.09) 4 = ______ 6
3 5 2
10 10 10 10
(1) (2) (3) (4) 6
3 5 2
3 3 3 3
19. If 9x = 3 92 ,, then x = ______
(1) 2 (2) 4 (3) 1 (4) 5
3 3 3 3
20. The length and breadth of a rectangular plot are 5×10 5 and 4×10 4 metres
respectively. Its area is ______.
(1) 9×101 m2 (2) 9×109 m2 (3) 2×1010 m2 (4) 20×1020 m2
Points to Remember
p
When the decimal expansion of q , q ! 0 terminates that is, comes to an end, the
decimal is called a terminating decimal.
p
In the decimal expansion of q , q ! 0 when the remainder is not zero, we have a repeating
(recurring) block of digits in the quotient. In this case, the decimal expansion is called
non-terminating and recurring.
p p
If a rational number q , q ! 0 can be expressed in the form m # n , where p ! Z and
2 5
m, n ! W , then the rational number will have a terminating decimals. Otherwise, the
rational number will have a non-terminating repeating (recurring) decimal.
A rational number can be expressed either a terminating or a non- terminating
recurring decimal.
An irrational number is a non-terminating and non-recurring decimal, i.e. it cannot be
p
written in form q , where p and q are both integers and q ! 0.
The union of all rational numbers and all irrational numbers is called the set of real
numbers.
Every real number is either a rational number or an irratonal number.
If a real number is not rational number, then it must be an irrational number.
n
If ‘a’ is a positive rational number, ‘n’ is a positive integer and if a is an irrational
n
number, then a is called as a surd.
If ‘m’, ‘n’ are positive integers and a, b are positive rational numbers, then
n
( )
n a a
n n n m n n m
(i) a =a = a (ii) n a × n b = n ab (iii) a = mn a = a (iv) =n
n
b b
The process of multiplying a surd by another surd to get a rational number is called
Rationalisation.
n
Expressing a number N in the form of N = a ×10 where, 1 ≤ a < 10 and ‘n’ is an
integer is called as Scientific Notation.
76 9th Standard Mathematics