ML_MiniProject_Report
ML_MiniProject_Report
on
Submitted to the
Pune Institute of Computer Technology, Pune
In partial fulfillment for the award of the Degree of
Bachelor of Engineering
in
Information Technology
by
Prof. S. A. Jakhete
2023-2024
i
SCTR’s PUNE INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
CERTIFICATE
Submitted by
is a bonafide work carried out by them under the supervision of Prof. S. A. Jakhete and it is approved
for the partial fulfillment of the requirement of Laboratory Practice I for the award of the Degree of
Bachelor of Engineering (Information Technology)
Place:
Date:
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We thank everyone who has helped and provided valuable suggestions for successfully developing
a wonderful project.
We are very grateful to our guide Prof. S. A. Jakhete, Head of Department Dr. A. S. Ghotkar and
our Principal Dr. S. T. Gandhe. They have been very supportive and have ensured that all facilities
remained available for smooth progress of the project.
We would like to thank our professor and Prof. S. A. Jakhete for providing very valuable and
timely suggestions and help.
iii
ABSTRACT
iv
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose, Problem statement 01
1.2 Scope, Objective 01
2. LITERATURE SURVEY
2.1 Introduction 02
2.2 Detail Literature survey 02
2.3 Findings of Literature survey 02
6. REFERENCES
7. ANNEXURE
7.1 Implementation Code 00
v
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
vi
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROBLEM STATEMENT
The purpose of this project is to develop a movie recommendation system that addresses the
challenge of content discovery in an increasingly vast and diverse film landscape. By utilizing movie
metadata such as cast, crew, and genres, the system aims to provide personalized suggestions
tailored to individual user preferences. The goal is to enhance user engagement and satisfaction by
ensuring that viewers can easily find movies that align with their interests, ultimately improving
their overall viewing experience. This project also seeks to explore the effectiveness of content-
based filtering techniques in generating relevant recommendations.
1
2. LITERATURE SURVEY
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The literature survey provides a comprehensive overview of existing research and methodologies
related to movie recommendation systems. This section highlights the evolution of recommendation
technologies, focusing on key approaches such as collaborative filtering and content-based filtering.
By analyzing prior studies, we aim to identify trends, challenges, and advancements in the field,
establishing a foundational understanding for the development of an effective movie
recommendation system.
In contrast, content-based filtering approaches focus on the intrinsic features of the movies
themselves. By analyzing attributes such as genre, cast, and plot descriptions, content-based systems
can recommend films that align closely with the user's past preferences. This method is particularly
advantageous for users with well-defined tastes, as it provides more consistent recommendations
based on specific characteristics. Nonetheless, content-based filtering may struggle with novelty, as
it often leads to suggestions that are too similar to previously enjoyed items, potentially limiting
user engagement over time.
The literature survey reveals a growing trend towards hybrid recommendation systems that combine
both collaborative and content-based filtering methods to leverage the strengths of each approach.
By integrating diverse data sources, these hybrid models aim to enhance recommendation accuracy
and overcome common challenges such as the cold start problem and limited novelty. Overall, the
findings underscore the importance of continuous research and development in the field, as well as
the potential for innovative solutions that can improve user experience in movie recommendation
systems.
2
3. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN
3.1 DETAIL ARCHITECTURE
▪ Data Ingestion: This involves collecting and loading data from the specified dataset, which in
this case is the TMDB movies dataset. The data will be cleaned and preprocessed to ensure
quality and consistency.
▪ Feature Engineering: Extract relevant features from the dataset, such as budget, genres,
revenue, and vote average. This step may include encoding categorical variables and
normalizing numerical features.
▪ Model Selection: Choose suitable machine learning algorithms based on the problem type (e.g.,
regression or classification). This could involve algorithms like Linear Regression, Decision
Trees, or Random Forests.
▪ Training Phase: Split the dataset into training and testing sets. Train the selected models using
the training set while tuning hyperparameters for optimal performance.
▪ Deployment: Once a satisfactory model is achieved, deploy it for predictions on new data. This
could involve creating a web service or integrating it into an application.
3
3.2 DATASET DESCRIPTION
The dataset used in this project is the TMDB 5000 Movies dataset and the TMDB 5000 Credit
datset. These two datasets are combined together for the model training. Key characteristics include:
▪ Data Preprocessing:
4
▪ Normalize numerical features and encode categorical variables.
▪ Model Development:
▪ Model Evaluation:
▪ Deployment: Prepare the model for real-world application through a suitable interface.
3.4 ALGORITHMS
For this project, the following algorithms can be implemented:
▪ Linear Regression: For predicting continuous outcomes such as revenue based on budget and
other features.
▪ Decision Trees: Useful for classification tasks such as predicting movie genres based on various
attributes.
▪ Support Vector Machines (SVM): Effective for classification problems where a clear margin
of separation exists between classes.
By employing these algorithms, one can effectively analyze the TMDB dataset and derive
meaningful insights or predictions regarding movie performances.
5
4. EXPERIMENTATION AND RESULTS
4.1 PHASE-WISE RESULTS
The experimentation phase of the project can be divided into several key stages, each yielding
specific results:
▪ Data Preprocessing: The dataset was cleaned and transformed, resulting in a structured format
ready for analysis. Missing values were addressed, and categorical variables were encoded.
6
Fig. 4.1 Data Preprocessing
▪ Feature Engineering: Relevant features were extracted, enhancing the dataset's usability for
the recommendation system. This included parsing genres and keywords into usable formats.
7
Fig. 4.2 Feature Engineering
▪ Model Training: Various algorithms were tested, including content-based filtering and
collaborative filtering, leading to the identification of the most effective model
8
Fig. 4.3 Model Training
▪ Recommendation Generation: The model successfully generated movie recommendations
based on user-inputted keywords, demonstrating its capability to match user preferences with
available movies.
9
4.2 EXPLAINATION WITH EXAMPLE
For instance, when a user inputs the keyword "space adventure," the model retrieves movies that
include this theme in their genres or keywords. The recommendation system may suggest titles like
"Avatar" and "John Carter," which feature elements of space exploration and adventure. This
illustrates how the model effectively aligns user interests with relevant movie attributes.
4.3 ACCURACY
We can't directly calculate accuracy in the traditional sense for a recommendation system like this.
Accuracy in recommendation systems is typically measured by metrics like:
▪ Precision: How many recommended items were relevant to the user.
▪ Recall: How many relevant items were recommended out of all relevant items.
▪ NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain): Considers the order of recommendations
and their relevance.
▪ MAP (Mean Average Precision): Measures the average precision across multiple users or
queries.
▪ Hit Rate: Whether a relevant item was present within the top-k recommendations.
To assess the model's accuracy, we would need a dataset with user ratings or preferences for movies.
We could then:
1. Split the data into training and testing sets.
2. Train the recommendation model on the training data.
3. Generate recommendations for users in the test set.
4. Compare the recommended movies with the actual movies that the users liked or rated highly.
5. Calculate the aforementioned metrics to evaluate the model's performance.
• Libraries: Pandas for data processing, Scikit-learn for implementing machine learning
algorithms, and NumPy for numerical operations.
• Visualization Tools: Matplotlib and Seaborn for visualizing data distributions and model
performance.
These tools collectively facilitated the development, testing, and evaluation of the movie
recommendation system.
10
5. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE
5.1 CONCLUSION
The project effectively implements a movie recommendation system that utilizes the given dataset
to suggest films based on user-provided keywords. By analyzing various attributes such as genres,
keywords, and popularity, the model can identify and recommend movies that align with the user's
interests. This approach not only enhances user experience by providing personalized suggestions
but also leverages data-driven insights to uncover hidden gems within the dataset that users may not
have considered otherwise.
11
6. REFERENCES
[1] Python documentation for the syntax of ast (Abstract Syntax Trees)
https://docs.python.org/3/library/ast.html
12