Practical Flying Guide 1 Visual Navigation v1.0
Practical Flying Guide 1 Visual Navigation v1.0
Contents
Foreward...............................................................................................................1
Introduction ........................................................................................................3
Practical Navigation .................................................................................................................................................... 3
Arrangement of the Guide .......................................................................................................................................... 3
Diversions......................................................................................................... 18
Estimating Track ........................................................................................................................................................ 19
Calculating Drift and Head/Tail Wind ........................................................................................................................ 19
Diversion Planning .................................................................................................................................................... 20
Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 28
Appendix 1........................................................................................................ 29
Example Navigation Log ............................................................................................................................................ 29
Practical Navigation
The purpose of this guide is to explain the “practical” airborne techniques and methodology of visual
navigation. There are many publications that explain the under-pinning theory and knowledge that
supports practical navigation, but this text assumes that knowledge already exists, and so lengthy
explanations are avoided.
Practical navigation is a simplified application of these navigation principles, designed for single-pilot
operations. Using a calculated and structured method of navigation avoids the need to “feature
crawl” or follow progress with a finger on the map, with the resulting “head down” time. In-fact the
map can be put away for relatively long periods, allowing time for a thorough lookout, in-flight tasks,
improved situational awareness, and accurate flying. In-flight the use of mental arithmetic is very
simple, navigation equipment is kept to a minimum, and the extensive use of “estimation” is used,
backed up by “gross-error” checks.
With the introduction of excellent technologies, it’s a common misconception that visual navigation
techniques have been made obsolete. Whilst navigation is the topic of consideration, the techniques
described in this guide are designed to ensure proper integration of all aspects of safely operating an
aircraft during a cross-country flight. The routines and workflows acquired for visual navigation
transfer well into instrument navigation and assist in developing non-technical skills such as workload
management, task prioritisation, situational awareness and decision making. As such, the principle
of these routines and workflows remain highly relevant throughout any pilot’s career.
The next section, Navigation Techniques, explains the dead reckoning methods used for navigating.
In Flying the Route, examples are given of how these techniques are applied in practise. These two
sections combined are the most important parts of this guide, as they describe the key principles of
successful visual navigation.
The next sections are Departures and Arrivals, and Map Reading. The next three sections; Diversions,
Lost Procedure and Inadvertent Entry into IMC (Instrument Meteorological Conditions) deal with
some potential difficulties that may arise during a cross-country flight.
The two final sections provide supplementary material for Night Navigation, and Using GNSS.
The guide predominantly refers to use of aeronautical charts and maps in paper format. It is
recognised that there are many types of electronic devices which can also be used for visual
navigation, but advice for these devices has not been included in detail in this guide. However, it is
important to note that if using these devices, they must be very well managed as they can create a
distraction, disrupt workflow and often increase workload.
Visual Navigation – Practical Flying Guide 1
3
Planning and Preparation
The key to a smooth and well flown cross-country flight is meticulous pre-flight planning and
thorough study of the route to be flown. Most of this work can be done several days in advance,
leaving the calculation of heading, groundspeed, and times to the day of the flight once the winds
are known.
The principle being that the more carefully prepared the pilot is, the smoother and easier it will go in
the air. Therefore, time spent preparing on the ground is very valuable. As a guide, in the initial stages
of training, planning and preparation could easily take double the time of the actual flight. This will
reduce as experience is gained, but good preparation always takes time.
Choice of Maps
It is essential to use appropriate and up to date aeronautical charts or maps. Where a digital map is
used, the equivalent paper copy should be referred to in order to verify the accuracy of information.
Generally, the Visual Navigation Charts (VNC) with scales of 1:500,000 and 1:250,000 are used for
visual navigation. The 1:500,000 VNC being used for planning, drawing on the route to be flown, and
for most of the map reading whilst airborne. However, it only shows selected aeronautical
information. For complete aeronautical information the 1:250,000 VNC must be used for both
planning and referred to whilst airborne.
Whilst these two maps cover most visual navigation requirements, there are other aeronautical
charts available and these are listed in the AIP. In addition, for more specialised requirements other
maps or charts may be required, for instance the LINZ (Land Information New Zealand) maps for
helicopter operations.
In addition, a Minimum Safe Altitude (MSA) should be determined for each leg of the route and noted
on the Navigation Log. This is calculated by searching for the highest obstacle 5nm either side of the
track, including 5nm beyond the Turning Points or Destination, rounding the altitude of the obstacle
up to the nearest 100ft, and then adding 1000ft, or 2000ft if over mountainous terrain. As the flight
is under VFR, it will often proceed at a lower altitude, but if an inadvertent entry into instrument
meteorological conditions (IMC) occurs (discussed later), the MSA is already planned. An alternative
method is to use the Maximum Elevation Figures (MEFs) from the map, and then add 1000ft, or
2000ft respectively, but this usually results in a much higher MSA and reduces the chances of exiting
the cloud.
It’s a good idea to plan a “Minimum VFR Altitude to Continue” for each leg of the route and note it
down in the Navigation Log, as changes in the weather can be quite subtle. Once airborne, this can
act as a “trigger” to alert the pilot to the fact they may have descended due to a lowering cloud base,
and that positive action needs to be taken, such as diverting. The altitude chosen will need to consider
the experience level of the pilot, being very conservative for student pilots.
If another airfield is to be visited then a study of the AIP is necessary, including any frequencies, VRPs,
arrival procedures, runways and circuit direction. In addition, the layout of the airfield, taxiways and
holding points, fuel availability and parking should all be checked, and the anticipated route from
touchdown to parking should be reviewed.
The pilot should have in mind some alternative plans, including airfields, in case the route cannot be
flown for some reason. Unexpected weather conditions being the most common.
The more preparation can be done on the ground prior to departure, the easier it will be in the air.
On the Day
All the planning described so far can be done ahead of the flight. On the day of the flight, weather
and NOTAMs must be checked, and any necessary changes to the plan can be made. With the
forecast winds the Navigation Log can be completed, and 6-minute markers drawn on the map (these
will be explained in the next section).
During flight planning the average wind for the planned altitude for the flight should be drawn onto
the map in degrees true and written in degrees magnetic. Immediately below write on the maximum
drift that might be expected throughout the flight. The reason for this will become apparent when
discussing diversions later.
The maximum drift would occur when the aircraft flies perpendicular to the wind and is derived from
the 1:60 rule.
Max Drift = 10 ÷ 2
= 5⁰
Figure 1 shows an example of a 1:500,000 VNC chart, prepared for a typical triangular route. Note
the circles around the Start and Turning Points, as well as gaps in the track lines where fixes have
been chosen. This ensures the features needed for identification are clearly visible. Fan lines have
been drawn, for each leg, on the downwind side, as well as 6-minute markers. The wind is drawn in
degrees True, but written in degrees Magnetic, and maximum drift has been written on to the map
as well.
Dead Reckoning
Dead reckoning is the process of navigating based on simple calculations, estimation and logic. Whilst
a map is used for planning and to check progress in flight, dead reckoning is not navigating by
following a map. Indeed, as previously mentioned, the map will be put away for relatively long
periods. This is an important point to appreciate, as it will result in more accurate flying, greater
situational awareness and less chance of becoming lost or disorientated.
However, the techniques described in this section need to be followed rigorously, for them to work.
Self-discipline and good workload management will be needed, and these are described in the next
section Flying the Route.
Successful navigation will be achieved if the heading is maintained accurately to achieve the desired
track, and the time is properly managed as a means of measuring distance.
When the map is referred to, perhaps approaching a fix, it is first viewed in the context of the elapsed
time since the last position check (TIME). This provides an approximate location along the track,
where the expected features depicted on the map can be reviewed (MAP). Then these features can
be compared to the features seen on the ground (GROUND). This method will reduce the chances of
mis-identification of features, and is a more efficient way of using the map, taking less time. It is also
a very good tool when dis-orientated as the time gives an approximate position along track, which is
particularly helpful over featureless terrain.
Heading
At the planning and preparation phase, the desired true track will be measured from the map, and
then converted to a magnetic track by applying variation. Compass deviation can then be applied to
improve accuracy. Adjustment for wind is calculated using a navigation computer. This results in the
magnetic heading required to achieve the desired track.
In-flight it is vital the pilot maintains this heading. Of course, even with accurate flying the aircraft
may drift off track due to changes in the wind. The tracking is normally checked at pre-planned points
or fixes. There are many methods for correcting track error utilising dead reckoning and the 1 in 60
rule. In this text we consider only one method, which requires the simplest of calculations whilst
airborne.
If the aircraft is found to be off-track, a track error exists, and the pilot must first consider what might
be the cause. Has the D.I. been properly aligned? Has the heading been diligently maintained? Was
In Figure 2, without any calculation, the pilot can estimate the TE as 5⁰ to the left. By correcting the
heading 5⁰ to the right the error is removed, and the desired track will be paralleled. The new heading
is noted on the Navigation Log.
With the TE removed, the pilot now needs to regain track, and for that can utilise the Standard Closing
Angle (SCA) method. This is based on the 1 in 60 rule and is a closing angle based on the speed of the
aircraft.
SCA = 60
TAS nm/min
As an example, an aircraft with a TAS of 90kts would travel at 1.5nm/min (90 ÷ 60 (min) = 1.5).
Therefore: SCA = 60
1.5
= 40⁰
So, applying the above formula, at a TAS of 90kts, the standard closing angle will be 40⁰. If another
aircraft cruises at a TAS of 120kts, the standard closing angle would be 30⁰. This simple calculation is
completed before flight.
The pilot should also estimate the distance off track. This can be done in a similar way to estimating
spacing when downwind in the circuit. The downwind leg is usually flown at 1 nm from the runway
at 1000ft agl, and is often taught to be judged using a point on the aircraft, for example 1/3rd of the
way down the wing strut on a high wing aircraft, or in line with a fuel cap on a low wing aircraft. This
method can be used using the same point on the aircraft, taking into account height above the
ground. Therefore, if the ground feature lines up with this point, the distance is 1nm for every 1000ft
agl. And at 3000ft agl, the distance will be 3nm.
In Figure 3, the track is regained by applying the SCA to the heading for the same number of minutes
as nautical miles off track. For instance; off track by 2 nm, fly SCA for 2 minutes.
Once the 2 minutes have elapsed, return to the new heading which was already re-calculated using
the TE.
To summarise:
3. If wind, assess track error and remove the error by amending the heading
4. Determine how many miles off track, and then apply the SCA technique for 1 min each nm
off track
Time
Similar to Heading, there are many methods of using time in dead reckoning navigation. In this text
we only consider one method, which again requires very simple calculations whilst airborne.
At the planning stage, once a track line has been drawn onto the map between a Start Point (SP),
Turning Point (TP) or Destination, time markers can be added. These are 6-minute markers shown in
Figure 4. The reason for using 6-minute markers is that they are very easy to calculate;
6 minutes = Groundspeed
10
Notice that the markers continue past the Turning Point or Destination. These 6-minute markers now
give a visual time scale and can be used to great effect in several ways. Of course, an accurate watch
or timepiece must be available.
• With the time overhead the Start Point noted down on the Navigation Log, it can immediately
be seen that the elapsed time to the TP or Destination in Figure 4 is 21 minutes. This added
to the time overhead the Start Point will give the ETA.
Visual Navigation – Practical Flying Guide 1
9
• During the planning phase, suitable fixes will have been chosen in order to assess the tracking
and from where corrections to heading, if necessary, can be made as described previously. It
is usually best to choose fixes 6 to 8 minutes apart. In flight the elapsed time and ETA to these
fixes, can be easily estimated from the map. In Figure 5, it can be seen that the first fix will be
reached 7 minutes after the SP, and the second fix after 14 minutes.
• If flying over relatively featureless terrain, as long as the heading is maintained, the aircraft’s
position can be easily estimated using the time scale.
• Airspace boundaries are not always easy to determine from ground features. As long as the
heading is maintained, the position of an airspace boundary can also be easily estimated using
the time scale. In Figure 5 the airspace boundary would be reached 16 minutes after the Start
Point.
• A timeframe assists in the planning of workload throughout the flight. It can be seen that
navigational tasks will be required at the Start Point, fixes and Turning Point or Destination.
However, in between these points the pilot can plan on accurate flying of the aircraft, looking
out, maintaining situational awareness, and other important tasks such as Cruise Checks or
radio calls.
If the wind were to change during the flight, then this would affect timing, and ETAs would need to
be adjusted. Timing would normally be checked at the pre-planned fixes. If there is an error, for
example the aircraft is 1 minute late at the first fix, before making any corrections the pilot should
again consider what might have been the cause. Has the airspeed been maintained consistently? Has
there been any manoeuvring such as avoiding traffic? Has time been logged correctly? If one of these
errors is identified, then the error will be a “one-off” and not cumulative. ETA for the destination can
be amended to 1 minute later and noted in the Navigation Log.
If the error cannot be attributed, then it is most likely a change in the wind. This means the error will
be cumulative along the remainder of the leg and timing corrections should be calculated. Again, this
will be very simple and uses the proportional technique. In this case, as the aircraft is 1 minute late
1/3rd of the way along track, it will be 2 minutes late at the second fix which is 2/3rds of the way, and
3 minutes late at the destination. The ETA for the destination should be amended in the Navigation
Log.
To summarise:
During planning a Start Point (SP), close to the airfield, will have been selected. After becoming
airborne, the pilot will head to the SP. Prior to flying overhead the SP, the pilot should widen out the
turn with the aim of flying directly overhead the SP and on track, as shown in Figure 6. The time
overhead can be checked, but not written down just yet as there are other tasks to accomplish first.
Once on heading it is vital to carry out a Gross Error Check. Use a recognisable feature, ideally straight
ahead in the distance, to discount any gross error in the heading, such as steering 120⁰ instead of
102⁰. The feature used, if not directly ahead, should be as close as possible to the track, and as far
ahead as practical.
Once gross errors have been checked the pilot carries out a WHAT check;
• T Time. Now enter the time overhead the Start Point as well as the ETA
for the Turning Point (or destination) in the Navigation Log. Check time
for the next fix.
Having ensured there are no gross errors, and having completed the WHAT checks, there will be
several minutes until reaching the first fix. The map can confidently be put away. The pilot can now
concentrate on accurate flying, thorough lookout and other tasks such as a Cruise Check.
About 2 minutes prior to the first fix the map can be brought out again, and the method of TIME –
MAP – GROUND used. Using time, the approximate position of the aircraft can be located on the
map. Then the anticipated features can be identified on the map and verified with the features on
the ground. Once the fix is identified any errors in track or time can be corrected as described
previously. If there are errors in both, attend to heading correction and regaining track first, then
make amendments to the ETA.
This workflow and method of managing workload will be successful only if the heading is maintained,
time is managed and the system of putting the map away at intervals is rigorously followed.
Avoiding Weather
The dogleg in Figure 7 provides a simple procedural technique for avoiding a patch of poor weather
en-route whilst ensuring that the aircraft will return to track. The aircraft is turned at a point by an
amount (usually 30⁰, 45⁰ or 60⁰) sufficient to avoid the weather. The time is noted, and this heading
is maintained until the weather is cleared. The elapsed time taken flying off track is observed and the
aircraft is turned back towards track, through twice the original heading change. This second heading
is maintained until an equal amount of elapsed time is flown returning to track, at which point a turn
back on to the original heading is made.
Figure 7 - Dogleg
Although track will be regained, time will be lost due to the greater distance flown. For a 30⁰ dogleg,
the time lost will be a quarter of the elapsed time taken to fly off track. For example, flying off track
for 4 minutes, the ETA will be 1 minute later. For a 45⁰ dogleg it will be about half of the time, and
for a 60⁰ dogleg it will be approximately equal to the time.
A variation on the simple dogleg technique is to turn back to a track parallel to the planned track for
a period of time, as shown in Figure 8, before turning to regain track. In the example below a
45⁰dogleg is used.
Managing Workload
Having applied the dead reckoning techniques above, it is hopefully apparent that navigation is a
logical and systematic activity, based on time. In-flight calculations and adjustments to heading and
ETA are very simple, use of the map is carefully managed, and this results in increasing the pilot’s
capacity to accurately fly the aircraft, lookout and attend to the other important tasks. During the
planning phase, periods of higher and lower activity can be identified, and the workload can be
planned and distributed across the whole leg.
At controlled airfields, the appropriate departure procedure published in the AIP should be chosen
and followed. The Start Point should be selected at the end of this departure procedure at a VRP, or
if there is no suitable VRP, then at a distinctive feature normally 3 to 4nm from the airfield.
At un-attended airfields, the pilot should depart via the circuit, and once clear either laterally by 2nm
or vertically by 1500ft aal (above aerodrome level), may then fly to the Start Point. Again, the Start
Point should be approximately 3 to 4nm from the airfield.
If the Start Point is on the same side of the airfield as the circuit direction (traffic side), then depart
via either the upwind, crosswind or downwind leg by extending that leg to clear the circuit by 2nm,
or climbing clear of the circuit by 1500ft aal, as shown in Figure 9.
All these options must take account of other traffic, with a thorough lookout being maintained,
especially if choosing to depart via the overhead.
Arrivals
When planning the flight to land at another airfield, or for the final leg returning to the original
airfield, plan to arrive at either a VRP or an identifiable feature 3nm to 4nm from the airfield.
Prior to arriving at this point review the AIP plate to refresh joining instructions and circuit
information. If it is an airfield being visited for the first time, the arrival plate should have been closely
studied on the ground during the planning phase, and simply reviewed in the air. Also, review the
map to identify key features and airspace boundaries where applicable.
The important thing is not to rush an arrival. Take the time to collect ATIS if available, review and
plan the arrival, and if required, obtain a clearance to enter a Control Zone. If necessary, “buy some
time” by remaining well clear of the airfield or airspace, and only proceed once the joining
instructions or procedures to be followed are clearly understood.
If arriving at an unattended airfield, normally plan to join the circuit via a Standard Overhead Join.
However, if the runway in use and traffic can be ascertained, then you can plan to join the circuit
direct onto the downwind leg, base leg or long final.
Remember, there may be non-radio traffic in the circuit, so keep a good lookout, give way and
integrate into the traffic established in the circuit.
Map Reading
It has already been mentioned that dead reckoning navigation uses a calculated method, as opposed
to following features depicted on the map, and that the map will be put down frequently during the
flight. Nevertheless, the map is still an essential tool for planning and checking progress, as well as
maintaining situational awareness. Therefore, good in-flight map reading techniques are essential.
Fixes
When in flight, maintaining track and time should be a prime aim. Errors should be recognised and
acted upon early, but concentration on navigation to the detriment of other tasks must be resisted.
It is equally important to keep a good lookout to reduce the risk of collision, to be aware of any
potential weather problems, and to manage the aircraft systems. To this end, significant features
should be selected for use as fixes at the planning stage, at 6 to 8-minute intervals. Fixes need not be
exactly on track, a good feature close to track will usually be better than a poor feature on track. The
ideal fix will have the following properties:
• Big. The check feature should be big or be part of a big feature. However, it must not be so
big that a precise point is indistinguishable.
• Unambiguous. The feature must be selected to ensure that it cannot be confused with a
similar feature nearby.
• Vertical Extent. A feature such as a hilltop, mast or chimney may well be visible from several
miles away.
• Easily Identified. The check feature should be seen and identified easily, to minimize time
spent searching for it.
Only rarely will a feature possess all these attributes and some compromise will be necessary.
Choice of Fixes
Some of the ground features suitable for visual map reading are discussed below. However, only
rarely is any one feature used in isolation; it is the relationship of one feature to another that provides
confident identification:
• Coastlines. Coastlines generally offer an excellent opportunity for fixing. There is usually some
associated feature such as a river estuary, headland, or inlet to enable position to be fixed
with reasonable accuracy.
• Water Features. Large rivers, estuaries, and lakes normally show up well. However, they
naturally tend to occupy the lowest ground in the area and so may be hidden from view by
the surrounding terrain. This is particularly true of lakes in mountainous regions; it is quite
possible to fly within a mile or two of a mountain lake and not see it. Smaller rivers are often
tree-lined; the trees can assist in locating the line of the river but can also tend to hide the
detail so that particular features of the river may not be seen.
• Masts. Masts, with their vertical extent, can provide good visual clues to position at lower
altitudes. However, they should not be selected as turning points, as they are difficult to see
in poor visibility.
• Towns and Villages. The identification of a town or village must normally be done by relating
it to other features in the vicinity, e.g. roads, railways, rivers and hills.
• Railways. In areas of dense population and industry, the identification of railway lines can
sometimes prove difficult. However, in more rural areas they provide an excellent line feature
and, if there is some unique aspect to the line such as a junction, station, or conspicuous
bridge, a pinpoint can be obtained.
• Roads. The usefulness of roads as check features is extremely variable, depending on the
nature of the surrounding landscape. Motorways can be particularly distinctive especially if
viewed lengthways. By comparison, a single-track, narrow road might prove extremely
significant in open country, especially over barren mountainous terrain. In general, the larger
the road the more useful it is likely to be.
• Woods. Like roads, woods can vary between excellent and useless. Although there can be
some change to wood shapes due to felling and de-forestation, the impact of this activity is
normally obvious. Nevertheless, some care is needed.
• Miscellaneous Features. Many other features can prove to be satisfactory navigation checks.
Power transmission lines can act as line features and, can provide pinpoints where they cross
each other or other line features. Power stations, airfields, transmission masts, and
lighthouses, are all worthy of consideration.
Figure 11 – Hold the map “Track Up” – NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATIONAL PURPOSES
Also, try to hold the map up near the instrument panel, when referring to it. This prevents the pilot
from looking down too much, and peripheral vision outside of the aircraft is maintained.
When identifying features on the ground, start by identifying the large features first, then move into
the smaller features next. The presence of features that lead towards the check feature can be used
to draw the eyes to the area. A lead-in is essential for small check features. Look for distinguishing
features, that are particular to the feature you are identifying.
• Large to small. There are ranges out to the East and West.
• Lead in. If flying northwards, there is a main road that runs from the south east, to the north
west toward the village.
• Distinguishing features. There is a swamp to the East with an inward curve. The main road
runs through the village and there is a perpendicular crossroads. Further north west along the
main road is a distinctive “S” bend.
Diversions
Diversions can arise for many reasons, but the most likely cause is un-forecast poor weather
conditions. As such, timely decision making is needed, followed by re-planning and flying to an
alternative airfield. Suitable alternative airfields will have been considered during the pre-flight
planning.
Before looking at an example of a diversion, there are two more airborne techniques which will need
explaining. Similar to the previous techniques, they are designed to minimise the use of navigation
equipment and complex calculations whilst airborne, allowing the pilot to maintain overall
management of the flight.
Estimating Track
If a straight line were to be drawn on the map, it’s angle can be visually estimated quite accurately.
By referring to the 90⁰ angle between the lines of longitude and latitude, depicted on the map, the
angle of the track line can be estimated as can be seen in Figure 13.
Visual Navigation – Practical Flying Guide 1
18
Figure 13 - Visualising Track
With some practise (this can be practised on the ground) the degrees True of a track drawn on the
map can be easily assessed. Applying variation gives degrees Magnetic track, and then all that
remains to establish the heading is to calculate the effect of the wind.
There are several methods for calculating the drift and head or tail wind for a given heading. In this
guide only one technique is described, that of visualising the effect of the wind on the DI/HSI or an
unused navaid. In Figure 14, an example is shown where the aircraft is on a heading of 230⁰ flying at
a TAS of 120kts, and the wind is 260/20. Firstly visualise a vertical line running centrally through the
DI face (vertical orange dashed line). This represents a scale of wind speed, the maximum for this
wind being 20kts. Then visualise a horizontal line running centrally through the DI face (horizontal
orange dashed line). This represents a drift scale, the maximum drift being 10⁰ having been previously
calculated and anotated on the map. Visualise the wind on 260⁰ touching the outer edge of the DI,
as that represents the maximum wind speed.
Diversion Planning
Once the decision has been made to divert to an alternative
airfield, a Start Point must be chosen. This could be a convenient ground feature on track a few miles
ahead of the current position. Or, if there are no useful ground features, the Start Point can be
located using the 6-minute markers, usually a few minutes ahead of the current time. Circle the Start
Point as well as the new destination on the map, then freehand a line between the two, as shown in
Figure 15. It does not have to be perfectly straight.
Visual Navigation – Practical Flying Guide 1
19
Figure 15 - Diversion Planning
Then estimate the True Track using the method already described. The True track in Figure 15 is
approximately 150⁰. With variation of 20⁰ East, the Magnetic Track is 130⁰. With the desired track
obtained, wind can be applied to obtain the heading as well as the groundspeed.
With an initial heading of 130⁰, a TAS of 120kts, visualise the wind of 250⁰/10kts on the DI/HSI, as in
Figure 16
The drift will be ¾ of the maximum drift (5⁰) resulting in approximately 4⁰ to the right, and a required
heading of 134⁰. The tail wind is ½ of the wind speed (10kts) resulting in 5kts. If TAS is 120kts, then
groundspeed is 125kts, and the aircraft will travel approximately 12nm every 6 minutes
(Groundspeed / 10). Now 6-minute markers can be drawn on to the diversion leg as seen in Figure
17.
It can now be seen from Figure 17, that the elapsed time to the diversion destination will be 16
minutes after the Start Point. Convenient fixes can be chosen to check tracking, and the elapsed time
to the fixes read off the time scale.
With practise this will only take a few minutes, and this procedure can be practised easily on the
ground.
With the essential planning complete, use the same techniques as described earlier to fly the new
route. Plan to fly overhead the SP on track, noting the time. Carry out a gross error check followed
by a WHAT check. Calculate ETA for the diversion destination, check the time at the next fix and put
the map away. Concentrate on accurate flying, looking out and other tasks such as fuel calculations
or reviewing arrival procedures for the new destination. A couple of minutes before arriving at the
fix, bring out the map, use TIME – MAP- GROUND to identify the fix and check tracking and timing.
Make any required adjustments, check time for the next fix and put the map away again. And so on.
Lost Procedure
Thorough planning and careful route study should drastically reduce the possibility of becoming lost.
Often the pilot may have a “sense” of being lost, when actually they are merely uncertain of their
position. This can usually be remedied by using the TIME-MAP-GROUND technique. Of course, this is
reliant on the heading having been maintained.
Among the most common causes of uncertainty are missing a turning point and flying on regardless
or having to re-route to avoid bad weather. Checking for gross errors in heading and timing may
resolve the problem, but should uncertainty persist, it is important to recognise the problem as early
as possible and take positive remedial action.
Initial Actions
Maintain the heading until a visual feature is seen. Then, noting the time, hold overhead the feature
and try to identify it by comparing it to the map. It is essential not to start wandering around. If no
visual feature can be seen, then maintain the heading. If possible, climb to increase the area of view
and then fix position by the best available means; visually, GNSS or with assistance from ATC. Many
pilots hesitate in seeking ATC assistance because of embarrassment, concerns over paperwork or
fear of retribution. These concerns must be put to one side as they will inhibit good decision making,
and probably make things worse. If having difficulty in contacting ATC, squawk 7700, and try
121.5mhz, as overflying airliners are often maintaining a listening watch and can assist in relaying
messages. If carrying a mobile phone, try calling the applicable ATC unit. It’s a good idea to have
saved these numbers onto your phone.
Subsequent Actions
Should these first actions fail to resolve the issue then it is important to stay calm, keep holding
overhead the feature or maintaining heading, and keep track of time. An assessment of fuel
remaining should be made. It should be possible to estimate the approximate position based on the
position of the last known fix, the heading flown subsequently and the elapsed time.
If the heading has been maintained, a DR position can be established. Which is another reason why
holding the heading is so important. With consideration of the wind, the heading will approximate
the Magnetic track. Convert this to True track by adding the variation and then freehand this track
from the last known position onto the map as shown in Figure 18. Note the time elapsed since the
last known position and count the time off in 6-minute steps (using the distance of previous 6-minute
markers will be sufficiently accurate). This establishes a DR position and a circle of uncertainty can
be drawn around it. A sensible radius for the circle of uncertainty might be equal to 10% of the
distance flown since the last fix.
Maintain visual contact with the ground and set heading towards a line feature (e.g. coastline,
railway, major road) outside of the circle of uncertainty, whilst map reading from ground to map. On
reaching the line feature, it can be followed until a further feature allows the actual position to be
established.
Essentially it is a situation where good Threat and Error Management (TEM) becomes very important.
Ideally the situation should be avoided altogether but if not, a progressive consideration of threats
will need to be considered and managed.
Avoiding IMC
During the pre-flight planning the general area weather conditions must be checked and assessed as
suitable for a VFR flight, with a low risk of significant deterioration of conditions. The cloud base
should be considered, and a cruise altitude planned to give generous terrain clearance and at the
very least, comply with regulations.
Both an MSA and a “Minimum VFR Altitude to Continue” as already described, should be calculated
for each leg and noted on the Navigation Log. If arriving at the “Minimum VFR Altitude to Continue”
un-expectedly, it serves as a cue to the pilot to take action.
Diversion options should have been considered at the planning stage, and when intending to fly
across higher ground it is useful to have identified “escape route” options to lower ground.
Pilots should assume they are in IMC conditions anytime they are unable to maintain aircraft attitude
control by sole reference to the external cues, regardless of the circumstances or the prevailing
weather conditions. In addition, a pilot should accept that they are effectively in IMC anytime they
Whilst the priority is to leave IMC as quickly as possible, a panicked “knee jerk” reaction must be
resisted, such as a steep turn where the possibility of losing control becomes very real. Movement of
the body and particularly the head, need to be kept to a minimum to avoid the onset of illusions and
spatial disorientation.
Maintaining Control
Once the pilot recognises that they have entered IMC, they should understand that the only way to
control the aircraft safely is by using and trusting the flight instruments. The pilot should make a firm
decision to change from visual reference to instrument flight before visual references are completely
lost. The pilot should deliberately remain calm and initially concentrate on the attitude indicator,
selecting and maintaining the correct attitude for straight and level flight whilst trimming accurately
to ease workload. They can then build up to a full instrument scan.
The altitude now needs to be checked against the MSA for that leg. During planning an MSA was
calculated by searching for the highest obstacle 5nm either side of the track, including 5nm beyond
the Turning Points or Destination, rounding the altitude of the obstacle up to the nearest 100ft, and
then adding 1000ft, or 2000ft if over mountainous terrain. If below MSA, climb immediately to that
altitude. If above MSA, then descend to that altitude (which may result in returning to VMC). Of
course, this MSA only works if the aircraft has remained on-track. If off-track then the MEF can be
read from the map, adding 1000ft or 2000ft respectively. This becomes the MSA and the aircraft must
be flown at this altitude as a minimum whilst in IMC.
Having established a safe altitude, the next step is to consider ice protection. In most light single-
engine aircraft this may be limited to selecting the pitot heat on and selecting the carburettor heat
to “Hot” from time to time to check for induction icing.
Exiting IMC
In most cases, an inadvertent entry into IMC will be best resolved by a 180⁰ turn to fly back into visual
meteorological conditions (VMC). This manoeuvre needs to be planned before attempting to execute
the turn.
Firstly, the direction of turn should be considered taking into account factors such as terrain on each
side of the flight path. For example, if before entry into IMC the pilot was aware of terrain to the left
of track then a turn to the right might be the best plan. Whilst the 180⁰ is the simplest exit strategy
it is quite possible that the aircraft had just passed over higher ground and is heading toward lowering
terrain. In this case a 180⁰ turn would not be appropriate (see below for further actions).
Before entering the turn, the pilot must decide on a target heading to roll out on. This can be achieved
by rotating the heading bug to the bottom of the DI/HSI. Where there is no heading bug, the pilot
should note the heading indicated at the bottom of the DI/HSI – this can be noted down, or a suitable
Navigation Aid can be set with the desired heading at the top of the indicator. A rate one turn should
be used for the manouevre.
Once straight and level on the planned heading to exit, it may take a few minutes to get back to VMC.
A period of time will have elapsed before the pilot recognised that entry into IMC had occurred and
Further Action
If the 180⁰ turn fails to achieve a return to VMC then the pilot will need to remain calm and accept
that they will have to continue to fly the aircraft by sole reference to the instruments, and further
action will need to be taken.
If still in IMC, then the pilot should ensure the aircraft is in stable straight and level flight, and properly
trimmed. Then make a “Distress” call on the most suitable frequency and squawk 7700. This should
be an ATC unit (either “radar”, “FISCOM”, or a Tower). If unable to raise an ATC unit, try 121.5, as
overflying airliners are usually listening out. Do not hesitate to make this call because of
embarrassment, or a sense of failure, or a concern about retribution. The call could be a real “life-
saver”. ATC may be able to offer assistance and advice to help find VMC and a potential diversion
airfield.
If unable to contact anyone using the radio, the pilot should try their mobile phone. It’s a good idea
to have stored the appropriate numbers in the phone. However, the primary task of maintaining
control through instrument flying remains the priority and the task of using the phone, broken down
into small steps.
If all attempts at contact fail, then the pilot will need to come up with another plan. Consider the
bigger picture of the weather situation. Where is the weather better, or in which direction is it
forecast to improve? In which direction is there lowering terrain? The combination of these should
help in deciding on an appropriate heading to reach VMC. Equally, a heading to fly out over the sea
may be best, as this will reduce the MSA to its absolute minimum.
Finally, if all of this fails don’t give up. Review fuel endurance remaining and keep going for as long
as fuel remains. If fuel runs out prepare for a forced landing, by trimming for the glide, turning into
the wind and then keeping the wings level. It is possible the aircraft breaks cloud low to the ground,
and some manoevering may be needed to complete a landing.
Night Navigation
This section discusses the aspects of navigation at night. There are other differences associated with
night flying, but these are well described in other publications and not repeated here.
The principles of navigation at night are essentially the same as for those used during the day.
However, due to the difficulty of recognising physical ground features, the DR techniques already
described are particularly relevant. Problems associated with judging distance are more easily
overcome with reference to the time markers on the map, using;
Planning
Visual navigation at night requires particular attention to the flight planning, with consideration of
some important differences when compared to navigating by day.
During night flight a deterioration in weather can be particularly difficult to detect. It is therefore vital
to have a good appreciation of the prevailing weather conditions and forecasts and take a
Visual Navigation – Practical Flying Guide 1
25
conservative approach as to what is acceptable. Conditions that may be accepted by day, may not be
acceptable for night flight.
Alternative plans and alternate airfields must be considered carefully as many airfields will not be
available at night, limiting options if a diversion is needed.
In the case of operating a single engine aircraft at night, the route over which the aircraft will fly
should favour flatter, “friendlier” terrain, to enable a greater chance of success in the event of a
forced landing.
Ground features for fixes and turning points should be selected for the ability to identify them at
night.
ATC units selected may be different from those selected by day for a similar route, as many units will
be “off watch”.
Similar to planning a flight by day, both an MSA and a “Minimum VFR Altitude to Continue” as already
described, should be calculated for each leg and noted on the Navigation Log. As terrain is difficult or
impossible to see at night, the MSA for each leg should also be the minimum cruise altitude.
Map Reading
Map reading becomes more challenging at night. As stated, terrain is virtually impossible to see, and
the ability to see other ground features will depend on the time of night and amount of residual light
or moonlight available. Also, the map is colour coded and when using red light at night, many of those
colours are not visible. It may be a good idea to carry an extra torch with a dim white light for looking
at the map, or to mark the outline of key features with a dark coloured pen.
Cities and towns can be identified by their shape which is depicted on the map. However, small
settlements and villages are represented by a small circle on the map and may not be easily
identifiable.
Generally, only main roads with street lighting are visible at night. However, during busy periods such
as “rush hour” with large amounts of traffic, other roads may become visible. But only for that period.
If it is a clear night and the moon is present, bodies of water such as lakes, ponds and rivers become
very visible. With no moon, they may be virtually invisible.
Airborne
As for navigating by day, navigating by night requires a managed division of tasks, so that other
essential items for the flight are attended to at the right time. Again, DR techniques, and particularly
the management of time, assists greatly in managing workload and ensuring a lookout is maintained
as well as good situational awareness.
Weather changes can be particularly difficult to detect, but there are some helpful cues to alert the
pilot to the proximity of poor weather. Losing sight of the stars, may be due to flying under cloud. If
a glowing “halo” appears around the navigation lights (red and green), you are likely to be flying at
the cloud base. If ground lights begin to look hazy, you may be flying into a layer of cloud or over fog.
Even though the visibility appears fine, you may be flying through precipitation. Sparkles illuminated
by your strobes indicate precipitation such as rain or snow showers.
Any of these cues require immediate action to avoid an inadvertent entry into IMC.
Visual Navigation – Practical Flying Guide 1
26
If at any time during the flight, problems such as worsening weather, disorientation or with the
aircraft occur, do not delay in seeking assistance from ATC.
Using GNSS
This section discusses the use of GNSS as an aid to visual navigation. It refers to properly installed
GNSS units as part of the aircraft avionics and not hand-held devices such as phones or tablets.
GNSS as an “Aid”
The term “aid” is important as it can be tempting to think GNSS navigation replaces many of the
foundational navigation techniques described earlier in this text. However, this view is in error as all
of the techniques and disciplines required of DR navigation are still highly relevant to ensure a
structured approach to navigation, even when using technology.
The Challenges
The important point being that GNSS is a very useful aid when used in the right way. If used in the
wrong way, GNSS will present many challenges. For instance:
• Data Programming. Manual data input without verification may produce wildly inaccurate
navigation, which may remain undetected until an infringement of controlled
airspace occurs. Programming and data input while airborne, increases the chances of an
error and again necessitates “head down” time.
• Use of the “DIRECT TO” Function. Using this function can lead to a direct routing infringing
controlled airspace, a danger area, or a routing over un-suitable terrain.
• Poor Database Accuracy. Poor database accuracy may be due to incorrect depiction, the
absence of some controlled airspace boundaries, or out-of-date information.
• Lookout. Any re-programming of the GNSS will require considerable “head down” time,
significantly reducing the ability to “see and avoid”.
• Excessive reliance on GNSS. Large navigational errors can arise when GNSS is used as the
sole navigation method, where gross error checks are not carried out, or there is no
Navigation Log to verify the GNSS output.
• Pressing on in Bad Weather. Because of the known accuracy of GNSS, there is a tendency
for pilots to “press on” in adverse weather where previously, they would have turned back
or diverted. Some pilots also plan to fly very close to controlled airspace boundaries in the
belief that GNSS will deliver exceptional accuracy.
When airborne, GNSS should only be used to supplement the navigation. The use of the map, WHAT
checks, gross error checks, time management should all be utilised. These are all “flight
management” techniques, with GNSS providing a supplementary source of information to add
confidence and efficiency.
Pilots need to be familiar with the GNSS unit fitted to the aircraft to avoid time wasted, input errors,
distraction and “head down” time during flight.
The workflow patterns based on time and described earlier should be used to manage workload,
ensure that a good lookout and situational awareness is maintained and to organise priorities.
Up-to-date maps and charts must still be carried in the aircraft and used with visual navigation
techniques as the primary means of navigation and verifying airspace.
Programming should be completed on the ground, and re-programming in the air kept to an absolute
minimum.
Following a deviation from track, care must be taken if using the “Go To” function to ensure that the
new track does not infringe airspace. A return to track as previously described would be a preferable
course of action.
When re-routing or diverting, use the diversion techniques described earlier for estimating track and
heading to get the diversion safely started. Catch up with GNSS programming as time allows and keep
the programming as simple as possible.
Conclusion
This completes the Practical Flying Guide 1 - Visual Navigation.
We have discussed the importance of thorough pre-flight planning, as well as studying the route and
visualising how ground features will appear from the air. Dead reckoning navigation techniques have
been explained with emphasis on the time-based nature of navigating. This time-based structure
provides a managed approach to the cross-country flight, ensuring tasks are properly prioritised and
distributed over the time available, allowing for a thorough lookout and situational awareness to be
maintained. Strategies have been suggested for dealing with situations where the flight has not gone
to plan, either due to deteriorating weather or becoming lost. And we’ve discussed some of the
differences to consider when navigating at night or using GNSS as an aid to navigation.
It is hoped that the techniques described, along with the workload management methods will go a
long way in providing pilots with the tools needed for safe and enjoyable cross-country flying.