Review Not peer-reviewed version

A Review of Vehicles for Fire

Suppression

Osman Acar * and Eija Honkavaara

Posted Date: 3 September 2024

doi: 10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

Keywords: Wildfire; Firefighting technology; Firefighting vehicles

Preprints.org is a free multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that

is dedicated to making early versions of research outputs permanently
available and citable. Preprints posted at Preprints.org appear in Web of
Science, Crossref, Google Scholar, Scilit, Europe PMC.

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions, and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and
contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting
from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content.

Review

A Review of Vehicles for Fire Suppression

Osman Acar 1,* and Eija Honkavaara 2

1 Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology, Selcuk University; osmanacar@selcuk.edu.tr

2 Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, 02150
Espoo, Finland; eija.honkavaara@nls.fi
* Correspondence: osmanacar@selcuk.edu.tr.

Abstract: The increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires necessitate innovative solutions to enhance
firefighting capabilities. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of vehicles specifically designed for
direct forest fire suppression, focusing on their speed of fire response, and encompasses both ground and aerial
units. The study explores the functionality and speed capacity of various fire suppression vehicles, including
fire trucks, firefighting aircrafts and helicopters, robotic firefighting vehicles and uncrewed aerial vehicles
(UAVs). Key features such as mobility, water capacity, and advanced technologies including Artificial
Intelligence (AI)-driven navigation and remote sensing capabilities are evaluated. The review also addresses
the operational challenges these vehicles face in wildland environments. Additionally, it identifies emerging
trends and innovations in fire suppression vehicle technology, offering insights into future developments that
aim to enhance the effectiveness and safety of firefighting operations in forest fires. This overview aims to serve
as a valuable resource for researchers, fire departments, and emergency response planners focused on
advancing fire suppression strategies in forest.

Keywords: keyword 1; keyword 2; keyword 3 (List three to ten pertinent keywords specific to the
article yet reasonably common within the subject discipline.)

1. Introduction
Firefighting has been a major societal challenge for centuries. The technology of firefighting has
evolved drastically in history as shown in Fig.1. The first recorded invention for firefighting is the
manual pump design shown in Fig.1-a designed by Ctesibius of Alexandria in ancient Egypt about
2000 BC. After about 1800 years, the concept of Ctesibius was improved and produced by Hero of
Alexandria in ancient Rome as shown in Fig.1-b [1]. This vehicle was completely human driven like
a wheelbarrow which was commonly used at that time. People used auxiliary tools like buckets and
shovels to pour water and throw soil on the fire until the great fire of London in 1666. It was the first
time that a syringe-like tool with a nozzle as shown in Fig. 1-c was used for firefighting [2]. After the
first patented invention of steam pump for mine drainage by Jerónimo de Ayanz y Beaumont in 1606,
the invention was developed to be used in firefighting until 1852 when the first steam engine was
introduced for fire extinguishing in Cincinnati as shown in Fig. 1-d [3]. Afterwards, the steam engine
for firefighting was carried by horses as shown in Fig. 1-e, when private firefighting services were
first used [4].
The combustion engine and airplanes were introduced to firefighting operations by the end of
19th. century as shown in Fig. 1-f1-f2 [4]. Back then, airplanes were used to carry 25 gallons of water
for extinguishing fires in 1929 [5]. When the Ford company flourished rapidly and standardized mass
production of automobiles and trucks, many of the fire trucks with ladders were developed as shown
Fig. 1-g [5]. By 1950, there were three types of firefighting vehicles along with helicopters as shown
in Fig. 1-h3. As technology advanced, the capacity of vehicles improved in terms of transported load
and pumping systems as shown in Fig. 1-i [5]. Robotics was first studied to involve in firefighting
operations as modern technology by the beginning of the 21st. century which increased the diversity
of the vehicles used for firefighting operations as an assistive vehicle [6].

© 2024 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license.

Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

The first notable use of UAVs in a firefighting operation occurred during the Esperanza Fire in
Southern California in 2006 [7]. By the 2010s, UAVs were being adopted in various firefighting
scenarios around the world, as the conventional technologies such as truck, airplane and helicopter
proceed to high levels of capacity as shown in Fig. 1-j1-j2-m2. The first commercially available robotic
firefighter was the Colossus, developed by Shark Robotics in 2017 [8]. UAVs have been used for a
range of tasks, including assessing fire behavior, mapping, and delivering fire retardants since 2020
[9]. Recently, quadruped robots have been used for indoor firefighting operations [10].

Figure 1. The chronological evolution of firefighting. a) The design of Ctesibius of Alexandria in

ancient Egypt, b) The design of Hero of Alexandria in ancient Rome, c) The syringe-like tool with a
nozzle used for the great fire in London, d) The first steam engine for fire extinguishing in Cincinnati,
e) The steam engine for firefighting carried by horses in Cincinnati, f1) The first fire truck in Los
Angeles. f2) The first fire fighting airplane in Los Angeles, g) The first fire trucks with ladders in Los
Angeles. h1) Developed fire truck in Los Angeles, h2) Developed airplane in Los Angeles, h3) The
first fire helicopter in Los Angeles, i) The modern fire truck in Los Angeles, j1) Modern fire truck for
airports made by Magirus, j2) Modern fire airplane in California, k) Robotic firefighter made by
Magirus, l) Research and Rescue quadruped made by China, m1) Firefighting drone made by China,
m2) Fire helicopter in California.

However, the technology has not yet fully realized its potential, as fire incidents continue to
increase globally, causing harmful effects on nature and biodiversity, and significantly impacting
global warming, people, and the economy. In 2021, wildfires affected 22 out of the 27 European
countries, leading to the burning of over 5,500 km² of land across Europe. The fires cost €54 billion
between 2000 and 2017 [11].
Firefighting involves several phases, starting with fire detection [12], which is a continuous
process that includes identifying wildfires through lookout towers [13], patrols using aircrafts [14] or
land vehicles [15], satellite imagery [16], and reports from the public. In cases of early detection, the
initial attack phase quickly deploys resources to the wildfire to attempt rapid containment before it
grows larger, using ground crews, water-dropping aircraft, and fire retardants. If the fire is not
suppressed in the early phases, an extended attack phase is initiated, involving the mobilization of
additional resources, including more personnel, equipment, and aircraft. Containment actions are
then implemented, such as establishing control lines around the wildfire to prevent its spread, often
involving bulldozers, hand crews creating firebreaks, and controlled burns. Suppression phase
directly attacks the fire along its edges and within its perimeter using water, foam, and fire retardants
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

to extinguish flames and cool hotspots. This is followed by a mop-up phase to extinguish any
remaining hotspots within the fire perimeter, ensuring the fire does not rekindle by checking for and
extinguishing smoldering materials. Finally, the patrolling phase involves monitoring the fire area
for any signs of re-ignition or flare-ups, which often continues for several days or weeks after the
main fire is extinguished.
Satellite based systems are attractive for fire monitoring as they operate autonomously, provide
global coverage, and are highly cost-effective. Several satellite-based systems are specifically
designed to capture images for wildfire detection. Both low earth orbit and geostationary satellites
are utilized for wildfire detection, each offering distinct advantages in spatial and temporal
resolutions [17]. Low earth orbit satellites, such as Advanced Very High-Resolution Radiometer
(AVHRR) [18], Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectro-radiometer (MODIS), and Visible Infrared
Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS), provide excellent spatial resolution down to 375 meters but have
a lower temporal resolution of 6 hours. MODIS data can be accessed publicly through the Web Fire
Mapper service [19]. However, these systems have some shortcomings, including limited
performance in detecting small fires, identifying fires at an early stage, operating through clouds, and
providing sufficiently accurate real-time data to support firefighting efforts. In contrast,
geostationary satellites like GOES and MSG-SEVIR offer images every 15 minutes but with a reduced
spatial resolution of 5 kilometers [20].
UAV-based fire detection is a recent trend topic of research. In wildfires, UAVs provide critical
data about the fire if they have connection to Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) [21].
However, the practical solutions on pose estimation of UAVs without a connection to GNSS are rare
[22]. As for some recent advancement of firefighting technology, the multi-objective optimization
model using the Deep Q-Network (DQN) algorithm effectively adjusts UAV formations for
monitoring and extinguishing wildfires. The DQN algorithm, trained through numerous
simulations, demonstrated faster and more accurate performance compared to genetic algorithms
but requires real-world validation [23]. A data-driven spatiotemporal model for predicting smoke
plume dynamics outperformed the Gaussian puff model, with future work focusing on refining the
model using multiple UAVs and applying it for tracking wildfire smoke plumes [24]. A super-pixel-
based graph convolutional network was developed for UAV-intervened wildfire segmentation, using
the simple linear iterative clustering algorithm for efficient segmentation and precise edge detection.
Machine vision is a fundamental tool for wildfire monitoring, enabling the use of AI and
internet of things (IoT) communication to detect and track objects during intrusions and fire
incidents, with plans to enhance its performance across various settings [25]. The Phoenix algorithm,
integrated into a modified Traveling Salesman Problem algorithm, improves wildfire monitoring
with a single UAV by enhancing energy efficiency and coverage [26]. Given the difficulty of accessing
wildfires by ground vehicles in mountainous terrain, small UAVs present a promising solution. An
effective UAV path-planning algorithm that utilizes real-time infrared images can monitor fires more
efficiently. The algorithm's effectiveness can be demonstrated using the EMBYR model to simulate
wildfire propagation. Additionally, the cooperative control of multiple low-altitude, short-endurance
UAVs, can improve the information update rate during fire monitoring [27].
Robotic technologies have been reducing risks to human life [28]. Robots are used to spray
retardant to burning areas for protection of firefighters from being exposed to fire. Four different
robot groups were mentioned in the literature of firefighting [29]. The classification comprises
detection, fire suppression, smoke extraction, and explosive disposal. Detection robots are equipped
with advanced sensors and thermal imaging cameras, enabling them to locate fire sources and assess
environmental conditions, even in smoke-filled or obscured areas. Fire suppression robots are
designed to directly combat flames by deploying water, foam, or other fire-retardant materials with
precision, reducing the spread of fire and minimizing damage. Smoke extraction robots help in
clearing smoke from confined spaces, improving visibility and air quality, which is essential for both
human firefighters and potential victims trapped in the area. Explosive disposal robots are crucial in
situations where hazardous materials or unexploded ordnance are present, safely neutralizing threats
and preventing secondary explosions.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

There has been significant progress in firefighting technologies during the past years. However,
there is still a gap in the literature about firefighting vehicles and their performance on rapid
intervention to wildfire. This is essential information when aiming for the more advanced use of
autonomous technologies in more efficient firefighting. This paper focuses on different types of
firefighting vehicles and evaluates their fire response speed and capacity. A realistic approach is
proposed for evaluation of fire extinguishing speed of each type of firefighting system. The remainder
of this paper is structured as shown in Fig.2, beginning with advancement of manned ground and
airborne vehicles, and then moving to future systems, including UAVs, robotics, and autonomous
systems.

Figure 2. The sections of the review.

2. Ground Vehicles for Advanced Fire Suppression

Firefighting trucks, the backbone of ground-based fire suppression efforts, have seen significant
technological advancements in recent years, enhancing their capability and efficiency. Modern fire
trucks are equipped with a tank made of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP), reducing its
weight by 47.9% and increasing its capacity by 13.3% [30]. Innovations such as high-capacity pumps
[31], advanced nozzle designs [32], and compressed air foam systems (CAFS) ensure optimal water
and foam application [33]. Furthermore, autonomous cars for firefighting were developed, allowing
for safer operations in hazardous environments [34].
Amphibious firefighting vehicles are specialized apparatus designed to combat fires in both
terrestrial and aquatic environments. These vehicles can transition seamlessly between land and
water, making them highly versatile and effective in diverse firefighting scenarios. They are capable
of operating on land and water, allowing for access to difficult-to-reach areas, such as remote lakes,
rivers, or wetlands [35].
NAFFCO ARFF FALCON series are equipped with powerful pumps and onboard water tanks
to extinguish fires on the airport. They are built to withstand harsh environments and heavy-duty
use, often featuring reinforced hulls and durable construction materials. They have enhanced
mobility to navigate challenging terrains and obstacles, making them invaluable for firefighting in
flood-prone or rugged areas [36].
The propjet technique, powered by compressed gasses, is an advanced spraying method used
in firefighting vehicles of airports. It utilizes the compressibility of air to produce supersonic speeds
through the rapid expansion of compressed air. Key features include a wide and adjustable power
range (0.5 to 50,000 KW), variable outlet speeds (from subsonic to high Mach numbers), and a high
power-to-weight ratio. This technique has been adapted for firefighting, creating a "compressed gas
+ extinguishants" system. This system converts extinguishants into high-speed microdots,
significantly enhancing their firefighting capabilities. For instance, at 0.8 MPa pressure, compressed
air can achieve an outlet speed of 680 m/s, compared to 40 m/s for water. Using a specially designed
energy conversion device, water streams driven by compressed air can reach speeds of 200 m/s with
droplet diameters of 60-100 micrometers, allowing the mist to penetrate flames effectively [37].
A turbojet fire truck, utilizing a WP-5 type aeroengine, can produce a gas jet with speeds of 400-
550 m/s and power up to 4000KW. When this gas jet is mixed with water or extinguishing foam
streams (at 60-80 m/s) in an energy conversion device, the resulting "gas-fine mist" or "gas-
extinguishing foam" stream can reach speeds of 200-250 m/s. This high-speed mist or foam penetrates
flames effectively, covering up to 300m² and extinguishing fires rapidly—an 80m² oil fire can be put
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

out in 10 seconds, and a 520m² fire in 80 seconds. Turbojet fire trucks are highly effective in
extinguishing large fires in airports, oil fields, warehouses, and high-rise buildings, and they also
excel in blowing away and cooling fire smoke [38].
A fine mist fire truck utilizes a specially designed expanding device that converts 1.0-1.2 MPa
compressed gas into a water stream, creating a fine mist with droplet sizes less than 200 micrometers
and an outlet speed exceeding 100 m/s, reaching distances up to 25 meters. This addresses two
limitations of conventional water mist systems: limited distance and poor flame penetration. The fine
mist effectively absorbs toxic gasses, cools the fire area, and disperses smoke, making it highly
suitable for fires in residential buildings, hotels, hospitals, and other places where human rescue is
critical [39].
An aerosol fire truck sprays superfine extinguishing powder to create an extinguishing aerosol
with excellent flowability and dispersity. This aerosol can rapidly fill indoor spaces, achieving a "fully
flooding" effect to extinguish fires quickly and efficiently. It is particularly effective for challenging
fires in tunnels, ancient constructions, and high-rise buildings. Additionally, when the aerosol
concentration exceeds a certain threshold, it exhibits anti-detonation properties, reducing or
preventing the deflagration and detonation of flammable gasses. This makes aerosol fire trucks
especially useful for fires that pose a risk of explosions [40].
The design of a light wildfire truck addresses the logistical challenges of extinguishing outdoor
fires. The primary issue with midweight fire trucks, which are the most used, is their limited off-road
capability. This limitation prevents firefighters from being transported directly to the fire site,
resulting in prolonged pedestrian approaches and slow movement on rough roads. Smaller vehicles,
such as the Dodge RAM, can carry up to 6 people and 1,000 liters of water. While medium-weight
fire engines average 60 km/h on asphalt but drop to 20 km/h on rough roads and require pedestrian
approaches off-road, light trucks can reach 70 km/h on asphalt, 40 km/h on rough roads, and 10 km/h
off-road. A practical calculation showed that for a fire 15 km from the fire department, involving 10
km of asphalt, 4 km of rough road, and 1 km of terrain, these speed differences significantly improve
response time [41]. These technological enhancements given above in firefighting trucks significantly
bolster the overall efficiency, safety, and effectiveness of fire suppression efforts, ensuring a more
robust response to fire emergencies. However, their speed of arrival cannot be as fast as the speed of
flying vehicles especially for wildfires, which usually occur in areas with difficult access. Table 1
shows a variety of information about currently used firefighting trucks as an example.

Table 1. Various parameters of exemplary firefighting trucks [41].

Average speed
Crew Weight
Type Volume(𝒎𝟑 ) on rough roads
(number of person) (𝟏𝟎𝟑 𝒌𝒈)
(𝒌𝒎/𝒉)
Raba R16 6 4 16 20
Unimog U500 3 2,7 16 20
Vw Amarok 4 0,12 2,5 40
Light Truck 6 1 3,5 40

3. Aerial Vehicles for Fire Fighting

Flying vehicles are highly relevant for firefighting wildfires because they can address logistical
challenges more effectively than the ground-based vehicles. They can cover shorter distances
between locations are avoid obstacles like hills, cliffs, or rough roads. In the event of a wildfire,
transportation is crucial because the sooner you can intervene, the faster you can extinguish the fire
and protect the environment.
Helicopters are essential in firefighting for various tasks, including transporting personnel and
cargo, applying water or retardant, conducting fire reconnaissance, aerial ignition, search and rescue,
and law enforcement missions. Type 1 helicopters, the largest and most expensive, can carry 700
gallons of water or retardant and are highly accurate in their drops, coordinating closely with ground
crews. They refill at dip sites like lakes and reservoirs. Some Type 1 helicopters can also transport up
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

to 15 personnel, while others focus on water or retardant drops and moving supplies. Type 2
helicopters, effective for initial attacks, can transport up to nine firefighters and deliver up to 300
gallons of water. Type 3 helicopters, though smaller, have a higher cruise speed and can carry four
to five firefighters with a 180-gallon bucket, making them quick responders to initial attack wildfires
[42]. However, helicopters are not as agile as UAVs. Although helicopters are currently the best
options in conventional technology, UAVs could replace them soon with innovative designs that offer
improved speed and agility [43,44].
Airtankers are crucial in wildfire suppression, offering different capacities and capabilities. Very
Large Airtankers (VLATs) like the DC-10 can deliver up to 9,400 gallons of fire retardant but are less
maneuverable. Large Airtankers, also called "Next Gen," carry between 2,000 to 4,000 gallons and
offer better maneuverability. Single Engine Airtankers (SEATs) deliver up to 800 gallons and are ideal
for lighter fuels. Water Scoopers are amphibious aircraft that can quickly scoop and drop up to 1,600
gallons of water. Military Airborne Firefighting Systems (MAFFS) convert C-130 aircraft into large
airtankers using portable retardant delivery systems. The MAFFS program is a collaboration between
the U.S. Forest Service and the Department of Defense [45].
However, aircrafts have many limitations in extinguishing fires. Aircraft must maintain certain
speeds and distances from the fire, making precise water discharge difficult. Additionally, they
require landing points for refueling, adding operational challenges. Despite these limitations, the
capital and operational costs of firefighting aircraft are extremely high, up to €35 million per year,
with acquisition costs starting at €3 million. Operating costs, including hiring pilots and maintaining
aircraft, can exceed €4,000 per hour. Budget constraints often hinder administrations from acquiring
and operating these firefighting resources [46].
Current practices for fighting fires, including human piloted airplanes, helicopters, ground fire
engines, and ground personnel, are limited by several factors. Most importantly, these methods put
human lives at risk, are inefficient at night, and suffer from limited mobility and inefficient water
release methods. When maneuverability, the consumed fuel, and travel time of airtankers are
considered, a swarm of innovative adaptive UAVs can be more affordable and quicker to detect and
extinguish the wildfires despite their low capacity of payloads before the fire spreads.

4. Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)

UAVs have emerged as pivotal in enhancing the efficiency and safety of firefighting operations
[47]. UAVs, commonly known as drones, offer unparalleled capabilities in real-time surveillance [48],
fire mapping [49], sensing, and monitoring, allowing firefighters to assess [50] situations rapidly and
accurately without putting human lives at risk. The recent advancements of UAV for firefighting are
addressed in this section. Although an airtanker can carry 35600 liters of water at once, it takes several
hours to prepare and reach the burning area. However, if a UAV can carry 100 liters for 30 minutes
at a time, a swarm of 100 UAVs could collectively deliver 10000 liters [51]. Their travel speed can
change about 40 km/h. The traveled distance between fire station and wildfire would be shorter than
the distance traveled by any other ground-based vehicle due to air transportation. Thus, UAVs can
intervene the fire quicker and more precisely from different directions. The advantages of UAVs
include risk-free operation for human pilots, agility, zero-emission, low cost compared to airtankers,
helicopters, and autonomy which is critical for the operation at night.
Recent advancements on UAVs are promising. A reinforcement learning (RL)-based platform
for fire warning and suppression has been proposed, comprising an energy-harvesting (EH)-assisted
small UAV(SUAV) for fire detection and multiple ground-based firefighting UAVs (FUAVs) for fire
suppression. This platform not only detects fires but also notifies FUAVs with accurate position data
to enhance fire extinguishing efforts. The goal is to inform as many FUAVs as possible. A deep Q-
learning (DQL)-based trajectory design helps optimize the SUAV's route to maximize FUAV
notification within a limited time. This DQL-based strategy outperforms traditional Q-learning in
mission success by increasing the number of FUAVs reaching the fire zone [52].
The fire extinguishing balls can be used to create fire breaks by the help of UAVs dropping them
to prevent their spread and protect vital areas. The fire-extinguishing UAVs were proposed to tackle
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

wildfires at their initial stages before ground teams arrive. These UAVs can deploy fire-extinguishing
balls accurately, with 100% accuracy within a 10-meter range and 80% accuracy from heights of 20
meters or less. Field tests showed that continuous deployment of these balls was effective for
constructing firebreaks and protecting critical facilities, achieving high performance in all tested
indicators. The use of multiple UAVs could significantly enhance wildfire response and prevention.
However, issues like the tendency of fire-extinguishing balls to roll upon deployment need to be
addressed, potentially by redesigning them to split upon impact for better stability and effectiveness
[53].
The controlled experiments tested the efficiency of fire-extinguishing balls for combating
wildfires, as part of a research project focused on designing a UAV system to deploy these balls using
remote sensing. The experiments indicated that fire-extinguishing balls could be effective if deployed
optimally by a swarm of UAVs. Future research could focus on developing the swarm platforms,
upgrading the dropping mechanisms, and creating wind trajectory models for various vegetation
types. Initial tests showed that 0.5 kg balls were ineffective for fires involving solid or liquid burning
materials, but larger balls should be used to improve the efficiency. However, these smaller balls
successfully extinguished a short grass fire within a 1-meter diameter circle, suggesting potential for
further development of UAV-assisted wildfire-fighting systems [54].
A fire extinguishing-ball throwing UAV was developed and tested for urban fires. The presented
solution achieved high precision in throwing maneuvers, with an average minimum distance of 0.17
meters between the ball and the target in simulations, and successful hits on a 19x19 mm target using
a real UAV. The system includes a modular architecture with a mission planner overseeing various
tasks, and a speed controller that translates desired velocities into position references. This design is
adaptable for future applications, such as UAVs in urban firefighting [55].
The early fire response and extinguishment was studied by developing a mathematical model
that considers the mass of extinguishing substances and UAVs' battery consumption. The model
aimed to reduce overall costs by optimizing sensor placement to detect fires early and efficiently. Key
factors included UAVs' limited battery life and charging station availability. A pragmatic greedy
heuristic approach was proposed, with the first phase determining optimal routes for fire
extinguishing and the second phase refining the solution using relocation and exchange operators.
The model ensures vehicle capacity and continuous battery supply. For example, using 12 UAVs
results in a 60% reduction, whereas deploying 4 UAVs achieves a 35% reduction. The corresponding
costs for these extinguishing operations are $28,539.20 and $25,592.80, respectively. Results showed
the heuristic algorithm's efficiency in finding optimal solutions, supported by computational analysis
based on Clark and Wright principles [56].
A novel approach has been proposed for autonomous firefighting missions using UAVs, which
includes a local planner module that guides the UAV along an obstacle-free path to the target zone.
Once the target point is detected, the UAV plans an optimal trajectory for a precision ballistic launch
of an extinguishing ball, considering its kinematics. The trajectory is designed to minimize traversal
time and final state error while adhering to UAV dynamic limits. The system's performance was
assessed through simulations and real-world tests involving randomly positioned obstacles and
target locations. Results indicated that the UAV effectively navigated complex environments,
accurately targeting and deploying the extinguishing ball, thus demonstrating the feasibility and
effectiveness of the proposed approach in real firefighting scenarios [57].
The reinforcement learning algorithms were studied to control a swarm of UAVs for combating
wildfires. DQN, Rainbow DQN, and FQF algorithms were compared and using simulations and
realistic wildfire scenarios in AirSim (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA), with swarms of two
and four UAVs. Consequently, DQN and FQF outperformed Rainbow DQN, with DQN and FQF
achieving similar results, although FQF occasionally struggled in some scenarios. The research
highlights the importance of testing with larger swarm sizes to assess efficiency, convergence, and
speed [58].
The multi-swarm cooperative information-driven search and divide and conquer mitigation
control (MSCIDC) approach for rapid detection and mitigation of wildfires was introduced. This
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

method employs a swarm of UAVs working together to efficiently locate and extinguish fire areas,
thereby minimizing the loss of biodiversity, nutrients, and soil moisture. MSCIDC uses a two-stage
search process: cooperative information-driven exploration and exploitation, based on thermal
sensor data, to quickly and accurately detect fires. The approach leverages global regulative repulsion
and merging among swarms to reduce detection and mitigation time, and local attraction among
swarm members to expedite reaching fire locations. The divide-and-conquer strategy ensures
effective allocation of fire sectors for extinguishing. Simulation results in a pine forest environment
demonstrated that MSCIDC significantly outperformed existing multi-UAV methods, reducing the
average burnt area by 65% and mission time by 60%, ensuring faster and more successful missions
[59].
UAVs are recently researched for direct firefighting operations. Most of them are not feasible
enough for the real application of direct firefighting in forest. The reasons for infeasibility are
unconsidered conditions such as instability, hitting the target under windy weather or the battery
life. Although UAVs dropping fire-extinguishing balls seem to be feasible for grass fires, they are
ineffective for fires on trees in forest. However, UAVs are very handy, when it comes to monitoring
and detection in wildfires. As mentioned above, there is a need for a supportive ground vehicle which
has communication with the monitoring and detection system.
A swarm of UAVs for both detection and extinguishing of fire would have a great effect on speed
of firefighting operations. However, the swarm ground vehicles must have the ability to fly for rapid
transportation of fire retardant for fire extinguishing operation. If the transportation of fire retardant
is done by road, the environmental protection benefits of early fire detection will be reduced.
Moreover, these ground vehicles would provide longer battery consumption duration due to the
lower necessity of stabilization compared to fire extinguishing operations by hovering on the sky.

5. Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Firefighting robots are advanced technological tools designed to enhance safety and efficiency
in firefighting operations by navigating hazardous environments, suppressing fires, and conducting
search and rescue missions. A fire-fighting robot designed for intelligent buildings was constructed
with an aluminum cylindrical frame measuring 40 cm in diameter and 80 cm in height. The robot
integrated six systems: structure, obstacle avoidance and driving, software development, fire
detection, remote supervision, and others. The fire detection system utilizes three LM393 3 pin IR
flame detection, smoke, temperature, machine vision, ultrasonic and microwave doppler sensors and
employs an adaptive fusion method, refined through computer simulation, for accurate fire
detection. The robot is programmed to detect and combat fires using sensor-based methods. Upon
confirming a fire, the robot locates the source and extinguishes it, demonstrating the effectiveness of
the implemented fire detection system [60].
The SnakeFighter concept focuses on using water hydraulic snake robots for fire intervention,
leveraging water for joint actuation, fire extinguishing, and cooling. The key design challenges and
details the development of a demonstrator robot that showcases this concept [61]. A biologically
inspired gait pattern was successfully implemented and tested. However, challenges remain,
including the need for a more compact and efficient hydraulic system and advanced control strategies
to make the fire-fighting snake robot fully operational [62].
A real-time monitoring system for home automation integrates various components, including
a fire-fighting robot, security devices, television, remote control systems, and communication
modules like GSM modems and wireless RF controllers. The fire-fighting robot is controlled by an
industrial personal computer (IPC) and programmed using Visual Basic. It receives security data
through a wireless RS232 interface and can be managed via a general user interface [61]. Some robots
employ IR and ultrasonic sensors for obstacle avoidance and use LM393 3 pin IR flame detection,
smoke, temperature, machine vision, ultrasonic and microwave doppler sensors to detect and
extinguish fires. Future improvements include developing a new obstacle detection module with an
enhanced fusion algorithm and incorporating a laser range finder for more precise environmental
mapping [63].
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

There are some recent advancements in robot-assisted firefighting systems, focusing on

technologies that enhance risky interventions, localization, navigation, early rescue, and
environmental surveillance. It contrasts the mentioned conventional firefighting robots and
traditional methods with emerging Cyber Physical Systems (CPSs), which integrate computational
and physical elements for improved autonomy and resilience. Integrating new technologies and
systems can significantly improve real-time data utilization, supporting better decision-making and
increasing the effectiveness of fire protection and firefighting operations [64].
A firefighting robot named CeaseFire was developed to assist firefighters by monitoring
temperature and air quality at fire sites and transmitting data to a remote operator. The robot featured
an onboard camera for visual assessment and optional audio capabilities for communication with
victims. Equipped with a large water tank and CO2-based fire extinguishing system, CeaseFire could
handle various types of fires, including electrical ones, and included a mist spray mechanism for self-
protection. Initial tests with artificial fires had shown that the robot performed effectively and was
expected to provide valuable support in real firefighting scenarios. Future improvements will focus
on enhancing temperature shielding, using more resistant materials, and incorporating lighter
batteries and heat-resistant components [65].
Firefighting robots are designed to extinguish fires without exposing firefighters to danger.
QRob's compact size allows it to access narrow spaces, and it is equipped with an ultrasonic sensor
to avoid obstacles and a flame sensor for fire detection. The robot can automatically identify fire
locations and extinguish fires remotely from a distance of up to 40 cm. Human operators can monitor
QRob using a camera connected to a smartphone or other remote devices [66].
Rainbow 5 is an advanced firefighting robot from Japan designed for complex fire scenarios,
including petrochemical fires, aircraft crashes, and oil/fat fires. It features an obstacle removal system
to clear debris and a dual-nozzle system: one for high-volume water discharge (5000 liters/min) and
one for foam (3000 liters/min). This configuration allows it to effectively manage intense fires and
hazardous environments, including those with explosion risks [67].
The Thermite RS1 is a highly capable and rugged firefighting robot designed for challenging
environments. It features a 24 hp diesel engine and can output up to 1,250 gallons per minute (gpm)
at 200 psi. Controlled remotely via a bellypack controller, it provides real-time high-definition and
infrared video, allowing precise operation in hazardous conditions. The RS1 is built with durable
construction-grade components, enabling it to push vehicles, climb stairs, and handle extreme
elements. It offers a stand-off range of 300-500 meters, has cooling sprayers for tracks and vehicles,
and can operate for up to 20 hours on a single tank. Optional attachments include a foam nozzle and
scene lighting for enhanced functionality [68].
The LUF 60 firefighting robot is designed for challenging fire scenarios where traditional
methods are impractical. It features a powerful 140 HP diesel engine and a crawler chassis that
ensures stability, precision, and the ability to navigate obstacles and steep inclines. The robot can
deliver up to 2,400 liters of water per minute as an atomized water jet with a reach of over 60 meters.
It can also switch to foam mode, with a foam throwing distance of approximately 35 meters, for
additional fire-fighting capabilities [69].
The LUF 120 is designed for combating large fires, with a water output of up to 18,000 liters per
minute from its main monitor. It is powered by a V6 450 hp diesel engine and features two hydraulic
water pumps for long-distance water projection. The robot includes a monitor that can rotate 350°
and adjust vertically from +20° to +80°, allowing it to operate effectively in challenging environments
like refinery fires. The crawler chassis ensures precise maneuverability and stability, and the robot
can function in extreme heat and low oxygen conditions without endangering human lives [70].
The LUF 300 is designed for tackling large fires with high efficiency and flexibility. It comes in
two models: the LUF 300 SG with an extendable extinguishing cannon and the LUF 300 HF with an
adjustable monitor nozzle. The LUF 300 HF features a 300 HP diesel engine, delivering water at a
distance of up to 110 meters and a rate of 8,000 liters per minute with 6 bar pressure boost. Its monitor
is adjustable vertically from -10° to +80° and can rotate 350°, providing flexibility in challenging
scenarios like refinery fires. The crawler chassis ensures stable maneuverability and can handle
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

10

obstacles such as cars. The machine operates effectively in extreme heat and low oxygen
environments [71].
The LUF Nano firefighting robot is an innovative and highly maneuverable device designed for
challenging terrains. It operates entirely on electricity and features an extinguishing monitor that
allows fires to be tackled from a safe distance, which is particularly useful in hazardous situations.
Additionally, it can carry equipment to the fire scene, enhancing its utility. Its agility and flexibility
make it suitable for complex firefighting scenarios [72].
The Parosha Cheatah GOSAFER is a versatile uncrewed ground vehicle (UGV) suitable for
firefighting and various other activities like rescue and exploration. It features a heavy-duty
hydraulic-powered robot arm with a water spray for extinguishing fires and is equipped with a range
of advanced tools, including day and night video cameras, thermal imaging, a laser rangefinder, an
acoustic detection system, and a nuclear detection system. The robust and adaptable GOSAFER can
be controlled from a distance, ensuring operator safety [73].
All the systems above are powerful in terms of extinguishing capability and safety. However,
they are not fast enough to prevent fire spread. Most of them need to be transported to the incident
area and controlled by an operator which causes a limitation of working hours. They are also slow
when it comes to refilling the tank.

6. Discussion and Outlook

6.1 Comparison of response speed of different techniques to evaluate the burned area upon the
arrival of fire trucks, air-tankers, helicopters, and UAVs. The data of fire spread rate produced by
burning white birch under 4.32 km/h wind speed and zero slope was selected to idealize the
conditions for all kinds of vehicles. According to the test results, the flame spread rate was 0.11 km/h
(Fig.3). In other words, if the fire ignites at a point in the middle of a forest, the flames will create a
circle with a 200 meter diameter, resulting in an approximately 31 500 square meter burning area
within one hour. Based on this data, we created an evaluation table for the burned area during the
arrival of each type of vehicle (Table 2). We assumed that the fire was in a forest with flat topography
and 15 km in top view from a fire station. The ground-based vehicles must use the main road to
approach the location. We designed a path scenario consisting of 15, 12, and 9 right-angled triangles,
as shown in Fig. 4 for the ground-based vehicles. For example, a truck will travel 12 km on the main
road at a speed of 90 km/h , then stop by the roadside. At this point, firefighters will spread out fire
hoses and begin extinguishing the fire. They can also deploy robotic firefighters, which means the
average speed to reach fire will decrease, as shown in Table 2.
A case study was conducted to compare firefighting vehicles under ideal conditions, including
a wind speed of 4.32 km/h, a zero slope etc. Although the cost of robotic firefighters is at the same
level as UAVs, they are not as effective as UAV due to arrival time to the incident location. However,
robotic firefighting technology can serve as an assistive tool to enhance the firefighter safety. The
significant disadvantage of electric UAVs, in particular, is the limited battery duration, which can
restrict the distance they can travel. As a result, UAVs are the most efficient for fires that are close to
a station to allow for battery changes. Given the cost of airtankers and helicopters shown in Table 2,
investing in a UAV-based firefighting system and station would be worthwhile.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

11

Figure 3. Flame spread rate with respect to wind velocity [74].

Table 2. Comparison of fire fighting vehicles response speed.

Average weight Average speed on Travel distance for Predicted Burned

Type with payload rough roads incident location and Area during Arrival
(Kg) (𝒌𝒎/𝒉) overall cost (𝒌𝒎, 𝒌€) (m2)
Fire Truck
30 000 40 21, 40 [76] 15 750
[75]
Robotic
Firefighter 1000 5 21, 80 [78] 126 000
[77]
Airtanker,
Helicopter 40 000 225 15, 10 000 2 100
[79]
UAV [80] 150 30 15, 80 15 750
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

12

Figure 4. A location of fire for ideal conditions of all the vehicles.

6.2. Outlook
Global warming has increasingly intensified wildfires over the past decade, highlighting the
inadequacy of traditional firefighting methods in effectively protecting people, property, and the
environment. This growing challenge demands innovative approaches and advancements in
firefighting technology and strategy. Our literature review has highlighted several critical areas for
research and development, which are outlined below.
Monitoring systems are crucial for early detection, assessment, and the mop-up phase of
firefighting operations. These systems help control fires and limit their spread while they are still
small and manageable. This is a key area of ongoing development, where technology offers numerous
new possibilities. In particular, there is a need for a sustainable hybrid monitoring system based on
UAVs and satellites that operates automatically and harmonically day and night especially during
the summer season in various countries.
Advancing UAV-based firefighting, there is a critical need to enhance both technology and
autonomy in UAV systems for effective management of multiple drones simultaneously. Research
and development should focus on establishing multiple UAV stations designed specifically for
wildfire scenarios, including mobile stations for the rapid deployment of UAV swarms. Ensuring safe
operation, especially when UAVs are used alongside manned aircraft, necessitates the development
of effective airspace management strategies. Creating reliable AI-based methods for precise detection
of fire fronts and hotspots is also crucial for improving UAV effectiveness in firefighting operations.
Additionally, to enhance UAV-based fire suppression efficiency, it is essential to study and test
various fire retardants to evaluate their extinguishing performance and electric consumption.
Furthermore, developing quick battery and retardant tank replacement systems will be necessary to
maintain UAV efficiency during firefighting tasks.
Considering the advantages of both flying and ground-based robotic systems, we propose the
development of adaptive vehicles capable of both aerial flight and navigation over rough terrain.
Such a vehicle could efficiently transport fire retardant from a station directly to the fire's location,
significantly aiding in extinguishing the fire before it has a chance to spread. To effectively implement
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

13

this technology, several advancements are necessary. For instance, developing a novel propeller
design is crucial to enable the UAV to perform effectively in both aerial and ground-based operations.
This would facilitate seamless transitions between flying and navigating challenging terrain, thus
optimizing the firefighting process. Additionally, integrating robust systems for rapid battery and
retardant tank replacement would further enhance the operational efficiency of these adaptive
vehicles, ensuring they remain effective throughout extended firefighting missions.
To support decision making during wildfires, we propose a digital twin-based system that
integrates relevant environmental information (e.g., topography, fuel, weather conditions) along
with real-time data on fire status could serve as the foundation for a firefighting decision support
system. This system could serve as a foundation for comprehensive firefighting decision support
system, incorporating fire spread modeling to predict the fire’s progression and optimize
extinguishing operations.
The proposed UAV-assisted firefighting system integrates satellite detection, UAV swarms, and
adaptive bimodal vehicles to improve wildfire response. The main phases of the system are
visualized in Figure 5 and detailed below:
1. Initial Triggering: The operation begins with a satellite detecting suspicious signs, such as smoke or
fire, in the forest. Satellite systems are essential for early fire detection, but there is a need to be
integrated with UAVs for detailed situational picture to foster faster and more accurate detection of
early fires. Furthermore, towers and citizen observations can be integrated to this system.
2. UAV Swarm Deployment: Upon receiving an alert from the satellite system, a swarm of UAVs is
launched from mobile stations strategically positioned within the forest. These UAVs take off to
monitor the area, especially in cases where satellite data is obscured by clouds or has limited update
intervals and spatial resolution. Fire monitoring UAV systems play a crucial role in assisting
firefighting crews in the field, detecting fires and evaluating their progress.
3. Precise Localization and Planning: The swarm of UAVs locates the fire's precise position to enable
creating a detailed plan to respond. This includes assessing the fire's current status and identifying
the best approach for extinguishing it. UAVs provide critical, real-time data that improves the
accuracy of fire localization, helping crews make informed decisions.
4. Firefighting Activation: Based on the data and plan generated by the UAV monitoring system,
adaptive bimodal UAVs (capable of both flight and ground navigation) are deployed. These UAVs
approach the fire's hot spot to spray retardant, aiming to extinguish the fire before it has a chance to
spread further.
5. Operational Efficiency and Autonomy: During firefighting operations, UAVs must monitor the forest
to determine the most efficient path to the firefighting with minimal battery power usage. If battery
power drops below a certain threshold, the adaptive UAV must return to its station to automatically
replace the battery and refill the retardant tank. All of these processes, from monitoring to refueling,
are managed autonomously by AI systems to ensure continuous and effective firefighting operations.
6. Fire Suppression and Additional Measures: Ideally, the fire is quickly suppressed due to early
detection and rapid intervention by the UAVs. However, if the fire begins to spread beyond control,
more robust equipment, such as fire trucks or ground-based robots, is deployed. In such cases, the
precise situational data provided by the UAVs enhances the efficiency of the firefighting efforts,
allowing for better coordination and resource allocation.
7. Post-Extinguishing Monitoring: After the fire has been extinguished, continuous monitoring is
essential to prevent re-ignitions. Both satellite systems and UAV swarms continue to monitor the
area, ensuring that any remaining hot spots are detected and addressed before they can escalate into
another fire.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

14

Figure 5. The proposed concept of firefighting operations.

7. Conclusion
This review aims to attract the attention of researchers and establish a comprehensive
framework for advancing robotic firefighting technology. We have compiled an extensive overview
of various vehicles currently employed in firefighting, systematically classifying them and
highlighting key trends for each vehicle type. Additionally, we provide a comparison of these
vehicles based on realistic data under ideal conditions. To push the boundaries of current practices,
we also propose a firefighting concept that integrates satellites, UAVs, and ground vehicles.
A critical aspect of fire suppression is the speed of intervention. Recent technological
advancements offer the capability to perform fire detection and suppression operations with greater
speed and efficiency. However, there is a need for innovative approaches to develop novel solutions.
We propose that vehicles capable of both aerial and ground transportation are crucial for modern
firefighting operations. While the air-tankers and helicopters are widely used, they often lack the
precision and speed required and incur significant operational costs. In contrast, robotic technologies
offer a promising alternative, potentially providing a more cost-effective and efficient solution.
UAVs have already demonstrated their potential in fire suppression, particularly in
extinguishing fires by dropping fire-suppressing balls. However, their current capabilities are largely
limited to managing grass fires and ground-level blazes within wildfires. UAVs are typically
evaluated in controlled experimental environments that do not fully reflect real-world conditions.
For example, the wind can cause a lot of electricity consumption during the operation as the UAVs
work to stabilize their position. Therefore, more comprehensive research is needed to assess UAV
performance in realistic scenarios, considering both energy consumption and fire suppression
efficiency. UAV designs should be reimagined to enable seamless operation in both aerial and
ground-based modes, enhancing their versatility and effectiveness in diverse firefighting situations.

References
1. Nolan, Dennis P. Firefighting pumping systems at industrial facilities. William Andrew, 2011.
2. “Five ways the Great Fire changed London”Museum of London, BBC, 2016.
3. “The Age of Steam Fire Engines” The Fire Fighters Association of Missouri, 2022.
4. “A Hot Spot for Firefighting History and Culture”Los Angeles Fire Museum, 2022.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

15

5. L. Charles Smeby, “Fire and Emergency Services Administration: Management and Leadership Practices”,
2nd Edition (Public Safety), Jones and Bartlett Learning, 2013.
6. Kitano, Hiroaki, and Satoshi Tadokoro. "Robocup rescue: A grand challenge for multiagent and intelligent
systems." AI magazine 22.1 (2001): 39-39.
7. Coen, Janice L., and Philip J. Riggan. "Simulation and thermal imaging of the 2006 Esperanza Wildfire in
southern California: application of a coupled weather–wildland fire model." International Journal of
Wildland Fire 23.6 (2014): 755-770.
8. “Heavy Firefighting Robot”, COLOSSUS, Shark Robotics, 2024.
9. Lattimer, Brian Y., et al. "Use of unmanned aerial systems in outdoor firefighting." Fire Technology 59.6
(2023): 2961-2988.
10. Wang, Meng, Xinghao Chen, and Xinyan Huang. "Robotic Firefighting: A Review and Future Perspective."
Intelligent Building Fire Safety and Smart Firefighting (2024): 475-499.
11. “Research and innovation, Forest fire research and innovation,” European Commission: Brussels, Belgium,
2024.
12. Alqourabah, Hamood, Amgad Muneer, and Suliman Mohamed Fati. "A smart fire detection system using
IoT technology with an automatic water sprinkler." International Journal of Electrical & Computer
Engineering (2088-8708) 11.4 (2021).
13. Cosgun, Ufuk, et al. "Visibility evaluation and suitability analysis of fire lookout towers in Mediterranean
Region, Southwest Anatolia/Türkiye." Fire 6.8 (2023): 305.
14. “Wildfire aviation”, Wildfire personnel and response tools, Response,Wildfire Service, Public safety and
emergency services, British Columbia, 2023.
15. “Firefighting vehicles”, Our vehicles, Istanbul Firefighter Office, 2024.
16. Toan, Nguyen Thanh, et al. "A deep learning approach for early wildfire detection from hyperspectral
satellite images." 2019 7th International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications
(RiTA). IEEE, 2019.
17. Sharma, Anshul, et al. "An IoT-based forest fire detection system: design and testing." Multimedia Tools
and Applications 83.13 (2024): 38685-38710.
18. Polastre, Joseph, et al. "Analysis of wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring." Wireless sensor
networks (2004): 399-423.
19. Martinez, Kirk, and Jane K. Hart. "Glacier monitoring: Deploying custom hardware in harsh
environments." Wireless Sensor Networks: Deployments and Design Frameworks (2010): 245-258.
20. Mazzeo, G., et al. "Performance assessment of a Robust Satellite Technique (RST-FIRES) for forest fire
detection and monitoring." EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 2012.
21. Karvonen, Hannu, et al. "Using a semi-autonomous drone swarm to support wildfire management–a
concept of operations development study." International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023.
22. Karjalainen, Väinö, et al. "Autonomous robotic drone system for mapping forest interiors." The
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 48 (2024):
167-172.
23. Liu, Wenjia, et al. "Multi-Target Optimization Strategy for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Formation in Forest
Fire Monitoring Based on Deep Q-Network Algorithm." Drones 8.5 (2024): 201.
24. Ragbir, Prabhash, et al. "A Control-Theoretic Spatio-Temporal Model for Wildfire Smoke Propagation
Using UAV-Based Air Pollutant Measurements." Drones 8.5 (2024): 169.
25. Mu, Yunjie, et al. "Superpixel-Based Graph Convolutional Network for UAV Forest Fire Image
Segmentation." Drones 8.4 (2024): 142.
26. Çoğay, Sultan, and Gökhan Seçinti. "Phoenix: Aerial Monitoring for Fighting Wildfires." Drones 7.1 (2022):
19.
27. Casbeer, David W., et al. "Forest fire monitoring with multiple small UAVs." Proceedings of the 2005,
American Control Conference, 2005.. IEEE, 2005.
28. Jin, Ji-Won, and Dahoon Ahn. "Development of a lightweight carbon fiber reinforced plastic water tank for
fire trucks." Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices 9.2 (2024): 100697.
29. Wan, Yu, et al. "A flow capacity function approach for centrifugal impeller inlet design." Applied Energy
371 (2024): 123558.
30. Shang, Fengju, et al. "Analysis of fire extinguishing performance and mechanisms in transformer oil pool
fires by large-scale compressed nitrogen foam: Impact of different nozzle pressures." Journal of Fire
Sciences (2024): 07349041241238151.
31. Tian, Fengyuan, et al. "Suppression Behavior Difference Between Compressed Air/Nitrogen Foam over
Liquid Fuel Surface Under Constant Radiation Heat Flux." Fire Technology 60.2 (2024): 1225-1243.
32. Alwan, Omar Hussein, et al. "Systematic development of an autonomous robotic car for fire-fighting based
on the interactive design approach." EUREKA: Physics and Engineering 3 (2024): 61-72.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

16

33. “Electric Amphibious All Terrain Emergency Fire Vehicle” Other Specialized Vehicles, Specialized Vehicle,
Transportation, Made in China, 2024.
34. NAFFCO Aviation, Fire Trucks, ARFF Vehicles on Custom Built Chassis, NAFFCO product, 2024.
35. Gea, W. A. N. G., J. I. Yong-xing, and S. H. E. N. Yao-zong. "The 3rd Generation Fire Truck and its Spraying
Technique." Procedia Engineering 11 (2011): 424-430.
36. “Single Shot Turbojet Foam Fire Truck Products”, Fire Truck, Special Fire Truck, HMvehicle, 2024.
37. “Single Shot Turbojet Foam Fire Truck”Transportation, Specialized Vehicle, Fire Truck, MadeinChina, 2024
38. “Aerosol fire extinguisher for new energy vehicles or vehicles”, S-firefighting, 2024.
39. Rekeny, Máté, and Ágoston Restás. "Increase Efficiency in Extinguishing Wildland Fires with Light Forest
Fire Trucks." Delta 15.1 (2021): 82-91.
40. “Helicopters”, National Interagency Fire Center, Boise, Idaho, 2024.
41. Kal’avský, Peter, et al. "The efficiency of aerial firefighting in varying flying conditions." 2019 International
Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT). IEEE, 2019.
42. McMillan, Gregor J., and Haofeng Hector Xu. "Helicopter Aerial Work: Technology to Meet Growing
Needs in Critical Missions." Journal of the American Helicopter Society 69.1 (2024): 1-18.
43. “Air Tankers”, National Interagency Fire Center, Boise, Idaho, 2024.
44. Balcerzak, A. Tomasz, et al. "The Polish perspective of using unmanned aerial vehicle systems in
international firefighting and crisis management missions-legal and technological analysis." 2021
International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). IEEE, 2021.
45. Karjalainen, Väinö, et al. "Autonomous robotic drone system for mapping forest interiors." The
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 48 (2024):
167-172.
46. Mishra, Balmukund, et al. "Drone-surveillance for search and rescue in natural disasters." Computer
Communications 156 (2020): 1-10.
47. Nex, Francesco, Filiberto Chiabrando, and Eija Honkavaara. "Preface: Workshop “IAMS-Intelligent
Autonomous Mapping Systems”." ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial
Information Sciences 10 (2023): 1159.
48. Karila, Kirsi, et al. "Estimating grass sward quality and quantity parameters using drone remote sensing
with deep neural networks." Remote Sensing 14.11 (2022): 2692.
49. “100kg Payload Heavy-Duty High-Rise Aerial Forest Wildland Fire Fighting Defense Customizable Heavy
Lift RC Firefighting Uav Drone”, Firefighting Drone, Hongfei Aviation Technology, 2024.
50. Panahi, Fereidoun H., Farzad H. Panahi, and Tomoaki Ohtsuki. "A reinforcement learning-based fire
warning and suppression system using unmanned aerial vehicles." IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation
and Measurement 72 (2022): 1-16.
51. Jin, Juan, Seunghan Kim, and Jiwon Moon. "Development of a Firefighting Drone for Constructing Fire-
breaks to Suppress Nascent Low-Intensity Fires." Applied Sciences 14.4 (2024): 1652.
52. Aydin, Burchan, et al. "Use of fire-extinguishing balls for a conceptual system of drone-assisted wildfire
fighting." Drones 3.1 (2019): 17.
53. Perez-Saura, David, et al. "Urban firefighting drones: Precise throwing from UAV." Journal of Intelligent &
Robotic Systems 108.4 (2023): 66.
54. Momeni, Maryam, and S. Mohammad J. Mirzapour Al-e. "Collaboration of thermal sensors and drones in
fighting wildfires; Mathematical model and heuristic approach." Internet of Things 26 (2024): 101168.
55. Mugnai, Michael, et al. "Towards Autonomous Firefighting UAVs: Online Planners for Obstacle Avoidance
and Payload Delivery." Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 110.1 (2024): 10.
56. Blais, Marc-Andrė, and Moulay A. Akhloufi. "Drone Swarm Coordination Using Reinforcement Learning
for Efficient Wildfires Fighting." SN Computer Science 5.3 (2024): 314.
57. John, Josy, et al. "An Efficient Approach With Dynamic Multiswarm of UAVs for Forest Firefighting." IEEE
Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems (2024).
58. Su, Kuo L. "Automatic fire detection system using adaptive fusion algorithm for fire fighting robot." 2006
IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Vol. 2. IEEE, 2006.
59. Liljeback, Pal, Oyvind Stavdahl, and Anders Beitnes. "SnakeFighter-development of a water hydraulic fire
fighting snake robot." 2006 9th international conference on control, automation, robotics and vision. IEEE,
2006.
60. Chien, Ting L., et al. "Develop a multiple interface based fire fighting robot." 2007 IEEE International
Conference on Mechatronics. IEEE, 2007.
61. Liu, Pengcheng, et al. "Robot-assisted smart firefighting and interdisciplinary perspectives." 2016 22nd
international conference on automation and computing (ICAC). IEEE, 2016.
62. Battistoni, Pietro, et al. "A cyber-physical system for wildfire detection and firefighting." Future Internet
15.7 (2023): 237.
63. Mittal, Shiva, et al. "CeaseFire: the fire fighting robot." 2018 International Conference on Advances in
Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICACCCN). IEEE, 2018.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 September 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202409.0184.v1

17

64. Aliff, Mohd, et al. "Development of fire fighting robot (QROB)." International Journal of Advanced
Computer Science and Applications 10.1 (2019).
65. Miyazawa, Kazuyoshi. "Fire robots developed by the Tokyo Fire Department." Advanced Robotics 16.6
(2002): 553-556.
66. “HOWE & HOWE THERMITE™ RS1”,MESFire, 2024.
67. “LUF-60”, LUF firefighter, 2024.
68. “LUF-120”, LUF firefighter, 2024.
69. “LUF-300”, LUF firefighter, 2024.
70. “LUF-nano”, LUF firefighter, 2024.
71. “Fire Fighting UGV” Parosha cheetah gosafer,2024.
72. Koo, Eunmo, et al. "A simple physical model for forest fire spread rate." Fire Safety Science 8 (2005): 851-
862.
73. Simeonov, Peter, et al. "Evaluation of advanced curve speed warning systems to prevent fire truck rollover
crashes." Journal of safety research 83 (2022): 388-399.
74. “Firefighting Truck“, MadeinChina, 2024.
75. “RTE robot” Firefighting robot, Rosenbauer, 2024.
76. “Firefighting Robot“, Made in China, 2024.
77. “How much does it cost to drop retardant on a fire?” Fire Aviation, 2020.
78. “Firefighting Drone“, Made in China, 2024.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those
of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s)
disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or
products referred to in the content.