Different Types of Sedimentation
Different Types of Sedimentation
granular particles will each settle separately and will each be subject to a
constant settling speed;
particles that are more or less flocculated will be of different sizes and,
therefore, subject to variable sedimentation rates. At low concentration levels,
the settling speed increases as the floc increases in size through collision with
other particles; this is termed flocculant settling.
At higher concentration levels, the abundance of floc and its interactions will lead to an
overall sedimentation which is most frequently characterised by a clearly defined
interface between the sludge mass and the supernatant liquid: this is hindered
settling where the rate will be optimum within a certain area of concentration, above
which, we talk of hindered settling.
This is the simplest case and the only one that can be easily described by equations.
When a granular particle remains in a liquid at rest, it will be affected by a driving force
FM (gravity minus the Archimedes thrust) and a resisting force FT (fluid drag) created by
viscosity and inertia forces:
hydraulic conditions
The value of C, the drag coefficient, is defined by the disturbance which is in turn
based on the settling speed. This disturbance is characterised by the Reynolds grain
number established by:
Re = adimensional.
where μ = dynamic viscosity.
When Re is low, the viscosity forces are far greater than the inertia forces. When Re is
high, the viscosity forces are negligible.
Table 9 provides the various values for a, n and C according to the Reynolds number.
Under laminar conditions, the Stokes law applied to a spherical particle will give:
The aggregation phenomena that cause growth will, therefore, very rapidly increase the
sedimentation rate.
Under transitory conditions, the Allen law also gives a rising rate based on particle size;
however, this rate rises far more slowly because:
sphericity factor
In the preceding operations, we then need to replace C by C' = ΨC and the Stokes law
will be written:
et le tableau 10 illustrates the considerable effect this factor has on “flat” materials.
Table 10. The considerable effect this factor has on “flat” materials
recovery conditions
Let us consider a rectangular sedimentation tank that has a length L, a vertical section
S = H·ℓ (where H is the water depth and ℓthe width) and a horizontal section S H = L· ℓ,
evenly crossed by a throughput Q that either ascends vertically or travels horizontally;
the following conditions will apply if the tank is to screen out a granular particle settling
at a rate Vo in still water:
VH:Hazen velocity (or hydraulic loading on the surface) similar to Vasc in the preceding
example and expressed in m3 · (h·m2)–1 or m · h–1.
In theory, for identical horizontal surface areas, a horizontal flow sedimentation tank can
thus be used to separate a greater number of particles (figure 12).
hydraulic distribution problems in the vertical plane both at the inlet and at the
outlet of a structure;
sludge accumulation and collection, reducing the available section;
in a circular, horizontal flow sedimentation tank, the horizontal component of the
particle velocity (V1) decreases from the centre outwards and the particle will
adopt a curvilinear trajectory
During sedimentation, flocculation will continue to take place and particle sedimentation
rate Vo will rise (figure 13).
Flocculant sedimentation effectiveness does not depend only on the hydraulic loading at
the surface but also on contact time. There are no mathematical formulae available for
calculating the sedimentation rate.
Only laboratory tests and graph methods can be used to ascertain this rate. Figure 14
provides the results of one such test.
When the flocculated particle concentration increases, the interaction between particles
can no longer be ignored; they undergo "hindered" settling. Initially, this may cause
flocculation and sedimentation to improve (see sludge contact clarification) and then
hindered beyond a certain critical concentration; we then talk of "hindered settling".
visual observation
When hindered settling is carried out in a tube of adequate height and diameter (at least
a 1-litre test tube), we normally see the appearance of four zones (figure 15).
Kynch’s fundamental hypothesis is that the rate at which a particle falls depends
exclusively on local particle concentration C Courbe de Kynch (figure 16).
From D, the flakes come into contact with each other and exert a compression effect on
the lower layers.
Kynch’s theory applies to section BC and CD that cover the main flocculated sludge
sedimentation area.
interpretation
Let us consider a suspension where its clarification does not include a coalescence
phase (figure 17), calculations show that:
in the BOC triangle, concentration and settling speed remain constant and equal
to the initial values found in B;
in the COD triangle, the equal concentration curves are straight lines that cross
through the origin; this means that, as soon as sedimentation commences, the
layers that are the closest to the base of the tank will have to transit through
every concentration from initial concentration to that applicable at point D, the
start of compression.
an upper zone bc where settling speed and concentration remain uniform and will
have retained their initial values V0 and C;
an intermediate zone cd where concentration increases gradually from c to d and
the settling speed drops accordingly;
a lower zone where sludge flakes are subject to compression.
In the medium considered at a point in time t2, the upper zone disappears and, at point
in time t4, only the lower zone remains.
With regard to point M in section CD, there are two concentration levels:
CM mean concentration.
According to the Kynch hypothesis:
Furthermore:
The three sections BC, CD and DE on the Kynch curve (figure 16) are used to
dimension hindered settling tanks. The BC phase refers to the solids contact
clarification area. The CD phase applies to structures where sludge concentration is
targeted (units used for thickened sludge recirculation). The DE phase is used for
sludge thickening.
The drawback of the Mohlman index is that it is heavily dependent on sludge initial
concentration. Therefore, methods have been put forward for establishing an
independent index for this concentration and which is, therefore, exclusively
characteristic of the state of the sludge in the plant concerned. This is:
SUEZ's degremont® water handbook offers to water treatment professionals, fundamental concepts of water
treatment processes and technologies as well as degremont® solutions applied to treatment line and adapted to each
use of water. Designed by field men for field men, this valuable tool is essential for site managers, environmental
managers, quality managers, maintenance managers, stakeholders in sustainable development, water agencies,
documentation centers in universities, consultants, local authority technical departments, water management
companies, etc.