The case study discusses Engineer Romeo Estabillo's journey in establishing his construction firm after graduating in 1981. Initially starting with small residential projects, the company grew to employ several civil engineers and administrative staff by 1996, prompting Estabillo to consider expanding his team further. Faced with the complexities of managing a growing business, he reflects on the need for a more scientific approach to decision-making regarding operations.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views3 pages
Case Study No. 2
The case study discusses Engineer Romeo Estabillo's journey in establishing his construction firm after graduating in 1981. Initially starting with small residential projects, the company grew to employ several civil engineers and administrative staff by 1996, prompting Estabillo to consider expanding his team further. Faced with the complexities of managing a growing business, he reflects on the need for a more scientific approach to decision-making regarding operations.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
Republic of the Philippines
PHINMA Araullo University
Cabanatuan City
BES 047: ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
CASE STUDY NO.2
R. E. CONSTRUCTION: It's Now or Never
Submitted by:
Pascua, Francis Lyn Lei P.
(BSCE2-MAIN2) Case 2. R. E. CONSTRUCTION: It's Now or Never
When Engineer Romeo Estabillo finished his Civil Engineering
course at Mapua Institute of Technology, he took the board examination and passed it in 1981. Wanting to start independently, he went back to his hometown (Santiago City) to organize his own construction firm. In his first few years of operation, he accepted contracts for the construction of residential houses. As he gained experience, his clients grew in number, and even the most prominent persons in the province of Isabela availed of his services.
At the start, he hired two assistants to help him in his daily
routine as a contractor. One of the two assistants, Mr. Silvino Santiago, was a third year-civil engineering student who had stopped schooling due to financial difficulties. His main task was as draftsman. His duty was to produce all documents relating to the physical requirements of the various contracts entered into by his boss. Among these documents are the building plan, specifications, bill of materials, building permit, etc. His additional duty was to assist Engineer Estabillo in supervising the foremen and workers at the various construction sites.
The second assistant, Mr. Romulo Mamaril, was assigned to
coordinate purchasing, bookkeeping, and other related administrative activities.
At the third year of operations, Engineer Estabillo was already
directing operations in his newly constructed office inside his residential compound. By this time, two more female employees were hired to assist in the various tasks performed in the office.
By 1994, Engineer Estabillo reviewed his company's payroll. It
indicated that he has employ six full-time civil engineers, two draftsmen, ten administrative personnel, one messenger and one security guard. The foremen and laborers working at the various projects were contractual.
By June 1996, Engineer Estabillo felt that business was
continuously growing, so he will have to secure the services of four additional civil engineers on a full-time basis. As he was directly supervising all operations, he now feels that he may not be able to perform his functions effectively if he will push through with the plan. He wants to make a decision, but he is apprehensive. He thinks operations are now more complex that decision-making must be a little scientific. With this thought, he pondered on how he will go about solving the problem.
Question: If you are Engr. Estabillo, what will be your action to
solve your problem? How you will implement this action?
INTRODUCTION: Provide a brief narrative about the case study,
summarizing the key points.
BODY: Include the interviewee's response in the question along
with their name, company position, and company address. Provide a narrative based on your analysis of the answer given by the interviewee.
CONCLUSION: Conclude with a narrative that reflects the overall
context and ideas presented in the interviewee’s response, along with your analysis.