0% found this document useful (0 votes)
225 views3 pages

Boeing 737-800 (NG) Aerodynamic - Geometry Parameters

Uploaded by

zainodiniparsa98
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
225 views3 pages

Boeing 737-800 (NG) Aerodynamic - Geometry Parameters

Uploaded by

zainodiniparsa98
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Boeing 737-800 (NG) Aerodynamic/Geometry

Parameters
Wing & Fuselage (clean configuration): The 737-800 has a 25° leading-edge swept wing 1 with span
≈34.32 m (112 ft 7 in) and planform area ≈124.6 m² 1 . Its aspect ratio is ≈9.44 1 . From Boeing data, the
wing root chord is ≈5.71 m and tip ≈1.25 m 2 , giving a mean aerodynamic chord of about 3.96 m
(≈13.0 ft). A modern supercritical (proprietary) airfoil is used on the wing (also on the horizontal tail) 3 . A
typical skin-friction “form factor” K for the wing is ~1.1–1.3 4 . The Oswald efficiency factor in clean cruise
is on the order of e≈0.80–0.83 5 (values drop when flaps/slats are deployed).

• Key geometry: wing sweep = 25° 1 ; AR ≈9.4 1 ; span ≈34.3 m 1 ; wing area ≈124.6 m² 1 ; MAC
≈3.96 m (≈13.0 ft) 2 ; e≈0.8 (clean) 5 ; K (wing) ≈1.2 (order-of-magnitude) 4 .

Fuselage drag (clean): The fuselage is ~39.5 m long by 3.76 m wide 6 1 . This yields a length‐to‐diameter
ratio ≈10.5:1. The wing reference area is 124.6 m² 1 . The wetted area of the fuselage (sides, nose and tail)
is on the order of ≈446–450 m² 7 (SUAVE-based estimate; includes cylindrical body plus cones).

• Key parameters: fuselage L/D ≈10.5 (39.5 m/3.76 m) 6 1 ; wing ref. area S_ref ≈124.6 m² 1 ;
fuselage wetted area S_wet,fus ≈446 m² 7 .

Wing and Tail drag (clean): The horizontal stabilizer and elevator use a similar supercritical section as the
wing, while the vertical tail typically has a symmetric (e.g. NACA 00xx) section 8 . The wing’s mean
thickness-to-chord ratio is roughly 10–12% 9 (SUAVE uses 0.10). Tailplane t/c is comparable (~0.10). The
wing taper ratio (tip chord/root chord) is about 0.22 (using 1.25/5.71 from Boeing data 2 ). The horizontal
and vertical tails have more moderate taper (data sparse, but roughly 0.3–0.5 typical). The total wing wetted
area (upper+lower) is roughly 2×S_ref ≈250 m² 10 .

• Key values: wing airfoil = supercritical (not NACA) 3 ; vertical-tail airfoil = symmetric; wing t/c ≈0.10–
0.12 9 ; tail t/c ≈0.10; wing taper ≈0.22 (tip/root) 2 ; wing wetted area ≈250 m² 10 .

Landing Gear (landing configuration): The 737-800 has a conventional tricycle gear (one nose strut, two
main struts) 11 . (Thus 3 gear assemblies total.) Main wheels are large (~1.2 m diameter including tire) and
spaced ≈5.71 m apart (track width) 12 ; the nose wheel is smaller (~0.5–0.6 m) and centrally mounted. Gear
is stowed in cruise, deployed for takeoff/landing.

• Key data: gear type = tricycle (1 nose + 2 main) 11 ; main gear track ≈5.7 m 12 ; wheel diam. ~1.2 m
(approx).

Engines/Nacelles (clean): The standard engines are CFM56-7B turbofans 13 . Two thrust variants exist: the
–7B24 (~107.6 kN each) or –7B27 (~121.4 kN each) 14 . In Boeing data the 737‑800 thrust is given as ~117 kN

1
(26,300 lbf) each 13 . Each nacelle is roughly 4.90 m long and 2.46 m in diameter 15 (length/diameter
≈2.0). The total wetted area per nacelle is on the order of ~40–45 m² (using ~1.1×πDL).

• Key values: engine = CFM56-7B turbofan 13 ; thrust (SL) ≈107–121 kN per engine (CFM56-7B24/7B27)
14 ; nacelle L/D ≈2.0 (4.90 m/2.46 m) 15 ; nacelle wetted area ≈42 m² (each).

Flap drag (takeoff/landing): The 737‑800 uses double-slotted Fowler flaps on the trailing edge (three-
segment flaps) 16 . The flap chord is about 20–35% of local wing chord. A typical flap/chord ratio (C_flap/
C_mean) is ~0.3 (range ~0.2–0.35 17 ). In cruise (clean) flaps are retracted; during takeoff/landing they
extend, greatly increasing profile drag.

• Key data: flap type = double-slotted Fowler (high-lift) 16 ; flap chord ratio C_flap/C_wing ≈0.25–0.35
17 (≈0.3 typical).

Slat drag (takeoff/landing): The 737‑800 has leading-edge slats (and Krueger flaps inboard). The slat chord
is small – roughly 10–15% of wing chord. A representative slat-chord ratio is ~0.1 (e.g. ~0.1–0.15 of wing
chord). Slats are deployed during takeoff and landing to increase camber and lift, but they also add drag.

• Key data: slat chord ratio C_slat/C_wing ≈0.1–0.15 (leading-edge slats).

Configurations: The above clean-configuration values apply with flaps/slats retracted and gear up. In
takeoff or landing configuration, flaps (20–30°) and slats (open) add surface area (via C_flap/C, C_slat/C
above) and increase Cd0 substantially. The wing/body geometry (sweeps, spans, etc.) remains the same.

Sources: Boeing/FAA data and credible references 1 6 2 , supplemented by technical analyses


(Stanford SUAVE, NASA textbooks, forums) 4 3 7 17 .

2
1 Boeing 737 Next Generation - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_Next_Generation

2 12 BOEING 737
https://janes.migavia.com/usa/boeing/boeing-737.html

3 8 boeing 737 - P-8A Poseidon Airfoil type - Aviation Stack Exchange


https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/100967/p-8a-poseidon-airfoil-type

4 Boeing 737-700 Drag | PDF | Drag (Physics) | Reynolds Number


https://www.scribd.com/doc/220607389/Boeing-737-700-Drag

5 Consider a Boeing 737-800 airplane with the following characteristics


https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/consider-boeing-737-800-airplane-following-characteristics-
mtow-180-000-lb-takeoff-thrust--q114598044

6 11 13 BOEING 737-800 | SKYbrary Aviation Safety


https://skybrary.aero/aircraft/b738

7 9 10 Boeing 737-800 - SUAVE Tutorial


https://suave.stanford.edu/tutorials/B737.html

14 Aircraft Directory
https://www.rocketroute.com/aircraft/boeing-737-800

15 dedienne-aero.com
https://dedienne-aero.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Leaflet-CFM56-7B-Engine-Stand.pdf

16 22.16.6. Support and Actuation Concepts - Abbott Aerospace UK Ltd


https://www.abbottaerospace.com/aa-sb-001/22-aircraft-specific-design-features-and-design-methods/22-16-57-wings/22-16-6-
support-and-actuation-concepts/

17 Thickness-to-Chord Ratio - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics


https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/thickness-to-chord-ratio

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy