Unit 2 Research Design
Unit 2 Research Design
Research Designs
A research design is a strategic framework that guides the entire research process. It outlines
the methods and procedures used to collect, analyze, and interpret data to answer specific
research questions. A well-crafted research design ensures the validity, reliability, and
generalizability of the findings.
1. Research Question(s): Clearly defined questions that the research aims to answer.
2. Research Hypothesis: A testable statement about the relationship between variables.
3. Research Methodology: The overall approach to the research, including the choice
of research design (e.g., experimental, correlational, descriptive, qualitative, or mixed-
methods).
4. Data Collection Methods: The specific techniques used to gather data, such as
surveys, interviews, observations, or experiments.
5. Data Analysis Techniques: The statistical or qualitative methods used to analyze the
collected data.
6. Sampling Strategy: The process of selecting a representative sample from the target
population.
7. Ethical Considerations: The ethical principles and guidelines that must be followed
during the research process.
(a) the sampling design which deals with the method of selecting items to be observed for the
given study;
(b) the observational design which relates to the conditions under which the observations are
to be made;
(c) the statistical design which concerns with the question of how many items are to be
observed and how the information and data gathered are to be analysed; and
(d) the operational design which deals with the techniques by which the procedures specified
in the sampling, statistical and observational designs can be carried out.
Efficient Planning: A clear research design helps in efficient planning and allocation
of resources.
Time Management: By outlining the timeline for each stage, it helps in effective
time management.
Cost-Effective: A well-designed study can reduce unnecessary costs and avoid
wastage of resources.
Accurate Data Collection: A clear design ensures that data is collected accurately
and consistently.
Reliable Instruments: It helps in selecting or developing reliable and valid data
collection instruments.
Data Quality Control: It provides a framework for data quality control and cleaning.
Scientific Rigor: A strong research design adds credibility to the research findings.
Generalizability: By ensuring representativeness, it increases the generalizability of
the findings to the target population.
A research design appropriate for a particular research problem, usually involves the
consideration of the following factors:
Research Methodology:
Research Design: The overall structure and plan of the research, including the
methods for collecting and analyzing data.
Data Collection Methods: The specific techniques used to gather data, such as
surveys, interviews, observations, or experiments.
Data Analysis Techniques: The statistical methods used to analyze the collected
data, like descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, or qualitative analysis.
Sampling:
Population: The entire group of individuals or objects that the research aims to study.
Sample: A subset of the population selected for the study.
Sampling Techniques: Methods used to select the sample, such as random sampling,
stratified sampling, or cluster sampling.
Sample designs are crucial for conducting effective research. They ensure that the selected
sample is representative of the target population, allowing for reliable generalizations. Here
are some of the most important sample designs:
Probability Sampling
In probability sampling, every member of the population has a known, non-zero chance of
being selected. This ensures that the sample is representative and unbiased.
Non-Probability Sampling
In non-probability sampling, not every member of the population has an equal chance of
being selected. This can lead to bias, but it is often used when probability sampling is not
feasible or practical.
1. Convenience Sampling:
o Participants are selected based on their availability and ease of access.
o This method is often used in preliminary studies or when resources are
limited.
2. Quota Sampling:
o The researcher sets quotas for different categories of participants (e.g., age,
gender, ethnicity).
o Participants are then selected based on these quotas, often using convenience
sampling within each quota.
3. Purposive Sampling:
o Participants are selected based on specific criteria relevant to the research
question.
o This is often used in qualitative research to gain insights from individuals with
particular knowledge or experiences.
4. Snowball Sampling:
o Initial participants are identified, and they refer the researcher to other
potential participants.
o This method is useful for studying hard-to-reach populations.
Exploratory research is often the first step in a research process, particularly when little is
known about a specific topic. It's characterized by its flexibility and adaptability, allowing
researchers to delve into a subject without rigid constraints.
Flexibility: Researchers can adapt their approach as they gain insights, making it
suitable for ambiguous or complex problems.
Open-endedness: The research questions are often broad and exploratory, allowing
for diverse findings.
Qualitative Focus: It often relies on qualitative methods like interviews, focus
groups, and case studies to understand the nuances of a phenomenon.
Small-scale: It's typically conducted on a smaller scale, focusing on a limited number
of participants or cases.
1. Literature Review: (a) the survey of concerning literature; (b) the experience survey
and (c) the analysis of ‘insight-stimulating’ examples.
o A systematic examination of existing research and scholarly articles.
o Helps identify knowledge gaps, theoretical frameworks, and potential research
directions.
2. Expert Interviews:
o In-depth conversations with experts in the field.
o Provides valuable insights, perspectives, and potential research avenues.
3. Pilot Studies:
o Small-scale studies to test research instruments and methodologies.
o Helps refine the research design for a larger study.
4. Focus Groups:
o Group discussions with a selected group of participants.
o Generates rich qualitative data on attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors.
5. Case Study Analysis:
o In-depth examination of specific cases or individuals.
o Provides detailed insights into complex phenomena.
Problem Definition: Helps clarify the research problem and identify key variables.
Hypothesis Generation: Formulates testable hypotheses for future research.
Research Design Development: Informs the design of subsequent quantitative
studies.
Theory Building: Contributes to the development of new theories or frameworks.
Descriptive Research
Diagnostic Research
Diagnostic research delves deeper than descriptive research to identify the root causes of a
problem or issue. It aims to understand the underlying factors contributing to a particular
situation.
Key Differences:
Feature Descriptive Research Diagnostic Research
Focus Describing a phenomenon Identifying the causes of a problem
Depth of Analysis Superficial In-depth
Research Questions What, where, when, how Why
Data Analysis Basic statistical techniques Advanced statistical techniques
Example:
Descriptive Research: A survey to determine the average age, gender, and income of
a particular population.
Diagnostic Research: A study to identify the reasons for low employee morale in a
company, which may involve surveys, interviews, and analysis of organizational
factors.
In conclusion, both descriptive and diagnostic research are valuable tools for understanding
the world around us. While descriptive research provides a snapshot of a situation, diagnostic
research digs deeper to uncover the underlying causes. By carefully selecting research
designs and data analysis techniques, researchers can gain valuable insights and inform
decision-making.
Design:
1. Participants: A group of college students experiencing moderate to high levels of
stress are recruited for the study.
2. Random Assignment: The students are randomly divided into two groups:
o Experimental Group: Receives the new mindfulness-based stress reduction
technique.
o Control Group: Receives no intervention or a standard stress management
technique.
3. Pre-test: Both groups take a standardized anxiety assessment to measure their
baseline anxiety levels.
4. Intervention: The experimental group participates in the new stress reduction
program (e.g., weekly mindfulness sessions), while the control group continues with
their usual routines or receives a standard stress management program.
5. Post-test: After the intervention period, both groups take the same anxiety assessment
again.
Design:
2. Quasi-Experimental Design:
o Lacks random assignment, making it difficult to establish causal relationships
with certainty.
o Non-equivalent Control Group Design:
Similar to the pre-test post-test control group design but without
random assignment.
Matching is used to create groups that are as similar as possible.
Example: Scenario: A city council wants to evaluate the effectiveness of a new recycling
program in increasing recycling rates. They cannot randomly assign residents to participate,
as the program is implemented city-wide.
Design:
1. Identify a comparison group: The city council selects a nearby city with similar
demographics and waste management infrastructure as the control group. This city
does not implement the new recycling program.
2. Measure baseline recycling rates: Both cities measure their recycling rates before
the program is implemented in the treatment city.
3. Implement the program: The new recycling program is implemented in the
treatment city.
4. Measure post-program recycling rates: After a specified period, both cities
measure their recycling rates again.
5. Compare results: The change in recycling rates between the pre- and post-program
measurements is compared between the two cities.
Design:
1. Baseline data: Collect data on smoking rates (e.g., through surveys) in the region
before the campaign begins. This establishes a baseline trend.
2. Intervention: Implement the anti-smoking campaign.
3. Post-intervention data: Continue collecting data on smoking rates at regular
intervals (e.g., monthly) after the campaign starts.
Data Analysis:
4. Analyze the time series data: Plot the smoking rates over time. Look for any
noticeable changes in the trend after the campaign begins.
5. Statistical analysis: Use statistical methods to determine if the observed change in
smoking rates is statistically significant and likely due to the campaign. This might
involve comparing the trend before and after the intervention, or using time series
analysis techniques to model the data.
3.Correlational Design:
Data Analysis:
Statistical Tests:
o t-tests: Compare means of two groups.
o ANOVA: Compare means of multiple groups.
o Chi-square test: Analyze categorical data.
o Correlation analysis: Measure the strength of the relationship between
variables.
o Regression analysis: Predict the value of a dependent variable based on
independent variables.
Examples: 1. T-tests
One-way ANOVA:
o Example: Comparing the average crop yield of three different types of
fertilizers.
Two-way ANOVA:
o Example: Comparing the average sales of a product in different regions and at
different times of the year.
3. Chi-Square Test
Chi-Square Test of Independence:
o Example: Determining if there is a relationship between gender and
preference for a particular type of music.
4. Correlation Analysis
Pearson Correlation:
o Example: Measuring the strength of the relationship between height and
weight in adults.
Spearman Rank Correlation:
o Example: Measuring the strength of the relationship between two variables
when the data is not normally distributed.
5. Regression Analysis
Internal Validity: The extent to which the independent variable causes the observed
changes in the dependent variable.
External Validity: The generalizability of the findings to other populations and
settings.
Reliability: The consistency and accuracy of the measurement instruments.
Ethical Considerations: Protecting the rights and well-being of participants.
1. Randomization:
Drug Testing: In a clinical trial for a new medication, patients are randomly assigned
to either the treatment group (receiving the new drug) or the control group (receiving
a placebo or standard treatment). This randomization helps to ensure that any
observed differences in outcomes are likely due to the drug itself and not pre-existing
differences between the groups.
2. Replication:
3. Local Control:
Scenario: A farmer wants to test the effectiveness of four different fertilizers (A, B,
C, and D) on their crop yield. They have a field with varying soil fertility.
Implementation: The farmer divides the field into four blocks based on soil fertility.
Within each block, the four fertilizers are randomly assigned to different plots.
Benefit: By grouping plots with similar soil fertility, the RBD controls for the
variation in soil quality, making it easier to isolate the effect of the fertilizers on crop
yield.
Additional Considerations:
Control Group: A group that does not receive the experimental treatment, serving as
a baseline for comparison.
Placebo Effect: The phenomenon where participants experience a change in response
to a treatment, even if it is inactive.
Blinding: A technique to minimize bias by preventing participants or researchers
from knowing which treatment group they are in.
Statistical Analysis: Appropriate statistical tests are used to analyze the data and
draw conclusions.
Factorial Design:
o Allows researchers to investigate the effects of multiple independent variables
simultaneously.
o It can identify main effects and interaction effects between variables.
Factors: Type of fertilizer (Factor A: Organic vs. Chemical) and Variety of seed
(Factor B: Hybrid vs. Traditional)
Levels: Each factor has two levels.
Design: 2x2 factorial design.
Treatments:
o Organic fertilizer + Hybrid seed
o Organic fertilizer + Traditional seed
o Chemical fertilizer + Hybrid seed
o Chemical fertilizer + Traditional seed
Factors: Color scheme (Factor A: Blue vs. Red) and Layout (Factor B: Simple vs.
Complex)
Levels: Each factor has two levels.
Design: 2x2 factorial design.
Treatments:
o Blue color scheme + Simple layout
o Blue color scheme + Complex layout
o Red color scheme + Simple layout
o Red color scheme + Complex layout
Scenario: A farmer wants to test the effectiveness of four different fertilizers (A, B, C, and
D) on their crop yield. They have a field divided into 16 plots arranged in a 4x4 grid. They
suspect that soil fertility might vary across the field both horizontally and vertically.
Problem: How can the farmer control for both horizontal and vertical soil variation while
testing the fertilizers?
Design:
Interpretation:
Each fertilizer is tested in every row and column of the field, controlling for both
horizontal and vertical soil variations
Scenario: A teacher wants to compare the effectiveness of three different teaching methods
(A, B, and C) on student test scores. They have three classes of students with varying
academic abilities.
Problem: How can the teacher control for the potential differences in student abilities across
the classes while testing the teaching methods?
Design:
Interpretation:
Each teaching method is used in each class, controlling for the potential differences in
student abilities across the classes.
By comparing test scores within each class, the teacher can isolate the effect of the
teaching methods from the student ability differences.
Internal Validity: The extent to which the independent variable causes the observed
changes in the dependent variable.
External Validity: The generalizability of the findings to other populations and
settings.
Reliability: The consistency and accuracy of the measurement instruments.
Ethical Considerations: Protecting the rights and well-being of participants.
Case Studies:
Scenario: A school district wants to evaluate the effectiveness of a new reading program on
student literacy.
Scenario: A company wants to determine consumer preferences for a new product design.
Scenario: A researcher wants to study the impact of social media on adolescent self-esteem.
Scenario: A political scientist wants to investigate the factors that influence voter turnout in
elections.
Qualitative and quantitative research are two primary approaches to conducting research.
They differ in their methodologies, data collection techniques, and the nature of the insights
they provide.
Quantitative Research
Qualitative Research
Quantitative Research:
o To test hypotheses
o To identify cause-and-effect relationships
o To make predictions
o To generalize findings to a larger population
Qualitative Research:
o To explore complex phenomena
o To understand subjective experiences
o To generate new theories or hypotheses
o To gain in-depth insights into a specific context
Key Differences
Data collection is a crucial step in any research process. It involves gathering information to
answer specific research questions. There are two primary methods of data collection:
primary data collection and secondary data collection.
Primary data is collected directly from the source to meet specific research objectives. It
involves original research and analysis.
Secondary data is data that has already been collected by someone else for another purpose. It
involves analyzing existing data to draw new insights.
The choice between primary and secondary data collection depends on various factors,
including:
Often, a combination of primary and secondary data can provide a more comprehensive
understanding of a research problem. By carefully considering the strengths and weaknesses
of each method, researchers can select the most appropriate approach to achieve their research
goals.
These three methods are fundamental tools in research, each with its own strengths and
weaknesses.
Surveys
Definition: A research method involving the collection of data from a sample of individuals
through a structured questionnaire.
Purpose: To gather information about people's attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, and knowledge.
Types of Surveys:
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Observations
Purpose: To gather information about behaviors, interactions, and events in a natural setting.
Types of Observations:
Participant Observation: The researcher becomes part of the group being studied.
Non-participant Observation: The researcher observes from a distance without
interacting with the participants.
Structured Observation: The researcher uses a checklist or rating scale to record
specific behaviors.
Unstructured Observation: The researcher observes without a predetermined
framework.
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Experimentation
Types of Experiments:
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
The best method for a particular research project depends on several factors, including: