Front Pages Seijan Edited
Front Pages Seijan Edited
Submitted By
Seizan Pandey
Caspian Valley College
T.U. Reg. No: 7-2-518-27-2020
Exam Roll No: 705180019
Campus Roll No: 19
Submitted To
The Faculty of Management
Tribhuvan University
Kathmandu, Nepal
Lalitpur, Nepal
June, 2025
DECLARATION
………...........
Seizan Pandey
Caspian Valley College
TU. Regd. No: 7-2-518-27-2020
Exam Roll No: 705180019
Campus Roll No: 19
June, 2025
ii
SUPERVISOR’S RECOMMENDATION
………………….……
June, 2025
iii
ENDORSEMENT
June, 2025
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the Tribhuvan
University – Faculty of Management for providing me with the opportunity to
conduct this research as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of
Business Studies (BBS) degree. This research titled “INVESTMENT POLICY OF
COMMERCIAL BANKS IN NEPAL: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NABIL
AND NEPAL BANK LTD.” has been a valuable academic journey filled with
learning, critical analysis, and growth.
I would also like to thank the officials and staff of NABIL Bank Ltd. and Nepal
Bank Ltd. for providing the necessary data and clarifications which were essential for
the successful completion of this study. I am also thankful to Nepal Rastra Bank
(NRB) for their publicly available reports and directives that significantly supported
the analytical framework of this research.
My gratitude also goes to my teachers, mentors, and friends who provided valuable
suggestions, academic support, and motivation during the various stages of the study.
I am especially thankful to my family for their unconditional love, understanding, and
continuous encouragement throughout my academic journey.
Finally, I acknowledge all the authors, researchers, and institutions whose works have
been referenced in this report. This study would not have been possible without the
contributions and support from all the individuals and organizations mentioned above.
Seizan Pandey
July 2025
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Declaration ....................................................................................................................ii
Endorsement ................................................................................................................. iv
Acknowledgement .......................................................................................................... v
Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. x
Abstracts ........................................................................................................................ xi
vi
1.7.2 Review of Empirical Studies ..................................................................... 10
3.2 Conclusion............................................................................................................ 37
REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................
APPENDIX .....................................................................................................................
vii
LIST OF TABLES
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
ix
ABBREVIATIONS
% : Percentage
A. D : Anno Domini
B. S : Bikram Sambat
CB : Commercial Bank
LTD : Limited
No. : Number
Rs. : Rupees
SEC : Section
x
ABSTRACTS
This study compares the investment policies and practices of Nabil Bank Ltd. (private
sector) and Nepal Bank Ltd. (Public sector) in Nepal. Using a mixed-method
approach, the research assesses liquidity management, credit risk exposure, capital
adequacy, asset allocation efficiency, and regulatory compliance over a period of five
years (2076/77–2080/81 B.S.). Data from annual reports, publications and financial
statements of the Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) are analyzed by descriptive statistics,
financial ratios (liquidity, NPL, CAR, loan-to-deposit) and trend analysis. The main
findings reveal significant differences: the Nabil Bank maintained stable liquidity
reserves (the average ratio of cash-to-deposit: 2.49 per cent, CV: 28 per cent), lower
non-performing loans (the average NPL: 2.35 per cent), and strategic investment
growth (170%). In contrast, Nepal Bank had volatile liquidity management (average
cash-to-deposit ratio: 5.37%, CV: 68%), increasing NPL (which reached 4.33%), and
unusual investment patterns. Although both banks met NRB capital requirements,
Nabil showed a better alignment of investment policies with profitability and risk
diversification objectives. The study concluded that dynamic data-driven investment
strategies such as Nabil’s strengthen financial resilience and economic contributions,
while Nepal Bank requires institutional modernization to address operational
inconsistencies.
Keywords: Investment Policy, Commercial Banks, Nepal, Nabil Bank, Nepal Bank
Ltd., Financial Ratios, Liquidity Management, Non-Performing Loans (NPL), Capital
Adequacy, Comparative Analysis.
xi