Scribd
Upload
32 views2 pages

PSIC Grantee Conference Feedback Form

This document is a feedback form for a Public Safety Interoperable Communications (PSIC) Grant Program Grantee Conference. It asks participants to rate different aspects of the conference, including registration, facilities, speakers, and sessions. Participants are asked to use a scale to rate general sessions and breakout sessions on content, topics covered, and speaker knowledge. Space is also provided for general comments.

Uploaded by

T.V.B.Babu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
32 views2 pages

PSIC Grantee Conference Feedback Form

This document is a feedback form for a Public Safety Interoperable Communications (PSIC) Grant Program Grantee Conference. It asks participants to rate different aspects of the conference, including registration, facilities, speakers, and sessions. Participants are asked to use a scale to rate general sessions and breakout sessions on content, topics covered, and speaker knowledge. Space is also provided for general comments.

Uploaded by

T.V.B.Babu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

PSIC Grantee Conference

Feedback Form

Thank you for completing the voluntary Public Safety Interoperable Communications (PSIC) Grant
Program Grantee Conference Feedback Form. Please return your completed form to the PSIC
Registration Desk or to a PSIC Support Team member. Your feedback is greatly appreciated!
Part I: Overall Conference Evaluation
Please evaluate the following statements using the following scale:
Strongly Agree (5), Agree (4), Neutral (3), Disagree (2) or Strongly Disagree (1).
1. The online registration process was helpful. ____
2. Overall, conference materials provided were appropriate and helpful. ____
3. Conference facilities were adequate. ____
4. Overall, conference speakers/presenters were informative. ____
5. The PSIC Grant Conference improved my understanding of PSIC grant requirements and
expectations. ____
Comments:

Part II: General Sessions:


Please evaluate the following statements using the following scale:
Strongly Agree (5), Agree (4), Neutral (3), Disagree (2) or Strongly Disagree (1).
Panel Discussion with the Grantees (Success Stories)
1. Content of the General Session was helpful and informative. ____
2. General Session topics/presentations covered areas of interest and concern. ____
3. General Session speakers were informative and knowledgeable. ____
Inspector General Presentation
1. Content of the General Session was helpful and informative. ____
2. General Session topics/presentations covered areas of interest and concern. ____
3. General Session speakers were informative and knowledgeable. ____
2010 National Emergency Communications Plan Update & Goals
1. Content of the General Session was helpful and informative. ____
2. General Session topics/presentations covered areas of interest and concern. ____
3. General Session speakers were informative and knowledgeable. ____
PSICs Hot Topics, PSIC Extensions, and Closeout
1. Content of the General Session was helpful and informative. ____
2. General Session topics/presentations covered areas of interest and concern. ____
3. General Session speakers were informative and knowledgeable. ____
PSIC Grant Success Story Show and Tell
1. Content of the General Session was helpful and informative. ____
2. General Session topics/presentations covered areas of interest and concern. ____
3. General Session speakers were informative and knowledgeable. ____

1
Comments:

Part III: Breakout Sessions:


Please evaluate the following statements using the following scale:
Strongly Agree (5), Agree (4), Neutral (3), Disagree (2) or Strongly Disagree (1).
Narrowband Deadline for Existing VHF/UHF Systems
1. Content of the General Session was helpful and informative. ____
2. General Session topics/presentations covered areas of interest and concern. ____
3. General Session speakers were informative and knowledgeable. ____
P25 Compliance Assessment Program and Public Safety Communications Research
1. Content of the General Session was helpful and informative. ____
2. General Session topics/presentations covered areas of interest and concern. ____
3. General Session speakers were informative and knowledgeable. ____
NEPA Compliance
1. Content of the General Session was helpful and informative. ____
2. General Session topics/presentations covered areas of interest and concern. ____
3. General Session speakers were informative and knowledgeable. ____
PSIC Period of Performance Extension
1. Content of the General Session was helpful and informative. ____
2. General Session topics/presentations covered areas of interest and concern. ____
3. General Session speakers were informative and knowledgeable. ____
Comments:

Part IV: Additional Comments


Please use the space below, or the back of this sheet, to include general comments about the conference
and/or additional PSIC topics that you would like to learn more about.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy