100% found this document useful (1 vote)
878 views8 pages

APQP / PPAP Checklist - Suppliers: Responsiblility Step

The document provides a checklist for APQP/PPAP submission and review. It outlines responsibilities for the program manager, supplier, and corporate supplier quality team to ensure all elements are completed. Key steps include the program manager sending the checklist to suppliers, monthly review meetings to monitor status, and identifying any at-risk elements that require additional involvement from relevant departments. The timing and responsibilities of the core team are also defined.

Uploaded by

rajesh sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
878 views8 pages

APQP / PPAP Checklist - Suppliers: Responsiblility Step

The document provides a checklist for APQP/PPAP submission and review. It outlines responsibilities for the program manager, supplier, and corporate supplier quality team to ensure all elements are completed. Key steps include the program manager sending the checklist to suppliers, monthly review meetings to monitor status, and identifying any at-risk elements that require additional involvement from relevant departments. The timing and responsibilities of the core team are also defined.

Uploaded by

rajesh sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

CORE TEAM CONTENT

APQP / PPAP Checklist - Suppliers


Responsiblility Step

Program Manager Send APQP / PPAP Checklist


to suppliers

Send updated document based on Status


Supplier of each element

Program Manager Review document and report out any


at risk elements

Review at risk elements with supplier


Program Manager and respective departments within CSP

*Note: additional departments may


need to be involved depending
elements that are at risk.
CORE TEAM CONTENT RESPONSIBILITY
Program Manager
Plant Quality Engineer
Supplier
Corporate Supplier Quality

Timing Team

Start of Program Program Manager

Monthly Supplier

Continuous Continuous
Monthly Program Manager loop until
loop until
Plant Quality Engineer
completion APQP
of APQP / Complete
PPAP PPAP
Approval Approval

Program Manager
Monthly - If warranted Plant Quality Engineer
Supplier
Corp Supplier Quality
*
PPAP Risk: Medium
PPAP Review Guide PPAP Recommendation: Maybe Approved, noting iss
Note: All documentation must be legible
Comments
PPAP Team Lead: Auditor/Team:
Supplier Name:
Part No.: Design Level: MY:
PPAP No. Family (Y/N): Date:

CHECKLIST Low Yes No N/A Comments


2 Is Part #, Description, and Revision level documented and correct? x
3 Are all selected elements appropriate for submission? Appropriate A, B, C analysis x
4 Does checklist note regulatory or CoP attribute requirements? If required per design record x
1 WARRANT [PSW] Yes No N/A Comments
1 Is the warrant Current AIAG edition compliant?
2 Does warrant include correct Part number and Revision level?
3 Are all required sections filled in by supplier?
4 Is warrant signed by supplier representative?
2 DESIGN RECORD Yes No N/A Comments
1 Are print(s) included to authorized revision level?
2 Are prints of components and details included?
3 Are supplier prints included? Check N/A if no supplier prints are required
4 Are KPC(s), KCC(s), SC's and CoP/Regulatory attributes called out on the drawing?
5 Has GD&T been agreed upon, and specified on the drawing?
6 Are there any Special Characteristics, and if so, detailed on the drawing?
3 AUTHORIZED ENTERPRISE CHANGE DOCUMENTS Yes No N/A Comments
1 Are all Enterprise Change documents closed and approved? Note: PPAP cannot be approved to an ECN
4 ENGINEERING APPROVAL as required per print Yes No N/A Comments
1 Is engineering approval provided where required? Check N/A if approval is not required
5 DESIGN FAILURE MODE & EFFECTS ANALYSIS [DFMEA] Yes No N/A Comments
1 Are part number and revision level noted ?
2 Are potential KPC(s), KCC(s), SC's and CoP/Regulatory attributes assigned correctly?
6 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMS [PFD] Yes No N/A Comments
0 1 Are part number and revision level noted?
0 2 Are process steps listed, including outside services, or process graphically shown?
0 3 Is the Supply Chain represented and included?
0 4 Is rework included on the flow diagram? If rework is part of normal processing
0 5 Have proprietary Process Flow Diagrams been reviewed and approved?
7 PROCESS FAILURE MODE & EFFECTS ANALYSIS [PFMEA] Yes No N/A Comments
0 1 Are part number and revision level noted?
0 2 Is the PFMEA consistent with the process flow diagram?
0 3 Are KPC(s), KCC(s), SC's and CoP/Regulatory attributes included, if shown on design record?
0 4 Are Failures consistent and appropriate?
0 5 Are Effects consistent and appropriate with Failure Modes?
0 6 Are Causes consistent and appropriate with Failure Modes?
0 7 Are Controls (Prevention and Detection) consistent and appropriate with Failure Modes and Causes?
0 8 Are Severity, Occurrence and Detection ratings consistent and appropriate?
0 9 Are RPNs consistent with ratings and appropriately addressed?
0 10 Are Recommended Actions documented and appropriate?
0 11 Have proprietary PFMEAs been reviewed and approved?
8 CONTROL PLAN Yes No N/A Comments
0 1 Are part number and revision level noted?
0 2 Is control plan consistent with the process flow diagram and PFMEA?
0 3 Are gages and checking aids noted?
0 4 Are KPC(s), KCC(s), SC's and CoP/Regulatory attributes included, if shown on design record?
0 5 Are controls and gages appropriate for tolerances, process and product characteristics, etc?
0 6 Are dimensions/tolerances consistent with print and is sampling plan appropriate for dimensions/tolerances?
0 7 Is Reaction Plan included?
0 8 Have proprietary Control Plans been reviewed and approved?
9 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS STUDIES Yes No N/A Comments
0 1 Was Measurement Systems Analysis (GR&Rs) performed on all checking aids and/or special gages?
0 2 Are all gage R&R's results <10%?
0 3 If R&R results >10% to < 30%, Is there evidence of management review for acceptability?
0 4 Are R&R results > 30%?
0 5 Are attribute gage studies completed using non-conforming parts?
10 DIMENSIONAL RESULTS Yes No N/A Comments
0 1 Is a fully bubbled print included? Can be part of Design Record
0 2 Is part number and revision level documented?
0 3 Are actual results recorded for five samples (or for # of samples requested)?
0 4 Are actual results recorded for all mold cavities?
0 5 Are results recorded for all dimensions, specifications, and notes? (may be noted on print)
0 6 Are specification and tolerance included to compare to result?
0 7 Do all results fall within specification limits?
0 8 Are KPC(s), KCC(s), SC(s,) CoP/Regulatory attributes dimensions identified? Check N/A if not required
11 MATERIAL / PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS Yes No N/A
0 1 Are there acceptable test results for all tests noted on print & control plan?
0 2 Are there acceptable test results for all SAE, ASTM and other specifications noted on print & control plan?
0 3 Do material test results include part number and meet what is specified on design record?
Do performance test reports show who performed tests, date of test, number parts tested, change level of parts tested, and specification &
4
0 change level parts were tested to?
0 5 Are test results on lab letterhead or laboratory report format?
Is documentation supplied for all Regulatory / "Conformance of Production" / Homologation compliance requirements identified on the design
6 record? (documentation, including the Certification Cover Sheet HS2.05.44, to be forwarded to CoP representative and stored in Certification
0 Repository)

505077170.xlsx
PPAP Risk: Medium
PPAP Review Guide PPAP Recommendation: Maybe Approved, noting iss
Note: All documentation must be legible
Comments
PPAP Team Lead: Auditor/Team:
Supplier Name:
Part No.: Design Level: MY:
PPAP No. Family (Y/N): Date:

12 INITIAL PROCESS CAPABILITY Yes No N/A Comments


1 Was capability study performed per acceptable standards? control charts, 100pcs, etc
2 Are capability results reported for all KPC(s), KCC(s), SC's or other features as required?
3 Are SC attributes equal or greater than 1.33 or inspected at 100%?
4 Are KPC or KCC attributes equal or greater than 1.67 or inspected at 100%?
13 QUALIFIED LABORATORY DOCUMENTATION Yes No N/A Comments
1 Is laboratory accredited for tests conducted? (Third party only)
2 Is A2LA, ISO 17025 or etc. certification and scope provided for tests conducted? (does not include QMS certification)
14. COSMETIC VALIDATION REPORT (CVR) or Appearance Approval Report (AAR) Yes No N/A Comments
1 Is cosmetic validation form submitted, completed, and approved?
17 CHECKING AIDS Yes No N/A Comments
1 Is Checking Aid noted on warrant with correct Change Level and date?
2 Does the checking aid agree with part dimensional requirements? Includes layout, drawings proof of calibration, etc
18 RECORDS OF COMPLIANCE TO CUSTOMER-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS Comments
a Certification of number of pieces run Yes No N/A Comments
1 Were 300 consecutive pieces produced or Customer documented approval for lesser quantity?
2 Is the declaration signed by appropriate supplier representative?
b Tooling Photograph (for customer owned tooling) Yes No N/A Comments
1 Are all tool photos included and legible? Photos of ownership, entire tool and tool detail that holds or produces part
2 Are tools properly marked? Tool Number, Property, Part Number
c Additional Requirements Yes No N/A Comments
1 Are additional requirements provided as noted?
2 Are all exceptions documented?

505077170.xlsx
ing issues

505077170.xlsx
ing issues

505077170.xlsx
APQP Risk: Medium
APQP Review Guide APQP Recommendation: Maybe Approved, noting iss
Note: All documentation must be legible
Comments
Team Lead: Auditor/Team:
Supplier Name:
Part No.: Design Level: MY:
PPAP No. Family (Y/N): Date:

GENERAL Yes No N/A Comments


1 Organize the Team
2 Define Scope
3 Timing - Project Tracker
1 PLAN AND DEFINE Yes No N/A Comments
1 Program Timing
2 Engineering BOM
3 Design Feasibility Study
4 Preliminary Process Flow Chart
5 Preliminary List of special product and process characteristics
6 Capacity Study/Capital Lineup
7 Tooling Lineup
8 Lessons Learned
2 PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Yes No N/A Comments
1 DFMEA
2 Design for Manufacturability and Assesmbly
3 Design Verification
4 Proto-type build Control Plan
5 Engineering Drawings (including math data / datums / special characteristics)
6 Engineering Specifications
7 Material Specifications
8 New Equipment, tooling, and facilities requirements
9 Special Product and Process Characterisitcs
10 Gages (including datums based on sub-assembly functionality / special characteristics) and Testing Requirements
3 PROCESS DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Yes No N/A Comments
1 Packaging Standards and specifications
2 Product / Process Quality System Review
3 Process Flow Chart
4 Floor Plan Layout
5 Charactersitic Matrix
6 PFMEA
7 Pre-Launch Control Plan (including error-proofing devices)
8 Process Instructions
9 Measurement System Analysis Plan
10 Preliminary Process Capability Study Plan
4 PRODUCT AND PROCESS VALIDATION Yes No N/A Comments
1 Significant production run
2 Measurement System Analysis
3 Preliminary Process Capability Study
4 Production Part Approval - Received / Reviewed PPAP Checklist
5 Packaging Evaluation
6 Production Control Plan
7 Quality Planning sign-off and meanagement support
5 FEEDBACK, ASSESSMENT, AND CORRECTIVE ACTION Yes No N/A Comments
1 Reduced Variation
2 Improvement delivery and service
0 3 Effective use of Lessons Learned/Best Practices

505077170.xlsx
ing issues

505077170.xlsx

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy