2.TOC Lecture2
2.TOC Lecture2
proof.
▪ To provide proofs
▪ Understand the entire notation and then rewriting the statement in your own words
▪ Break down it into parts and considered each part separately to find the proofs.
Definitions, Theorems and Proofs:
▪ For example, suppose we want to prove “P if and only if Q”
Often written “P iff Q” and also can be written as P↔ Q, where both P and Q are
mathematical statements
➢ Breaking down it into parts and considered each part separately to find the proofs.
The first part is : - “P only if Q,” which means: If P is true, then Q is true
We can write it as P → Q.
The second part is:- “P if Q,” which means: If Q is true, then P is true
We can write it as Q → P
➢ We must prove each to get the proof for the original problem.
Definitions, Theorems and Proofs:
▪ Definitions describe the objects and notions that we use.
▪ A definition may be simple, as in the definition of set given earlier in this chapter, or complex.
▪ we must make clear what constitutes that object and what does not
▪ Once objects and notations are defined, we then proceed with making the mathematical statements
about them
▪ A proof is a convincing logical argument that tries to show that a statement is true
▪ Some statements are proved as they assist in proving some other more significant
▪ A statement that has been proven true in order to further help in proving another statement is called
a lemma.
▪ A theorem / proof which allows to conclude that some other related statements are true, are called
corollary
TYPES OF PROOF:
▪ PROOF BY CONTRADICTION
▪ PROOF BY INDUCTION
PROOF BY CONSTRUCTION/DIRECT PROOF
▪ Many theorems state that a specific type of an object exists.
▪ One method for proving the existence of such an object is to prove that P ⇒ Q (P implies Q)
▪ In other words, we would demonstrate how we would build/construct that object to show that it can
exist
▪ Theorem: If a and b are consecutive integers, the sum of a + b must be an odd number.
▪ Proof:
▪ Following the steps, we laid out before, we first assume that our theorem is true
▪ Therefore, we can say that a + b = 2a + 1 ( Let’s consider this as P & use P to show that Q i.e,
a + b is an odd number)
PROOF BY CONSTRUCTION III
▪ We know that
▪ That means the proof contradicts the assumption; therefore it is called “Proof by Contradiction”
▪ Proof:
▪ If n = 2k + 1 then
n² = (2k + 1)²
▪ Using the definition for odd numbers, we must say that n² is odd
▪ Thus we can say n² must be even, and we’ve proven the original theorem
PROOF BY INDUCTION
▪ Proof by induction is a more advanced method of proving things
▪ This method is used to show that all elements in an infinite set have a certain property
▪ The next part of the proof is the inductive step. The inductive step is the part where we will
generalize our basis and take it a step further.
PROOF BY INDUCTION II
▪ The inductive step:
▪ Suppose our theorem is true for some n = k ≥ 1, that is: 1 + 2 + 3 + . . . + k = k(k + 1)/2.
▪ the induction step, proves that if the statement holds for any given case n = k,
▪ then it must also hold for the next case i.e., for n = k + 1.
𝑘
= 𝑘+1 +1
2
𝑘+1 𝑘+2
=
2
PROOF BY INDUCTION III
𝑘+1 𝑘+2
▪ we have proved 1 + 2 + 3 … + 𝑘 + 𝑘 + 1 =
2
▪ We’ve followed a logical progression from the basis or the base case, to the inductive step, all the way