SR4S Coding Guide
SR4S Coding Guide
Coding guide
About Star Rating for Schools
Approximately 500 children are killed in preventable traffic crashes around the world every day. Sometimes
they are killed just yards from the school entrance. Every traffic death and every injury violate a child’s right to
an education.
Star Rating for Schools is an evidence-based tool for measuring, managing and communicating the risk
children are exposed to on a journey to school. It supports quick interventions that save lives and prevent
serious injuries from day one.
The United Nations has included road safety in its Sustainable Development Goal target 3.6, which is to halve
road deaths and serious injuries by 2030. SR4S is key to meeting these global targets for child and adolescent
pedestrians.
Star Rating for Schools was awarded a prestigious Prince Michael International Road Safety Award in
December 2018, recognising the application’s huge potential to reduce risk and save the lives of pedestrians
worldwide.
Star Rating for Schools harnesses the power of the iRAP Star Ratings to measure the risk children are exposed
to on their journey to school. The iRAP Star Ratings are an internationally recognised measure of risk on roads,
with the least safe roads rated as one star and the safest as five stars. Star Rating for Schools utilises the
pedestrian component of Star Ratings to provide a measure of the contribution of road design to the risk for
each pedestrian.
Star Rating for Schools has only been made possible through the generous support of:
2 New location
2.1 Road name
The name of the primary road where the assessment is being conducted.
2.2 Section
The section name/number is used to differentiate between different locations along the same road, for instance.
It is recommended that the section name/number be meaningful to the end user. For example, section names
could describe a location as ‘in front of school’.
2.5 Image
Add images of the location that are sufficient to allow the data reviewer to check all the data collected for
accuracy. Pictures are also important for keeping records of the data collection process and decisions made
by the assessor in the field. For example, right and left side of the road, special conditions, etc. These will also
be helpful in capturing the baseline situation and will allow a comparison to be made after road upgrades.
Undeveloped
Residential
Industrial
Farming
One side
Poor
Two
2
Four or more
4
>3.25m
to
4.25m
Medium
MEDIUM
2.75m
to
3.25m
Present
Poor
POOR
Medium
MEDIUM
<4.3°
≥7.5 to <10%
• Divided carriageways are those that physically separate opposing traffic flows by either a barrier or a
wide physical median consistently and for a distance of 400m or more.
• An undivided carriageway has no physical separation between opposing traffic flows, or physically
separates traffic for a section of less than 400m.
Notes:
One-way roads must be coded as undivided and the ‘Median type’ set to one-way. Service roads must be
coded separately to the main carriageways. Code service roads the same way as standard roads.
Coding options
North/East
Carriageway A assessed.
South/West
Carriageway B assessed.
Double centreline
• Stripes
• Coloured paving
Turn lane
Flexible posts
0 to
1m
Separated 1m to <5m
1 to
5m
Separated 5m to <10m
5 to
10m
10 to 20m
Separated 20+m
>20m
Concrete Barrier
Wire Barrier
One way
Poor
Present
SCHOOL
limit.
Signs / markings
SCHOOL
Not applicable
SCHOOL
throughout the school day or during periods of high pedestrian
activity only, for example, at school start and finish times.
No Supervisor
Sidewalk 1m to 3m Away
1m to <2.4m Wide
≥2.4m Wide
Present
Lights
Bridge or Tunnel
The crossing is higher or lower than the road and hence does
not mix pedestrians and vehicles.
Marked
Refuge
• Vehicle drivers are required to stop and give pedestrian right-of-way (and do so)
• The facility is clearly visible and can be anticipated by vehicle drivers, and
• The facility is not obstructed by parked vehicles, street furniture or other items.
A pedestrian crossing is ineffective where for example:
• Drivers may brake suddenly or fail to see the facility due to the road’s curvature, speed, downward
gradient, poor sight distance or other factor,
• Pedestrians are entering the facility between parked cars and cannot be seen by approaching drivers
or
No crossing
1 to 5
6 to 25
26 to 50
51 to 100
101 to 200
201 to 300
301 to 400
401 to 500
501 to 900
900+
0%
1-5%
6-10%
11-20%
21-40%
41-60%
61-80%
81-99%
100%
0-5%
6-10%
11-15%
16-20%
21-30%
31-40%
>40%
No Intersection
Traffic joins the road being assessed via a merge lane. This is
typically the case at split level intersections.
Diverge lane
Traffic exits the road being assessed via diverge lane. This is
typically the case at split level intersections.
3 legs
4+ legs
Roundabout
Formal U-turn
Informal U-turn
1 or 2 Driveways
Commercial Access
• Lack of advance signage and marking on an intersection approach where the intersection is not clearly
visible to approaching drivers (such as where approach visibility is limited).
• Very short merge lanes.
Poor
No Curve
Moderate
Very sharp
The road has curves between 45º and 90º which can only be
driven at low speeds.
Poor
-10 km/h -10 km/h Most vehicles are travelling 10km/h below the speed limit
-5 km/h -5 km/h Most vehicles are travelling 5km/h below the speed limit
+5 km/h +5 km/h Most vehicles are travelling 5km/h above the speed limit
+10 km/h +10 km/ Most vehicles are travelling 10km/h above the speed limit
+15 km/h +15 km/ Most vehicles are travelling 15km/h above the speed limit
Present
Jan 2019 1.1 Added ‘None’ category for property access point.
Oct 2020 1.5 New description of crossing quality and right and left side of the road.
June 2021 1.6 General edits and minor changes to attribute and sub-attribute labels. Land use
‘residential’ definition updated. Pedestrian fence attribute is locked for review. Diagrams
updated for grade, median, school zone, school crossing supervisor and road edge.
June 2023 1.7 Broad updates to reflect changes to the pedestrian model. New categories include
‘Diverge lane’ in intersection type; ‘Shared path’ in sidewalks, and ‘Unmarked crossing’
in pedestrian crossing features. Intersection channelization has been removed (has no
impact on the pedestrian model). ‘Pedestrian channelisation’ attribute replaces
‘Pedestrian fencing’. Coding guidance changes required for intersection side road flow
and for crossings with pedestrian refuges which are integrated into the road median.
Motorcycle and heavy vehicle percentage have been introduced into Flow. Signals have
been removed from intersection details (has no impact on the pedestrian model).
Diagrams simplified and updated.