Module 6 Written Assignment 3
Module 6 Written Assignment 3
Student Name
February 21,2021
This study source was downloaded by 100000886156221 from CourseHero.com on 06-14-2024 15:44:51 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/175044977/Module-6-Written-Assignment-3docx/
2
Schools have been traditionally thought of as safe zones for students and staff members.
Over the past few years, there have been numerous school shootings in various states in the
United states. The Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting in 2012 was one of the deadliest
school shooting in the US. Community members and parents have often presumed that schools
are safe and protocols for unforeseen events like school shootings are in place (Everett-Haynes,
2011). The shooting sparked a lot of debate as to whether school staff more so teachers should be
allowed to carry concealed weapons in school. Politicians, educators and various community-
based groups have debated the merits and demerits of arming school staff in an effort to counter-
Video Summary
The video begins with a segment from Judy Woodruff, a news anchor from PBS News
who introduces a news feature aired by the media house known as Making the Grade. She begins
by giving a recap of the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting that killed 20 children and 6 members
of staff. She claims that the shooting did not become a transformative moment in creating
policies that restrict gun access. The shooting however made several school districts ramp up
security measures like hiring police officers, installing cameras and also metal detectors.
Correspondent Kavitha Cardoza travels to West Union, Ohio where she interviews Joe Eaton
who runs a firing range. The students in the firing range work for school districts in various
capacities like school drivers, principals and teachers. John Eaton expresses his views on the
need for armed school staff. He compares the situation of having an active shooter in a school
with a kid drowning. In the latter, the nearest person responds to the emergency before medics
arrive and so should a school shooting scenario. Lori Snyder-Lowe, the superintendent of
This study source was downloaded by 100000886156221 from CourseHero.com on 06-14-2024 15:44:51 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/175044977/Module-6-Written-Assignment-3docx/
3
Morgan Local School District also expresses her views. She argues that the school district is
wide and emergency response might not be as quick as needed for some schools that are further
away from the Sherriff’s office. Erin Knox, a teacher at Fairfield City Schools also shares her
concerns. Despite having a concealed carry permit, the school does not allow her to carry her gun
to school and hopes that this might change soon. She argues that she needs to be able to defend
her students in case there is an active shooter in the school. Various non-profit movements like
Moms Demand Action have joined forces with Everytown for Gun safety to advocate for anti-
gun laws in school and have so far been successful. Various individuals like John Moffatt express
their opinions on the matter and argue that even for trained police officer, they rarely hit a target
in an active shootout and do not feel teachers will perform better in a school setting with lots of
kids.
Argument
As described above, your first level subheading should be centered, bold, and written in
Your second level subheading should be left-aligned, bold, and written in upper and
lower-case letters.
Your third level subheading should be left-aligned, bold, and written in title case heading.
You would include a third level heading if you are providing more detail about a specific second
level heading topic. Again, you would typically only include a third level heading if you were
including at least two third level headings under the same second level heading topic.
This study source was downloaded by 100000886156221 from CourseHero.com on 06-14-2024 15:44:51 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/175044977/Module-6-Written-Assignment-3docx/
4
Provide a clear conclusion that incorporates major themes and findings from your
analyses (You may provide your conclusion here OR after your “Argument Evaluation”; please
recall that in either instance the conclusion is to be a separate paragraph and you may use a first
Argument Evaluation
Teachers and school staff should be armed. In a school setting, teachers are the primary
caregivers of school going kids within the premises. They are responsible for protecting the
teachers need to promptly respond to as fast as possible. They might not be the best suited people
for that scenario but before security personnel arrive, they should be able to ward off the attacker
and minimize casualties. Arming the teachers gives them a better chance to face an attacker.
Knowing teachers are armed could also be a measure of deterring violence from schools (Isbell,
schools. Runevitch,2013 argues that saving one life is worth arming educators in an effort of
protecting and providing safety to students. Schools have come up with various methods of
securing their premises from shooters. Hiring armed police is one way although some schools
might not have the financial resources to hire the extra personnel (Kennedy,2003).
Saving lives is a positive social change that will affect a community as a whole. In case
of a tragedy, the main objective is getting everyone out of harm’s way as fast as possible. The
psychological anxiety that teachers might experience in the event of having an active shooter in
their school might be a deterrent to them providing security to children. Getting the training
required to handle a firearm and use it correctly in an emergency gives the teacher the confidence
This study source was downloaded by 100000886156221 from CourseHero.com on 06-14-2024 15:44:51 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/175044977/Module-6-Written-Assignment-3docx/
5
and self-esteem knowing that in case of any attack, they stand a chance of protecting their
students.
A source can be said to be credible if it demonstrates authority and expertise (Facione &
Gittens,2016). The sources selected in this paper have been thoroughly researched based on the
references in the journals and papers. The sources are free of conflicts of interest and are not
skewed to support one side of the argument. The sources are also current and not outdated in that
they were written at the time when school shootings were rampant and not earlier than that. The
authors also do not stand to benefit in any way from the research done but are scholars who seek
to gather information about an issue that is affecting society. This is a clear demonstration that
they will not benefit in any way from the information and findings of the study but rather seek to
The claims in the argument for teachers needing to carry weapons to school are valid and
sound. According to the course text, Facione & Gittens,2016, an argument is said to be valid if
all premises are true therefore making the conclusion impossible to be false. The premises in this
case are the need for security in a school and the need for a fast response in an active shooting
situation. Teachers being the core caregivers in a school are therefore the most suited to be armed
in order to respond faster than the authorities. The premises are true and therefore justifies the
conclusion.
The reasoning used in writing this paper is empirical reasoning. Empirical reasoning is
based on observation, careful logic and open scrutiny to others. Empirical reasoning is also open
to Independent verification. The sources used in researching the topic are freely available as
expert analyses and can be verified by independent parties at will. In the process of researching
This study source was downloaded by 100000886156221 from CourseHero.com on 06-14-2024 15:44:51 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/175044977/Module-6-Written-Assignment-3docx/
6
content for the paper statements made in the study were cross-referenced with text in the course
book.
Conclusion
Whether to arm teachers or not continues to be a subject for debate. The nation is divided into
two groups who follow different schools of thought. Those who support arming teachers are
most probably pro-gun ownership while those who don’t are anti-gun ownership. Some groups
can also be argued to use the ideological reasoning to argue for or against the issue of gun
ownership. The major issue remains to be the safety of students in schools and also the ability of
teachers to hold off attackers before authorities arrive at the scene of an active shooter.
This study source was downloaded by 100000886156221 from CourseHero.com on 06-14-2024 15:44:51 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/175044977/Module-6-Written-Assignment-3docx/
7
References
Everett-Haynes, L. (2011, April 27). Study: School climate a key factor in feeling of safety,
climate-key-factor-feelings-safety
Facione, P. A., & Gittens, C. A. (2016). Think critically (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Kennedy, M. (2003c). Paying for protection. American School and University, 76(2), 20-26.
Runevitch, J. (2013, January 18). Noble County, Indiana considers arming teachers . Retrieved
from http://www.wthr.com/story/20626939/noble-county-considers-arming-teachers
This study source was downloaded by 100000886156221 from CourseHero.com on 06-14-2024 15:44:51 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/175044977/Module-6-Written-Assignment-3docx/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)