0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views16 pages

Field Visit Report

Uploaded by

southking0301
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views16 pages

Field Visit Report

Uploaded by

southking0301
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Department Of Civil Engineering

Rewa Engineering College, Rewa

Field Visit Report


INDEX
1. Project details:
Project name
Site address
Date of visit
Name of the people visiting
2. Introduction:
Brief description of the project
Purpose of the site visit
3. Summary of Activities:
Schedule and timeline of the site visit
Persons met and their designations
Discussions held or activities observed
4. Observations:
Detailed account of what was observed
Photos (with captions or descriptions) can be particularly helpful
Status of ongoing work
Equipment/material present on site
Safety measures in place and any violations observed
Environmental considerations and their adherence
5. Issues Identified:
Any deviations from the planned work
Delays or challenges faced
Areas of concern related to quality, safety, environment, or other
pertinent topics
6. Recommendations/Actions to be Taken:
Steps or measures suggested to address the identified issues or concerns
Any follow-up required with specific persons or entities
7. Conclusion:
Overall assessment of the site visit
Next steps or future visits
Project Name- Amphitheater and REC Frame Selfie
Point.
Location- Rewa Engineering College
Visit Date

Introduction: This Site is located in Rewa Engineering College We Have


Worked in Two site one is Amphitheater and Second is REC Frame This Site
Are Constructed by our College Alumni for Development of Infrastructure.

Project Details:
Equipment Used for Construction

1. Iron Pan (or Ghamela): For filling and placing the material
at requires place.

2. Line and Pins: For alignment of various building members.

3. Rammer: For compacting the soil surface and compacting


the ground

4. Trowel: For placing, compacting or plastering by mortar in


case of brick masonry construction.

5. Plumb bob: For checking the verticality of various


members.

6. Spirit level: For checking horizontal level.

7. Kassi or Phawrah: For material filling or mixing.

8. Steel Tape: For vertical and horizontal measurement.

9. Mason’s square: For fixing and checking the building


corners.

10. Tilting Mixer: For preparing concrete.

11. Plate Vibrator: For compacting plinth and the ground

12. Niddle Vibrator: For compacting the concrete in


vertical and horizontal members.
Structure Details:

Dimensions: Total Size of REC Frame is 20X20ft


Area: 400/Sq.ft

Construction Materials:

RCC Columns,
RCC Beams,
Steel Reinforcement,
1st Class Fly ash Bricks
Cement Morter

For Flooring:
Kota Stone
Granite
PCC

Construction Technique

1. Layout
• The layout process began by referring to the detailed construction
drawings, which included foundation and plinth beam plans.
• Surveying Tools Used: Tools such as theodolites, leveling
instruments, and measuring tapes were utilized to ensure accurate
alignment and measurements.
• Benchmarks and Reference Points: Benchmarks were established to
serve as fixed points of reference. These points ensured that the
alignment and levels were maintained consistently throughout the
construction.
• Verification: After the layout was marked, it was checked
thoroughly by the site engineer or supervisor to confirm its accuracy
against the drawings.
2. Excavation
• Preparation: The site was prepared by clearing vegetation, debris,
and unwanted materials. A site inspection ensured that the
excavation area was free of obstructions.
• Excavation Process:
o Excavation was carried out using equipment such as
excavators, backhoes, or manually where machinery could
not access.
o The depth and width of the excavation adhered strictly to the
project specifications, ensuring a proper base for the
foundation.
• Soil Testing and Stability:
o The excavated soil was tested for its load-bearing capacity.
Weak soil layers, if present, were replaced with compacted
earth or granular fill.
o The sidewalls of the excavation were stabilized using shoring
or slope protection where necessary to prevent collapse.
• Post-Excavation Activities: The excavated area was cleaned, leveled,
and prepared for the next stage of construction.
3. PCC in Foundation
• Purpose: The Plain Cement Concrete (PCC) layer served as a
leveling and protective base for the reinforcement and foundation.
It prevented direct contact between the reinforcement and soil,
which could lead to corrosion.
• Mixing and Proportion:
o The PCC was mixed using a standard M10 grade (1 part
cement, 3 parts sand, and 6 parts aggregate) with the
required amount of water.
o The mix was prepared using a concrete mixer to ensure
consistency and uniformity.
• Laying Process:
o The PCC was poured evenly across the base of the
excavation.
o It was compacted using tampers or compacting tools to
remove air pockets and ensure a dense, uniform surface.
o The surface was finished smooth with a trowel, and slopes
were provided where required to aid water drainage.
• Curing: Water curing was initiated after the concrete set, typically
24 hours after pouring, to ensure proper strength development.
4. Reinforcement Placement
• Material Preparation:
o Steel reinforcement bars were cut and bent according to the
structural drawings.
o High-quality, corrosion-resistant steel was used to ensure the
durability of the structure.
• Placement:
o The bars were placed at specified distances using spacers to
maintain proper cover and alignment.
o Tying was done using binding wire to hold the reinforcement
in place during concreting.
• Quality Checks:
o Proper spacing, bar overlap (lapping), and anchorage were
checked to ensure structural integrity.
o Cover blocks were used to maintain the required concrete
cover around the steel to protect it from environmental
damage.

5. Formwork Installation
• Material Used: Formwork materials included steel, wood, or
aluminum depending on the project’s requirements and budget.
• Installation Process:
o The formwork was assembled around the reinforcement to
shape the foundation and plinth beam.
o The joints and gaps were sealed to prevent concrete leakage
during pouring.
• Checks and Adjustments:
o The formwork was checked for alignment, stability, and
levelness. Bracings were added for additional support where
required.
o Release agents were applied to the formwork to facilitate its
easy removal after curing.

6. Concreting
• Concrete Preparation: The concrete mix (usually M20 grade for
structural components) was prepared using cement, sand,
aggregate, and water in specified proportions.
• Pouring Process:
o Concrete was poured into the formwork in layers, ensuring
even distribution.
o Vibrators were used during pouring to compact the concrete,
eliminating air pockets and improving density.
• Leveling and Finishing: The surface was leveled with a trowel, and
a smooth finish was provided where necessary.
• Quality Checks:
o Slump tests were conducted on-site to verify the workability
of the concrete.
o Cube samples were taken for compressive strength testing
after curing.

7. Curing
• Purpose: Curing was carried out to ensure the hydration of cement,
which is critical for achieving the desired strength of concrete.
• Methods Used:
o Water curing was done by covering the surface with jute bags
or sprinkling water at regular intervals.
o In some cases, curing compounds were applied to retain
moisture.
• Duration: The curing period varied depending on the weather and
structure but typically lasted 7-14 days.
8. Removal of Formwork
• The formwork was removed only after the concrete attained
sufficient strength to support itself and the load of subsequent
construction.
• Proper care was taken to avoid damage to the edges or corners of
the concrete.
9. Inspection and Quality Checks
• The constructed components were inspected to ensure compliance
with the design specifications.
• Any deviations or defects were rectified immediately before
progressing to the next stages.
10. Further Construction
• After completing the foundation and plinth beam, construction
moved to subsequent phases, such as column casting, wall
construction, and slab laying, as per the project plan.

Summary of Activities

1. Timeline
• Date: [Insert date(s)]
• Time: [Start and end time of the activities]
• Duration: [Duration of the activity]
2. Persons Met With
• Name(s): [List the names of individuals involved in the meeting or
activities]
• Designation: [Their roles or designations, e.g., Engineer, Contractor,
Supervisor]
• Organization/Team: [Organization or team they represent]
3. Discussion Held
• Topics Discussed:
1. Progress of the project so far, including completed tasks (e.g.,
layout, excavation, PCC).
2. Issues faced during the process, such as site challenges,
material delays, or manpower concerns.
3. Solutions and recommendations proposed during the meeting
to address challenges.
4. Updates to timelines, milestones, or deliverables based on the
current status.
5. Future action plan and division of responsibilities for the next
phase of construction.
• Decisions Taken:
o Approval of design changes (if any).
o Scheduling of subsequent activities (e.g., concreting, curing,
formwork removal).
o Material procurement timelines and logistics.
o Additional resources or equipment requirements.
• Action Points:
o [Action 1: Assign tasks to specific team members with
deadlines.]
o [Action 2: Follow up on material delivery and procurement
status.]
o [Action 3: Conduct safety checks before the next stage.]
4. Additional Notes
• Observations on work quality and adherence to design standards.
• Key takeaways from the discussion, including insights or suggestions
provided by team members.
• Pending issues or approvals needed for further progress.

Observation Report
1. Positive Observations
1. Timely Completion of Excavation and PCC:
o The excavation and Plain Cement Concrete (PCC) work were
completed as per the schedule and adhered to the specified
dimensions in the design.
o The PCC surface was finished uniformly, providing a strong
and level base for further construction activities.
2. Quality of Materials Used:
o High-quality materials, including cement, aggregates, and steel
reinforcement bars, were utilized.
o Materials were tested for compliance with standards, ensuring
durability and strength of the structure.
3. Team Coordination:
o Effective communication and coordination among the site
team, supervisors, and contractors facilitated smooth progress
of the work.
o The site team demonstrated prompt response to minor issues,
minimizing delays and ensuring project efficiency.
4. Adherence to Safety Standards:
o Workers adhered to safety protocols, including the use of
personal protective equipment (PPE) and safe handling of
equipment.
o Proper signage and barricades were in place to secure the
worksite, enhancing overall safety.
5. Reinforcement Placement – Initial Setup:
o The reinforcement bars were initially arranged correctly as per
the design, with adequate spacing and proper lapping where
required.
o Cover blocks were used to maintain the required concrete
cover, ensuring protection of the reinforcement.

2. Negative Observations

1. Bending of Reinforcement Bars in Columns:


o Issue Identified:
Some reinforcement bars in the columns were
bent out of alignment due to insufficient
bracing or improper handling during
placement.
o Impact:
This could potentially affect the structural integrity and load
transfer efficiency of the columns.
2. Leakage of Concrete During Casting:
o Issue Identified:
Concrete leakage was observed during casting,
caused by gaps in the formwork. Improper
sealing and alignment of the shuttering panels
contributed to this issue.
o Impact:
This may result in loss of cement slurry,
weakening the concrete mix and causing
surface irregularities such as honeycombing.

3. Causes of Mistakes
1. Bending of Reinforcement Bars:
o Lack of adequate bracing and improper spacing during
reinforcement placement.
o Displacement caused by vibrations during concrete pouring.
2. Leakage of Concrete:
o Poorly sealed or misaligned formwork.
o Inadequate bracing of formwork to handle concrete pressure.
4. Recommendations for Improvement
1. For Reinforcement Bar Alignment:
o Reinforcement should be properly tied and braced to prevent
displacement during concreting.
o Conduct pre-concreting inspections to verify alignment and
placement accuracy.
2. For Concrete Leakage Prevention:
o Inspect formwork thoroughly and seal all gaps using foam
tape or mastic sealant before casting.
o Ensure the formwork is adequately braced to withstand the
pressure of concrete pouring.
5. Rectification Measures
1. Bent reinforcement bars should be realigned or replaced as
necessary to restore their intended structural performance.
2. Areas affected by concrete leakage should be repaired using non-
shrink grout or mortar to restore uniformity and strength.
know if further adjustments are needed!
Conclusion

The construction process has demonstrated significant progress with


commendable achievements in key areas such as quality of work,
adherence to timelines, and effective teamwork. Despite minor
challenges, the overall performance has been satisfactory, and the
identified issues have been addressed with actionable recommendations
to ensure the project stays on track and meets its intended quality
standards.
Key Positive Outcomes
1. Adherence to Timeline:
o The excavation and PCC works were completed within the
scheduled timeframe, reflecting efficient planning and
execution.
2. Material Quality:
o High-grade materials, including cement, aggregates, and
reinforcement bars, were used, which comply with the
required standards and contribute to the durability of the
structure.
3. Team Coordination:
o The site team exhibited strong coordination and
responsiveness, which facilitated seamless progress and
immediate resolution of minor issues.
4. Safety Practices:
o The implementation of safety protocols, including PPE usage
and secure site conditions, minimized risks and ensured a safe
working environment for all personnel.
Challenges Encountered
1. Bending of Reinforcement Bars:
o Misalignment of reinforcement bars in the columns was
observed due to insufficient bracing and vibrations during
concrete pouring.
o This issue, if left unchecked, could impact the load-bearing
capacity and overall strength of the structure.
2. Concrete Leakage During Casting:
o Gaps in the formwork led to concrete leakage during casting,
causing potential strength reduction in some areas and surface
imperfections such as honeycombing.
Corrective Actions and Recommendations
1. Reinforcement Alignment:
o Proper bracing and spacers should be used to secure
reinforcement bars during placement.
o Regular inspections and monitoring during concreting will
help identify and rectify alignment issues in real time.
2. Formwork Sealing:
o Formwork gaps must be sealed using appropriate materials
such as foam tape or mastic sealant.
o Bracing the formwork to withstand concrete pressure will
prevent future leakage and ensure uniform casting.
3. Quality Assurance and Inspections:
o Enhanced supervision during critical stages like concreting and
reinforcement placement will ensure adherence to design
specifications.
Overall Assessment
The project is progressing effectively, with strong adherence to planned
schedules and quality benchmarks. Positive observations such as the
quality of materials, organized execution, and teamwork reflect the
commitment to achieving project objectives. While certain issues like
reinforcement misalignment and concrete leakage were noted, these have
been effectively addressed through immediate corrective actions.
With the recommended measures in place, the subsequent construction
phases, including column casting and slab work, are expected to proceed
smoothly and achieve the desired quality and safety standards. Continued
focus on quality control, team coordination, and adherence to protocols
will ensure the successful completion of the project within the specified
timeline.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy