1

Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
DIVISION OF BOHOL
District of Maribojoc
BUSAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Maribojoc, Bohol

INSTRUCTIONAL PLAN (iPlan)

(With inclusion of the provisions of DepEd OrderNo.8, s. 2015)
Name of LORETO C. JUGO JR. Grade/Year Level DATE:
Teacher 11 and 12 JULY 9, 2018
LearningArea: INTRODUCTION TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN PERSON
Quarter: 1ST
Competency/ies: At the end of the session, learners are expected to analyze situations that show the
difference between opinion and truth.
CODE: PPT11/12-Id-2.2

iplaN No.OBJECTIVE: The learners determine statements that are considered truth or Time Duration
14 opinion. 1 hour
CONTENT: METHODS OF PHILOSOPHIZING

Knowledge: Remembering: Remember the definition and idea of truth and opinion.

Understanding:

Skills Applying: Integrated learnings on truth.

Analyzing:

Evaluating:

Creating:

Attitudes Disposition: Raise the value of truth.

VALUES: MAKADIYOS:
______________________________________________________________________________
MAKA-TAO: Share truth toward others.
______________________________________________________________________________
MAKAKALIKASAN:
______________________________________________________________________________
MAKABANSA:

Resources Introduction to the philosophy of the Human Person Textbook and Internet Research
Needed:

Elements of the Plan Methodology

Preparations Motivation/ Let the assigned group facilitate the recapitulation
Introductory Activity: of the pervious lesson using flash cards.

Presentation Activity: Guess and Dress Me Up *Provide 2 human figures

labeled as Truth and Opinion.

Analysis How did you determine that the statement is

considered truth or opinion?
Watch a short clip on: SPONGEBOB
Abstraction SpongeBob: Empty your mind Processing: Identify
situations from the video which can be considered
as truth and opinion.

Practice Application Let the students answer the given question: Based
 2

on the discussion, how should analysis of situations

be done?

Assessment Matrix
Levels of Assessment What will I assess? How will I assess? How will I score?
Assessment Knowledge:
CHECK-UP (5 Items)

Process or Skills: Situational Analysis

Understanding(s)

Products/performances
(Transfer of Understanding)

Assignment

Have the students cite an instance in their life where they find truth to be really
essential/significant.

CONCLUDING ACTIVITY: What are your three attributes of yourself that are true?

V. REMARKS
CARRIED
VI. REFLECTION
A. No of learners who earned 80% in the
evaluation 76 OUT OF 83 LEARNERS got 80%
B. No of learners who require additional activites
for
remediation who scored below 80% 7 Learners
C. Did the remedial lessons work? No of learners
who have caught up with the lesson Yes, 7 Learners
D. No of learners who continue to require
remediation O Learner
E. Which of my teaching strategies worked
well? Why did these work? Peer Tutoring and Discussion
F. What difficulties did I encounter which my
principal or supervisor can help me solve?
G. What innovation or localized materials did I
use/discover which I wish t share with other
teachers?

Prepared by:
NAME: LORETO C. JUGO JR. SCHOOL: BUSAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
POSITION/DESIGNATION: SST-II DIVISION: BOHOL
CONTACT NUMBER: 09297625157 EMAIL ADDRESS: Lj_sccs@yahoo.com

Checked by:

TERESA C. ARAIS
School Head
 3

Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
DIVISION OF BOHOL
District of Maribojoc
BUSAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Maribojoc, Bohol

INSTRUCTIONAL PLAN (iPlan)

(With inclusion of the provisions of DepEd OrderNo.8, s. 2015)
Name of LORETO C. JUGO JR. Grade/Year Level DATE:
Teacher 11 and 12 JULY 10, 2018
LearningArea: INTRODUCTION TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN PERSON
Quarter: 1ST
Competency/ies: At the end of the session, learners are expected to analyze situations that show the
difference between opinion and truth.
CODE: PPT11/12-Id-2.2

iplaN No. OBJECTIVE: The learners understand the key concept of the Nature of Truth. Time Duration
15 1 hour
CONTENT: METHODS OF PHILOSOPHIZING

Knowledge: Remembering:

Understanding: Understand the key concepts of the Nature of Truth.

Skills Applying:

Analyzing:

Evaluating: Give some examples of the nature of truth.

Creating:

Attitudes Disposition: Participate in the activities.

VALUES: MAKADIYOS:
______________________________________________________________________________
MAKA-TAO: Appreciate the honesty of a human person.
______________________________________________________________________________
MAKAKALIKASAN:
______________________________________________________________________________
MAKABANSA:

Resources Introduction to the philosophy of the Human Person Textbook and Internet Research
Needed:

Elements of the Plan Methodology

Preparations Motivation/ Let the assigned group facilitate the recapitulation
Introductory Activity: of the previous lesson in a form of a charade.
Presentation Activity: Relate to the class the story of a
Lost and Found cellular phone unit.
Analysis Ask the students:
Why is it necessary to avoid giving speculations in
looking for a solution to a problem presented?
Abstraction Discuss the Nature of Truth:
1. Correspondence Theory
2. Coherence Theory
3. Pragmatic Theory
 4

Practice Application Ask the students to act out a situation in the

context of their experiences in the family and let
their classmates determine truth from opinion.

Assessment Matrix
Levels of Assessment What will I assess? How will I assess? How will I score?
Assessment Knowledge: CHECK-UP QUIZ (10 Items)

Process or Skills:

Understanding(s)

Products/performances
(Transfer of Understanding)

Assignment
Ask the students to cite a specific example in any of the three (3) theories of truth in the context
of their experience as senior high school students.

CONCLUDING ACTIVITY: On the basis of the discussion, how would you determine if your beliefs
are true?
V. REMARKS
CARRIED
VI. REFLECTION
A. No of learners who earned 80% in the
evaluation 59 OUT OF 83 Learners got 80%
B. No of learners who require additional activites
for
remediation who scored below 80% 24 Learners
C. Did the remedial lessons work? No of learners
who have caught up with the lesson Yes, 19 Learners
D. No of learners who continue to require
remediation 5 Learners
E. Which of my teaching strategies worked
well? Why did these work? Role Playing
F. What difficulties did I encounter which my
principal or supervisor can help me solve?
G. What innovation or localized materials did I
use/discover which I wish t share with other
teachers?

Prepared by:
NAME: LORETO C. JUGO JR. SCHOOL: BUSAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
POSITION/DESIGNATION: SST-II DIVISION: BOHOL
CONTACT NUMBER: 09297625157 EMAIL ADDRESS: Lj_sccs@yahoo.com

Checked by:
TERESA C. ARAIS
School Head
 5

Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
DIVISION OF BOHOL
District of Maribojoc
BUSAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Maribojoc, Bohol

INSTRUCTIONAL PLAN (iPlan)

(With inclusion of the provisions of DepEd OrderNo.8, s. 2015)
Name of LORETO C. JUGO JR. Grade/Year Level DATE:
Teacher 11 and 12 JULY 12, 2018
LearningArea: INTRODUCTION TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN PERSON
Quarter: 1ST
Competency/ies: At the end of the session, learners are expected to realize that the methods of philosophy
lead to wisdom and truth.
CODE: PPT11/12-Id-2.3

iplaN No. OBJECTIVE: The learners understand the meaning of Fallacy. Time Duration
16 1 hour
CONTENT:

Knowledge: Remembering:

Understanding: Explain the meaning of fallacy.

Skills Applying:

Analyzing:

Evaluating: Give own examples of fallacy.

Creating:

Attitudes Disposition: Be firm in fighting for the truth.

VALUES: MAKADIYOS:
______________________________________________________________________________
MAKA-TAO: Identify fallacy on other people.
______________________________________________________________________________
MAKAKALIKASAN:
______________________________________________________________________________
MAKABANSA:

Resources Introduction to the philosophy of the Human Person Textbook and Internet Research
Needed:

Elements of the Plan Methodology

Preparations Motivation/ Let the assigned group facilitate the recapitulation
Introductory Activity: of the previous lesson in a form of a Gallery Walk.

Presentation Activity: The teacher shows a video clip that presents

examples of fallacies of argumentation. After the
video presentation, ask the students to identify
fallacious statements.
Analysis Guide the students to the concept that opinionated
statements may come in a form of a fallacy.

Abstraction Discuss the meaning of fallacies used in

argumentation.
 6

Practice Application Cite examples of fallacies

which they had experienced or observed.

Assessment Matrix
Levels of Assessment What will I assess? How will I assess? How will I score?
Assessment Knowledge: CHECK-UP Quiz (10 Items)

Process or Skills:

Understanding(s)
ORAL RECITATION

Products/performances
(Transfer of Understanding)

Assignment
Enumerate examples of fallacies and define them.

CONCLUDING ACTIVITY: Why is there a need to identify fallacies from truth?

V. REMARKS
NOT CARRIED
VI. REFLECTION
A. No of learners who earned 80% in the
evaluation
B. No of learners who require additional activites
for
remediation who scored below 80%
C. Did the remedial lessons work? No of learners
who have caught up with the lesson
D. No of learners who continue to require
remediation
E. Which of my teaching strategies worked
well? Why did these work?
F. What difficulties did I encounter which my
principal or supervisor can help me solve?
G. What innovation or localized materials did I
use/discover which I wish t share with other
teachers?

Prepared by:
NAME: LORETO C. JUGO JR. SCHOOL: BUSAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
POSITION/DESIGNATION: SST-II DIVISION: BOHOL
CONTACT NUMBER: 09297625157 EMAIL ADDRESS: Lj_sccs@yahoo.com

Checked by:

TERESA C. ARAIS
School Head
 7

Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
DIVISION OF BOHOL
District of Maribojoc
BUSAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Maribojoc, Bohol

INSTRUCTIONAL PLAN (iPlan)

(With inclusion of the provisions of DepEd OrderNo.8, s. 2015)
Name of LORETO C. JUGO JR. Grade/Year Level DATE:
Teacher 11 and 12 JULY 13, 2018
LearningArea: INTRODUCTION TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN PERSON
Quarter: 1ST
Competency/ies: At the end of the session, learners are expected to realize that the methods of philosophy
lead to wisdom and truth.
CODE: PPT11/12-Id-2.3

iplaN No. OBJECTIVE: The learners understand the methods of philosophizing. Time Duration
17 1 hour
CONTENT:

Knowledge: Remembering: Discuss the methods of philosophizing.

Understanding:

Skills Applying: Apply the methods of philosophy towards wisdom and truth.

Analyzing:

Evaluating:

Creating:

Attitudes Disposition: Appreciate the methods of philosophizing.

VALUES: MAKADIYOS:
______________________________________________________________________________
MAKA-TAO: Relate important people behind the study of philosophy to other people.
______________________________________________________________________________
MAKAKALIKASAN:
______________________________________________________________________________
MAKABANSA:

Resources Introduction to the philosophy of the Human Person Textbook and Internet Research
Needed:

Elements of the Plan Methodology

Preparations Motivation/ Let the assigned group facilitate the recapitulation
Introductory Activity: of the previous lesson in a form of a Telephone
Conversation.
Presentation Activity: Pageant (Introduction) *Divide the class into 4-6
groups (whatever the case may be). *Each group
should have 1 representative who will present
“who they are”
Analysis Discuss Methods of Philosophy:
 Critical Thinking
 Components of Critical Thinking
Abstraction With the advent of social media, how would
you uphold truth and wisdom?
 8

a. Facebook b. Instagram c. Twitter d. Etc.

Practice Application Write a couplet on your perspective about the
given statement: A person is more than just his/her
Facebook profile/account.

Assessment Matrix
Levels of Assessment What will I assess? How will I assess? How will I score?
Assessment Knowledge: Check-up Quiz (5 Items)

Process or Skills:

Understanding(s)

Products/performances
(Transfer of Understanding)

Assignment

Answer on your own:

What is the significance of philosophy to everyday living?

CONCLUDING ACTIVITY: What is the significance of philosophy to everyday living?

V. REMARKS
NOT CARRIED
VI. REFLECTION
A. No of learners who earned 80% in the
evaluation
B. No of learners who require additional activites
for
remediation who scored below 80%
C. Did the remedial lessons work? No of learners
who have caught up with the lesson
D. No of learners who continue to require
remediation
E. Which of my teaching strategies worked
well? Why did these work?
F. What difficulties did I encounter which my
principal or supervisor can help me solve?
G. What innovation or localized materials did I
use/discover which I wish t share with other
teachers?

Prepared by:
NAME: LORETO C. JUGO JR. SCHOOL: BUSAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
POSITION/DESIGNATION: SST-II DIVISION: BOHOL
CONTACT NUMBER: 09297625157 EMAIL ADDRESS: Lj_sccs@yahoo.com

Checked by:

TERESA C. ARAIS
School Head