Week 7 Lesson
Week 7 Lesson
NG
AND
WRITI
WEEK 7
NG
CONTENTS OF THIS TEMPLATE
2.DETERMINING
TEXTUAL EVIDENCE 4. CHARACTERISTICS OF
A GOOD EVIDENCE
2
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the end of the lesson, the student should be
able to:
◈ Formulate counterclaims
◈ Differentiate claims and counterclaims and;
◈ Determining textual evidence
4
LESSON 7:
FORMULATING
COUNTERCLAIMS
AND DETERMINING
TEXTUAL EVIDENCE
4
FORMULATING
COUNTERCLAIMS
To be an effective critical thinker, it is not
enough just to be able to identify claims
and assertions. The ability to analyze an
argument is essential to understanding the
text more deeply, but understanding the
claim is not the only facet of the argument.
You must also learn how to analyze the
counterclaims and evidence provided by 5
the text.
FORMULATING
COUNTERCLAIMS
By being able to locate and provide
counterclaims to an argument, you
show a deep competence and
familiarity with the writer’s topic. It
shows that you are examining
different perspectives and not just
passively accepting the writer’s claim. 6
The following questions will help you
formulate a counterclaim:
interesting.
DETERMINING TEXTUAL
EVIDENCE
Evidence is crucial in swaying the
reader to your side. A jury or judge,
for example, relies on the evidence
presented by a lawyer before it
makes a decision regarding a case.
11
DETERMINING TEXTUAL
EVIDENCE
necessary.
EXAMPLES:
1. This is clear when Meursault
attends his mother’s funeral. The
Stranger by Albert Camus
2. This is clear when he flies over
the sea. Song of Solomon by Toni
Morrison 18
2. Summarizing –
is putting someone
else’s words into
your own words.
It’s
youuseful when
want to point to a larger section of
text but do not need the details of the
original text. Summarizing literary
fiction usually occurs in the 19
22
3. Paraphrasing –
is also putting
someone else’s
words into your
own
whenwords. It is more detail than a
you need
useful
summary but less than a direct quote.
A paraphrase focuses concisely on a
single main idea. 23
Paraphrasing should be written in
your own words, include a page
number, and be followed by a
statement explaining its
importance and connection to the
topic sentence.
24
EXAMPLES:
1. Original: “that it was one of those
things that was bound to happen sooner
or later” (33).
Paraphrase: As an absurdist, Meursault
doesn’t put meaning towards any object
or being. Therefore, he doesn’t mourn
over his mother’s death and acts
25
indifferently towards his loss(33).The
Stranger by Albert Camus
4. Quoting –
illuminates your
ideas and support
your argument
using the exact
the original text. It’s useful when you
words
want tofrom
capture the particular
language an author uses. It is the
most convincing evidence of the four 26
types as they add credibility to the
point
you are trying to
make. As with all the
textual evidence,
make sure you
explain
connectedhowtothe
your point — let the
quote
readerisknow the significance of the
quotations you use.
27
There are three levels of direct quoting:
a. Specific details