Detailed Lesson Plan San Mariano National High School Grade Level 9

School
Teacher JOHN RED GADON VENUS Learning Area ENGLISH

Time & Dates KINGFISHER 8:15-9:00 Quarter 4th Quarter

HUMMINGBIRD 10:05-10:50
ROBIN 1:20-2:05
DOVE 2:05-2:50
Department of Education
San Mariano National High School

Detailed Lesson Plan

I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards The learner demonstrates understanding of how Anglo-American
literature and other text types serve as means of connecting to the
world; also, how to use ways of analyzing one-act play and different
forms of verbal for him/her to skillfully perform in a one-act play.
B. Performance Standards The learner skillfully performs in one-act play through utilizing
effective verbal and non-verbal strategies and ICT resources based on
the following criteria: Focus, Voice, Delivery, and Dramatic
Conventions.
C. Learning Competencies / EN9RC-IVf-2.22
Objectives
Write the LC Code for each At the end of the lesson, the learners are expected to:
a) Identify the standards to use in judging the relevance and
worth of ideas;
b) Provide a critical feedback/reaction to a certain situation;
c) and show respect on one’s assessment.

II. CONTENT Judging the Relevance and Worth of Ideas, Soundness of Author’s
Reasoning, and the Effectiveness of the Presentation
III. LEARNING
RESOURCES
A. References PIVOT 4A pg. 118 of 349
MELC pg. 140
1. Teacher’s Guide Pages
2. Learner’s Materials Pages
3. Textbook pages
4. Additional Materials from Power point Presentation, Chalk, Bond paper, YouTube
Learning Resource (LR)
Portal
B. Other Learning Resources
IV. PROCEDURES  Prayer
 Greetings
 Checking of Attendance

A. Reviewing previous lesson or YESTERDAY’S BRAIN DUMP

presenting the new lesson Before we dive into our new topic, let us take a moment to recall what
in your brain dump yesterday.
 Why do people read?
What does relevance mean?
What does worth mean?
As a student, how judging the relevance and worth of ideas help you
to eliminate fake news or misinformation?
B. Establishing a purpose for CODE UNLOCKED (Individual)
the lesson
Instructions: Each number corresponds to a letter. Read the given
definition and identify what is being described.

1) .3, 21, 18, 18, 5, 14, 3, 25

Refers to how recent or up-to-date the information is.
Answer: Currency
2.) 1, 3, 3, 21, 18, 1, 3, 25
The correctness and truthfulness of the information.
Answer: Accuracy
3.) 1, 21, 20, 8, 15, 18, 9, 20, 25
The expertise or credibility of the author or source.
Answer: Authority
4.) 18, 5, 12, 5, 22, 1, 14, 3, 5
How closely the information relates to the topic or purpose.
Answer: Relevance
5.) 16, 21, 18, 16, 15, 19, 5
The reason why the information was created (to inform, persuade,
entertain, or sell).
Answer: Purpose

Very Good. This activity helps you to unlocked the vocabulary that
you will encounter in our today’s lesson. This activity also boost your
solving skills with a little integration of basic math keeping it
engaging and fun.
C. Presenting WHAT’S WRONG? (Individual)
examples/instances of the
new lesson Instructions: Read the conversation of Marie and Clara and answer the
following questions.

Clara: Have you read the Facebook post circulating online since April
2? It was confirmed that serial killers are roaming around our
neighboring town. According to my friend, who resides in the
mentioned town, there are four victims in the different Barangays. I
am worried about my relatives there. I hope they are fine.

Marie: I think you are worrying for nothing, because earlier today, I
have read some news from Frontline Pilipinas published by news
correspondent Justinne Punzalan. Based on the article, Manila City
Mayor, Honey Lacuna and Manila Police District had clarified the
said issue. According to them, it is not true that there are serial killers
roaming around in their town and it is just a FAKE NEWS!

Questions:
1. Which statements are more convincing? Clara’s or Marie’s?
- Marie’s statements are more convincing.

2. What are the things you considered in making your choice?

- I considered the credibility of the sources. Marie cited an official
 news report and statements from authorities, while Clara relied on
hearsay from a friend.

3. What do you think is the impact of unconfirmed information

spreading online?
- The spread of unconfirmed information can cause unnecessary
panic, fear, and confusion, leading to mistrust and potential harm.

4. What do you suggest to the readers or listeners?

- Readers and listeners should verify information from reliable
sources before believing or sharing it. Fact-checking helps prevent the
spread of misinformation.

This activity teaches students critical thinking and media literacy. It

helps them evaluate information, verify sources, and avoid spreading
misinformation.
D. Discussing new concepts and CAARP TEST
practicing new skills #1
A source's credibility is influenced by a variety of things. Expertise,
viewpoint, and publication date of the source are all taken into
account. The author's level of competence on the subject matter is
expressed in the form of an advanced degree or considerable
experience in a particular sector.

According to reliable sources, the author's qualifications are typically

included. However, in other cases, the author's qualifications may not
be stated, and the publication itself may be the marker of quality. Even
in non-scholarly media, such as well-respected newspapers and
magazines, the articles' substance is thoroughly scrutinized throughout
publishing.

The author's point of view is another factor that contributes to a

source’s credibility. In particular, its potential for bias, which is the
presenting of information in an erroneous or unjust manner. It is
possible to have a prejudice that is both deliberate and inadvertent.

Finally, while evaluating any source, whether online or print, take into
account the date of publication or latest update. Even high-quality
items might become out of date and unsuitable for certain tasks.

But how do you determine if a source is reliable?

1.Currency is important because information can quickly become

obsolete. Supporting your statement with facts that have been
superseded by new research or recent events weakens your argument.

2. Accuracy is the extent to which information contains factual and

updated details that can be verified by consulting alternative and/or
primary sources.
3. Authority is important in judging the credibility of the author’s
assertions. In a trial regarding DNA evidence, a jury gives far more
authority to what a genetics specialist has to say compared to someone
off the street.
4. Relevance is the information's level of importance to a particular
 viewing purpose or explicitly stated need for that information.
5. Purpose is important because books, articles, and Web pages exist
to educate, entertain, or sell a product or point of view. Some sources
may be frivolous or commercial in nature, providing inadequate, false,
or biased information. Other sources are more ambiguous concerning
their partiality. Varied points of view can be valid, as long as they are
based upon good reasoning and careful use of evidence.

Put on your thinking caps and use the CAARP (Currency, Accuracy,
Authority, Relevance, and Purpose) to help you evaluate
information sources.

E. Discussing new concepts and CRITERION (Individual)

practicing new skills #2
Instructions: Read each source description as a group.
For each source, identify which CAARP criterion (Currency,
Accuracy, Authority, Relevance, or Purpose) is most important to
evaluate. Write the name of the criterion and a 1-2 word reason for
your choice.

A scientific journal article about cancer treatments published in 2001.

Which CAARP criterion is most important? Why?
-Currency – Medical information from 2001 may be outdated.

A travel blog written by a professional travel journalist who has

visited over 50 countries.
Which CAARP criterion is most important? Why?
-Authority – The journalist’s expertise adds credibility to travel
advice.

A government website providing statistics about unemployment rates,

updated monthly.
Which CAARP criterion is most important? Why?
-Accuracy – Statistics must be factual and reliable.

An online advertisement for a weight-loss supplement claiming

"guaranteed results."
Which CAARP criterion is most important? Why?
-Purpose – The ad is likely biased because it aims to sell a product.

An educational website designed to help high school students study

for exams.
Which CAARP criterion is most important? Why?
-Relevance – The website must match the needs of high school
students.
This activity is designed for students to apply the CAARP test in
evaluating information sources. It will help them develop critical
thinking

F. Developing Mastery (Leads CAR RACING (Group)

to Formative Assessment 3)
Instructions: The class will be divided into 5 groups. Each group
will choose color of the CAR. And if they get the correct answer,
their car will move one step. First to get in finish line, wins.

1. What does the "C" in CAARP stand for?

o Answer: Currency
2. What type of degree indicates an author’s expertise?
o Answer: Advanced degree
3. What does “P” in CAARP stand for?
o Answer: Purpose
4. Which source factor assesses factual correctness?
o Answer: Accuracy
5. What publication type is mentioned as non-scholarly?
o Answer: Newspapers and magazines
6. What can become outdated over time?
o Answer: Information

Why is a genetics specialist credible in a trial?

o Answer: Subject expertise

8. Why might an author’s bias be unintentional?
o Answer: Human nature
9. Why should information be verified with other sources?
o Answer: Ensure accuracy
10. What might indicate credibility if author details are
missing?

 Answer: Publication reputation

11. Why does outdated information weaken arguments?

 Answer: Superseded facts

12. Why is relevance essential when choosing sources?

 Answer: Fulfills purpose

13. How can a publication's date affect reliability?

 Answer: Timeliness matters

14. Why is bias harmful to credibility?

 Answer: Distorts facts

15. How can a source’s purpose affect its trustworthiness?

 Answer: Influences content

16. Why should you assess a publication’s scrutiny process?

 Answer: Ensures quality

 17. Why is considering both viewpoints essential?

 Answer: Balanced perspective

18. How can you confirm a source’s accuracy?

 Answer: Cross-reference sources

This activity is designed for the students to distinguish the statements

if it is a fact or opinion. It will help them to be critical thinker.

G. Finding practical applications FACT OR FLOP (Individual)

of concepts and skills in
daily living Instructions: Students will read five short descriptions of information
sources.
For each source, they must:
a. Identify two CAARP criteria that help determine the source’s
credibility.
b. Decide whether the source is credible or not credible.
c. Write a brief explanation (1-2 sentences) for their choice.

Source #1:
A blog post titled "Why Vaccines Are Dangerous" written by an
anonymous author. It has no references or scientific evidence and was
last updated in 2015.

Is this source credible? Why or why not?

- Source #1: Not credible.
CAARP Criteria: Currency, Accuracy
Reason: The information is outdated, and the author has no
identifiable authority or evidence.

Source #2:
An article titled "Climate Change and Its Impact on Oceans"
published in 2023 by National Geographic. The author is a marine
biologist with a Ph.D., and the article includes references to scientific
studies.

Is this source credible? Why or why not?

- Source #2: Credible.
CAARP Criteria: Accuracy, Authority
Reason: The article is written by a qualified expert and uses verified
scientific evidence.

Source #3:
A social media post claiming that drinking lemon water cures all
diseases. The post has no scientific references and was shared by a
fitness influencer with no medical background.

Is this source credible? Why or why not?

 - Source #3: Not credible.
CAARP Criteria: Authority, Accuracy
Reason: The influencer lacks medical expertise, and the claim is
unsupported by evidence.

Source #4:
A government website titled "Healthy Eating Guidelines for Teens",
published in 2022 by the Department of Health. It includes evidence-
based information and practical tips.

Is this source credible? Why or why not?

- Source #4: Credible.
CAARP Criteria: Accuracy, Relevance
Reason: The government website provides up-to-date, factual
information tailored to the target audience.

Source #5:
An online article titled "Top 10 Ways to Lose Weight Fast", published
on a website that sells diet supplements. The article promotes its
products without scientific evidence.

Is this source credible? Why or why not?

- Source #5: Not credible.
CAARP Criteria: Purpose, Accuracy
Reason: The source is biased, promoting products without reliable
evidence.

This activity will help the students to have self-reflection and self-
realization about how social media platforms affects their skills in
grammar. In addition, this activity aims to help them comprehend and
analyze what they’re reading.
H. Making generalizations and General Genius
abstractions about the lesson
Instructions: Everyone will stand. The teacher will ask the questions,
and the students will answer. The first student to answer correctly will
be seated.

What does CAARP means?

-Currency, Accuracy, Authority, Relevance, and Purpose.

How can CAARP help you analyzing the text you’re reading if it is
fact or fictitious?
- CAARP helps by checking a text’s Accuracy for factual details, the
author’s Authority for credibility, and its Purpose to detect bias or
fiction.
I. Evaluating Learning QUIZLET
Instructions: Read each question carefully and choose the best answer.

1. Which CAARP criterion ensures that information is up-to-date and

not outdated?
A. Accuracy
B. Authority
C. Currency
D. Relevance
 2. What does the Accuracy criterion focus on?
A. The author's level of expertise
B. Information that can be verified as factual and current
C. The intended purpose of the information
D. The publication's point of view

3. Why is Authority important when evaluating a source?

A. It shows if the source is free from bias
B. It ensures the information is relevant to your topic
C. It determines if the author is credible and knowledgeable
D. It verifies that the information is up to date

4. Which criterion assesses how well the information fits your specific
needs?
A. Currency
B. Relevance
C. Purpose
D. Accuracy

5. What is the main concern when evaluating the Purpose of a source?

A. Determining whether the author is qualified
B. Identifying if the information is factually correct
C. Understanding whether the source aims to educate, entertain,
or persuade
D. Checking if the content is current and updated
J. Additional activities for ASSIGNMENT: Source Evaluation (15 points)
application or remediation
 Assignment/Agreement Instructions:.Find an online article, news report, or website about a
(____ minutes). Fill-in current event or topic of interest. Use the CAARP test to evaluate the
below any of the four source. Write a short paragraph (4-6 sentences) explaining the
purposes following:
 Reinforcing / strengthening
the day’s lesson.  Title and website of the source (1 point)
 Enriching / inspiring the  Currency: Is the information recent and up to date? Why is
day’s lesson. this important for the topic? (3 points)
 Enhancing / improving the  Accuracy: Are the facts correct? Can you verify them from
day’s lesson. other trusted sources? (3 points)
 Preparing for the new lesson.  Authority: Who is the author or organization? What makes
them credible? (3 points)
 Relevance: Does the information match your needs? Who is
the intended audience? (3 points)
 Purpose: Why was the information created? Is it to inform,
persuade, entertain, or sell? Is there any bias? (3 points)

V. REMARKS
VI. REFLECTION
A. Number of learners who
earned 80% on the formative
assessment.
B. Number of learners who
require additional activities
for remediation.
C. Did the remedial lessons
 work? Number of learners
who have caught up with the
lesson.
D. Number of learners who
continue to require
remediation.
E. Which of my teaching
strategies worked well? Why
did this work?
F. What difficulties did I
encounter which my
principal or supervisor can
help me solve?
G. What innovation or localized
materials did I use/discover
which I wish to share with
other teachers?

Prepared by:
JOHN RED GADON VENUS
Practice Teacher

Checked by:
MARY RUTH L. GAPIZA JENALYN H. PATALEN
Cooperating Teacher Cooperating Teacher

MARY JOY D. FERIOL

MASTER TEACHER II

Noted by:
VERNANDINA B. BAGSIT
HEAD TEACHER III Approved by:
RICKY A. APOSTOL
PRINCIPAL IV