module 2
module 2
➢ This force may be insufficient to alter appreciably the random path of an individual
electron; the effect when averaged over all the electrons, however, is a net motion of
the group in the -x-direction.
➢ If Px is the x-component of the total momentum of the
group, the force of the field on the n electrons/cm3 is
Eq 1
➢ If the collisions are truly random, there will be a constant probability of collision at any
time for each electron.
➢ Let us consider a group of N0 electrons at time t = 0 and define N(t) as the number of
electrons that have not undergone a collision by time t.
➢ The rate of decrease in N(t) at any time t is proportional to the number left unscattered
at t,
Eq 2
and represents the mean time between scattering events called the mean free time.
➢ The probability that any electron has a collision in the time interval dt is
Eq 4
Eq 5
➢ The sum of acceleration and deceleration effects must be zero for steady state.
Eq 6
Eq 7
➢ For steady state, the electrons have on the average a constant net velocity in the negative x-direction:
Eq 9
Sub Eq 8 in Eq 9 Eq 10
➢ Thus the current density is proportional to the electric field, as we expect from Ohm’s law:
Eq 11
➢ The conductivity can be written
Eq 12
➢ The quantity called the electron mobility, describes the ease with which electrons drift
in the material.
➢ The mobility can be expressed as the average particle drift velocity per unit electric field.
Eq 13
Eq 14
Conductivity Eq 15
Factors Affecting Mobility
Effects of Temperature on mobility
➢ The two basic types of scattering mechanisms that influence electron and hole mobility are
lattice scattering and impurity scattering.
➢ In lattice scattering a carrier moving through the crystal is scattered by a vibration of the
lattice, resulting from the temperature.
➢ The frequency of such scattering events increases as the temperature increases, since the
thermal agitation of the lattice becomes greater.
➢ The thermal motion of the carriers is also slower at lower temperature. Since a slowly
moving carrier is likely to be scattered more strongly by an interaction with a charged ion,
impurity scattering events cause a decrease in mobility with decreasing temperature.
➢ The other scattering mechanisms include neutral Impurity scattering and carrier-carrier
scattering.
➢ The scattering probability is inversely proportional to the mean free time and therefore to
the mobilities due to two or more scattering mechanisms add inversely.
Approximate
temperature
dependence of
mobility with
both lattice
and impurity
scattering
Mobility vs Concentration of impurities
➢ As concentration of impurities increases ➔ Ionized impurity scattering increases and mobility
decreases
1. Find the electron and hole concentrations and resistivities of silicon samples, for each of the
following impurity concentrations 5 x 1015 boron atoms/cm3, ni = 9.65 x 109
The Hall Effect
➢ Experimental setup to measure the carrier concentration directly and the type of the
semiconductor.
➢ This Lorentz force due to the magnetic field will exert an average upward force on the
holes flowing in the x-direction.
➢ The upward directed current causes an accumulation of holes at the top of the sample that
gives rise to a downward-directed electric field Ey.
➢ Since there is no net current flow along the y-direction in the steady state, the electric field
along the y-axis exactly balances the Lorentz force
➢ Once the electric field Ey becomes equal to vxBz, no net force along the y-direction is
experienced by the holes as they drift in the x-direction
➢ The Hall field Ey is proportional to the product of the current density and the magnetic field.
➢ A measurement of the Hall voltage for a known current and magnetic field yields
➢ All the quantities in the right-hand side of the equation can be measured. Thus, the carrier
concentration and carrier type can be obtained directly from the Hall measurement.
➢ If a measurement of resistance R is made, the sample resistivity can be calculated:
➢ The mobility is simply the ratio of the Hall coefficient and the resistivity:
Diffusion Processes
➢ Current component due to spatial variation of carrier concentration in the semiconductor
material.
➢ The carriers tend to move from a region of high concentration to a region of low concentration.
➢ Since the mean free path between collisions is a small incremental distance, we can divide x into
segments wide, with n(x) evaluated at the center of each segment.
➢ The same is true of electrons within one mean free path of x0 to the right; one- half of
these electrons will move through x0 from right to left in a mean free time.
Eqn 1
➢ Since the mean free path is a small differential length, the difference in electron
concentration (n1 - n2) can be written as
Eqn 2
Then
Similarly
➢ The diffusion current crossing a unit area (the current density) is the particle flux density
multiplied by the charge of the carrier:
➢ It is important to note that electrons and holes move together in a carrier gradient but the
resulting currents are in opposite directions because of the opposite charge of electrons and
holes.
Total current in a semiconductor is sum of drift and diffusion current due to electrons
and holes.
➢ Since the drift terms are proportional to carrier concentration, minority carriers seldom provide
much drift current.
= −
dpdpdp
−
ppp
=
(
pp (
0p.0(01 .)01
.001 )
− )
− (
p−p (
0p)
0(0) )
J = −
difdifdif= − eD
JJ eD eD −
−eD
eD eD =
= eD
eD eD
p
p p
− −
p p p p p p
dxdxdx x xx 0 .
0 01
0
.01. 01−
0 0 0
p (0.01) − 4 1017
(
20 = − 1.6 10 −19
)
(10 )
0.01 − 0
Since the hole diffusion current is positive, the hole gradient must be negative, which implies that the value of
hole concentration at x = 0.01 must be smaller than the concentration at x = 0.
Influence of the field on the energies of electrons in the band diagrams.
Eq 1
➢ The electrostatic potential V(x) related to the electron potential energy E(x)
V(x)
➢ Choosing Ei as a convenient reference, we can relate the electric field as
Interpret the Energy band diagram shown in Figure
➢ No discontinuity or gradient
can arise in the equilibrium
Fermi level EF . NO Excess carriers
Einstein Relation
➢ Thus any fluctuation which would begin a diffusion current also sets up an electric field which
redistributes carriers by drift.
At Equilibrium
Eq 1
Concentration of holes wrt x is given by
Eq2
Sub Eq 2 in 1
➢ For example, a donor distribution Nd(x) causes a gradient in n0(x), which must be
balanced by a built- in electric field .
Q: Minority carriers (holes) are injected into a homogeneous n-type semiconductor
sample at one point. An electric field of 50 V/cm is applied across the sample, and the
field moves these minority carriers a distance of 1 cm in 100 ps. Find the drift velocity
and the diffusivity of the minority carriers.
Diffusion and Recombination; The Continuity Equation
➢ When the excess carriers diffuse we have to consider the important effects of recombination.
➢ The current densities are already expressed per unit area; thus dividing Jp(x)/q by
gives the number of carriers per unit volume entering A per unit time.
Rate of recombination in
elemental Adx =
➢ As Δx approaches zero, we can write the current change in derivative form:
Eqn 1
Eqn 3
where
➢ Let us assume that excess holes are somehow injected into a n-type semi- infinite semiconductor
bar at x = 0.
➢ The steady state hole injection maintains a constant excess hole concentration at the injection
point
➢ The injected holes diffuse along the bar, recombining with a characteristic lifetime.
➢ The injected excess hole concentration dies out exponentially in x due to recombination
➢ Diffusion length Lp represents the distance at which the excess hole distribution is reduced to
1/e of its value at the point of injection.
Injection of holes at x = 0, giving a steady state hole
distribution p(x) and a resulting diffusion current density Jp(x).
Diffusion constant
Diffusion length
Hole current
➢ At thermal equilibrium, no current flows in semiconductor and gradient in Fermi level is zero
➢ Any combination of drift and diffusion implies a gradient in the steady state quasi- Fermi level.
➢ In case of nonequilibrium electron concentration with drift and diffusion total electron current
in semiconductor
Shows that total electron current is proportional to the
gradient of electron quasi-Fermi Level