The document provides a rubric for evaluating mock job interviews, application letters, and resumes for Grade 11 students at Leonora S. Salapantan National High School. It outlines specific scoring criteria across categories such as organization, content, verbal and non-verbal communication, structure, and originality. Each category is rated on a scale from 'Very Great Extent' to 'Not at All' to assess students' performance effectively.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views2 pages
Rubric
The document provides a rubric for evaluating mock job interviews, application letters, and resumes for Grade 11 students at Leonora S. Salapantan National High School. It outlines specific scoring criteria across categories such as organization, content, verbal and non-verbal communication, structure, and originality. Each category is rated on a scale from 'Very Great Extent' to 'Not at All' to assess students' performance effectively.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
xLeonora S.
Salapantan National High School
Grade 11- Reading and Writing R.V Sanchez Street San Miguel, Iloilo Name:___________________________________________________________________Date:___________________________________ Year and Strand:_____________________________________Section:_______________Time:___________________________________
Rubric for the Mock Job Interview
Category Scoring Criteria VGE GE SE LE N (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) ORGANIZATION Ideas are arranged logically. Appropriate organizational pattern is observed. Transitions are smooth. CONTENT Answers are relevant and well-developed. Purpose is well-defined. Main points are stated clearly. Arguments are sound and supported with valid and credible sources. The answers captures interviewer’s attention. Speech is ended effectively with a review of the main points. VERBAL Answers are not delivered in a monotone voice, voice is modulated. Fillers are avoided. Volume is well-adjusted to audience size. Rate or speed of speaking is varied. Audible and pleasant voice is used. Pauses are effectively used. Words are pronounced and enunciated well. Eye contact is established and maintained. NON-VERBAL Speaker is prepared and confident. Distracting movements or mannerisms are avoided. Facial expressions are appropriate to the message. Gestures, posture, and facial expressions are expressive, dynamic and natural. Attire is appropriate. Mastery of the speech is evident. VGE-to a very great extent GE- to a great extent SE- to some extent LE- to little extent NE- not at all _____________________________________ Interviewer’s Name and Signature Criteria for Rating the Interviewer’s Application Letter Category Scoring Criteria VGE GE SE LE N (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) STRUCTURE 1. Has the letter followed the prescribed structure (Full- Block Style) 2. Is the recipient and his/her address identified and ended correctly and accurately? 3. Does the letter have a clear and organized formatting (uniform font styles and standard sizes) CONTENT 4. Are the information in the letter factual? 5. Is the letter free from typo errors and grammar errors? 6. Is the letter free from spelling and punctuation errors? 7. Are the details organized in a readable manner? 8. Is the content cohesive and coherent? ORIGINALITY 9. Are the words carefully chosen to convey the interviewee’s intent? 10.Is the letter tailored/ customized/ personalized to fit the interviewee?
Criteria for Rating the Interviewer’s Resume
Category Scoring Criteria VGE GE SE LE N (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) STRUCTURE 1. Has the resume’s structure been tailored / customized/ to fit the interviewee’s list of information? 2. Does the resume contain the required ID picture (taken professionally) 3. Does the resume have a clean and organized formatting (uniform font styles and standard sizes? CONTENT 4. Are the information in the resume factual? 5. Is the resume free from typo and grammar errors? 6. Is the resume free from spelling and punctuation errors? 7. Are the details organized in a readable manner? 8. Is the content cohesive and coherent? ORIGINALITY 9. Are the words carefully chosen to convey the interviewee’s intent? 10.Is the resume tailored/ customized/ personalized to fit the interviewee?